HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) DRAFT O�SO H� ?.
W\PEAK E�
1865 ..-+'.
CITY OF SOUTHBEND
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT
JAMES MUELLER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
March 6, 2018
Filed in Clerk's Office
City of South Bend—Office of the Clerk MAR 07 2018
St. Joseph County Public Library (all branches)
Mishawaka Public Library (all branches) KAREEMAH FOWLER
Walkerton Public Library CITY CLERK,SOUTH BEND,IN
New Carlisle-Olive Township Public Library
City of Mishawaka Planning Department
RE: 2017 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER)
Attached is a DRAFT copy of the City of South Bend /St. Joseph County Housing Consortium
2017 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER).
This document must be made available to the public through March 28, 2018. A FINAL copy of
the CAPER will be provided March 29, 2018 to replace the DRAFT.
Your assistance is appreciated. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns at
(574) 235-5841 or Itimmer @southbendin.gov.
Sincere I ,
Lory L. Timmer
St. Joseph County Housing Consortium Staff
DAN BucKENMEYER A=YNA ALDRIDGE PAMELA MEYER TIM CORCORAN
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGAGEMENT&ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT
14005 County-City Building 1227 W.Jefferson Blvd.I South Bend,Indiana 466011 p 574.235.93711 www.southbendin.gov
' Filed in Clerk's Office
MAR o7 2019
])RAFT
KAREEMAH FOWLER
CITY CLERK,SOUTH REND, IN
2017 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL
PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION
REPORT
FOR
' THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
& EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG)
AND
THE ST. JOSEPH COUNTY HOUSING CONSORTIUM
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM (HOME)
4 SOUTH 8�
4
' U
PEACE
1865
1
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
Filed in Clerk's Office '
MAR 07 2018 r
KAREEMAH FOWLER t
CITY CLERK,SOUTH BEND,IN
1
i
1
CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes
Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan.
91.520(a)
' This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and
executed throughout the program year.
' During 2017, 52 South Bend households received help with housing issues: 32 owner-occupied rehabs,
and 20 homebuyer education clients. Low-mod income homeowners received needed repairs through
' the SBHIP and Rebuilding Together programs.
The Community Homebuyers Corporation (CHC) assisted 16 low-mod income buyers purchase their first
home.
' The City of South Bend supported affordable housing through four major partners: South Bend Heritage
Foundation (SBHF),the Near Northwest Neighborhood, Inc. (NNN), the Northeast Neighborhood
Revitalization Organization (NNRO), and Habitat for Humanity of St.Joseph County.
' SBHF has developed affordable housing for the residents of South Bend for the past 40 years. SBHF
currently focuses its efforts in the Near West Side and Lincoln Park neighborhoods. In 2017 SBHF
completed the following projects:
• Four(4) single-family home acquisition-rehabs;
• Two (2) single-family new construction homes;
• One (1) duplex acquisition-rehab;
• 32-unit permanent supportive housing for the chronically homeless.
SBHF projects to be completed in 2018:
• One (1) duplex acquisition-rehab;
• Three (3) single-family acquisition-rehabs;
• One (1) rental unit rehab.
The NNRO formed in 2000 to strengthen and revitalize South Bend's Northeast Neighborhood. In 2018,
the NNRO will complete the following projects:
' • One (1) single-family new construction home;
• One (1) single-family acquisition-rehab;
• (4) mortgage subsidies.
CAPER 1
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
The NNN has been improving the quality of life in the Near Northwest Neighborhood for the past 20
years.The NNN completed the following projects in 2017:
• Two (2) single-family home acquisition-rehabs.
NNN projects to be completed in 2018: '
• Three (3) single-family home acquisition-rehabs; ,
• Two (2) single-family new construction homes.
Habitat for Humanity continues to be a strong partner in the affordable housing market. Habitat ,
completed the following projects in 2017:
• Two (2) single-family new construction homes;
• Three (3) single-family home acquisition-rehabs.
Habitat projects to be completed in 2018: '
• Five (5) single-family new construction homes; ,
• Two (2) single-family home acquisition-rehabs.
1
CAPER 2 '
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) '
r
o o 0
y Q o n 00 m
u E o Ln m
a u 0 00 O rn
r I E
m U U O a Cr
c
m m m �D 00
' Q. a E
On •� m
L u Oa O rn
41 Y C. Q m
m a� w I a` m n c00 0
L
Om M M O p
C CaC) O N O O
O C a1 C• O N Ql
U _ V E 6 N
O O al O --— O V) d U i cY
� e••I in
41 OA
*' N oA
3 Ln v N
Y u Q Ln a m O O
E
' Op
v y O
aj
O U
V) m CL i fC6 O Ln
bn ui I vj a m O m o
3 O 3 L
1 M � Ln
al m ? -a _0
E of bOA O Ln 't3 h0
a co vi p 3 i aj 4 CO v Ln
O 04 .? v Y O V) a in O O u l
V OA j Q O 2 Q n Q m 2 2 O n
Y O ' V
3
s a�i °4-j o
1 m v a�
w o (AN a. Ln Y �
O t i .>� •N C N
a +O+ ° o aj coo f6 cm o E ° ° v
O -00 c *L' L v cc v o > a�i a�i o
U f0 0 M _ O r L OC 2 0 m 0 v
3 E E o
O YO ° " d stn
fu O a -o Y r1 O O O to
C QJ N C to LLj O 00 O O N ui
3 Ln B u U` O M 01 O (7 M ('
41 a L p m M C m m
m
kd 3 a Q a E O m 0 � Ln m (A � � Ln 00 D O
r u F n Q u t/)- S tn• w t/> w tn- w t/). U th U 2
3 vii :3 o
in N p u
L L Ln QJ C
O O tip w O Y o0
ap
L — }, +-+ C >, ajj O
r m_ Ln _� E ai
T 5- Y Ln N S-
O u vi v ° � OQ to c o
aJ c �_ v v 2 E o
3 vi o N E E E C E > O : a
L
C V1 VI Q O x
> m 2 VQ ti
V > Y 9
kD
0 O Ln
C. _
°
C Q 'D 3 c 3 C C
° O Y c p C ° m ° �
In .'� N N m l0 Q f0 Q 2 Z
Y 'D � -0 N U U oY
C O E N N _0 aj .O C ' OA
SZ '� •C aJ L a) m Q •� O
tao E Q ai O •E � 3 � 3 m E C 3 m
rV aJ u O C7 Q m Q m Q u u 2 O
1
o
r- O O Q O ,
N l0 O O O O Ol n
N O :I' O O 00 lD
N r-1 N r-I 'cF ri
:I-
CY)
'
l0 00 .-I r N N
N -1 C}' -I 00 c1 N M
O '
O O O
Ln O O c--I Ln 00
Ol N
O O O O o n O
O O v) O O l0 O
O O O1 O O O
Oct O -q O Ln '
O1 ,
lD r-I c-I N Ll"7
.—I rn c-I 00 O N lD
l0 O Ln Lo O '
rl ci N c-I ri O -1 L.n
0 M 0 _0 V) -0 0 dA 0 0A
(A n N N N O n �i� n vvi 'in
Z3 Z3 Z5 .2 2 2 2 Q O O O a Q 2 2 S S D_
Q
L U
p 0A
v @ O N
u
L U O Ln -9-- O
U)
B � N N 2 N
u �
� Q of
w O U1 aA °_ •0 3 0 b.0
E a"i E a`i (U cu Q v .Ln
O O O O > Q- O O a)
O O O S O 2 O 2 2
O l0 O O O n O I'D O
C7 O w U O w U O C7 O C7 � O ct (J O
O
m °N m co °o o m o m 0 m cD o CO 0
° 1:t O 00 ° N O N ° cH ° Lr ° r, N r-I LIi N ° �t
U tr� S -v). U tr 2 ti? U tr� U t/} U tn- w tf� w tit U t� ,
c
0D O cc
O
E a� Un (A a
-0 ap -0 aU'i N � o
L L in I FD L In L � O
O p O O C E > E O :3 E E O 7 a
O O O p 41 6 O O O O v
a 2 a 2 z u ° a a 2 2 2 Q S
Ln Ln o
4- V)
O n Q n Q Q N
C i dpq O U V) U N u z Ln
O N
C N QJ U1 u
u N N O o
aoi o '�_ a E m E c a o
� 'N v Ln S O vpi n = N dA N = N 0p c u
o O = = ° a U LL = Q 2 U 0 o a a 0 o +,
a a O o '
1
1
0 0 0
0 0 °m LO
O 0 ci c I
N
LO N
O O to N
i O
O LI)
O O
rl M
1
N
N o
O
LD
N
c--I
O O O O
i 0
0
O O O O O
1 0 pp 0 dA " " -O "O _
tiA
c c c v c a (L) a) v c
V) 7A (A 71 O N O N " V) "
Ln V)0 0 0 0 a_+ a) a) VI O Ln
O O c O O C " VV
) O O W C O
2 2 2 2 D a Q d Q S Q 2 2 n_
Q
U
a s Q) C
+" o y O v O O N O t"6 oz 2 C
i i � � U � + � � 4= U } 2 � � � Q = Q �
�„ cLO > O 3 O > c O + a1
N 00 O O � u O a, u t O
� U I S n Q +- m n ra + CO H -- 2 0
i O
C) "' O 00 00
O O to
D c i 0 0 0 c I N N cn
U U U w th w
V) V) V) V7 Y
y �
N aJ O_ T 4J Q
i " v " � _� " � E " � E " "
Z ..O qA a! O z O 7 Q- O a) m
C) O ro
v
.� a) 2 ro 'O .� = c� 2 ° 2 ° 41 a� o
o z E c v o E c u > c E > E E ci
v O O O Q � O O O Q O O a) O O a)
' Q 2 2 Z cn Q 2 2 Z cn Z U 0 Z U D 2 2
V) V7 u O
0
" " .N .N N
i O _ O _ .+ C U — O O o
c (o c (v E 2 2 z
O * O } U E o
a--' O }' O li U N
U U a! ] i
O O U O U O O_ u
�O a) 0 0 C) iZ Q m E (D a Z a Z o a rr 0
i
0 0 0 0 000 '
O O 00 ri
O rl c-I r-I M lT
10 I- Ln
O
O
lfl '
O I,
w N ri .-I Lf)
o O O O O '
O O O O Lr1
0
O O O O I'D O
L.0 r I -i 0
lU
N
O M N O rI N O O 0
a+
C
LLs
a iO �
O Ln N O N cc O ate+
m
i
++
U H
0 GD 0 txo 0 w 0 -0 0 -0
O O C O O C O O C a a + O N O N N
a n: :D O O O = a = a a Q a
bA
L O Q L U
� a
-O O v O +_O•+
to _0 IA '
lC (6
a� v V) �tio 4- a v
O 0 OCO p OCD — !O p 'tn 4- f6 -� 'V) N to H
_ L L L C
to V1 tB N (a LL N N M - i? O lB ( O' O N •L •Q.
