HomeMy WebLinkAbout6B(6) Resolution No. 2698~ ~(6)
Community & Economic Development
1200 County-City Building, 227 West Jefferson, South Bend, Indiana 46601-1830 Phone 574/235-9371 Fax 574/235-
9021
To: Redevelopment Commission and Board of Public Works
From: Ann Kolata
Subject: Addendum to Master Agency Agreement -Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
at Oliver Industrial Park
Date: June 15, 2010
Resolution Number 2698 amends the Master Agency Agreement (Agreement) between the
Redevelopment Commission and the Board of Public Works by adding the Phase II Environmental
Site Assessment at Oliver Industrial Park to the Agreement. The attached proposal from Hull &
Associates includes soil sampling (up to 103 samples), analysis of analytical data from the soils
sampling and preparation of a report, and preparation of a Revised Remediation Work Plan for the
Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP #6001202 - Area C Soils). The professional services
described in Hull's proposal have a not to exceed cost of $76,230. We are working closely with the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management to complete our participation in the Voluntary
Remediation Program and this soil sampling is necessary to be able to submit our Revised
Remediation Work Plan to them. We have told IDEM that we would submit this Revised
Remediation Work Plan by July 30t1i.
Please contact me at 235-9374 or akolata~southbendin.~ if you have any questions.
RESOLUTION NO. 2698
RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
AN ADDENDUM TO THE MASTER AGENCY AGREEMENT
(Phase II Environmental Site Assessment at Oliver Industrial Park)
WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2010, the South Bend Department of
Redevelopment, acting by and through its Redevelopment Commission (the
"Commission") and the South Bend Board of Public Works (the "BPW'") entered into a
Master Agency Agreement which authorized the BPW to act as agent for and on behalf
of the Commission for certain projects during 2010; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Master Agency Agreement, the Commission desires
to add the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment at Oliver Industrial Park to the Master
Agency Agreement by way of this Addendum.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the South Bend Redevelopment
Commission as follows:
Section 1. The Commission hereby approves the Addendum to Master
Agency Agreement (Phase II Environmental Site Assessment at Oliver Industrial Park)
and hereby authorizes its execution in substantially the form attached hereto with such
changes as the Commission may deem necessary or appropriate upon the advice of
counsel, said execution thereof to be conclusive evidence of the Commission's approval
of such changes. The Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of the Addendum with the
BPW.
Section 2. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect after its adoption
by the Commission.
Section 3. Don Inks or Jeff Gibney is authorized to execute on behalf of the
Connnission any documents necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution.
ADOPTED at a meeting of the South Bend Redevelopment Commission held on
June 18, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., in Room 1308, County-City Building, South Bend, Indiana
46601.
CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
DEPARTMENT OF
REDEVELOPMENT
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
ATTEST:
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
ADDENDUM TO
MASTER AGENCY AGREEMENT
(Phase II Environmental Site Assessment at Oliver Industrial Park)
phis Addendum to Master Agency Agreement (this "Addendum-'), made and
entered into as of the 28th day of June, 2010, by and between the South Bend Department
of Redevelopment, acting by and through its Redevelopment Commission (the
"Commission") and the City of South Bend. Indiana. a municipal corporation duly
organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of Indiana, acting by and through
its Board of Public Works (the "BPW"') for purposes of the Commission designating the
BPW to act as the Commission's agent to undertake the Phase II Environmental Site
Assessment at Oliver Industrial Park (the "Project")
WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2010, the Commission and the BPW entered
into a Master Agency Agreement which authorized the BPW to act as agent for and on
behalf of the Commission for certain projects during 2010; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Master Agency Agreement, the Commission desires
to add the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment at Oliver Industrial Park to the Master
Agency Agreement by way of this Addendum.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, the BPW and the Commission agree as follows:
1. The Commission hereby empowers and appoints the BPW, pursuant to the
Master Agency Agreement. to act as the Commission's agent for the limited purpose of
contracting for and managing the completion of the Project, the scope of said Project
being more speciticall; described in "Exhibit A", attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. All of the teens and conditions of the Master Agency Agreement shall
control this appointment and this Addendum shall be attached to the Master Agency
Agreement.
