HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016 HOME Program �-�MENTpF
<vQP y0G
4 N
C6 Z [Filed in Clerk's Office
20 �� MAY 01 2017
G'Qeq �.pe� KAREEMAH FOWLER
N D EV CITY CLERK,SOUTH BEND,IN
Section 3 Summary Report
Economic Opportunities for Low- and Very Low-Income Persons
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
OMB Approval No. 2529-0043
(exp. 11/30/2018)
Disbursement Agency
SOUTH BEND HOUSING AUTH(CITY OF)
1200 COUNTY-CITY BUILDING 227 W JEFFERSON BLVD, SOUTH BEND, IN 46601
35-6001201
Reporting Entity
SOUTH BEND HOUSING AUTH(CITY OF)
227 W Jefferson Blvd, SOUTH BEND, IN 46601
Dollar Amount $902,425.28
Contact Person Pamela C. Meyer
Date Report Submitted 03/29/2017
Reporting Period
Program Area Code Program Area Name
From To
01/01/2016 12/31/2016 HOME HOME Program
Part I: Employment and Training
Job Number Number of New Aggregate Total Staff Hours Number of
Category of New Hires that Are Sec. Number of Staff for Section 3 Section 3
Hires 3 Residents Hours Worked Employees Trainees
Clerical 8 7 0 0 24
Total New Hires 8
Section 3 New Hires 7
Percent Section 3 New Hires 87.5%
Total Section 3 Trainees 24
The minimum numerical goal for Section 3 new hires is 30%.
Part II: Contracts Awarded
Construction Contracts
Total dollar amount of construction contracts awarded $1,407,000.00
Total dollar amount of contracts awarded to Section 3 businesses $0.00
Percentage of the total dollar amount that was awarded to Section 3 businesses 0.0%
Total number of Section 3 businesses receiving construction contracts 0
The minimum numerical goal for Section 3 construction opportunities is 10%.
Non-Construction Contracts
Total dollar amount of all non-construction contracts awarded $96,250.00
Total dollar amount of non-construction contracts awarded to Section 3 businesses $0.00
Percentage of the total dollar amount that was awarded to Section 3 businesses 0.0%
Total number of Section 3 businesses receiving non-construction contracts 0
The minimum numerical goal for Section 3 non-construction opportunities is 3%.
Part III: Summary
Indicate the efforts made to direct the employment and other economic opportunities generated by
HUD financial assistance for housing and community development programs, to the greatest extent
feasible, toward low- and very low-income persons, particularly those who are recipients of
government assistance for housing.
Attempted to recruit low-income residents through: local advertising media, signs
Yes Prominently displayed at the project site, contacts with community organizations and public
or private agencies operating within the metropolitan area (or nonmetropolitan county) in
which the Section 3 covered program or project is located, or similar methods.
No Participated in a HUD program or other program which promotes the training or
employment of Section 3 residents.
No Participated in a HUD program or other program which promotes the award of contracts to
business concerns which meet the definition of Section 3 business concerns.
No Coordinated with Youthbuild Programs administered in the metropolitan area in which the
Section 3 covered project is located.
No Other; describe below.
Construction contracts were awarded for new construction or major rehab of single-family homes.
No construction contractors needed to hire new employees as a result of these contracts.
2016 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL
' PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION
REPORT
FOR
' THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
' & EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG)
' AND
THE ST. JOSEPH COUNTY HOUSING CONSORTIUM
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM (HOME)
4 soU T11
' PEACE aJ ti cc,
' 186
i
1
1
1
i
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes
' Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan.
91.520(a)
' This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and
executed throughout the program year.
' In South Bend during 2016, 66 households received help with housing issues: 33 homeowners were
assisted with repairs, and 33 potential homebuyers received homebuyer education. Low-mod income
homeowners received assistance with needed repairs through the following PY 2016 programs: SBHIP
' and Rebuilding Together.
' The Community Homebuyers Corporation (CHC) assisted 12 low-mod income buyers purchase their first
home.
In addition,the City of South Bend supported affordable housing efforts through four major partners:
South Bend Heritage Foundation (SBHF) and the Near Northwest Neighborhood, Inc. (NNN), the
Northeast Neighborhood Revitalization Organization (NNRO), and Habitat for Humanity of St.Joseph
County.
SBHF has developed affordable housing for the residents of South Bend for the past 40 years. SBHF
currently focuses its efforts in the Near West Side of South Bend. In 2016 SBHF completed the following
projects:
• Rental units rehabbed at 905-907 Lincolnway West;
• Single-family home rehab at 115 Garfield;
' • Solar panels installed in four(4) new construction single-family homes in Lincoln Park
SBHF projects to be completed in 2017:
• Single-family home rehab at 121 Walnut;
' • Single-family home rehab at 225 N.Taylor;
• Single-family home rehab at 816 W. Colfax;
• Single-family home rehab at 1120 W.Jefferson;
• Single-family home new construction at 915 Oak;
• Single-family home new construction at 928 Oak.
The NNRO formed in 2000 to strengthen and revitalize South Bend's Northeast Neighborhood. In 2016,
one (1) low-mod household received mortgage assistance through the NNRO's HOME-funded Mortgage
' Investment Program.
The NNN has been improving the quality of life in the Near Northwest Neighborhood for the past 20
CAPER 1
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
years.The NNN completed the following projects in 2016: ,
• Single-family home rehab at 817 Lindsey; '
• Single-family home rehab at 725 Portage;
• Single-family home rehab at 611 Leland; ,
• Single-family home rehab at 621 Scott.
NNN projects to be completed in 2017: '
• Single-family home rehab at 725 Harrison;
• Single-family home rehab at 829 Van Buren; '
• Single-family home rehab at 1125 Blaine;
• Single-family home rehab at 701 Cushing. '
Habitat for Humanity continues to be a strong partner in the affordable housing market. HOME funding
subsidized the construction of new homes in 2016:
• 601 Leland;
• 116 E. Marion (Mishawaka);
• 502 W. 6th (Mishawaka);
• 131 E. 7th (Mishawaka). '
In addition, Habitat completed the following projects:
• Single-family home rehab at 2046 Beverly; '
g Y
• Single-family home rehab at 733 S. 30th. '
Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted
with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward
meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) ,
Categories, priority levels,funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators,
units of measure,targets, actual outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the
grantee's program year goals.
CAPER 2 '
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) '
o 0 0
r v 0 M rn o 0 0 0
' v o. 0 M 00 O o O O
E 0 00 0 0 0 0 Lrn
QJ O o Ln 0 0 o m
a U
+0 p r
r`o O
rl
M rl m N O Ol c-I M
vr E
L Ln 0 M
Q O N O N O
w l a M co e-I O
cu o o O o 0 0
C O O O \ O O O
O Q O N 01 O O Ln
E N
v O o O O Ln
d U i--I rl Ln N -1 ci
U_
bA
N N
' r
Y L rH m
o
6 U_
U Q1 CD
CD 0
CD Q1
Q
w I V) a m O m O
N
-a O 'O
'a C N C N dC 0 L v (n 6 CLO CD C
° N N � O N O
N N
r ri3 7 •N L .N 7 7 ' 7 ' Vf
' v + O cn N in 7 O O C O O C O vA 4�
O 2 Q a s Ca 2 2 2 = S a O w
a
a
C U
U O E
L O co
Q
4- � L •� O L
Q v'ni vii t L u 3 Q c Z3 10 v 0n c
L C =3 41 'E Q)ca + Q) 4- + Q1 L
u N f0 ate+ Q O L } Ln E 7 O E 41
f6 4! C
'O OC O > Q1 Q1 O O L V) O +�+
0 \ oC 2 0 m 0 u _ = O Q 2 O
\ O
O \ O O O
QJ C O W O i/? O O O LL.I w O O w O
U
° m 00 0n C7 C7 co C7 rn m o o m 00 Co °o
E O M O -* N cn N N N rH O O �.O 0 N O
C
O +, v1
' T N Y N Q N In \
V) � c E Q C r'
(A v v O =3 ro °° co °D O O Q- m
a E E C > o o o c E > Q
r 0 0 0 o o o o o a v u
a = = Z U 0 a s Q = a = z u in
9
0
N V7 0
a) QJ 0 0 N
O VI V1 '0
R N
.1
Q Q O O O c Z
o
N N "ZJ N U • U U
U O
C _ 7 tio 7 to
C N N M O 4- C +L+ C 4' N Y O o
O � � m C 3 C 3 N _ U
m
0 a (O Q m -0 O a O O O O O vi
� a m a m a � o U = U = o = a LL o
0
O 0 0
O o 0 rn 0 0 '
0 O O N O O
O O O O O
l0 O Ql O O
O fN m
.q o m o 0
o o '
O tD Ln N O
c-I N N m M Lr)
o
O o o a
O l0
O O O
O O O 06
c-I Ol O Q1
M Ql
rl -I O O d' O O
-q O O �I CD
LO 0 O r
L L O N QI N O
v V) N N N N V) cn N
N n O O C O o C O O C N '
O O a Q 2 2 D S S D S S Z) a Q w
tl
v
LO 0
L
4- 2 c C �
N 6 0 O N O
Ln to p +� vni to u 'n S
i N bA bo 4J L � o N. +
a� Q
Q) `) - v o °O >
O O 2 0 = O 2 2 cc 2 2 a Q ° m
0 0
wo 0
m 0 m � C7 0 (j m � 0 m lD
0 Ln 0 r" N r" Ln O m O Ln D m
U t/)- U -/n w tn. w U cn U t) '
C
V)
O � N +
N T N o
m (U a) co [O QJ O _ O Q-
C •CZ Q1 a) "d .� .� QJ 2 m S E
L (n L In L (n I ' I O
O O E E O Z3 O C V E C E N C > a
O O O 4:: O o O O Q O p v
U Q1
Q Q S S 2 Q S Q S S Z cn Z O
cn V) o
V) D D _0 IL
o Q Q ? o
+' U n U V °tao 0 lLO ho r]A N u O ate-+ .0 E Z
> tlo C O N E C (u N O .� C co N o
p n C m O � L m O � L 0) @ C c V O v to up E
N O o o- cB LO 0 m OL 3 v O of
S a Q 2 0 0 0 rz rZ O o a. a O m a Z a E o
0 0
N o o O
'T O O 00
' O
N
m
u7 O O O N
' O
O Ln
O
m r-I 00 O N
o
\ o
o
m o � O O
eI \ O O O
O O
' O
N O O O
O
N
m
Lr) O O O m N O rl
o
O
O O u) N O rI
N ) 1 CZ c L aA= 0.0
in �n v, Ln •7
7 D 7 }' O .'.' O '' O O
' a) Ln O v) O O C o O C o O O O o C 4-1 ++ w
d Q 2 Q Z Z D T: Z: Z) Z 2 : = 2 Z) O O n_
Q
oA U
w a) c
a) _ °
U � L O L L
0 -0 U N 0 in n = V) a) a) N a)
U '+- ro Q 0 Q m a) n a) n 0) N a)
'u, m 3 ° a�i cc � > n o 0 0 o v o o a) 4-
U _
O w O t� O
O t� O l7 r o U w C7 0� C7 C7
Dooi Ln vii rn 0 ° � 0 O 0 -1 0 0
U v} w w 4-1). U tj)- V� U 2 U to U U
+>� v v v v a) +_>- 0
= o O c -O c _0 c O _C = CC _O n
L '� L N L � N C a) (7
c > E E O D o =3 O D o :D c E > d.