E � E Z3 -C t -C c c m c c0 s Lu E
U
Q
O O O O O W
U c w C7 2 U (7 0 U U O w C ct O '
c O LL7
on rn 0 0 p 0 0 0 � 0 0 `1 O ° Ln LQ1n V) I ~
U = U = U U tf? U U V-T Z -L� L1J -)- W V).
CLO C bA C N "O co
_N Q O N N .N a) N oN
-0 7 C E 7 C Z v� �i O
to n3 n3 co O O iZ O C Q O aj N
O = 0 O Z5 O = c E > c E > c E E c
O O O O p 4 O p O O v 4- Q O O
Q 2 Q = Q = Q 2 Z U 0 Z U 0 Z Ln
c
N o
U O
tll *' N +' C O C O J -O m N cu N Ln
CA N d0 N +' ac W +- Ln v o '
N '� N '� •+�•+ 4- � 4L O� aJ �p U V) N N z
m N L O
Ln = U i Q 4•
� E E c E
= . cco u
N C N O N N V SZ V Ln C C 7 7 m
i
Assess how the jurisdiction's use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and
specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority
' activities identified.
During the 2017 program year, Year Three of the 2015-2019 5-year plan,the City of South Bend and the
St.Joseph County Housing Consortium effectively used their Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG), HOME, Shelter Plus Care (SPC), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)funds to undertake a
' variety of programs, projects and activities designed to address housing and community development
needs throughout the City of South Bend and St.Joseph County. High priority initiatives funded with
1 CDBG included:
• acquisition/rehab/resale
• acquisition/rehab/rental
• new construction
• owner-occupied housing rehabilitation
• homebuyer assistance
• slum/blight clearance
' • provision of public safety services
• coordinated entry for homeless populations
• technical assistance
• program administration
• homebuyer counseling
• fair housing activities
• section 106 reviews
• homeless shelter operating costs
• rapid rehousing
• tenant-based rental assistance
tThe accomplishments of the City of South Bend and the St.Joseph County Housing Consortium were
consistent with the consolidated Plan's high-priority community development and housing objectives,
' and are presented in this report.
CAPER 7
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted '
Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted). '
91.520(a)
CDBG HOME ESG
White 89 13 0
Black or African American 35 6 0 '
Asian 1 0 0
American Indian or American Native 2 0 0 '
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Total 127 19 0
Hispanic 9 1 0
Not Hispanic 118 16 0
Table 2—Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds
Narrative 1
In addition to the CDBG beneficiaries noted in the table above, four(4) households identified as '
"African-American and White", and three (3) families identified as "Other". One household that
identified as Other also identified as being Hispanic.The total number of families assisted with 2017
CDBG funds was 134. '
1
CAPER 8 '
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) '
' CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)
Identify the resources made available
Source of Funds Source Resources Made Amount Expended
Available During Program Year
' CDBG CDBG 2,959,622 1,868,078
HOME HOME 1,268,009 1,546,197
' HOPWA HOPWA
ESG ESG 377,344 300,913
Other Other
Table 3-Resources Made Available
Narrative
The amounts indicated in the "Resources Made Available" column in the table above represent PY2017
resources ONLY. The amounts indicated in the "Amount Expended During Program Year" column
indicate dollars spent from PY2017 resources as well as resources remaining from previous program
years.
Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments
Target Area Planned Actual Narrative Description
Percentage of Percentage of
Allocation Allocation
Census Tract 19 11 13 City of South Bend
Census Tract 6 20 20 City of South Bend
St.Joseph County Housing
City of Mishawaka 3 3 Consortium Jurisdiction
CDBG Entitlement and St.Joseph
' County Housing Consortium
City of South Bend 34 37 Jurisdiction
Lincoln Park Neighborhood 5 1 City of South Bend
' Northeast Neighborhood 14 13 City of South Bend
Olive Street-Lincolnway
West Neighborhood 0 0 City of South Bend
River Park Neighborhood 0 0 City of South Bend
Rum Village Neighborhood 13 13 City of South Bend
St.Joseph County- Not St.Joseph County Housing
South Bend or Mishawaka 0 0 Consortium Jurisdiction
Western Avenue
Neighborhood 0 0 City of South Bend
Table 4—Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments
CAPER 9
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
Narrative
Based on data received from HUD for the NSP1 and NSP3 programs, the areas of greatest need in the ,
City of South Bend were identified as census tracts 6,4, 21, and 5,two of which are located in the Near
Northwest and Near West Side neighborhoods.The City also identified census tracts 19 and 20 as
areas of greatest need based on the data and the foreseen likelihood of foreclosures.
Additionally,the geographic allocation of resources was based upon: '
• History of the City's focus/redevelopment and support of Community
Development Corporations (CDCs) ,
• Areas of need per NSP determinations
• Location of most vacant and abandoned structures '
• High foreclosure rates (NSP)
• Age of housing stock
• High cost loans (NSP) '
• Completing the 5-year plan as outlined in the 2015-2019 Housing and Community Development
(HCD) Plan
Mishawaka
Beginning in 2015,the St.Joseph County Housing Consortium opted to fund housing projects in t
Mishawaka by contracting with agencies directly, rather than through the City of
Mishawaka. Subsequently, PY2017 HOME funds were awarded to Habitat for Humanity for the '
construction of two (2) single-family homes in Mishawaka.
St.Joseph County '
The St.Joseph County Housing Consortium did not receive any requests for funding in 2017 to serve the '
unincorporated areas of the County.
1
CAPER 10 '
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) '
Leveraging
Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds),
including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any
publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the
needs identified in the plan.
ESG match dollars come from a variety of sources including private donations, volunteer labor,
and United Way grants. HOME match dollars come from private donations, volunteer labor,
land donations and waived fees/taxes.
1 In 2017 the City of South Bend's Community Homebuyers Corporation (CHC) provided $247,013
of CDBG funds in the form of forgivable mortgage subsidies to sixteen (16) families, enabling
them to become homeowners. These subsidies were leveraged with $1,053,305 in private
mortgage funding. CDBG provides the mortgage subsidy of 20%, not to exceed $22,000 of the
purchase price of a home, and local lenders represented on the CHC board pool their funds to
provide the remaining dollars. CHC offers financing to clients that are usually not
conventionally lendable. Pre- and post-purchase counseling required for the mortgage subsidy
program is a major contributing factor to its success.