3. Don Inks or Jeff Gibney is authorized to execute on behalf of the
Commission any documents necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned execute this Addendwn to Master
Agency Agreement to be effective as of the date first written above.
CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
DEPARTMENT OF
REDEVELOPMENT
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
ATTEST:
South Bend Rede~~elopment Commission
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS
Gar~~ Gilot, President
Carl Littrell, Member
Don Inks, Member
ATTEST:
Linda Martin, Clerk
Fxhihit `~A"
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment at Oliver Industrial Park
Project: Additional Soil Sampling at Redevelopment Commission owned land in the
Oliver Indush•ial Park, analysis of analytical data from the soils sampling and preparation
of a report, preparation of a Revised Remediation Work Plan for the Voluntary
Remediation Program - VRP #6001202 (Area C Soils)
The projected budget for these Phase II activities is not to exceed $76,230 and will be
funded through the Airport Economic Development Area Tax Increment Finance Budget.
Hull
June 15, 2010
Ms. Ann Kolata
Senior Redevelopment Specialist
City of South Bend Department of Community & Economic Development
227 West Jefferson Blvd, 12th Floor
South Bend, Indiana 46601
RE: Scope of Work and Cost Estimate for Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
Activities at Oliver Industrial Park Located in South Bend, Indiana (the Site);
SB1061.400.0001
Dear Ms. Kolata:
Hull & Associates, Inc. (Hull) is pleased to present the City of South Bend (Client) the following
proposal to provide professional engineering services for the above referenced project. The
purpose of this document is to establish the Scope of Work as we understand it and to provide a
fee schedule for the project.
Additional Phase II ESA
General
Hull proposes to conduct additional Phase II ESA Activities at the Site to evaluate:
Areas of the remaining undeveloped, City-owned parcels at the Site; namely the
parcel(s) southwest of Oliver Plow Court, and the parcel(s) generally north and
northeast of Oliver Plow Court where prior areas of recognized environmental
conditions (RECs) have not been adequately delineated; and
2. The vertical and horizontal distribution of chemicals of concern (COCs) in surface
and subsurface soils where the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM) 1996 Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) Nonresidential
Tier II Cleanup Goals are exceeded at certain historical sampling locations.
Based on the Phase I ESA, Phase II ESA, and Phase III remedial activities completed to date,
several areas of the Site require additional assessment activities toward the end of preparing a
VRP Remediation Work Plan for the Site. Those areas were generally described in a prior
Remediation Work Plan prepared for the Site (including parcels no longer owned by the City) by
Hull in April 2004. The areas that apply to the proposed additional Phase II ESA activities at the
remaining parcels are further described below. The number of soil borings proposed in each
area is also included in the descriptions below.
Area 1 -This area is located in the southwest corner of the Site and is directly north of
MW-1. Two 10,000-gallon quench oil underground storage tanks (USTs), a drum storage
area north of the old oil pump house, and two former fuel oil USTs were formerly located
6435 Castleway West Drive, Suite 119 • Indianapolis, Indiana 46250
800.241.7173 fax 614.793.9070 www.hullinc.com
Ms. Ann Kolata
June 15, 2010
SB1061.400.0001
Page 2
in this area. In addition, this area contained two USTs that were encountered and
removed during demolition activities. Potential COCs include volatile organic
compounds (VOCS), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), polychlorinated
chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and metals. Soils were previously sampled in this area on
a limited basis; seven soil borings are proposed.
Area 4 -This area was the location of the gray iron foundry. A review of Sanborn maps
indicates that the floor for the foundry was initially earthen. Potential COCs are metals.
Soils were previously sampled in this area on a limited basis; two additional borings are
proposed.
Area 6 -This area was formerly occupied by two buildings and most recently found to
have been used as a hazardous waste storage area (on the northern portion of the
former building #20). Furthermore, a machine shop was located in Building #20. A UST
was also noted on the southeast side of this area. Potential COCs include VOCS,
SVOCs, PCBs and metals. Five additional borings are proposed.