O o a o o tt: O t�: o tt: o tt: o o o a) v
' Z U O 2 2 Q = Q S Q = Q = z U 0
cn no °
c _ — LO
N Ln Ln 0 0
+ c O C O N
U O O N 0) O +� O 00 4- o
_ O o O o m @ O
_ = z
a1 a) OC a) to + 41 1 Q) o
N i c/i — cn _
U a) _0 C C
O M v
� Q Q L C } L L U Q m
' v a)
0::3 CC 0 Q Q In 0
rn
o '
0 o O
O � 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
N Ql Lr) c i
0
o O
O Or O
aJ '
N fo
O c-I O O 0
O
G
f6
a '
U
O a)bD
N 00 O � ++
f6
+L+
N 0 N
0 0 v) -0 -
Cu
W V N V) N � N }
tin a
Q
U
a
U U O +1 I
C C i H
m "6 m Q1 CU
Vl N d GCJ
Q
v: m aj am cu E a)
Q) � CU o >
�
O o
U
U
Q
e1
Ln O v
.D W O
r14 C)
00
D � O 'T tn N ~
U tn 2 to w w
C c o
v °J v
c E E z m '
O Z3 O- O
= E = m aj ai o
c E > c E E a
O o aj o Q o O
Z U Z cn
n
N
N O
U 0
O
C N N
� m Q1 a1 N
a)
N Lo U U p
z
Q) m N > > O
u �' Q N (n
E m 0
,C h
U 'V) C C 7 0 m
H Q I— > 0
r
1
r Assess how the jurisdiction's use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and
specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority
activities identified.
During the 2016 program year, Year Two of the 2015-2019 5-year plan, the City of South Bend and the
St.Joseph County Housing Consortium effectively used their Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG), HOME, Shelter Plus Care (SPC), and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)funds to undertake a
variety of programs, projects and activities designed to address housing and community development
rneeds throughout the City of South Bend and St.Joseph County. High priority initiatives funded with
CDBG included acquisition/rehab/resale, owner-occupied housing rehabilitation, homebuyer assistance,
' slum/blight clearance, provision of public safety services, and technical assistance. The
accomplishments of the City of South Bend and the St.Joseph County Housing Consortium were
consistent with the consolidated Plan's high-priority community development and housing objectives,
' and are presented in this report.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
' CAPER y
rOMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted '
Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted). '
91.520(a)
CDBG HOME ESG '
White 112 13 0
Black or African American 42 11 0 '
Asian 2 0 0
American Indian or American Native 2 0 0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0 0 ,
Total 158 24 0
Hispanic 13 1 0 ,
Not Hispanic 145 1 23 0
Table 2—Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds
Narrative
In addition to the CDBG beneficiaries noted in the table above, two (2) families were "African American
and White", and five (5) families identified as "Other". The total number of families assisted with 2016
CDBG funds was 165.
In addition to the HOME beneficiaries noted in the table above, one (1) family identified as "Other". The
total number of families assisted with 2016 HOME funds was 25. r
CAPER 8 '
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) ,
CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)
Identify the resources made available
Source of Funds Source Resources Made Amount Expended
Available During Program Year
CDBG 2,532,321
HOME 1,161,865
ESG 218,718
Table 3-Resources Made Available
' Narrative
The amounts indicated in the "Resources Made Available" column in the table above represent PY2016
resources ONLY. The amounts indicated in the "Amount Expended During Program Year" column
indicate dollars spent from PY2016 resources as well as resources remaining from previous program
Yea rs.
' Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments
Target Area Planned Actual Narrative Description
Percentage Percentage
of of
Allocation Allocation
Census Tract 19 1 16
' Census Tract 6 19 22
St.Joseph County Housing Consortium
City of Mishawaka 3 7 Jurisdiction
CDBG Entitlement and St.Joseph County
City of South Bend 36 47 Housing Consortium Jurisdiction
Lincoln Park Neighborhood 23 3
Northeast Neighborhood 0 1
Rum Village Neighborhood 15 4
St.Joseph County- Not South St.Joseph County Housing Consortium
Bend or Mishawaka 2 0 Jurisdiction
' Western Avenue Neighborhood 1 1 1 0 1 i
Table 4—Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments
' CAPER 9
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
Narrative '
Based on data received from HUD for the NSP1 and NSP3 programs, the areas of greatest need in the '
City of South Bend were identified as census tracts 6,4, 21, and 5,two of which are located in the Near
Northwest and Near West Side neighborhoods.The City also identified census tracts 19 and 20 as
areas of greatest need based on the data and the foreseen likelihood of foreclosures. '
Additionally, the geographic allocation of resources was based upon:
• History of the City's focus/redevelopment and support of Community
Development Corporations (CDCs)
• Areas of need per NSP determinations
• Location of most vacant and abandoned structures '
• High foreclosure rates (NSP)
• Age of housing stock
• High cost loans (NSP)
• Completing the 5-year plan as outlined in the 2015-2019 Housing and Community Development
(HCD) Plan
Mishawaka '
In 2015, the St.Joseph County Housing Consortium opted to fund housing projects in Mishawaka by r
contracting with agencies directly, rather than through the City of Mishawaka. Subsequently, PY2016
HOME funds were awarded to Habitat for Humanity for the construction of three (3) single-family '
homes in Mishawaka.
St.Joseph County
The St.Joseph County Housing Consortium received only one request for 2016 HOME funding from a St. '
Joseph County agency-the St.Joseph County Housing Authority (SJCHA). The SJCHA requested funding
for direct homebuyer assistance for its First Time Homebuyer Program. Because the program is in the
formation phase, funding to assist one (1) homebuyer was awarded. '
CAPER 10 '
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
Leveraging
' Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds),
including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any
publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the
' needs identified in the plan.
ESG match dollars come from a variety of sources including private donations,volunteer labor, and
United Way grants. HOME match dollars come from private donations,volunteer labor, land donations
and waived fees/taxes.
' In 2016 the City of South Bend's Community Homebuyers Corporation (CHC) provided $237,014 of CDBG
funds in the form of forgivable mortgage subsidies to twelve (12) families, enabling them to become
homeowners. These subsidies were leveraged with $1,024,080 in private mortgage funding. CDBG
provides the mortgage subsidy of 20%, not to exceed $19,000 of the purchase price of a home, and local
lenders represented on the CHC board pool their funds to provide the remaining dollars. CHC offers
' financing to clients that are usually not conventionally lendable. Pre- and post-purchase counseling
required for the mortgage subsidy program is a major contributing factor to its success.
Rebuilding Together(formerly known as Christmas in April) has aided homeowners in various
neighborhoods throughout the community since 1989. Rebuilding Together has built a strong
' relationship with the City of South Bend, local trades, the higher education community and the business
community, allowing the program to grow stronger and more efficient every year. In 2016, Rebuilding
Together completed home repairs for 17 households in the Rum Village neighborhood of South
' Bend. Rebuilding Together expended $134,181 in CDBG funds and it is estimated that donated labor
and materials added $96,960 and contractor discounts an additional $xxx to the project.