' Rebuilding Together (formerly known as Christmas in April) has aided homeowners in various
neighborhoods throughout the community since 1989. Rebuilding Together has built a strong
relationship with the City of South Bend, local trades, the higher education community and the
business community, allowing the program to grow stronger and more efficient every year. In
2017, Rebuilding Together completed home repairs for 16 households in the Rum Village
neighborhood of South Bend. Rebuilding Together expended $121,737 in CDBG funds and it is
estimated that donated labor and materials added $XXX and contractor discounts an additional
$XXX to the project.
Fiscal Year Summary—HOME Match
1. Excess match from prior Federal fiscal year 0
2. Match contributed during current Federal fiscal year 0
' 3.Total match available for current Federal fiscal year(Line 1 plus Line 2) 0
4. Match liability for current Federal fiscal year 0
' 5. Excess match carried over to next Federal fiscal year(Line 3 minus Line 4) 0
Table 5—Fiscal Year Summary-HOME Match Report
CAPER 11
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
.� o
4.- o '
m c �
°1 0
+�
+° f° v
0 c CL
M b yr
s
O O
O..
O C _�
m (0
O m 'LL o
L O
O O O �
N Q @ Q
, G O X m
j 'L
3
N v O
-� E
L
U U Q '
Vf S a' LL
H
p
O v
N "a '% E
-0 'LL O 41 O
�L L
Q C
O y _
H i L O
\ 41 O L-O 7 uj
CL 0 CL O p 0 0
4- c= Q a E i
' Minority Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises— Indicate the number and dollar value
of contracts for HOME projects completed during the reporting period
Total Minority Business Enterprises White Non-
Alaskan Asian or Black Non- Hispanic Hispanic
Native or Pacific Hispanic
' American Islander
Indian
Contracts
' Dollar
Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Contracts
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
' Dollar
Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0
' Total Women Male
Business
Enterprises
Contracts
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0
Number 0 0 0
Sub-Contracts
Number 0 0 0
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0
Table 8-Minority Business and Women Business Enterprises
Minority Owners of Rental Property—Indicate the number of HOME assisted rental property owners
I and the total amount of HOME funds in these rental properties assisted
Total Minority Property Owners White Non-
Alaskan Asian or Black Non- Hispanic Hispanic
' Native or Pacific Hispanic
American Islander
Indian
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dollar
' Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 9—Minority Owners of Rental Property
1 CAPER 13
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
Relocation and Real Property Acquisition—Indicate the number of persons displaced,the cost of ,
relocation payments,the number of parcels acquired, and the cost of acquisition
Parcels Acquired 0 0 ,
Businesses Displaced 0 0
Nonprofit Organizations
Displaced 0 0 !
Households Temporarily
Relocated, not Displaced 0 0 '
Households Total Minority Property Enterprises White Non-
Displaced Alaskan Asian or Black Non- Hispanic Hispanic
Native or Pacific Hispanic
American Islander
Indian '
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
Table 10—Relocation and Real Property Acquisition
!
!
1
1
1
1
CAPER 14 !
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) '
i
iCR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520 b� )
' Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the
number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income,
moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.
iOne-Year Goal Actual
Number of Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 27 116
Number of Non-Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 73 50
Number of Special-Needs households to be
provided affordable housing units 10 16
Total 110 182
Table 11—Number of Households
iOne-Year Goal Actual
Number of households supported through
Rental Assistance 37 132
Number of households supported through
' The Production of New Units 10 2
Number of households supported through
Rehab of Existing Units 52 0
Number of households supported through
Acquisition of Existing Units 7 0
Total 106 134
Table 12—Number of Households Supported
' Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting
these goals.
' The PY2017 activities undertaken in calendar year 2017, and counted in the numbers above, were:
• South Bend Home Improvement Program
• Rebuilding Together
• Department of Community Investment Housing Counseling
' • Community Homebuyers Corp.
• Acquisition/rehab/resale activities
i • Oaklawn TBRA
• FUSE Project (Oliver Apartments)
• Coordinated Entry
CAPER 15
iOMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
i
• ESG Shelter Operations-AIDS Ministries, the Center for the Homeless, Life Treatment Centers, i
Youth Service Bureau and the YWCA
• ESG Rapid Rehousing-AIDS Ministries and the YWCA '
• ESG TBRA-YWCA
Cumulative housing information is provided in the attached spreadsheets for each funding source. i
Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans. '
The outcomes noted in the attached spreadsheets for each funding source indicate that the City of
South Bend and the St.Joseph County Housing Consortium are allocating funds to the activities that i
meet the priorities of the 2015-2019 HCD Plan and best serve low-mod income families in the respective
jurisdictions. As data is collected in preparation of the 2018 Action Plan,these outcomes will be i
reviewed again.
Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons i
served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine
the eligibility of the activity.
Number of Households Served CDBG Actual HOME Actual '
Extremely Low-income 13 16
Low-income 36 0
Moderate-income 64 2
Total 113 18
Table 13—Number of Households Served
Narrative Information
1
CAPER 16
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) ,
1
1
CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c)
1 Evaluate the jurisdiction's progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending
homelessness through:
' Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their
individual needs
The Regional Planning Council (formerly the Continuum of Care) agencies worked together to design and
implement a collaborative process based on referrals and complementary programs and services. The
process includes emergency shelter,transitioning to ESG or Supportive Housing Programs (SHP) funded
agency programs, as well as working within the Regional Planning Council to ensure specific client needs
' are met appropriately. Case management services were available in 2017 to regularly assess the needs
of clients.
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons
1 The Regional Planninc Council continued to discuss and work on strategies that resulted in the following
priorities:
• Restructuring the traditional shelter system toward the Housing First model and meeting Hearth
Act priorities;
• Focusing on rapid re-housing activities with ESG;
' • Using two distinct approaches, one for circumstantially impoverished homeless and one for
chronically impoverished homeless,to re-house them;
1 • Reducing the unsheltered or precariously housed population;
• Reducing the time spent in transitional housing;
• Joining the Balance of State CoC.
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely
' low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after
being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care
facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections
programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that
address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs
The chronically homeless, severely mentally ill, veterans, persons with HIV/AIDS,victims of domestic
violence, and youth were moved into rapid re-housing options rather than the traditional shelter system
whenever possible.The chronic substance abuse homeless subpopulation used a traditional shelter
model with expanded services and programs.
' CAPER 17
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families '
with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to
permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that '
individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals
and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were '
recently homeless from becoming homeless again
In 2015, a team from South Bend attended the Indiana Supportive Housing Institute for the opportunity '
to learn best practices for developing housing with support services. With insight gained from the
institute, a tax credit application for a Frequent Users System Engagement (FUSE)facility to be located in
the City of South Bend, was submitted to the Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority
(IHCDA).The application/project was unanimously supported by the St.Joseph County Continuum of
Care. IHCDA announced the award of tax credits to the project in February 2016. Construction of the ,
32-unit facility was completed in the fall of 2017. Leasing began in November 2017, and by December
31st, 21 units were occupied with formerly chronically homeless individuals.
The City, in partnership with the Center for the Homeless Robert L. Miller,Sr.Veteran's Center, Life
Treatment Centers,the Veteran's Administration, and the Continuum of Care, announced on November '
11, 2016 the intent to join the Mayor's Challenge to End Veteran Homelessness. All partners will
continue their work to create the required 'By Name List' to identify at-risk veterans and connect them
with permanent housing and related services.
CAPER 18 '
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) '
CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)
' Actions taken to address the needs of public housing
The Housing Authority of South Bend (HASB) continued to provide the residents of South Bend high
' quality services, despite significant monitoring and additional administrative reporting requirements by
HUD. HASB successes in 2017 included achieving the HUD certification as a High Performer in the
administration of its Housing Choice Voucher Program (HCV). Additionally, the administration of its Low
Rent Program is no longer listed as "troubled". The HASB has continued to keep its occupancy in all of
its Programs at or above 97%.
' In 2017 all five members of the HASB Board were reappointed to additional terms. The Board approved
an annual budget for 2018 and the HASB is current with all HUD mandated submissions.