Area 7 -This area includes Building #30, a former paint shop, and a courtyard bounded
by building #s 30, 31 and 33. A Japanning building once occupied the courtyard.
Investigations in this area indicated SVOCs above Tier II nonresidential cleanup goals.
An additional eight soil borings are proposed (four each in the vicinity of HGB-15 and
HGB-18) to delineate SVOCs.
Area 10 -This area contained a 500,000-gallon water retention pond used for fire
protection purposes and Building #31. Soil samples from MW-8 and HGB-19 were
found to contain lead and/or benzo(a)pyrene at concentrations exceeding their
respective VRP Tier II nonresidential cleanup goals. An additional seven soil borings
are proposed to delineate SVOCs and metals.
Area 11 -This area is the former location of the administration buildings for Oliver Plow
in the northeast portion of the Site. The subsurface contained building debris and other
demolition material prior to Phase II demolition activities. Sample results in this area
indicate low levels of SVOCs below the VRP Tier II nonresidential cleanup goals. An
additional two soil borings are proposed to further evaluate the potential presence of
SVOCs and metals.
Area 12 -This area is located in the southwest portion of the Site and was the former
location of coke storage piles. In addition, this area formerly had PCB-containing
transformers. Potential COCs include SVOCs, PCBs and metals. Five soil borings are
proposed to evaluate that residual COCs do not remain.
Area 13 -This area is located in the southwest portion of Building #41A and is the
location of a Former Quench Oil Pit. Potential COCs include SVOCs and metals. Two
soil borings are proposed.
Area 14 -This area includes the former railroad tracks along the west side of buildings
35B and 41A that were located on the Site. Potential COCs include SVOCs and metals.
Three soil borings are proposed.
Ms. Ann Kolata
June 15, 2010
SB1061.400.0001
Page 3
Area 15 -This area is located in the north central portion of Building #41A and is the
location of former PCB-containing transformers and quench oil pits. Potential COCs
include SVOCs and PCBs. Four soil borings are proposed.
Area 20 -This area is located in the western portion of the Site to the west of Building
#35 in the area of a former loading dock, as well as within the footprint of Building #356.
During demolition activities, discolored soils were encountered in this area. Potential
COCs include metals. Six soil borings are proposed.
Building 46 -When this former building, located in the southwestern-most portion of the
Site, was demolished solvents and paint waste were discovered. Although portions of
soil and waste were removed from the Site and properly disposed, COCs including
SVOCs, VOCs, and metals may remain at the Site. Three soil borings are proposed.
Specific Scope of Phase 11 Work
Hull proposes to perform the following tasks to address the objectives of the Phase II ESA, as
described below:
Task 1 Historical Data Review and Compilation; Generation of Phase II ESA Scope
of Work and Health 8 Safety Plan; Project Management
Hull has reviewed historical documentation to develop this Scope of Work and clarified certain
data with Grauvogel & Associates, the City's contractor charged with oversight of environmental
matters during demolition activities at the Site. Hull will also generate aSite-specific Health &
Safety Plan that will be followed during implementation of the Phase II ESA Scope of Work.
This task also includes project management duties including coordination with the laboratory
and drilling subcontractors.
Task 2 Intrusive Phase II Investigation of Soil
The primary elements of the intrusive investigation include:
direct-push soil borings to anticipated depths of approximately 4 to 20 ft. below
ground surface (bgs);
2. analysis of one surface sample and, as applicable, one subsurface soil sample
per soil boring -collected using adirect-push drilling rig -and to be tested for:
• up to 99 samples collected at 42 soil borings, including quality
assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples, for Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act metals using Method SW 846 6010/7000;
• up to 48 samples collected at 15 soil borings, including QA/QC samples, for
VOCs using Indiana Modified Method 5035;
• up to 103 samples collected at 44 soil borings, including QA/QC samples, for
SVOCs using Method SW846 8270/8270 SIM; and
• up to 46 samples collected at 38 soil borings, including QA/QC samples, for
PCBs using Method SW846 8081.