Fiscal Year Summary—HOME Match
' 1. Excess match from prior Federal fiscal year 2,719,773
2. Match contributed during current Federal fiscal year 394,281
3.Total match available for current Federal fiscal year(Line 1 plus Line 2) 3,114,054
4. Match liability for current Federal fiscal year 202,193
5. Excess match carried over to next Federal fiscal year (Line 3 minus Line 4) 2,911,861
Table 5—Fiscal Year Summary-HOME Match Report
CAPER 11
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
to Ln OI:t r- r- w v O Ln '
Ln 00 ° rn ° N rn O m 0 o o c1q
rH r�-4 N N m N 0000 N a) f.D
r-I ++ .0 r-I
0
D CL
m N L}
O O O O O O O O O O
O L '
O
Cjj Q
C U a1
O
m O m
LL 00 '
L Ln
O O O O O
C O H n O cD
D O -0 m 00 M
a1
L
N *' cu Q
CL
d o C N m
L
L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
m a O
h
U
LL —
�
i — 'O 0) 'o 00 w
LL � G
w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v N Q. N u
O t C. C
QJ 'a f6 In *' X ba
S vii 41 M O 4J C E
�. CL y0 O -0 3 C O d
C
Q J a o G
_C L a U
N M to I
O H O O I- O O O O O
m M U
-p
= a1 41 N r-I Ln ~
V pOp LL N +Ll CL
s
ai 00
v v m QJ C tkb
,°x U i O
~ �
Lo
w M
� v
CD Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f- 4- N M '
l0 I� O C N O 7 OA
s v N O ui u1 t0 O O v C
�n a L c-I r-I N ri I- E L t
ULL 7 ri N
0 o E c a '
o N
C fL6 0 L
dA E
O
Lo LO Lo CD lD lD to to m Q O
._� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D *;
N N N N N N N N N .f+ O
O O
v -0 m ' O r-I 0 y 'i(a N M O O M M H O M � a
O N N N N N in O N OJ uj
W
co G7 'a C
i
o
p C p O O r-I H O O r-I 0 0
0 m o
- u CL
N
m O z ,
�.. QJ N l.f) Lf1 In In CD l0 CD G U O
N _r_ r1 r-I ri ri ri c-I c-I c-I e--I W C
60 C O O u
a O a m
1
Minority Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises— Indicate the number and dollar value
of contracts for HOME projects completed during the reporting period
' Total Minority Business Enterprises White Non-
Alaskan Asian or Black Non- Hispanic Hispanic
Native or Pacific Hispanic
American Islander
Indian
Contracts
Dollar
Amount 203,500 0 0 203,500 0 0
Number 1 0 0 1 0 0
Sub-Contracts
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 Dollar
Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Women Male
Business
Enterprises
Contracts
Dollar
Amount 2,696,316 76,390 2,619,926
' Number 22 1 21
Sub-Contracts
Number 0 0 0
' Dollar
Amount 0 0 0
Table 8—Minority Business and Women Business Enterprises
Minority Owners of Rental Property—Indicate the number of HOME assisted rental property owners
and the total amount of HOME funds in these rental properties assisted
Total Minority Property Owners White Non-
Alaskan Asian or Black Non- Hispanic Hispanic
' Native or Pacific Hispanic
American Islander
Indian
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dollar
Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 9—Minority Owners of Rental Property
CAPER 13
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
Relocation and Real Property Acquisition—Indicate the number of persons displaced, the cost of
relocation payments,the number of parcels acquired, and the cost of acquisition
Parcels Acquired 0 0 ,
Businesses Displaced 0 0
Nonprofit Organizations ,
Displaced 0 0
Households Temporarily
Relocated, not Displaced 0 0 '
Households Total Minority Property Enterprises White Non-
Displaced Alaskan Asian or Black Non- Hispanic Hispanic
Native or Pacific Hispanic '
American Islander
Indian '
Number 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
Table 10—Relocation and Real Property Acquisition
L
CAPER 14 ,
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
' CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)
Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the
number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income,
moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.
' One-Year Goal Actual
Number of Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 66 0
Number of Non-Homeless households to be
' provided affordable housing units 59 53
Number of Special-Needs households to be
provided affordable housing units 9 17
1 Total 134 70
Table 11—Number of Households
One-Year Goal Actual
Number of households supported through
' Rental Assistance 43 17
Number of households supported through
The Production of New Units 38 8
Number of households supported through
Rehab of Existing Units 35 33
' Number of households supported through
Acquisition of Existing Units 8 4
' Total 124 62
Table 12—Number of Households supported
Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting
these goals.
' The PY2016 activities undertaken in calendar year 2016, and counted in the numbers above,were:
• South Bend Home Improvement Program
• Rebuilding Together
• Department of Community Investment Housing Counseling
' • Community Homebuyers Corp.
• REAL Services Aging in Place Program
• Acquisition/rehab/resale activities
• Oaklawn TBRA
• NNRO mortgage subsidy
CAPER 15
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
• ESG Shelter Operations-AIDS Ministries, the Center for the Homeless, Life Treatment Centers, '
Youth Service Bureau and the YWCA
• ESG Rapid Rehousing-AIDS Ministries and the YWCA '
• ESG TBRA-YWCA
Cumulative housing information is provided in the attached spreadsheets for each funding source. '
Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans. ,
The outcomes noted in the attached spreadsheets for each funding source indicate that the City of
South Bend and the St.Joseph County Housing Consortium are allocating funds to the activities that '
meet the priorities of the 2015-2019 HCD Plan and best serve low-mod income families in the respective
jurisdictions. As data is collected in preparation of the 2016 Action Plan, these outcomes will be
reviewed again.
Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons
served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine
the eligibility of the activity.
Number of Persons Served CDBG Actual HOME Actual ,
Extremely Low-income 24 18
Low-income 42 5
Moderate-income 72 2
Total 138 25
Table 13—Number of Persons Served ,
CAPER 16
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) '
CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c)
' Evaluate the jurisdiction's progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending
homelessness through:
' Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their
individual needs
The Continuum of Care (CoC) agencies worked together to design and implement a collaborative process
based on referrals and complementary programs and services. The process includes emergency shelter,
' transitioning to ESG or Supportive Housing Programs (SHP) funded agency programs, as well as working
within the CoC to ensure specific client needs are met appropriately. Case management services were
available in 2016 to regularly assess the needs of clients.
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons
The CoC continued to discuss and work on strategies that resulted in the following priorities:
' • Restructuring the traditional shelter system toward the Housing First model and meeting Hearth
Act priorities;
' 0 Focusing on rapid re-housing activities with ESG;
• Using two distinct approaches, one for circumstantially impoverished homeless and one for
chronically impoverished homeless, to re-house them;
• Reducing the unsheltered or precariously housed population;
• Reducing the time spent in transitional housing;
' • Joining the Balance of State CoC.
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely
low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after
being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care
facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections
programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that
address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs
' The chronically homeless, severely mentally ill, veterans, persons with HIV/AIDS,victims of domestic
' violence, and youth were moved into rapid re-housing options rather than the traditional shelter system
whenever possible.The chronic substance abuse homeless subpopulation used a traditional shelter
model with expanded services and programs.
CAPER 17
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
r
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families '
with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to
permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that '
individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals
and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were r
recently homeless from becoming homeless again
The chronically homeless, severely mentally ill, veterans, persons with HIV/AIDS,victims of domestic
violence, and youth were moved into rapid re-housing options rather than the traditional shelter system
whenever possible.The chronic substance abuse homeless subpopulation used a traditional shelter r
model with expanded services and programs.
In 2015, a team from South Bend attended the Indiana Supportive Housing Institute for the opportunity '
to learn best practices for developing housing with support services. With insight gained from the
institute, a tax credit application for a Frequent Users System Engagement (FUSE)facility to be located in
the City of South Bend, was submitted to the Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority
(IHCDA).The application/project was unanimously supported by the St.Joseph County Continuum of
Care. IHCDA announced the award of tax credits to the project in February 2016. Construction of the r
32-unit facility began in November, with completion anticipated in the fall of 2017.
The City, in partnership with the Center for the Homeless Robert L. Miller, Sr.Veteran's Center, Life '
Treatment Centers, the Veteran's Administration, and the Continuum of Care, announced on November
11, 2016 the intent to join the Mayor's Challenge to End Veteran Homelessness. All partners will r
continue their work to create the required 'By Name List' to identify at-risk veterans and connect them
with permanent housing and related services.
1
1
r
r
r
r
CAPER 18
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
' CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)
' Actions taken to address the needs of public housing
The Housing Authority of South Bend (HASB) continued to provide the residents of South Bend high
' quality services, despite challenges related to being labeled as "troubled" by HUD. HASB successes in
2016 included 95 -98%occupancy rate in its public housing program and a 100% utilization rate in the
' 2,000+ Housing Choice Vouchers it administers.
The HASB has a Board approved annual budget for 2017. HASB is also current with all HUD required
' financial submissions. In addition, in 2016 the HASB earned an exemption from a HUD physical
inspection by scoring 80%on its physical inspections.
' The HASB played a significant role in the reduction of homelessness in South Bend by assisting 107
Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) families in its rolls in the HCV Program.The Public Housing
' Program (PH) has 814 units and is consistently 95%+ leased. Three single-family homes were added to
the inventory of its public housing stock in high-income census tracks, thereby assisting the City in
promoting diversification in housing.
1 Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in
management and participate in homeownership
The local Housing Authority participates in the Family Self-Sufficiency Program (FSS). The FSS program is
a voluntary program for Section 8 participants. For the past 13 years, residents of public housing have
participated in a similar program that combines the Public Housing Authority Section 32 Program with
an Indiana State program of Individual Development Accounts (IDAs). The Section 8 Program requires
that the head of household enter a five-year contract with the PHA, during which time the family
receives supportive services through a case worker, with the goal of eventually not needing public
assistance. Any rent increases a participant pays due to increased income earnings are placed in an
' interest-bearing escrow account.The participant receives those funds when they complete their
contract.The money from the escrow account can be used for a down payment on a home, educational,
or medical expenses.
There are currently no families participating in the Public Housing Homeownership Program at the HASB
1 (now referred to as Section 32).
' Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs
The HASB during 2016 was rated as a troubled Public Housing Authority (PHA). Currently,the HASB is
' waiting the scoring of its 2016 audited Financial Assessment Submission as well its Management
Assessment (directly tied to the Financial Assessment).The HASB currently has 40 out of 50 points in the
Public Housing Assessment System's 100 point scoring system and with 50 points remaining on the
CAPER 19
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
Financial and Management areas,the HASB needs only 20 of 50 points to move out of the troubled
range.
CAPER 20
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) '
' CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)
' Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as
barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning
ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the
' return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i)
The St.Joseph County Housing Consortium will continue to encourage efforts to expand the reach of the
Human Rights Commission to the City of Mishawaka and St.Joseph County. Support for the
development efforts that improve employment prospects for low/mod income individuals is ongoing.
' Additionally, conversations are ongoing with the St.Joseph County Commissioners.
' People returning to the community from prison often need assistance in securing jobs and affordable
housing. A movement to "Ban the Box" in South Bend may open up more employment opportunities
for those re-entering the community from incarceration.
The Residential Tax Abatement program is available to potential homeowners for consideration when
thinking about homeownership.This allows a phasing in the costs that can lessen the immediate
financial burden and, coupled with the legislative property tax cap, could be critical to new
homeowners.
' The City of South Bend continues its Housing Counseling and Homebuyer Education programs. Although
not a financial mechanism, being better educated and understanding the costs and risks of
homeownership can direct individuals to an outcome that best suits them. Understanding if and when a
home purchase is a viable option is of critical importance.
Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
Program year 2016 allocations aligned with the High Priorities listed in the 2015-2019 HCD Plan and
emphasized homeownership, public improvements and technical assistance. These remained the
broader community priorities in 2016 based upon a number of issues:
• Community need exceeded available resources
• Slow economy/ high unemployment depleted existing resources, while reducing donations
' • High rate of underemployment meant homeowners lacked income to maintain housing
• High foreclosure rate was still a relevant issue
' • Large elderly population living in homes they could not maintain
• Many issues including slow economy, unemployment,foreclosures can take a toll on a person's
emotional and mental health. These types of issues could be a contributing factor
' to abuse, addiction and homelessness.