The HASB played a significant role in the reduction of homelessness in South Bend by assisting 107
1 Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) families in its rolls in the HCV Program. The HASB partnered
with several local entities in the development of additional housing options by making HCV project-
based vouchers available to projects seeking to increase affordable housing availability in the City.
tFor the first time since 2009, the HCV opened its HCV Waiting List and received more than 3,000
applications in 24 hours. Several hundred applications have been processed to date. The HCV Program
1 also implemented a state-of-the-art digital financial interface that allows landlords to access via the
HASB website: 1)their account transaction history; and, 2) receive direct deposit of subsidy payments.
' This process significantly increases the speed of landlord compensation.
Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in
' management and participate in homeownership
The HASB participates in the Family Self-Sufficiency Program (FSS). The FSS program is a voluntary
1 program for Section 8 participants and Public Housing Residents. In 2017, the HASB FSS program
expanded beyond its mandatory number. For the past 14 years, residents of public housing participated
' in a similar program that combines the Public Housing Authority Section 32 Program with an Indiana
State program of Individual Development Accounts (IDAs). In addition, the HASB, in partnership with the
Northeast Neighborhood Revitalization Organization (NNRO), is assisting three public housing and HCV
' Participants purchase a new construction home.
Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs
The HASB was no longer listed as a "troubled" agency in 2017.The HASB Board and Management team
met the performance measures HUD uses to categorize the effectiveness of Public Housing Authorities.
The HASB is now listed as a High Performer in its administration of the Housing Choice Voucher
Program.
CAPER 19
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)
Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as '
barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning
ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the
return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i) '
In 2017 the St.Joseph County Council approved an agreement that puts the South Bend Human Rights
Commission in charge of investigating discrimination cases of residents that live outside the city limits of
South Bend. Previously, County residents could only submit complaints to Indianapolis agencies. County
residents will also now be able to have LGBT-related complaints investigated; Indianapolis agencies '
don't investigate those complainces.The St.Joseph County Housing Consortium will continue to
encourage efforts to expand the reach of the Human Rights Commission to the City of Mishawaka.
Support for the development efforts that improve employment prospects for low mod income
individuals is ongoing. '
People returning to the community from prison often need assistance in securing jobs and affordable
housing. A movement to "Ban the Box' in South Bend may open up more employment opportunities ,
for those re-entering the community from incarceration.
The Residential Tax Abatement program is available to potential homeowners for consideration when ,
thinking about homeownership.This allows a phasing in the costs that can lessen the immediate
financial burden and, coupled with the legislative property tax cap, could be critical to new ,
homeowners.
The City of South Bend continues its Housing Counseling and Homebuyer Education programs.Although '
not a financial mechanism, being better educated and understanding the costs and risks of
homeownership can direct individuals to an outcome that best suits them. Understanding if and when a
home purchase is a viable option is of critical importance.
Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) '
Program year 2017 allocations aligned with the High Priorities listed in the 2015-2019 HCD Plan and
emphasized homeownership, public improvements and technical assistance. These remained the '
broader community priorities in 2017 based upon a number of issues:
• Community need exceeded available resources '
• Slow economy/ high unemployment depleted existing resources, while reducing donations
• High rate of underemployment meant homeowners lacked income to maintain housing '
• High foreclosure rate was still a relevant issue
• Large elderly population living in homes they could not maintain
CAPER 20 '
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) '
' • Many issues including unemployment and foreclosures can take a toll on a person's emotional
and mental health. These types of issues could be a contributing factor to abuse, addiction and
homelessness.
South Bend's neighborhood revitalization focus became more urgent in recent years with the onset of
the national housing crisis and the resulting number of vacant and abandoned homes. This situation,
coupled with an aging housing stock, created a challenging environment for neighborhoods and the
community. Complementary responses including acquisition/rehabilitation, and demolition were seen
as necessary and critical to achieving revitalization and assuring other investment.Therefore resources
were directed toward programs that addressed those activities.
Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320
' The Housing Authority of South Bend maintained a Section 8 Landlord Assistance Program in which any
resident living in a Section 8 unit identified as lead contaminated and where the owner refuses to bring
the home into a lead safe status, has an absolute preference on the Public Housing waiting list for the
first available unit. Additionally, any pre-1978 Section 8 home that was identified during the Housing
Authority's Annual Housing Quality Standards Inspection as having chipping, peeling or cracking paint
had to receive and pass a clearance test by a State certified inspection.
These policies significantly increased the number of affordable housing units that are lead-safe in the
City.The HASB also maintains an active list of current lead safe addresses at
http://www.hasbonline.com/docs/safe.pdf
' Additionally, from 2006 through 2016,the HASB received a Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Grant. In
2016, due in part to HUD reducing the amount of funds in this program by 50%, the HASB grant was not
renewed. The HASB will continue to apply or support another application for additional lead hazard
reduction funds to be available to St.Joseph County.
Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
Examples of the variety of mechanisms the community has employed to address poverty included the
Center for Homeless STAR (Skilled,Trained, Able, and Ready) program which incorporated job readiness,
externships,job retention, and job search assistance. Another program that assists poverty-level families
is Bridges Out of Poverty. Bridges Out of Poverty is a local program based on a nationally recognized
model that serves to educate both the low-income individual and the employer community on how to
' work together to address issues that prevent people in poverty from becoming employed.
The Employer Resource Network (ERN) is a collaboration between Michiana Bridges, the City of South
' Bend, the Community Foundation and five local employers.The group has a shared desire to increase
rention in their entry-level workforce while assisting their employees solve non-workplace problems
impacting their attendanace and productivity. For an under-resourced employee lacking coping skills, a
CAPER 21
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
financial safety net or family support, small problems such as car troubles or lack of child care can
escalate into lost work time or a lost job. ERN helps employees find solutions to such problems.
A Resource Navigator,trained in rapid problem resolution and with access to a wide range of '
community resources, is on-site at each employer's workplace for a portion of each week and available
the rest of hte week by phone and email. This Resource Navigator works directly with employees to
address their everyday non-workplace issues, connect to resources, and build stability. While these
services are focused on entry-level workers, they are available to all employees. In 2016 there were 245
referrals to the ERN with, 220 being unique employees served.The retention rate was reported at 100%.
In 2015,the City of South Bend, in conjunction with the City of Mishawaka, the St.Joseph County
Chamber of Commerce, IVY Tech Community College, WorkOne Development, and a number of local
businesses launched a new workforce training initiative, "Supporting Manufacturers and Regional '
Talent" (SMART). SMART assists residents in obtaining the necessary skills to participate in a wider range
of employment opportunities. Participants are trained through IVY Tech as skilled workers in
manufacturing. Smart also merges various local employer advisory boards into one council to provide a
unified local effort in job creation. In 2017,the program continued to develop a skilled workforce to
meet the needs of local manufacturers.
The St.Joseph County community was further committed to implementation of the low income ,
employment provisions at 24 CFR, Part 135 in the use of federal funds covered by Section 3. To that
end, the Section 3 clause is incorporated into each contract. All public works construction contracts
using such funds included Section 3 language as well. In addition,Section 3 requirements were outlined
during the pre-construction meeting for those projects. '
Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
Any targeted a pp roach to a geography meshes the efforts of South Bend City departments,the CDCs
and other nonprofits such as Habitat for Humanity to broadly plan and advance the effort. The CDBG,
HOME and NSP funds targeted to the Near Westside, Near Northwest, and Northeast Neighborhood
offered an opportunity for all of these entities to work together using their areas of expertise and
educate each other on opportunities and challenges that will support the successful conclusion of the
plan. South Bend utilized a team approach to working with its partners in implementing the
programs/projects funded through the various federal sources.The Community Investment staff
regularly communicated with all sub-grantees, and met with those entities involved in the targeted
areas. Regularly scheduled meetings with CDCs occurred due to the nature of work and amount of
funds allocated. '
Desktop and on-site monitoring of organizations occurred regularly throughout the year.
St.Joseph County Housing Consortium members were continually informed of project/program status at '
their meetings throughout the year.
CAPER 22
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) '
The Regional Planning Council (formerly the Continuum of Care),which includes the Cities of South Bend
and Mishawaka, continued to meet monthly to discuss program status and funding opportunities, and to
address the broader issues of homelessness and service in the community.
In 2015, on behalf of efforts related to the St.Joseph County CoC, the City of South Bend contracted
' with the Corporation for Supportive Housing's (CSH) National Consulting Team to explore the action
steps needed to bring the CoC into compliance with current federal guidance and regulations, and
' consider the option of merging with the Balance of State (BOS). After review and consultation with CSH,
the St.Joseph County CoC unanimously approved reaching out and pursing the process to join the
Balance of State.The merger was completed in 2017.
Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service
' agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
1.The St.Joseph County Continuum of Care merged with the IN Balance of State (BoS) in 2017. Efforts
to formalize the current structure of the Regional Planning Council (formerly the Continuum of Care) are
ongoing. Monthly, as well as special topic Regional Planning Council meetings, were held throughout
' the year.