Please note that Hull will collect and submit subsurface soil samples to the
Ms. Ann Kolata
June 15, 2010
SB1061.400.0001
Page 4
laboratory, but will request that the samples be held for potential analysis
pending receipt of results for surface soil samples. Should the results of surface
soil analyses not warrant the analysis of the subsurface soil samples at certain
locations, the laboratory will be directed to discard the samples. Note that
laboratory analyses of surface soil samples only would result in a savings of
approximately $15,000.
Soil Sampling Procedures
Soil sampling will be conducted using adirect-push unit. Hull's field representative will screen
samples using a photoionization detector (PID). The driller will be required to decontaminate all
down-hole equipment between sampling depths using a non-phosphatic detergent (e.g.,
Liquinox) and rinsing with distilled water.
Soil samples will be selected based on Hull's field observations. In general, those samples
exhibiting the highest PID readings or other evidence of impact will be selected for chemical
analysis. In addition, a second (deeper) soil sample may be selected and submitted to the
laboratory to evaluate the vertical extent of contamination. If samples in a given boring exhibit
little variation in the degree of apparent contamination, Hull's field representative may
preferentially select the surface sample (i.e. 0 to 2 ft. bgs) for analysis. Unused samples will be
placed in a Department of Transportation-approved 55-gallon drum. The driller will
decommission the borings by filling the boreholes with bentonite chips.
Task 3 Report
Upon receiving analytical data from the laboratory, Hull will prepare a brief summary report to
document field activities and findings of the Phase II evaluation. The report will include the
following:
a narrative describing the Site, including a summary of work completed;
2. a summary of data collection activities and rationale for sampling locations and
frequencies;
a comparison of chemical analytical data to VRP standards;
4. a description of the physical and chemical characteristics of the subsurface
materials encountered;
5. a bibliography of references;
6. other supporting information that present data and/or conclusions (e.g., drilling
logs, tables, etc.); and
7. recommendations for further activities.
Upon completion of the Initial Phase II investigation activities one draft copy of the report will be
submitted. Three copies of the final report will be prepared upon approval of the City.
Task 4 Preparation of Revised Remediation Work Plan
Ms. Ann Kolata
June 15, 2010
SB1061.400.0001
Page 5
Hull will prepare a revised Remediation Work Plan (RWP) in accordance with IDEM VRP
requirements. The revised RWP will incorporate all historical data, including documentation
generated during demolition and remediation activities, and will appropriately address IDEM's
comments to the previous RWP in IDEM's letter dated September 28, 2004. This task assumes
that generation of VRP Tier III non-default cleanup goals is not necessary.
SCHEDULE
Hull will enter into the Phase II ESA investigation within two weeks of receiving authorization to
proceed by the City. Hull anticipates that field activities will be completed in one to two weeks.
Based on standard turnaround times, Hull will receive chemical analytical results from the
laboratory within two weeks of completing fieldwork. Null will prepare a summarization of data
within one week of receiving final analytical reports and a draft report within two weeks of
completing the data summary. Hull understands that the City's deadline to submit a revised
Remediation Work Plan to the City is July 30, 2010, and will endeavor to meet that deadline by
compressing these timelines where possible.
COMPENSATION
A breakdown of costs is presented in Table 1 (Attachment B), which describes anot-to-exceed
amount for the project of $76,230 for the Phase II Site Assessment Activities. The fees have
been developed based on our estimate of hours for each labor category expected to be involved
in the project. The rates used to calculate compensation for each labor category are within the
ranges presented in Table 2 (Attachment B). Actual rates and hours expended for each
category may vary based on project personnel used. Additionally, personnel in labor categories
not included in Table 1 or Table 2 may be used. The Client will be billed for actual labor hours
and other project costs with the total project cost not to exceed that shown in Table 1, unless
additional work is required as discussed below. If agreed upon, subcontractors (e.g., drilling
and chemical analyses) will bill directly to the Client and Hull would review and, if applicable,
recommend approval of the contractor's invoice. If subcontractor's fees are included on Hull's
invoices, the subcontractor's fees will be billed as described in Table 2, Note 7. The project will
be billed on a four-week basis with payment due to Hull within thirty days after receipt of an
invoice.