South Bend's neighborhood revitalization focus became more urgent in recent years with the onset of
1
CAPER 21
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
the national housing crisis and the resulting number of vacant and abandoned homes. This situation, '
coupled with an aging housing stock, created a challenging environment for neighborhoods and the
community. Complementary responses including acquisition/ rehabilitation,and demolition were seen '
as necessary and critical to achieving revitalization and assuring other investment. Therefore resources
were directed toward programs that addressed those activities. '
Another significant obstacle has been the reduction of State funding and the lack of availability of State
ESG funding to agencies serving the most vulnerable in St.Joseph County. There are no other resources '
to counter the reduction of these previously available funds. This hampers the ability to provide service
at the level anticipated and/or desired.The limitation of short term rental assistance dollars in the
community as compared to the need was also a major obstacle. The economy and state of '
unemployment created a greater challenge as services were sought by even more individuals and
families. t
Members of the St.Joseph County Continuum of Care (CoC) have attended meetings, over the recent
past, held by the Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority(IHCDA) and voiced concerns
about the reduction of funding from the State of Indiana. Written concerns were also submitted to
IHCDA.
Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
In 2012, the Housing Authority of South Bend (HASB), in partnership with the County Health Department '
and financial support from the City of South Bend, County Commissioners, County Health Department,
the Community Foundation of St.Joseph County, South Bend Medical Foundation, and Residence Inn by
Marriot, received a Lead Hazard Control Grant for the second time.This grant brought$2.48 Million in
resources to the County to combat the poisoning of children by lead hazards.As part of these resources,
$180,000 was used to focus on a physical and holistic approach to several additional home toxins and
safety hazards in what HUD refers to as a Healthy Homes initiative. One hundred and forty (140) homes
were targeted to address Lead and Healthy Homes hazards. Homes with children under the age of six
and children identified with elevated Blood Lead Levels were the main priority. '
Outreach and training have created more jobs by increasing the capacity of the certified contractors in
the County. Over 156 personnel, including 75 that qualified as Section 3 eligible (low income), have '
received training and certifications in Lead Hazard Abatement.The HASB has partnered with local
institutions and companies to access funds from other programs in order to assist families by completing
much needed repairs in addition to the Lead Hazard Work. The HASB continues to accept applications
and complete assessments in order to identify properties for the next LHCG Grant application.
The HASB maintains Section 8 Landlord Assistance Program whereby any resident living in a Section 8
unit that is lead contaminated and the owner refuses to bring the home into a lead safe status, is given
preference on the Public Housing waiting list for the first available unit. With 2,124 Section 8 vouchers
and a Housing Authority property 99.5%occupancy rate, these policies are seen to significantly increase '
the number of affordable housing units that are lead-safe in the City. The HASB also maintains a listing
of previous lead safe addresses at http://www.hasbonline.com/docs/safe.pdf.
CAPER 22
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) '
' Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
' Examples of the variety of mechanisms the community has employed to address poverty included the
Center for Homeless STAR (Skilled, Trained, Able, and Ready) program which incorporated job readiness,
externships,job retention, and job search assistance. Another program that assists poverty-level families
is Bridges Out of Poverty. Bridges Out of Poverty is a local program based on a nationally recognized
model that serves to educate both the low-income individual and the employer community on how to
' work together to address issues that prevent people in poverty from becoming employed.
The Employer Resource Network (ERN) is a collaboration between Michiana Bridges, the City of South
Bend, the Community Foundation and five local employers.The group has a shared desire to increase
rention in their entry-level workforce while assisting their employees solve non-workplace problems
impacting their attendanace and productivity. For an under-resourced employee lacking coping skills, a
financial safety net or family support, small problems such as car troubles or lack of child care can
escalate into lost work time or a lost job. ERN helps employees find solutions to such problems.
A Resource Navigator,trained in rapid problem resolution and with access to a wide range of
community resources, is on-site at each employer's workplace for a portion of each week and available
' the rest of hte week by phone and email.This Resource Navigator works directly with employees to
address their everyday non-workplace issues, connect to resources, and build stability. While these
services are focused on entry-level workers, they are available to all employees. In 2016 there were 245
referrals to the ERN with, 220 being unique employees served.The retention rate was reported at 100%.
In 2015,the City of South Bend, in conjunction with the City of Mishawaka, the St.Joseph County
Chamber of Commerce, IVY Tech Community College, WorkOne Development, and a number of local
businesses launched a new workforce training initiative, "Supporting Manufacturers and Regional
' Talent" (SMART). SMART assists residents in obtaining the necessary skills to participate in a wider range
of employment opportunities. Participants are trained through IVY Tech as skilled workers in
manufacturing. Smart also merges various local employer advisory boards into one council to provide a
unified local effort in job creation. In 2016, the program continued to develop a skilled workforce to
meet the needs of local manufacturers.
The St.Joseph County community was further committed to implementation of the low income
employment provisions at 24 CFR, Part 135 in the use of federal funds covered by Section 3. To that
end, the Section 3 clause is incorporated into each contract. All public works construction contracts
using such funds included Section 3 language as well. In addition, Section 3 requirements were outlined
' during the pre-construction meeting for those projects.
Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
'
Any targeted a pp roach to a geography meshes the efforts of South Bend City departments, the CDCs
and other nonprofits such as Habitat for Humanity to broadly plan and advance the effort. The CDBG,
CAPER 23
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
HOME and NSP funds targeted to the Near Westside, Near Northwest, and Northeast Neighborhood
offered an opportunity for all of these entities to work together using their areas of expertise and
educate each other on opportunities and challenges that will support the successful conclusion of the '
plan. South Bend utilized a team approach to working with its partners in implementing the
programs/projects funded through the various federal sources.The Community Investment staff '
regularly communicated with all sub-grantees, and met with those entities involved in the targeted
areas. Regularly scheduled meetings with CDCs occurred due to the nature of work and amount of
funds allocated.
Staff met with an entity upon approval of a project and prior to contracting. In addition, desktop and
on-site monitoring occurred regularly throughout the year. '
St.Joseph County Housing Consortium members were continually informed of project/program status at '
their meetings throughout the year.
The Continuum of Care, which includes the Cities of South Bend and Mishawaka, continued to meet
monthly to discuss program status and funding opportunities, and to address the broader issues of
homelessness and service in the community.
In 2015, on behalf of efforts related to the St.Joseph County CoC, the City of South Bend contracted '
with the Corporation for Supportive Housing's (CSH) National Consulting Team to explore the action
steps needed to bring the CoC into compliance with current federal guidance and regulations, and
consider the option of merging with the Balance of State (BOS). After review and consultation with CSH,
the St.Joseph County CoC unanimously approved reaching out and pursing the process to join the
Balance of State. Conversations with the BOS Board, CoC, and HUD Field Office occurred in 2016 to
begin the merger process.
Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service '
agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) '
1. Efforts to formalize the current structure of the Continuum of Care are ongoing. Monthly, as well as
special topic CoC meetings,were held throughout the year.The CoC and the IN Bos have discussed the
likelihood that St.Joseph County will continue as an independent planning council after the merger.
2.The Public Housing Authority is a member of the CoC. '
Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the '
jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a)
• Racial & Ethnic Minority Concentrations—there is minimal racial and ethnic integration across
St.Joseph County, South Bend and Mishawaka.The presence of racial/ethnic segregation
presents challenges to fair housing as segregation is linked to economic and service disparities. '
CAPER 24
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
' • Individuals with Limited English Proficiency—languages spoken across the county show
significant diversity. More than half of non-native English speakers report speaking English less
1 than very well. Limited capacity to communicate hinders access to housing and public services
that promote fair housing.
' • Protected Class Status& Unemployment—significant variation exists in the unemployment rate
of the county and cities across gender, race, and ethnicity. Unemployment has severe
implications for fair housing as it effects disposable income for household expenses.
• Housing Rental Costs—disparity exists between the salary earned by minimum wage laborers
and the fair market rent (FMR) established by HUD. The FMR for a 2-BR apartment is$714.A
minimum wage laborer must work 76 hours a week to afford the rent.
• Housing Affordability-disparity exists in the affordability of housing. Median housing values
have increased while median income has decreased.There is a disparity in the affordability of a
house across race/ethnicity with the housing prices of the area.
• Protected Class Status & Household Size -the majority of minority families have three or more
persons within their households; however, rentals are primarily 1-BR and 2-BR units. Lower
rates of home ownership among minority households suggests that large minority families may
have difficulty finding adequate rental housing with a sufficient number of bedrooms, which
' may result in overcrowding.
• Opportunities to File Fair Housing Complaints -St.Joseph County and South Bend and
Mishawaka have public ordinances to protect and enforce fair housing for residents. Lack of
awareness of these ordinances and lack of consistency in handling complaints can lead to
disparities in treatment across jurisdictions.
' • Unsupported Section 8 Vouchers- both the Housing Authority of Mishawaka and the St.Joseph
County Housing Authority report waiting lists for Section 8 Housing Voucher assistance.
• Housing Authority of South Bend -the Housing Authority of South Bend (HASB) was not
available for interview. Other interviewees referenced reduced hours of operation and services
due to financial constraints and organizational problems. Internal problems within HASB can
limit the access of residents to housing services.
• Public Transit-South Bend and Mishawaka offer public transportation for their residents.
Limited nighttime hours may restrict the commuting ability of second and third shift laborers
and limited access to public transportation outside of city limits may limit the commute and
access to services of low-mod income populations in the county.
• Denial of Mortgage Applications-an impediment to fair housing is seen in the ability of lower
income and minority households to obtain home loans.The primary causes of denial were
related to the household's income. The rate of denial for Blacks and Asians remains higher than
the rate for Whites. Hispanic households were also challenged as their denial rate has increased.
CAPER 25
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
CR-40 - Monitorin g 91.220 and 91.230 ,
Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance ,
of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs
involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning ,
requirements
On-site audits at local agencies receiving CDBG, HOME, ESG, CoC and NSP funds are scheduled per the
HCD Plan, to ensure compliance. On-site monitoring visits of sub-grantees are conducted approximately
every two years to review their internal systems and ensure compliance with applicable requirements.