2.The Public Housing Authority Is a member of the CoC.
Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the
jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a)
• Racial & Ethnic Minority Concentrations—there is minimal racial and ethnic integration across
St.Joseph County, South Bend and Mishawaka.The presence of racial/ethnic segregation
presents challenges to fair housing as segregation is linked to economic and service disparities.
• Individuals with Limited English Proficiency—languages spoken across the county show
significant diversity. More than half of non-native English speakers report speaking English less
than very well. Limited capacity to communicate hinders access to housing and public services
that promote fair housing.
• Protected Class Status& Unemployment—significant variation exists in the unemployment rate
of the county and cities across gender, race, and ethnicity. Unemployment has severe
' implications for fair housing as it effects disposable income for household expenses.
• Housing Rental Costs—disparity exists between the salary earned by minimum wage laborers
and the fair market rent (FMR) established by HUD.The FMR for a 2-BR apartment is$792. A
minimum wage laborer must work 85 hours a week to afford the rent.
• Housing Affordability-disparity exists in the affordability of housing. Median housing values
have increased while median income has decreased.There is a disparity in the affordability of a
' house across race/ethnicity with the housing prices of the area.
• Protected Class Status& Household Size -the majority of minority families have three or more
persons within their households; however, rentals are primarily 1-BR and 2-BR units. Lower
CAPER 23
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
rates of home ownership among minority households suggests that large minority families may
have difficulty finding adequate rental housing with a sufficient number of bedrooms, which
may result in overcrowding.
• Opportunities to File Fair Housing Complaints-St.Joseph County, South Bend, and Mishawaka
have public ordinances to protect and enforce fair housing for residents. Lack of awareness of '
these ordinances and lack of consistency in handling complaints can lead to disparities in
treatment across jurisdictions.
• Unsupported Section 8 Vouchers- both the Housing Authority of Mishawaka and the St.Joseph '
County Housing Authority report waiting lists for Section 8 Housing Voucher assistance.
• Housing Authority of South Bend -the Housing Authority of South Bend (HASB) was not
available for interview. Other interviewees referenced reduced hours of operation and services ,
due to financial constraints and organizational problems. Internal problems within HASB can
limit the access of residents to housing services.
• Public Transit-South Bend and Mishawaka offer public transportation for their residents.
Limited nighttime hours may restrict the commuting ability of second and third shift laborers
and limited access to public transportation outside of city limits may limit the commute and
access to services of low-mod income populations in the county.
• Denial of Mortgage Applications-an impediment to fair housing is seen in the ability of lower '
income and minority households to obtain home loans.The primary causes of denial were
related to the household's income.The rate of denial for Blacks and Asians remains higher than
the rate for Whites. Hispanic households were also challenged as their denial rate has increased.
CAPER 24
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) '
' CR-40 - Monitorin g 91.220 and 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance
of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs
involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning
' requirements
' On-site audits at local agencies receiving CDBG, HOME, ESG, and NSP funds are scheduled per the HCD
Plan,to ensure compliance. On-site monitoring visits of sub-grantees are conducted approximately
every two years to review their internal systems and ensure compliance with applicable
1 requirements. A minimum of eight (8) on-site audits are completed annually. The audits are performed
by two DC] staff members working together to review accounting procedures and program rules. These
' on-site monitoring visits are in addition to the monthly desk audits completed when reviewing
subrecipient claims, constant communication on projects via phone and email, and various meetings to
discuss program issues. Each claim for payment submitted by a subrecipient requires a progress report
' relevant to the goals stated in the Scope of Services. In 2017 the following on-site monitoring visits
were conducted by staff, no findings or concerns were identified:
' • Neighborhood Resource Connection (5/16/17)—CDBG
• REAL Services (5/17/18)—CDBG
' • South Bend Human Rights Commission (6/09/17) -CDBG
• South Bend Home Improvement Program (6/12/17) -CDBG
• Department of Code Enforcement (10/24/17) -CDBG
• Historic Preservation Commission (10/27/17)—CDBG
• South Bend Heritage Foundation (11/21/17)—HOME, CDBG
• Near Northwest Neighborhood (12/06/17)—HOME, CDBG
When the City of South Bend contracts with CDBG and HOME subrecipients, a memo is provided
detailing the process to engage M/WBEs. In addition, a list of M/WBEs in St.Joseph County from the
State of Indiana is provided to subrecipients. During on-site monitoring visits, evidence is requested that
attempts were made to engage M/WBEs.
Additionally, based on the size and complexity of a project/program there are regularly scheduled
' meetings between staff and agencies in order to manage real time communication, check status, and
immediately address any issues/challenges that may arise.
CAPER 25
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d) '
Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to
comment on performance reports.
In accordance with regulations of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development,the St. '
Joseph County Housing Consortium prepared a draft 2016 Consolidated Annual Performance and
Evaluation Report (CAPER) describing the Consortium's accomplishments in housing and community '
development for January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.
The draft version of the CAPER will be available to the public for review and written comment from '
March 7 through March 21, 2018 at the following locations: all branches of the St.Joseph County and
Mishawaka Public Libraries; the Walkerton Public Library, and New Carlisle/Olive Township Public '
Library; the City of Mishawaka Planning Department office; the City of South Bend Department of
Community Investment office; and the City of South Bend City Clerk's office. The draft version of the
CAPER was also online at www.southbendin.gov. Notice of the draft CAPER's availability to the public '
was published in the South Bend Tribune, the local paper of highest circulation, and El Puente, the
region's Spanish language newspaper.
All comments will be considered when finalizing the CAPER. '
After formal submission to HUD on or about March 30, 2018,the final CAPER will be made available for '
public review at the above locations. The final CAPER will also be available on the City of South
Bend's website.
CAPER 26
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) ,
' CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)
' Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction's program objectives
and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its
experiences.
The City of South Bend has not made any changes to program objectives. The goals of all programs still
' align with the priorities of the 2015-2019 HCD Plan.
Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI)
' grants?
No
[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.
1
CAPER 27
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
CR-50 - HOME 91.520 d 1
Include the results of on-site inspections of affordable rental housing assisted under the
program to determine compliance with housing codes and other applicable regulations
Please list those projects that should have been inspected on-site this program year based upon
the schedule in §92.504(d). Indicate which of these were inspected and a summary of issues
that were detected during the inspection. For those that were not inspected, please indicate
the reason and how you will remedy the situation.
All HOME-assisted affordable rental housing facilities that were due for inspection in 2017 were
inspected. The following units were inspected to confirm compliance with established housing codes:
YWCA Home to Women (inspected 11/2017)—10 of 10 units, classroom,first and second floor laundry,
client lounge, visitor lounge, children services, and kitchen/dining inspected. No required repairs are
noted below: ,
• 1st floor laundry: Establish dryer exhaust maintenance, hook up dryer vent, patch drywall,
shorten exhaust vents to eliminate kinking
• 2nd floor laundry: Establish dryer exhaust maintenance, hook up dryer vent, patch drywall,
shorten exhaust vents to eliminate kinking
• Visitor lounge: Stained ceiling tiles—monitor for leak
North Park Apartments (Inspected 11/2017)—4 of 8 units inspected. All units passed.
East Bank Village Apartments (inspected 11/2017)—9 of 29 units, and common and utility areas
inspected. Required repairs are noted below: ,
• 1st Floor main hall: Emergency egress light dim—check battery north end
• 1st floor laundry: Clean dryer vents and establish cleaning program; shorten vent lines
• 2nd floor main hall: North emergency egress light not working
• Unit 209: Bad GIF receptacle in bathroom
Provide an assessment of the jurisdiction's affirmative marketing actions for HOME units.
92.351(b) '
The following language is included in every HOME contract executed between the St.Joseph County '
Housing Consortium and a subrecipient:
"The Developer agrees to carry out the Consortium policy and procedures for affirmative marketing by 1
the use of community-wide publications, approved Equal Housing Opportunity logo type or slogan in any
applicable marketing of housing assisted with HOME funds, and by any other procedure delineated in
CAPER 28
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) '
' attached Appendix III, "Affirmative Marketing Procedures".
' Developers who are not in compliance with the above affirmative marketing will incur corrective actions
as described in Appendix III (included as an attachment to this report).
Refer to IDIS reports to describe the amount and use of program income for projects,
including the number of projects and owner and tenant characteristics
' Describe other actions taken to foster and maintain affordable housing. 91.220(k) (STATES
ONLY: Including the coordination of LIHTC with the development of affordable housing).