ADDITIONAL WORK
Additional work beyond the Scope of Work defined herein shall not be performed until such time
as an amendment to this proposal, including the scope of the additional work and associated
costs, has been prepared in writing to address the additional work and said amendment has
been approved by the Client in writing.
Specific items not within the Scope of Work on this project include, but are not limited to the
following:
collection and analysis of more than 103 soil samples, including QA/QC samples
for chemical analysis;
calculation of VRP Tier II Cleanup Goals as part of the Remediation Work Plan;
Ms. Ann Kolata
June 15, 2010
SB1061.400.0001
Page 6
and
3. communication with regulatory agencies regarding the Site.
No amendment to this proposal shall be required in situations where additional work may be
necessary, as a result of unanticipated or unidentified conditions including, but not limited to, the
presence of unidentified or mislocated buried utilities, structures, or objects and unanticipated
hazardous materials and/or hazardous or dangerous circumstances, to complete previously
identified tasks. Hull shall be compensated for the actual time spent performing this additional
work and other direct expenses and subcontractor fees at the billing rates outlined in Table 2.
STANDARD OF CARE AND LIMITATIONS
Hull shall perform its services using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under
similar conditions by reputable members of its profession practicing in the same or similar
locality at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made or intended by
our proposal or by our oral or written reports. The work will not attempt to evaluate past or
present compliance with federal, state, or local environmental or land use laws or regulations.
Conclusions presented by Hull regarding the Site to be investigated shall be consistent with the
Scope of Work, level of effort specified, and investigative techniques employed. Reports,
opinions, letters and other documents will not evaluate the presence or absence of any
compound or parameter not specifically analyzed and reported. The presence of radiation,
radon, lead, electromagnetic fields, and indoor air pollution will not be investigated, unless
specifically stated in the Scope of Work. Hull makes no guarantees regarding the completeness
or accuracy of any information obtained from public or private files or information provided by
subcontractors.
If the proposal is acceptable, please sign and return a copy of the Task Order contained within
Attachment B. We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this proposal. Please call me at (317)
517-6506 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Douglas G. Stuart, CHMM
Senior Project Manager
~ ~ ~~
r,~'~-CGr ~'~j
~~
W. Lance Turley
Principal
DGSNVLT
ct: Hull File Copy
ATTACHMENT A
Tables
TABLE 1
ADDITIONAL SITE ASSESSMENT AND VRP WORK
CITY OF SOUTH BEND
FORMER OLIVER INDUSTRIAL PARK; SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
Task 1 Data Review, HASP, Project Management
Labor
Estimated Cost
$ 5,560
Task 1 Subtotal $ 5,560
Task 2 Soil 8~ Groundwater Sampling
Labor
Subcontractor Costs (including markup)
Equipment
Supplies
Miscellaneous Costs
$ 11,150
$ 45,773
$ 980
$ 387
$ 1,100
Task 2 Subtotal $ 59,390
Task 3 Report Preparation
Labor
Miscellaneous Costs
Task 4 Prepare Revised Remediation Work Plan
Labor
Miscellaneous Costs
$ 4,340
$ 150
Task 3 Subtotal $ 4,490
$ 6,540
$ 250
Task 4 Subtotal $ 6,790
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $ 76,230
HULL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
JUNE 2010
S61061.400.0001
assoc atES, Inc.