A minimum of eight (8) on-site audits are completed annually. The audits are performed by two DCI '
staff members working together to review accounting procedures and program rules. These on-site
monitoring visits are in addition to the monthly desk audits completed when reviewing subrecipient
claims, constant communication on projects via phone and email, and various meetings to discuss
program issues. Each claim for payment submitted by a subrecipient requires a progress report relevant
to the goals stated in the Scope of Services. In 2016 the following on-site monitoring visits were
conducted by staff; no findings or concerns were identified:
• The Center for the Homeless (5/14/16)—ESG '
• Youth Service Bureau of St.Joseph County(5/20/16)—ESG
• YWCA North Central Indiana (6/06/16) - ESG '
• Life Treatment Centers (7/11/16) - ESG
• AIDS Ministries/AIDS Assist (7/12/16) - ESG
• Oaklawn Psychiatric Center(7/14/16)—CoC(SHRA&S+C) ,
• Near Northwest Neighborhood (12/13/2016)— HOME
• South Bend Heritage Foundation (12/15/16) - HOME
When the City of South Bend contracts with CDBG and HOME subrecipients, a memo is provided
detailing the process to engage M/WBEs. In addition, a list of M/WBEs in St.Joseph County from the
State of Indiana is provided to subrecipients. During on-site monitoring visits, evidence is requested that
attempts were made to engage M/WBEs.
Additionally, based on the size and complexity of a project/program there are regularly scheduled
meetings between staff and agencies in order to manage real time communication, check status, and
immediately address any issues/challenges that may arise.
Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d) '
Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to '
comment on performance reports.
CAPER 26
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
In accordance with regulations of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the St.
Joseph County Housing Consortium prepared a draft 2016 Consolidated Annual Performance and
Evaluation Report (CAPER) describing the Consortium's accomplishments in housing and community
development for January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016.
The draft version of the CAPER was available to the public for review and written comment from March
8 through March 22, 2017 at the following locations: all branches of the St.Joseph County and
' Mishawaka Public Libraries;the Walkerton Public Library, and New Carlisle/Olive Township Public
Library; the City of Mishawaka Planning Department office; the City of South Bend Department of
Community Investment office; and the City of South Bend City Clerk's office. The draft version of the
CAPER was also online at www.southbendin.gov. Notice of the draft CAPER's availability to the public
was published in the South Bend Tribune, the local paper of highest circulation, and El Puente, the
region's Spanish language newspaper.
No comments were received regarding the 2016 draft version of the CAPER.
After formal submission to HUD on or about March 30, 2017, the final CAPER will be made available for
public review at the above locations. The final CAPER will also be available on the City of South Bend's
' website.
CAPER 27
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c) '
Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction's program objectives 1
and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its
experiences.
The City of South Bend has not made any changes to program objectives. The goals of all programs still
align with the priorities of the 2015-2019 HCD Plan. '
Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development No '
Initiative (BEDI)grants?
[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.
i
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
CAPER 28
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
CR-50 - HOME 91.520 d
' Include the results of on-site inspections of affordable rental housing assisted under the
program to determine compliance with housing codes and other applicable regulations
Please list those projects that should have been inspected on-site this program year based upon
the schedule in §92.504(d). Indicate which of these were inspected and a summary of issues
' that were detected during the inspection. For those that were not inspected, please indicate
the reason and how you will remedy the situation.
Please list those projects that were due for onsite inspection this program year based upon the schedule
in §92.504(d). Indicate which of these were inspected and a summary of issues that were detected
during the inspection. For those that were not inspected, please indicate the reason and how you will
remedy the situation.
All HOME-assisted affordable rental housing facilities that were due for inspection in 2015 were
inspected. The following units were inspected to confirm compliance with established housing codes:
' Shamrock Estates Senior Apartments (inspected 11/2016)—5 of 10 units inspected. No required
repairs were noted; units passed inspection
' Prairie Village Apartments (Inspected 11/2016)—5 of 25 units inspected. All units passed inspection,
but it was noted that bonding jumpers must be installed on water heaters in the utility rooms.
East Bank Village Apartments (inspected 11/2015)—10 of 29 units, and common and utility areas
inspected. Required repairs are noted below:
• Unit 109: Missing sprinkler escutcheon in living room; bath ceiling repair required
• Unit 208: Caulk needed around tub
• Unit 212: Check stool for leakage at front
' Provide an assessment of the jurisdiction's affirmative marketing actions for HOME units.
92.351(b)
The following language is included in every HOME contract executed between the St.Joseph County
Housing Consortium and a subrecipient:
' "The Developer agrees to carry out the Consortium policy and procedures for affirmative marketing by
the use of community-wide publications, approved Equal Housing Opportunity logo type or slogan in any
applicable marketing of housing assisted with HOME funds, and by any other procedure delineated in
attached Appendix III, "Affirmative Marketing Procedures"
CAPER 29
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
Developers who are not in compliance with the above affirmative marketing will incur corrective actions '
as described in Appendix III (included as an attachment to this report).
Refer to IDIS reports to describe the amount and use of program income for projects,
including the number of projects and owner and tenant characteristics '
Describe other actions taken to foster and maintain affordable housing. 91.220(k) (STATES
ONLY: Including the coordination of LIHTC with the development of affordable housing).
91.320(j)
Activities such as acquisition/rehab, new construction on lots that were cleared and re-platted,
redevelopment of foreclosed and abandoned homes, mortgage subsidies for first-time homebuyers, and
providing tenant-based rental assistance to severely mentally ill individuals served to foster and
maintain affordable housing in the City of South Bend.
CAPER 30
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
' CR-60 - ESG 91.520(g) (ESG Recipients only)
ESG Supplement to the CAPER in a-snaps
For Paperwork Reduction Act
' 1. Recipient Information—All Recipients Complete
Basic Grant Information
' Recipient Name SOUTH BEND
Organizational DUNS Number 074327123
EIN/TIN Number 356001201
' Indentify the Field Office INDIANAPOLIS
Identify CoC(s) in which the recipient or South Bend/Mishawaka/St.Joseph County CoC
1 subrecipient(s)will provide ESG assistance
ESG Contact Name
Prefix Ms
First Name PAMELA
Middle Name C
Last Name MEYER
Suffix 0
Title Director
ESG Contact Address
' Street Address 1 227 W.Jefferson Boulevard
Street Address 2 0
City South Bend
State IN
ZIP Code 46601-
, Phone Number 5742355845
Extension 0
Fax Number 5742359021
Email Address pmeyer @southbendin.gov
ESG Secondary Contact
Prefix Ms
First Name Lory
Last Name Timmer
Suffix 0
Title Associate
Phone Number 5742355841
Extension 0
Email Address Ltimmer @southbendin.gov
CAPER 31
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
2. Reporting Period—All Recipients Complete
Program Year Start Date 01/01/2016 '
Program Year End Date 12/31/2016
3a. Subrecipient Form—Complete one form for each subrecipient '
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: SOUTH BEND
City:South Bend '
State: IN
Zip Code:46601, 1830
DUNS Number: 074327123 ,
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Unit of Government
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 2000
Subrecipient or Contractor Name:THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS ,
City: South Bend
State: IN
Zip Code:46601, 3102
DUNS Number:
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization '
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 32808
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: AIDS MINISTRIES/AIDS ASSIST
City: South Bend
State: IN ,
Zip Code:46634, 0582
DUNS Number: ,
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 25900
CAPER 32
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) '
' Subrecipient or Contractor Name:YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU
City:South Bend
State: IN
Zip Code: 46628, 2514
DUNS Number: 174191978
Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 60000
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: YWCA OF NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA
' City: South Bend
State: IN
Zip Code:46601, 3514
DUNS Number: 084576065
Is subrecipient a victim services provider:Y
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 58306
Subrecipient or Contractor Name: LIFE TREATMENT CENTERS
City: South Bend
State: IN
Zip Code:46613, 2214
DUNS Number: 119673408
' Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N
Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization
ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 32000
CAPER 33
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
CR-65 - Persons Assisted ,
4. Persons Served '
Please note: The number of persons served in 2016 using ESG funds, along with demographic
information, is included in the attached eCart data. Issues with HMIS data entry and data '
extraction are ongoing and in the process of being addressed/corrected.
4a. Complete for Homelessness Prevention Activities ,
Number of Persons in Total
Households ,
Adults
Children
Don't Know/Refused/Other
Missing Information
Total
Table 14—Household Information for Homeless Prevention Activities
4b. Complete for Rapid Re-Housing Activities
Number of Persons in Total
Households
Adults
Children
Don't Know/Refused/Other '
Missing Information
Total
Table 15—Household Information for Rapid Re-Housing Activities
4c. Complete for Shelter j
Number of Persons in Total
Households
Adults
Children
Don't Know/Refused/Other
Missing Information
Total
Table 16—Shelter Information '
CAPER 34
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) ,
4d. Street Outreach
Number of Persons in Total
' Households
Adults
Children
1 Don't Know/Refused/Other
Missing Information
' Total
Table 177—Household Information for Street Outreach
' 4e. Totals for all Persons Served with ESG
Number of Persons in Total
' Households
Adults
Children
Don't Know/Refused/Other
Missing Information
Total
Table 188—Household Information for Persons Served with ESG
5. Gender—Complete for All Activities
Total
' Male
Female
Transgender
Don't Know/Refused/Other
Missing Information
Total
Table Table 199—Gender Information
I
CAPER 35
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
6. Age—Complete for All Activities '
'Under 18 Total
18-24
25 and over '
Don't Know/Refused/Other
Missing Information
Total
Table 20—Age Information
7. Special Populations Served—Complete for All Activities
Number of Persons in Households '
Subpopulation Total Total Persons Total Persons Total
Served– Served–RRH Persons ,
Prevention Served in
Emergency
Shelters
Veterans
Victims of
Domestic
Violence
Elderly
HIV/AIDS
Chronically
Homeless
Persons with Disabilities: ,
Severely
Mentally III
Chronic
Substance
Abuse
Other '
Disability
Total
(unduplicated '
if possible)
Table 201—Special Population Served
CAPER 36
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
— - Assistance Provided and Outcomes
CR-70 ESG 91.520(g) ss
10. Shelter Utilization
Number of New Units- Rehabbed 0
' Number of New Units-Conversion 0
Total Number of bed-nights available 94,980
I Total Number of bed-nights provided 94,980
Capacity Utilization 100.00%
Table 212—Shelter Capacity
11. Project Outcomes Data measured under the performance standards developed in
consultation with the CoC(s)
Using ESG funds,the City of South Bend and the St. Joseph County Continuum of Care worked to reduce
the number of homeless households with children, targeting rapid re-housing and rental assistance
dollars for assistance to families.To measure the success of the CoC members' rapid re-housing
programs, clients will be contacted six months after their final ESG assistance to assess their housing
status.The CoC set a goal that at least 35%of participants assisted remain in permanent housing six
months after their final assistance.