1 91.320(j)
Activities such as acquisition/rehab, new construction on lots that were cleared, redevelopment of
foreclosed and abandoned homes, and tenant-based rental assistance to severely mentally ill individuals
served to foster and maintain affordable housing in the City of South Bend.
CAPER 29
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
CR-60 - ESG 91.520 ESG Recipients only)
�J) � p Y)
ESG Supplement to the CAPER in a-snaps
For Paperwork Reduction Act
1. Recipient Information—All Recipients Complete
Basic Grant Information
Recipient Name SOUTH BEND
Organizational DUNS Number 074327123
EIN/TIN Number 356001201
Indentify the Field Office INDIANAPOLIS '
Identify CoC(s) in which the recipient or Indiana Balance of State
subrecipient(s)will provide ESG assistance ,
ESG Contact Name
Prefix Ms '
First Name PAMELA
Middle Name C
Last Name MEYER '
Suffix 0
Title Director
ESG Contact Address
Street Address 1 227 W.Jefferson Boulevard
Street Address 2 0
City South Bend
State IN
ZIP Code 46601-
Phone Number 5742355845
Extension 0
Fax Number 5742359021
Email Address pmeyer @southbendin.gov
ESG Secondary Contact
Prefix Ms
First Name Lory
Last Name Timmer
Suffix 0 '
Title Associate
Phone Number 5742355841
Extension 0
Email Address Ltimmer @southbendin.gov
CAPER 30
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
' 2. Reporting Period—All Recipients Complete
' Program Year Start Date 01/01/2017
Program Year End Date 12/31/2017
3a. Subrecipient Form–Complete one form for each subrecipient
' Subrecipient or Contractor Name:SOUTH BEND
City: South Bend
' State: IN
Zip Code:46601, 1830
DUNS Number: 074327123
' Is Subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Unit of Government
' ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 3038
Subrecipient or Contractor Name:THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS
' City:South Bend
State: IN
Zip Code:46601, 3102
DUNS Number:
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
' Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 53000
1 Subrecipient or Contractor Name:AIDS MINISTRIES/AIDS ASSIST
City:South Bend
State: IN
Zip Code:46634, 0582
DUNS Number:
Is Subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount:49006
CAPER 31
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
Subrecipient or Contractor Name:YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU '
City:South Bend '
State: IN
Zip Code:46628, 2514
DUNS Number: 174191978 '
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 106400 '
Subrecipient or Contractor Name:YWCA OF NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA '
City: South Bend
State: IN
Zip Code:46601, 3514
DUNS Number: 084576065
Is subrecipient a victim services provider:Y
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 113900
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: LIFE TREATMENT CENTERS '
City: South Bend
State: IN '
Zip Code:46613, 2214
DUNS Number: 119673408 '
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 52000
CAPER 32
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
CR-65 - Persons Assisted
' 4. Persons Served
4a. Complete for Homelessness Prevention Activities
' Number of Persons in Total
Households
Adults 0
Children 0
' Don't Know/Refused/Other 0
Missing Information 0
Tota 1 0
Table 16—Household Information for Homeless Prevention Activities
4b. Complete for Rapid Re-Housing Activities
Number of Persons in Total
Households
Adults 47
Children 69
Don't Know/Refused/Other 0
Missing Information 0
Total 116
' Table 17—Household Information for Rapid Re-Housing Activities
' 4c. Complete for Shelter
Number of Persons in Total
Households
Adults 1,274
Children 214
Don't Know/Refused/Other 0
Missing Information 0
' Total 1,488
Table 18—Shelter Information
CAPER 33
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
r
4d. Street Outreach ,
Number of Persons in Total ,
Households
Adults 0 r
Children 0
Don't Know/Refused/Other 0
Missing Information 0
Total 0
Table 19—Household Information for Street Outreach
4e. Totals for all Persons Served with ESG r
Number of Persons in Total r
Households
Adults 1,321
Children 283
Don't Know/Refused/Other 0
Missing Information 0 r
Total 1,604
Table 20—Household Information for Persons Served with ESG
5. Gender—Complete for All Activities
Total r
Male 1,015
Female 586 '
Transgender 3
Don't Know/Refused/Other 0
Missing Information 0
Total 1,604
Table 21—Gender Information
r
1
1
r
r
CAPER 34
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) r
' 6. Age—Complete for All Activities
' Under 18 Total 283
' 18-24 114
25 and over 1,207
Don't Know/Refused/Other 0
' Missing Information 0
Total 1,604
' Table 22—Age Information
7. Special Populations Served—Complete for All Activities
Number of Persons in Households
Subpopulation Total Total Persons Total Persons Total
Served— Served—RRH Persons
Prevention Served in
Emergency
Shelters
Veterans 30 0 1 30
Victims of Domestic
Violence 412 0 4 412
Elderly 4 0 0 4
HIV/AIDS 18 0 17 1
Chronically Homeless 190 0 0 190
Persons with Disabilities:
Severely Mentally
111 93 0 0 93
Chronic Substance
Abuse 923 0 0 923
Other Disability 134 0 0 0
' Total
(Unduplicated if
possible) 1,059 0 0 1,059
Table 23—Special Population Served
CAPER 35
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
1
r
CR-70— ESG 91.520(g) - Assistance Provided and Outcomes
10. Shelter Utilization r
Number of New Units- Rehabbed 0 r
Number of New Units-Conversion 0
Total Number of bed-nights available 78,317
Total Number of bed-nights provided 74,046 r
Capacity Utilization 94.55%
Table 24 —Shelter Capacity r
11. Project Outcomes Data measured under the performance standards developed in
consultation with the CoC(s)
Using ESG funds,the City of South Bend and the St.Joseph County Regional Planning Council worked to r
reduce the number of homeless households with children, targeting rapid re-housing and rental
assistance dollars for assistance to families.To measure the success of the Regional Planning
Council's members' rapid re-housing programs, clients will be contacted six months after their final ESG
assistance to assess their housing status.The Regional Planning Council set a goal that at least 35%of
participants assisted remain in permanent housing six months after their final assistance.