TABLE 2
2010 BILLING RATE SCHEDULE
Princi al $150.00 - $200.00
Senior Project Mana er $120.00 - $175.00
Project Mana er $100.00 - $140.00
Government & Community
Relations $ 80.00 - $150.00
Senior En ineer $100.00 - $140.00
Project En ineer $ 90.00 - $120.00
En ineer 2 $ 70.00 - $100.00
En ineer 1 $ 65.00 - $ 85.00
Senior En ineer $100.00 - $140.00
Project En ineer $ 90.00 - $120.00
Electrical En ineer 2 $ 80.00 - $110.00
Electrical En ineer 1 $ 70.00 - $ 90.00
Senior Electrical Desi ner $ 95.00 - $115.00
Electrical Desi ner 2 $ 85.00 - $105.00
Electrical Desi ner 1 $ 70.00 - $ 90.00
... -...
Senior H dro eolo ist
$100.00 - $140.00
Project H dro eolo ist $ 85.00 - $115.00
H dro eolo ist 2 $ 70.00 - $100.00
H dro eolo ist 1 $ 60.00 - $ 80.00
Senior Scientist $100.00 - $140.00
Project Scientist $ 85.00 - $115.00
Scientist 2 $ 70.00 - $100.00
Scientist 1 $ 60.00 - $ 80.00
~~.
GIS Mana er
$ 80.00 - $120.00
GIS S ecialist $ 50.00 - $ 80.00
Senior Desi ner $ 80.00 - $110.00
Desi ner $ 70.00 - $ 90.00
CAD 2 $ 60.00 - $ 80.00
CAD 1 $ 50.00 - $ 70.00
Senior Technician $ 50.00 - $ 80.00
Technician 2 $ 40.00 - $ 65.00
Technician 1 $ 30.00 - $ 55.00
Clerical $ 30.00 - $ 50.00
NOTES:
1. Hourly billing rates for personnel apply to actual time spent in meetings concerning the project,
preparing for such meetings, project coordination time, design activities, field and office
investigations, and travel time when job-related.
2. Hourly billing rates reflect the range of salaries for each job classification. Rates are typically
reviewed and adjusted periodically to account for salary increases and other changes.
3. If personal vehicles are utilized, travel mileage is billed at the federal mileage reimbursement rate.
If company-owned vehicles are utilized, rental rates of $75/day, $300/week, or $1,000/month are
used in lieu of travel mileage. If rental vehicles are utilized, the actual cost of the rental and
gasoline will be billed directly with no mark-up.
4. Air transportation fees are billed directly with no mark-up. Travel time is typically billed only for
that time actually spent flying to/from the project location and does not include layovers, delays,
etc.
5. Project reimbursable expenses such as reproduction by vendors, overnight shipping, meals, and
lodging associated with travel or extended field activities, etc. are billed directly with no mark-up.
Certain project reimbursable expenses such as sampling kits, health and safety equipment, etc.
are billed at flat rates based on the cost of the materials.
6. Field equipment rented from outside vendors is billed directly with no mark-up. If field equipment
owned by Hull is utilized on the client's project, competitive market-equivalent rates are billed for
daily or weekly rental.
7. Subcontractors' fees are billed to the Client at a rate equal to the subcontractor fee multiplied by
1.1 to recover Hull's contractual liability risk and associated operational expense.
HULL & ASSOCIATES, INC. JUNE 2010
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA SB1061.400.0001
ATTACHMENT B
Task Order
HULL 8~ ASSOCIATES, INC.
TASK ORDER NO: 001
HULL PROJECT CODE: SBI-061
CONTRACT NUMBER: CNTRCT.400.1411
Subject to the terms and conditions of the above referenced Contract, the Consultant agrees to
perform the following Scope of Work as follows:
Complete a Phase II ESA at the Oliver Industrial Park Located in South Bend,
Indiana (the Site) as described in Hull's June 15, 2010 proposal (Hull Document
#SB1061.400.0001).
NUMBER OF COPIES OF DELIVERABLE:
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST: $76,230
HULL & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT CONTACT: Doug Stuart
CLIENT PROJECT CONTACT: Ann Kolata
CLIENT AUTHORIZATION:
DATE:
(Please return one signed original to Hull & Associates, Inc.'s Project Contact and retain
one signed original for Client's records)
HULL & ASSOCIATES, INC. C-1 JUNE 2010
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA SB1061.400.0001