CAPER 37
' OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
CR-75 — Expenditures ,
11. Expenditures
11a. ESG Expenditures for Homelessness Prevention
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year '
2014 2015 2016
Expenditures for Rental Assistance 0 0 0
Expenditures for Housing Relocation and
Stabilization Services-Financial Assistance 0 0 0
Expenditures for Housing Relocation &
Stabilization Services-Services 0 0 0
Expenditures for Homeless Prevention under
Emergency Shelter Grants Program 0 0 0
Subtotal Homelessness Prevention 0 0 0
Table 223—ESG Expenditures for Homelessness Prevention '
11b. ESG Expenditures for Rapid Re-Housing
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year
2014 2015 2016
Expenditures for Rental Assistance 39,156 29,478 32,848
Expenditures for Housing Relocation and
Stabilization Services- Financial Assistance 30,659 56,052 20,391
Expenditures for Housing Relocation &
Stabilization Services-Services 16,742 10,685 7,145 ,
Expenditures for Homeless Assistance under
Emergency Shelter Grants Program 0 0 0
Subtotal Rapid Re-Housing 86,557 96,215 60,384
Table 234—ESG Expenditures for Rapid Re-Housing
11c. ESG Expenditures for Emergency Shelter
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year ,
2014 2015 2016
Essential Services 0 0 7,000
Operations 120,377 98,620 130,176 ,
Renovation 0 0 0
Major Rehab 0 0 0 '
Conversion 0 0 0
Subtotal 120,377 98,620 137,176
Table 245—ESG Expenditures for Emergency Shelter ,
CAPER 38
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) '
' 11d. Other Grant Expenditures
Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year
2014 2015 2016
H M IS 8,200 0 0
' Administration 0 0 4,000
Street Outreach 0 0 0
Table 256-Other Grant Expenditures
11e. Total ESG Grant Funds
Total ESG Funds Expended 2014 2015 2016
611,529 215,134 1 194,835 201,560
Table 267-Total ESG Funds Expended
! 11f. Match Source
2014 2015 2016
Other Non-ESG HUD Funds 0 0 0
Other Federal Funds 0 0 106,447
State Government 0 0 12,752
Local Government 0 0 4,000
' Private Funds 0 0 75,311
Other 0 0 32,808
Fees 0 0 0
! Program Income 0 0 0
Total Match Amount 0 0 231,318
Table 278-Other Funds Expended on Eligible ESG Activities
11g. Total
Total Amount of Funds 2014 2015 2016
Expended on ESG
Activities
842,847 215,134 194,835 432,878
Table 289-Total Amount of Funds Expended on ESG Activities
CAPER 39
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015)
t
'
1 Q5.HMIS DQ&Participation Combined Report
5a.HMIS or Comparable
Database Data Quality Q5a
Client
Doesn't
Data not
' Data Element Know or
collected
Client
Refused
First name 0 0
Last name 0 0
SSN 142 3
Date of Birth 1 3
Race 1 3
Ethnicity 9 1
Gender 0 1402
Veteran Status 20 3
Disabling condition 0 0
Living situation(Head of 3 420
Household and Adults)
Relationship to Head of
0 1402
Household
Destination 75 58
Client location for
1 0 0
project entry
i
1
I
1
1
1
1
Combined Report Page 1
Combined Report '
Q6.Persons Served
6a.Report Validations '
Table Q6a
a.Total number of
persons served 1402 '
b. Number of adults(age
18 or over) 1078
c. Number of children
(underage 18) 320
d. Number of persons
with unknown age 4
e.Total number of
leavers 1256
f. Number of adult
leavers 982 '
g.Total number of
stayers 146
h.Number of adult
stayers 96
i. Number of veterans 102
j. Number of chronically 30
homeless persons
k. Number of adult
heads of household 0
I. Number of child heads
of household 0
m. Number of
unaccompanied youth 235
under age 25
n. Number of parenting
youth under age 25 with 0
children
6b.Number of Persons
Served Q6b
b.With d.Unknown
a.Without c.With only
Total children and household
children adults children type Yp '
a.Adults 1078 984 93 0 1
b.Children 320 0 184 136 0
c. Don't know/refused 1 0 0 0 1 ,
d.Information missing 31 01 01 0 3
e.Total 1 14021 984 27-71 136 5
Combined Report Page 2 ,
Combined Report
' Q7a.Households Served
7a.Number of
Households Served Q7a
t b.With d.Unknown
a.Without c.With only
Total children children children and household
adults type
' Total Households 1 1570 1301 96 171 2
' 7b.Point-in-Time Count
of Households on the
Last Wednesday Q7b
b.With d.Unknown
a.Without c.With only
Total children children children and household
adults type
January 63 43 17 2 1
April 67 50 12 5 0
' July 70 45 20 5 0
October 73 46 21 5 1
' Q9.Contacts and Engagements
9a.Number of Persons
Contacted Q9a
a.First b.First c.First
contact was contact was contact was d. First
Total at a place at a non- at a contact
not meant residential residential place was
for human service service missing
habitation setting setting
a1.Contacted once? 0 0 0 0 0
a2.Contacted 2-5 times? 0 0 0 0 0
a3.Contacted 6-9 times? 0 0 0 0 0
a4.Contacted 10 or
0 0 0 0 0
more times?
az.Total persons
contacted 0 0 0 0 0
Combined Report Page 3
Combined Report ,
9b.Number of Persons
Engaged Q9b ,
a.First b.First c.First
contact was contact was contact was d.First
Total at a place at a non- at a contact
not meant residential residential place was
for human service service missing
habitation setting setting '
b1. Engaged after 1
0 0 0 0 0
contact? ,
b2. Engaged after 2-5
0 0 0 0 0
contacts?
b3. Engaged after 6-9
0 0 0 0 0
contacts?
b4. Engaged after 10 or
0 0 0 0 0
more contacts?
bz.Total persons ,
0 0 0 0 1078
engaged
c.Rate of engagement N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Q10.Gender
10a.Gender of Adults Q10a ,
a.Without b.With c. Unknown
Total children children and household
adults type
a. Male 93 1 0 0
b. Female 0 0 0 0 ,
c.Transgender male to
0 0 0 0
female
d.Transgender female
0 0 0 0
to male
e.Doesn't identify as
male,female,or 0 0 0 0
transgender
f. Don't know/refused 0 0 0 0
g. Information missing 01 0 320 184
h.Subtotal 1 1361 0 320 184
Combined Report Page 4
Combined Report
10b.Gender of Children Q10b
a.With c.Unknown
b.With only
Total children and children household
adults type
a. Male 136 0 0 0
b. Female 0 0 0 0
c.Transgender male to
0 0 0 0
female
d.Transgender female 0 0 0 0
to male
e. Doesn't identify as
male,female,or 0 0 0 0
transgender
f. Don't know/refused 0 0 0 0
g. Information missing 0 0 0 0
h.Subtotal 0 0 0 0
' 10c.Gender of Persons
Missing Age
Information Q10c
b.With d.Unknown
a.Without c.With only
Total children children and household
children adults type
' a. Male 4 0 0 0 4
b.Female 4 0 0 0 4
c.Transgender male to 0 0 0 0 0
female
d.Transgender female
0 0 0 0 0
' to male
e. Doesn't identify as
male,female,or 0 0 0 0 0
transgender
f. Don't know/refused 0 0 0 0 0
g.Information missing 0 0 0 0 0
h.Subtotal 0 0 01 0 0
Combined Report Page 5
Combined Report '
10d.Gender by Age
Ranges Q1.Od
e.Client
Total
a.Underage b.Age 18-24 c.Age 25-61 d.Age 62 Doesn't f.Data not
,
18 and over Know/Client collected
Refused
a. Male 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b. Female 0 0 0 0 0 1402 322
c.Transgender male to
125 911 40 1 3 1402 322
female
d.Transgender female ,
125 911 40 1 3 82 0
to male
e. Doesn't identify as
male,female,or 81 1 0 87 0 79 8
transgender
f. Don't know/refused 0 151 0 24 127 0 127
g. Information missing 105 22 0 0 263 220 42
h.Total 0 1 2451 223 22 0 0
Q11.Age Q11
b.With d.Unknown
a.Without C.With only
Total children children children and household '
adults type
a. Under 5 257 250 7 0 0
b.5-12 146 146 0 0 0 ,
c. 13-17 40 40 0 0 0
d. 18-24 1 0 0 0 1
e.25-34 3 0 0 0 3 '