r
1
r
r
r
1
r
CAPER 36
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) ,
CR-75 — Expenditures
' 11. Expenditures
11a. ESG Expenditures for Homelessness Prevention
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year
2015 2016 2017
' Expenditures for Rental Assistance 0 0 0
Expenditures for Housing Relocation and
Stabilization Services- Financial Assistance 0 0 0
Expenditures for Housing Relocation &
Stabilization Services-Services 0 0 0
' Expenditures for Homeless Prevention under
Emergency Shelter Grants Program 0 0 0
Subtotal Homelessness Prevention 0 0 0
Table 25—ESG Expenditures for Homelessness Prevention
11b. ESG Expenditures for Rapid Re-Housing
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year
2015 2016 2017
Expenditures for Rental Assistance 29,478 32,848 74,145
' Expenditures for Housing Relocation and
Stabilization Services- Financial Assistance 56,052 20,391 44,258
Expenditures for Housing Relocation &
' Stabilization Services-Services 10,685 7,145 16,566
Expenditures for Homeless Assistance under
Emergency Shelter Grants Program 0 0 0
Subtotal Rapid Re-Housing 96,215 60,384 134,969
Table 26—ESG Expenditures for Rapid Re-Housing
11c. ESG Expenditures for Emergency Shelter
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year
2015 2016 2017
Essential Services 0 7,000 0
Operations 98,620 130,176 158,050
Renovation 0 0 0
' Major Rehab 0 0 0
Conversion 0 0 0
Subtotal 98,620 137,176 158,050
Table 27—ESG Expenditures for Emergency Shelter
CAPER 37
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
11d. Other Grant Expenditures ,
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year '
2015 2016 2017
Street Outreach 0 0 0
HMIS 0 4,000 0
Administration 0 4,000 0
Table 28-Other Grant Expenditures '
11e. Total ESG Grant Funds
Total ESG Funds Expended 2015 2016 2017 ,
194,835 205,560 293,019
Table 29-Total ESG Funds Expended
11f. Match Source
2015 2016 2017
Other Non-ESG HUD Funds 17,000 0 0
Other Federal Funds 12,845 106,447 78,249
State Government 70,054 12,752 70,000
Local Government 0 4,000 0
Private Funds 71,958 75,311 141,952 ,
Other 44,131 32,808 53,038
Fees 0 0 0 '
Program Income 0 0 0
Total Match Amount 215,988 231,318 343,239
Table 30-Other Funds Expended on Eligible ESG Activities
11g. Total
Total Amount of Funds 2015 2016 2017
Expended on ESG
Activities
410,823 436,878 636,258
Table 31-Total Amount of Funds Expended on ESG Activities
CAPER 38
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018)
Office of Community Planning and Development DATE: 03-02-18
' U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development TIME: 9:09
Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 1
PR26-CDBG Financial Summary Report
' Program Year 2017
SOUTH BEND,IN
IPARTI. SUMMARY OF CDBG RESOURCES
01 UNEXPENDED CDBG FUNDS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 2,761,607.45
02 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 2,365,622.00
03 SURPLUS URBAN RENEWAL 0.00
04 SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN FUNDS 0.00
05 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 196,518.15
05a CURRENT YEAR SECTION 108 PROGRAM INCOME(FOR SI TYPE) 0.00
06 FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LINE-OF-CREDIT 0.00
06a FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LOCAL CDBG ACCOUNT 0.00
07 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AVAILABLE 23,373.44
08 TOTAL AVAILABLE(SUM,LINES 01-07) 5,347,121.04
PART II: SUMMARY OF CDBG EXPENDITURES
09 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER THAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 1,640,147.26
10 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT 6,015.51
'11 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT(LINE 09+LINE 10) 1,646,162.77
12 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 203,690.21
13 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS 0.00
'14 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 14,057.55
15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES(SUM,LINES 11-14) 1,863,910.53
16 UNEXPENDED BALANCE(LINE 08-LINE 15) 3,483,210.51
PART III:LOWMOD BENEFIT THIS REPORTING PERIOD
'17 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS 0.00
18 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD MULTI-UNIT HOUSING 2,923.49
19 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW/MOD ACTIVITIES 1,531,410.48
20 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT 6,015.51
'21 TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT(SUM,LINES 17-20) 1,540,349.48
22 PERCENT LOW/MOD CREDIT(LINE 21/LINE 11) 93.57%
LOW/MOD BENEFIT FOR MULTI-YEAR CERTIFICATIONS
23 PROGRAM YEARS(PY)COVERED IN CERTIFICATION PY:2017 PY: PY:
24 CUMULATIVE NET EXPENDITURES SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT CALCULATION 0.00
25 CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES BENEFITING LOW/MOD PERSONS 0.00
26 PERCENT BENEFIT TO LOW/MOD PERSONS(LINE 25/LINE 24) 0.00%
PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE(PS)CAP CALCULATIONS
27 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES 143,679.68
28 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 0.00
29 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 87.00
30 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS 0.00
31 TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS(LINE 27+LINE 28-LINE 29+LINE 30) 143,592.68
32 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 2,365,622.00
33 PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 25,167.27
134 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP 0.00
35 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP(SUM,LINES 32-34) 2,390,789.27
36 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PS ACTIVITIES(LINE 31/LINE 35) 6.01%
PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION(PA)CAP
137 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 203,690.21
38 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 0.00
39 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 0.00
40 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS 14,057.55
141 TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS(LINE 37+LINE 38-LINE 39+LINE 40) 217,747.76
42 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 2,365,622.00
43 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 196,518.15
44 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP (2,268.92)
'45 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP(SUM,LINES 42-44) 2,559,871.23
46 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PA ACTIVITIES(LINE 41/LINE 45) 8.51%
[L'10,L
m
HOHad
421H
Lil POW
CIA N •Q — M V1
tz
OmudsiH
O
zl 1a430 N N
'd
z KOEIS -00
y
aV 31SUI'WN � � E
pW., 10 PuId .5 cc
m to
A a3?4M o°wn w .E N
F V Xseit+3eN v no 3
0
10 PuI my - >' 00 b
CA ^
°
V ue?sy
U al?4lY178 °' U °'
°
VV lO xOEIg N aCi N
IsI Oud 1a43O `� v ° v ❑�❑
10 MuH 3eN ' N
Isuly 3eN E oNO o y
10 PuI iW
A U d C O
uel5`p' O 'O O
O � .d
ueOUau:y 'ti m
N O O O v� Vt O M N m
-QeOLL JV ^ U ^ U N •,
a U
ally m O O nl V' V' r N V m N M V > >
•^ v� O C
r oo r.l
N 69 <`� V1 � � `✓' ^ J: � — 1 •- O N O O O O O O 69 �O 69 e9 r O — r N M
m 0
z rl vi vt W m v� O V O O O v1 vi O m G � _ M 7 Vl M
✓` Vl M vt C\ O e} v� M MV �O N N O h m ti
M
J 49 69 69 69 69 di 69 69 69 69 69 N F 69
w
A
F
a
c?
a
m
O
m Q\ b O u'1 O M M 69 EA hr 69 69 69 69 69 69 m M O O O 69 H> �I •-- 69 b9
A N � O w O Nt m h O N1 r h h O O h DD m
Qh Vi 69 N 6�9 h Vi .�. .Mr bM9 59 fA � 6h9 ,N. m� O m O O
z O 69 69 fH 69 fA 69 ^, fA 69
w N 49
I :r
F h� N �n •-- in O rn
69 EA �O O h v� O b M O O v1 h M M N h v1 m O OC M h ^ .r h m h
N ^ •-- V3 N M V' N fA N -- -+ M M --� -+ 7 69 69 N 69 69 .-i 69 69 N
A H9 b9 b9 69 fA EA 69 69 59 (!f 69 69 69 69 69 69 EA (A b9 69 H9
GQ W
O
N
- N
Cl)
e0 R
0 0
F F
a
w E
G �
a a w
E L
.u'• F L' F F � � :� O e
v
O c n v d L " `F u u
c ° u u v o
ea V o-ay C N
O M V 7 V �n CR b U) h V U CO U
N O N N N N N N N O U 0
? .- 0 N
� ° ° p,
r4 N p O v 14 N .D JJ L N v L p p N ✓$ Q O
L
v o p O d d m p .d U
,° cC cx p 04 94 w v 2
ti C C U U C C C U U N C C N ° U m
U N U p d O U U U O O O U •?? U p p O O O
3 ❑ E E Cq o o E E E
w° w° O Q w° Q O w° O < Q Q O cu° O Q c ¢ 0G Q Z x O x z �� w° w° Q Q Q
a
A
aim h h h h !0- m oo m m m m m m m m m oo m m m m m m m rn m m rn
W x F, m rn a,
Y
o
d 0
N
C
O
W
W 0 0 o
Z .0 `z Z E C C
'd o o
o o 0 0
j ° V U y V •d o '�o
o v`d d ° .❑j❑
y O O w O N O 9 b O d
IC T w 'Sp T 0.r W
e T 0. � o
L Lx° fi ° L Ir0
E v ° u v ❑ aF .m u j_r 0 aF m ,� v ° .-
a E E U Z .2 C L 0 z
° O 0 0 ° o u 0 0 u 3 0 0 0 ° o q m aC E E E
F0
0
a°i aCi w° aCi ° v aCi .5 E w
aE F Foaa w � 00 0 � m �' zwoa ° � 'vzw
° E 'E m = p .n 1 � � iA , t tit 3 ¢ a � t U
a v 0 0 0 0 ° p W o o u p m 0 0 0 [uz�l 0 p p 0 ,p U p u o 0 0 0 0
a d Z U U V) n U n L U V) z V x 94 U V) a Z rn U) Z a o a5 Z � ] w U U U
6 •C d � 7 E �"'
U M O o N N O O
h E A o G ti O ti ti n ti ti U ti ti ti n n a n ti - ti n n n n n n n ti ti ti ti n N
N U u U O v n o 0 0 - — — h h h h h h h h h h h
w
N •-- O N O C O 10 O 'd' h N ca
C � h an a0 O m 0 O
vt m O 7 Vi �O N N m h m
> G M M N R
W W N
z
� a
m^°, D\ O Vt M M �O m U
O N ca A N O M O O h ca M h O m
P G m m m C N Ol m
L>» ^ ^ ^ N N N N N M N M M M M D1 M M M M M N N M
U
rn
0
U
HOHa3 0
#1H
fi
a
PON
w
MO] O
O
t
'IA °c
ttl
��. omedsiH
W o_
O - -
Lz. �
Z 1ag10 a
o
O NOEI9
w V ISE[V WN
d
10 PUI UTV d
Q eI?L[M 0
L
78�ISEIV IN v
to puI Ul
v7 c
Q aI?gM
°
U aI?gM V 0
`V IO)IOB12 Co
Isl aed laglp - —
10 MRH IUN (�
NSUIV ION Q
to puI Ury U
US!Sv E
ueauacuy
0
-uzau3y o
Tit,
— U
alll)M
U
z
V�n O V a7 Co' a O rl M O o o�O O W v N O o O C,
O, O
1O G\
z Vf 69 69 M Y T C r
Q 69 69 69 � 69 � fA Vi� Y tUJ
Q L
m 4
4
Q
G O O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O
(W 69 fA 69 69 69 69 69 69 Y3 69 69 69 64 69 H3 69 69 69� (n O
F o
d �
0.1
O
.Z. °s� o0 0o r
.Mr .d. Obi trH .r. b
69 69 69
O A fA 69 69 � � 00 M
66
a
x
w
Vl O O M M �O O O vt O O r 69 b9 to C' G�
F O h W ^ N O O O V
O vt
('� Vf 69 69 69 b9 69 M� fA M� 69 69 � M U
Q Vi
Qa
O
N
N
rn In co
0 0 o Q Q
of c O O
u c ° r F
o o L O U
�N R z
az � o�4n n04n U � c
N A O O O �a
o v v n 0
vi v d `d O u O a O d O c v ° U` -o b E c
:G F F W F .w F F u .z.�. F c O .o
U > s v a
cr E ° ^
UiW v o r d ° ° r v o Q
d O O O P� O O O z U O U N N
tU N N N Q N N Q N Q N x N C:J C7
a pU ❑U❑ U❑❑ �.. � N.w U � Q Q
U U
N tad N U
P a o Q C C� d _ ' 3 ° r °o 0
00 0 0o k'' U o 0 o pa. , 0 N 's •5 o o �cq
v v v W I.W., a a a. a Q (3 v
O O O a 7 7 K to
O O O (n Cl) V] X c
0 U 1� Q ' a } p
O O 0 U U U O,
O O N N
O 0 0
z z z H H H q c7w a � ww
CD
x
W I:.
a U
U Q
CL
0
C4
0
't+
m 0
W
A � z N o
A Q
.� O
G
m a° a° a° o � I x
a c c c E 0 a
y fi aI 0.1 W fi o o fA .0
c r o
ad o Q0
Z
LQ rw
G
U t� r � o°o o`DO o`DO ono rn � 0
fi y m fi d U U U U U U U U U U U
A
e°a
(6
d r o ol C a>
o-
Z N w
a
Q
U
0
N N N N N N N N N U
co ..-i M [� N �✓
IuIO.L
HOHad M oo N r
VKH
w
POW
MO'I
7
_ IA 77 7.o r
N
O
w o?uuds'H —
� laglp
v xaulg
O N xsuiv TUN ac° c
a 10 PUI UIV w ti c
a 01MI b w
w w)Isuly WIN
10 Pul Wy ti°_
Qn N uu?sy w E
a E
E
U oligm w
V-v 10 xaulg goy aai �' R
Isl and 13TO o
10 Mull lull 'b
a� U
KSR[V luN �=
10 pul Wd 0 0
CA s
I16Isv 0
Q
UE3I1aUIV N M �N N 7
rn
-uE0I13F' 4 v
O
.N.
WzF
N -
� O O
ox
U
O O O Cl C G1i O O O M O M O N O O O O O M O r
M V kn M O In �O [� 'cY �n O O O O M ,•r
l� r M M N O •+ N O V1 O O M _
V ri o 1 vi 7 cn M 7 N 0 N m — r
Q `t'
Q
q
q o 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 o c
.a H u9
O
C, Q
�
O C 0 Cl 0 Cl M1 o It 0 Cl l� V' r O N c O O O O O M 10 r
W C °o o rn
A r 10 CD m o v `o
Z r N 'r M
N O
5j� N
W N
Cl)
O C5 O C C 7 0 0 0 V O O d' O O O O O M M O
M v� M 'cl' c M O O V O O O O M M O
r r- M cl —
[.� M M 10 l�
w — O
A N
O sF,
Oa
1
o O
o •�
o
y p
o z
z w a,
It a
E F o
o E
Ero v
o a 0 c 0
F c 3a x Q U co
v
d o = c o X v o
3 u ° 3 a z c 3 cn i fA 3
_
d
a ro c c ^ c c o 3 c c c 0 a a r-
, a
o °� = O 'o o o o 0 0 0 0
Q' d y C4' c z 04 E
o c
o ro o o c .o C
N c W I o\ ti 0.1 E 0 0 0 0
04 U
ctl _ E W U U F E tY U U U U
U c c E a 3 c 3 o E 3 a c Er
3 c E o 3 3 3 3
U N U U aJ y aJ 'G b c '� U U U U y b aJ a) aJ U
i dH ¢ dz < d nwzddzF 'u d zzzz :
0
CL
0 0 0 0
co
c m m
p N N N N
7 bD DD bD w
W O O O O
w O O 0 = E 0 E O O O O
�a O - U o U c U U
0 N N
v aaa E U �i v o oo
� o '� �
CL. n0
.
•° .0 0 0 0
z a Q U > > °
w E o o c
CL -E
n
a y
i Cy h o o j ° i ° ° °
w o
o U o o
.E i5' .E 0 -m a ° ` °
0 In p m z ro z z
d c j
arn o
N x U m�
c a� w° w° aai aci 0 0 w° a a a. w° w° c Q.
z 3 z m Y 3 c P] a1 p] 0.1 2 m 3 v y z :° 3 y
A Y� c o Y Yyd o c ro W
= E c a`di cxd o a�C O C) j o o o o m c�tl cd � —'• c c U 0 M M
L d V z z 0 z cn x z O x � � cn rn w) an z x 0 z z 2 x x 0 Q
U
E a -0 _ _ _ W
0 �'+ A O o 0 O N 0 0 0 O O N M It 0 0 0 0 o O O O �
U w
r O 'i W r� _ O O O O M x x A O
O
cO AN v � nv v v n o o10 �o �o1010 rr- V- r
0
N
c
C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q N W N N N N N N N N N
�W-, W b � b b b •� b -O 'C 'C b b
V) > > > > > > >
> 00
42) O 40, 4° 40. N 40. 40. 42) 420 442' 410,
V'1 V7 V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V)
U -o U U U U U U U U U
r� = 0, °
En o ri; o 0 o (31, O o 0 0 0 0
co CIS t•+ CC '++ a:+ 'a+ N '�+ •�:+ '�+ '�+ '�+ 'r:+
U y U N U U U U U U U U U
.� •.�. 6J •� CJ N N Q N N N N N U
U U y U vl vJ v) N v) Cn V] h y v)
Cd Cd Cd cd Cd as CIS m Cd co
O O N 0 N N U U U N N N 0
U U a U a a a W a a a a a F%
T
U O 00 V) M O cl
C M U M O 01 O O O
•m Cd O N O p O O O N
c l ri ri M N [� VN)
CD
� cl
8 o 0 0 0
dC)
Cl)
T
V) _ O [� O
O N N 00 [ N 00 O p M
G d O 00 V) M M
YS .0 N N M r N Lr) M
W r
b ti
y 0�0 Cl N O O 00 O CD O
�O 00 O N a n O O O
-,. M
�t [� oo O) M N O
N N M M �F Lr) O kf) LO
C�j J
Cd
71 b O
U > U U > ^0
0 ,4: O 0 C O
O
U
U U 3 Cd U 3
NN Ste." W C',
In
U In
Q _N
U N N U CC" '_•'v0
'C bic
C O O 0 0 C O O 0 ,. •N 0 'G
_ C O N d
O
C C + C b d U �, 0
s� 0 +� 0 0 C O « 0 ++ 0 0 t~ 0 0.1 0
Gn d) ti -�- V� °
d p] 0 C U 0 w O D R O C a) N �i 0 4•. O U D
L G
� O U A E cU n ai y L 0 U O O O
. Y
o o <n
U
ee d to �„ L s~ °- :~ :~ 0 „ C L 3 :~ 00 CL)
'C C
C CC 7 bN ,. , U2 y� v, W LU r•„ >' t.„ U] U °O O
�7 V U N U N cn N
bb
N Cd U
d v� O G ° o 0 = ° a� > a� a °> a V2 o a� = M 0 L °� > 5 °
y n w N C N Cpy U C N L O N N 4. N �" N ° U N L 0 U ++ U N
> °
> W; k" >a 3 > >}.
L
C CO O O of) O O O U cn O 0 O ca
a 0
V1 V] U V] v) U?
CL
OA _ M 4 O
0 p O O 0 Q Q ;.o F d U H �">0 N - N
N H F
O E y CQ O O O O M O O O M M O
CQ 1 1 i i i 1 i i
r bA aLi C Z "W-+ � ti ti �W-+ Wi ti ti-, ti ti ti