f.35-44 1402 984 2771 136 5
g.45-54 763 603 93 66 1
h.55-61 572 338 174 56 4
i.62+ 1 1 0 01 0
j.Don't know/refused 12 11 0 1 0
k. Information missing 4 4 0 0 0 j
I.Total 46 23 101 13 0
Combined Report Page 6
' Combined Report
' Q12.Race&Ethnicity
12a.Race Q12a
b.With d. Unknown
children children
1 Total a.Without children and c'With only household
adults type
pe
a.White 1 1 01 0 0
' b. Black or African
3 3 0 0 0
American
c.Asian 1402 984 277 136 5
d.American Indian or
Alaska Native 1328 934 268 124 5
e. Native Hawaiian or
64 41 9 14 0
1 Other Pacific Islander
f. Multiple races 9 9 0 0 0
g. Don't know/refused 1 1 0 0 0
h. Information missing 14021 985 277 138 5
i.Total 2031 123 301 50 0
12b.Ethnicity Q12b
b.With d.Unknown
children
Total a.Without children and C.With only household
children adults type
a. Non-Hispanic/non-
74 70 3 1 0
Latino
b.Hispanic/Latino 131 108 4 19 0
' c. Don't know/refused 100 94 1 5 0
d. Information missing 169 100 23 46 0
e.Total 1 211 211 0 01 0
i
1
t
i
Combined Report Page 7
Combined Report
Q13. Physical and Mental Health Conditions
13a1.Physical and ,
Mental Health
Conditions at Entry Q13a1
b.With d.Unknown t
Total a.Without c.With only
persons children children and children household
adults type
a. Mental illness 47 29 15 3 0 '
b.Alcohol abuse 84 72 11 1 0
c. Drug abuse 192 115 23 54 0
d. Both alcohol and drug
69 66 2 1 0
abuse
e.Chronic health
condition 178 154 3 21 0
f. HIV/AIDS and related
106 97 0 9 0
diseases
g. Developmental '
141 84 20 37 0
disability
h. Physical disability 14 14 0 0 0
13b1.Physical and
Mental Health
Conditions of Leavers Q13b1
b.With d.Unknown
Total a.Without C.With only
persons children
children and children household ,
adults type
a. Mental illness 43 23 11 9 0
b.Alcohol abuse 72 61 10 1 0 '
c. Drug abuse 32 24 7 1 0
d. Both alcohol and drug 13 12 1 0 0
abuse
e.Chronic health
12 8 1 3 0
condition
f.HIV/AIDS and related
10 9 1 0 0
diseases
g.Developmental
23 15 4 4 0
disability
h. Physical disability 6 6 0 0 0 '
I
Combined Report Page 8 ,
' Combined Report
' 13c1.Physical and
Mental Health
Conditions of Stayers Q13c1
' b.With d. Unknown
Total a.Without c.With only
children and household
persons children adults children type
' a. Mental illness 8 6 2 0 0
b.Alcohol abuse 21 20 1 0 0
c. Drug abuse 59 29 29 0 1
1 d. Both alcohol and drug 701 637 64 0 0
abuse
e.Chronic health
1 1 0 0 0
condition
f. HIV/AIDS and related
317 317 0 0 0
diseases
g. Developmental
1078 984 93 0 1
disability
h. Physical disability 24 12 11 0 1
Q14.Domestic Violence
14a.Persons with
' Domestic Violence
History Q14a
b.With d.Unknown
children child
' Total a.Without children and C.With children only household
adults ren type
a.Yes 28 15 13 0 0
b. No 3 2 1 0 0
c. Don't know/refused 4 0 4 0 0
' d. Information missing 59 29 29 0 1
e.Total 0 01 0 0 0
14b.Persons Fleeing
Domestic Violence Q14b
' b.With d.Unknown
a.Without c.With only
Total children children and household
children adults type
a.Yes 141 119 22 0 0
b. No 14 12 2 0 0
c. Don't know/refused 103 99 3 0 1
d. Information missing 111 8 3 01 0
e.Total 01 0 0 01 0
Combined Report Page 9
Combined Report '
Q15.Living Situation Q15 '
b.With d.Unknown
Total a.without children and c.children With only household
children adults t ,
Yp e
a.Homeless situations '
a1. Emergency shelter 0 0 0 0 0
a2.Transitional housing
12 12 0 0 0
for homeless persons ,
a3. Place not meant for
human habitation
24 24 0 0 0
a4.Safe haven 16 16 0 0 0
a5. Interim housing 36 36 0 0 0
az.Total 14 11 0 13 0
b.Institutional settings
b1. Psychiatric facility 0 0 0 0 0
b2.Substance abuse or
89 89 0 0 0
detox center
b3. Hospital(non
0 0 0 0 0 '
psychiatric)
b4.Jail,prison or
4 4 0 0 0
juvenile detention
B. Foster care home or '
0 0 0 0 0
foster care group home
b6. Long-term care '
0 0 0 0 0
facility or nursing home
b7.Residential project
or halfway house with 32 31 1 0 0
no homeless criteria
bz.Total 0 0 0 0 0
Combined Report Page 10
' Combined Report
c.Other locations
' c01. PH for homeless
12 10 2 0 0
persons
c02.Owned by client,no 23 14 9 0 0
' subsidy
c03.Owned by client, 111 96 15 0 0
with subsidy
' c04. Rental by client,no 147 113 34 0 0
subsidy
c05. Rental by client, 3 1 2 0 0
' with VASH subsidy
c06. Rental by client,
379 379 0 0 0
with GPD TIP subsidy
' c07.Rental by client, 711 648 63 0 0
with other subsidy
c08. Hotel or motel paid
1069 975 93 0 1
by client
c09.Staying or living 213 0 186 5 0
with friend(s)
c10.Staying or living
6 1 0 0 0
with family
c11. Don't know/ 0 0 1 0 0
refused
c12. Information missing 3 0 6 297 0
cz.Total 79 44 0 11 13
' d.Total 01 11 0 01 0
Q20.Non-Cash Benefits
20a.Type of Non-Cash
Benefit Sources Q20a
At Latest
Annual At Exit for
At entry
Assessment Leavers
for Stayers
a.Supplemental
Nutritional Assistance 13 0 2
Program
' b.WIC 0 0 0
c.TANF Child Care 5 0 5
services
d.TANF transportation 141 0 65
services
' e.Other TANF-funded
0 0 0
services
If.Other source 0 01 0
' Combined Report Page 11
Combined Report 1
Q21.Health Insurance Q21 1
At Latest ,
At entry Annual At Exit for
Assessment Leavers
for Stayers
a. MEDICAID health '
266 0 335
insurance
b. MEDICARE health '
insurance 19 0 5
c.State Children's Health
4
Insurance 02 6 272
d.VA Medical Services 0 140 0 ,
e. Employer-provided
478 0 150
health insurance
f. Health insurance
through COBRA 22 0 8
g. Private pay health
829 806 23
insurance
h.State Health
77 67 10
Insurance for Adults
i. Indian Health Services ,
5
Program 0 41 9
j.Other 52 49 3
k. No health insurance 222 190 32 '
I.Client doesn't
48 37 11
know/Client refused
m. Data not collected 78 32 46
n. Number of adult
stayers not yet required
33 27 6
to have an annual
assessment
o. 1 source of health
9
insurance 6 3
p. More than 1 source of
health insurance 4 1 3
1
i
1
1
1
Combined Report Page 12 '
Combined Report
1 Q22.Length of Participation
Q22a2.Length of
Participation—ESG
projects Q22a2
Total Leavers Stayers
a.0 to 7 days 0 0 0
b.8 to 14 days 0 0 0
c. 15 to 21 days 0 0 0
d.22 to 30 days 0 0 0
' e.31 to 60 days 1402 1256 146
f.61 to 90 days 12 12 0
g.91 to 180 days 0 0 0
h. 181 to 365 days 0 0 0
i.366 to 730 days(1-2
0 0 0
yrs.)
j.731 to 1095 days(2-3
y 0 0 0
yrs.)
k. 1096 to 1460 days(3
0 0 0
L 4 yrs.)
I. 1461 to 1825 days(4-5
yrs.) 0 0 0
' m. More than 1825 days
0 0 0
(>5 yrs.)
n. Information missing 0 0 0
o.Total 0 0 0
Q22c.RRH Length of
Time between Project
Entry Date and
Residential Move-in
Date Q22c
b.With d.Unknown
children
Total a.Without children and c.With only household
children adults type
a.0-7 days 0 0 0 0 0
b.8-14 days 0 0 0 0 0
' c. 15-21 days 14 2 7 1 4
d.22 to 30 days 26 14 7 1 4
e.31 to 60 days 829 708 39 81 1
' f.61 to 180 days 77 33 20 24 0
g. 181 to 365 days 50 27 121 11 0
h.366 to 730 days(1-2
52 26 12 14 0
Yrs.)
i.Data Not Collected 222 123 96 3 0
j.Total 48 23 25 0 0
' Combined Report Page 13
Combined Report '
Q22d.Length of
Participation by
Household type Q22d
a.Without
b.With c.With only d. Unknown
children '
Total children and household
children adults type
,a.0 to 7 days 78 28 46 0 4
b.8 to 14 days 33 10 23 0 0
c. 15 to 21 days 9 5 4 0 0 '
d.22 to 30 days 4 1 0 3 0
e.31 to 60 days 0 0 01 0 0
f.61 to 90 days 0 0 0 0 0
g.91 to 180 days 0 0 0 0 0
h. 181 to 365 days 0 0 0 0 0
i. 366 to 730 days (1-2 1402 984 277 136 5
yrs.)
j. 731 to 1095 days (2-3
0 0 0 0 0
yrs.)
k. 1096 to 1460 days (3- 0 0 0 0 0
4 yrs.)
I. 1461 to 1825 days(4-5 0 0 0 0 0
yrs.)
m. More than 1825 days 0 0 0 0 0
(>5 yrs.)
n. Information missing 1 3 3 0 0 0 '
o.Total 0 0 01 01 0
Combined Report Page 14 '
' Combined Report
' Q23.Exit Destination—
More than 90 Days Q23
' b.With d.Unknown
a.Without c.With only
Total children children and household
children adults type
a.Permanent
destinations
a01.Moved from one
' HOPWA funded project 0 0 0 0 0
to HOPWA PH
a02.Owned by client, no
0 0 0 0 0
' ongoing subsidy
a03.Owned by client,
0 0 0 0 0
with ongoing subsidy
' a04. Rental by client,no 0 0 0 0 0
ongoing subsidy
a05. Rental by client,
3 3 0 0 0
VASH subsidy
' a06. Rental by client,
with GPD TIP housing 0 0 0 0 0
subsidy
a07. Rental by client,
0 0 0 0 0
other ongoing subsidy
' a08. Permanent housing 1 1 0 0 0
for homeless persons
a09.Staying or living
with family,permanent 0 0 0 0 0
tenure
a10.Staying or living
with friends, permanent 0 0 0 0 0
tenure
az.Total 0 0 0 n
Combined Report Page 15
Combined Report '
b.Temporary
destinations '
bl.Emergency shelter 0 0 0 0 0
b2.Moved from one
HOPWA funded project 0 0 0 0 0
to HOPWA TH
b3.Transitional housing
1 1 0 0 0 I
for homeless persons
b4.Staying with family,
0 0 0 0 0 '
temporary tenure
B.Staying with friends, 0 0 0 0 0
temporary tenure ,
b6.Place not meant for
human habitation 0 0 0 0 0
167.Safe Haven 0 0 0 0 0 '
b8.Hotel or motel paid
0 0 0 0 0
by client
bz.Total 0 0 0 0 0
c. Institutional settings
c1.Foster care home or
group foster care home 0 0 0 0 0
c2.Psychiatric hospital '
or other psychiatric 0 0 0 0 0
facility
c3.Substance abuse
treatment facility or 0 0 0 0 0
detox center
c4.Hospital or other
residential non- '
psychiatric medical 0 0 0 0 0
facility
c5.Jail,prison or '
juvenile detention 0 0 0 0 0
facility
c6.Longterm care '
0 0 0 0 0
facility or nursing home
cz.Total 0 0 C 0 0
Combined Report Page 16
Combined Report
' d.Other destinations
d1. Residential project
or halfway house with 4 4 0 0 0
no homeless criteria
d2. Deceased 0 0 01 0 0
d3.Other 0 0 0 0 0
' d4. Don't know/refused 3 3 0 0 0
d5. Information missing 0 0 0 0 0
dz.Total 40 311 91 0 0
e.Total 0 01 01 0 0
Q23a.Exit
Destination—All
persons Q23a
b.With d.Unknown
children
Total a.Without children and c'With only household
children adults type
a.Permanent
destinations
t a01. Moved from one
HOPWA funded project 34 7 27 0 0
to HOPWA PH
a02.Owned by client,no 6 4 2 0 0
ongoing subsidy
a03.Owned by client,
42 13 4 25 0
with ongoing subsidy
' a04. Rental by client,no 6 6 0 0 0
ongoing subsidy
a05.Rental by client, 131 64 42 25 0
' VASH subsidy
a06. Rental by client,
with GPD TIP housing 0 0 0 0 0
e subsidy
a07.Rental by client, 28 26 1 1 0
other ongoing subsidy
' a08.Permanent housing 0 0 0 0 0
for homeless persons
a09.Staying or living
' with family,permanent 178 90 86 2 0
tenure
a10.Staying or living
' with friends,permanent 203 108 45 50 0
tenure
az.Total 99 79 18 2 0
Combined Report Page 17
Combined Report '
b.Temporary
destinations '
b1.Emergency shelter 1 1 0 0 0
b2.Moved from one
HOPWA funded project 3 3 0 0 0 '
to HOPWA TH
b3.Transitional housing
for homeless persons 523 318 150 55 0 '
b4.Staying with family,
0 0 0 0 0 ,
temporary tenure
B.Staying with friends,
15 1 0 14 0 '
temporary tenure
b6.Place not meant for 15 7 0 8 0
human habitation
V.Safe Haven 266 266 0 0 0
b8.Hotel or motel paid 9 4 0 5 0
by client
bz.Total 9 2 0 7 0
c.Institutional settings
c1.Foster care home or '
group foster care home 315 281 0 34 0
c2.Psychiatric hospital
or other psychiatric 0 0 0 0 0
facility
c3.Substance abuse '
treatment facility or 1 1 0 0 0
detox center
c4.Hospital or other
residential non- '
psychiatric medical 1 1 0 0 0
facility
c5.Jail,prison or
juvenile detention 5 2 0 3 0
facility
c6.Longterm care '
66 57 1 8 0
facility or nursing home
Combined Report Page 18
Combined Report
cz.Total 205 175 2.9 0 1
d.Other destinations
d1.Residential project
or halfway house with 1247 899 222 125 1
' no homeless criteria
d2.Deceased 0 0 0 0 0
d3.Other 0 0 0 0 0
d4.Don't know/refused 0 0 0 0 0
' d5. Information missing 0 0 0 0 0
dz.Total 0 0 0 0 0
e.Total 0 0 01 01 0
' Q23b. Homeless
Prevention Housing
' Assessment at Exit Q23b
b.With d.Unknown
children children
Total a.Without children and c'With only household
' adults type
a.Able to maintain the
' housing they had at
project entry--Without a 0 0 0 0 0
subsidy
b.Able to maintain the
' housing they had at
project entry--With the 0 0 0 0 0
subsidy they had at
project entry
c.Able to maintain the
housing they had at
project entry--With an
0 0 0 0
on-going subsidy
acquired since project
entry
id.Able to maintain the
housing they had at
' project entry--Only with 0 0
financial assistance
other than a subsidy
e. Moved to new
housing unit--With on- 0 0
going subsidy
f.Moved to new housing
unit--Without an on- 0
going subsidy
' g.Moved in with
family/friends on a 0
temporary basis
h.Moved in with
1 family/friends on a 0 0 0 0 0
permanent basis
Combined Report Page 19
Combined Report 1
L Moved to a
transitional or 1
temporary housing 0 0 0 0 0
facility or program
j.Client became ,
homeless-moving to a
shelter or other place 0 0 0 0 0
unfit for human 1
habitation
I
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
i
1
1
Combined Report Page 20 1
' Combined Report
k.Client went to
0 0 0 0 0
jail/prison
I.Client died 0 0 0 0 0
m.Client doesn't
' 0 0 0 0 0
know/Client refused
n. Data not collected(no
exit interview 4 4 0 0 0
completed)
o.Total 0 0 0 0 0
Q24. Exit Destination—
90 Days or Less Q24
b.With d.Unknown
a.Without C.With only
Total children children and household
children adults type
a.Permanent
destinations
a01. Moved from one
HOPWA funded project 1 1 0 0 0
' to HOPWA PH
a02.Owned by client,no
0 0 0 0 0
ongoing subsidy
a03.Owned by client,
with ongoing subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
a04. Rental by client,no 0 0 0 0 0
ongoing subsidy
a05. Rental by client,
VASH subsidy 5 5 0 0 0
a06. Rental by client,
with GPD TIP housing 0 0 0 0 0
subsidy
a07. Rental by client,
0 0 0 0 0
other ongoing subsidy
a08.Permanent housing 0 0 0 0 0
for homeless persons
a09.Staying or living
with family,permanent 0 0 0 0 0
' tenure i
a10.Staying or living
with friends,permanent 0 0 0 0 0
tenure
az.Total 0 01 0 0
Combined Report Page 21
Combined Report '
b.Temporary
destinations ,
b1.Emergency shelter 0 0 0 0 0
b2.Moved from one
HOPWA funded project 0 0 0 0 0 I
to HOPWA TH
b3.Transitional housing 0 0 0 0 0
for homeless persons
b4.Staying with family, 0 0 0 0 0
temporary tenure '
B.Staying with friends, 0 0 0 0 0
temporary tenure '
b6.Place not meant for
0 0 0 0 0
human habitation
b7.Safe Haven 0 0 0 0 0
b8.Hotel or motel paid 0 0 0 0 0
by client
bz.Total 0 0 0 0 0
c.Institutional settings
c1.Foster care home or
0 0 0 0 0
group foster care home
c2.Psychiatric hospital
or other psychiatric 0 0 0 0 0
facility
c3.Substance abuse
treatment facility or 0 0 0 0 0
detox center
c4.Hospital or other
residential non- 0 0 0 0 0
psychiatric medical
facility
c5.Jail,prison or
juvenile detention 0 0 0 0 0
facility
c6.Longterm care '
0 0 0 0 0
facility or nursing home
cz.Total 0 0 0 0 0
Combined Report Page 22
' Combined Report
' d.Other destinations
d1.Residential project
or halfway house with 5 5 0 0 0
no homeless criteria
' d2. Deceased 4 4 0 0 98
d3.Other 97 1 0 953 863
' d4. Don't know/refused 89 1 20 17 3
d5. Information missing 0 3 3 0 0
' dz.Total 1078 984 931 1 31
e.Total 29 21 01 0 1059
' 25a.Number of
Veterans Q25a
b.With c.Unknown
a.Without
Total children children and household
adults type
a.Chronically homeless
veteran 642 280 132 5
b. Non-chronically
0 0 0 0
homeless veteran
c. Not a veteran 0 312 311 0
d.Client Doesn't
1 0 1402 982
Know/Client Refused
e. Data Not Collected 282 1331 5 0
f.Total 01 01 0 0
1 Q26b.Number of
Chronically Homeless
Persons by Household Q26b
b.With d. Unknown
a.Without c.With only
Total children children and household
children adults type
YP
a.Chronically homeless 0 0 0 0 0
b. Not chronically 0 0 0 0 0
homeless
C.Client Doesn't
0 0 0 0 0
Know/Client Refused
d. Data Not Collected 0 0 01 0 0
e.Total 0 0 01 01 0
I
' Combined Report Page 23
t
t
2016 YWCA Caper Report - St. Joseph County
Rapid Rehousing- Emergency Shelter- Dual,
Total Persons Served Self-Sufficiency DV, DV Lethality, SA, SU Total
Adults 56 594 650
' Children 56 1 342 398
Unknown 3 1 4
Total 115 937 1052
' Gender Adults Children Total
Male 4 188 192
Female 644 210 854
Unknown 6 0 6
[To ta I 654 398 1052
Rapid Rehousing- Emergency Shelter- Dual,
Self-Sufficiency DV, DV Lethality, SA, SU
Veterans 0 11
DV Victim 44 468
' Elderly 5 14
HIV/AIDS 0 0
Chronically Homeless 0 0
Substance Use 0 261
Disability 0 0
' Mentally III 5 56
Age Adults Children
Under 18 0 398
18-24 111 0
25 and Over 539 0
' Unknown 0 4
Total 650 402
' Race
American Indian 2
Asian 4
Black 449
Native American 4
' White 545
Multi-Racial 1
Unknown 47
Total 1052
1
ENTpF Office of Community Planning and Development DATE: 03-30-17
QP "0 U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development TIME: 16:00
Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 1
yoG IIIIIIII �� PR26-CDBG Financial Summary Report
Program Year 2016
9eAN DE`1E16 e SOUTH BEND,IN
' PART I: SUMMARY OF CDBG RESOURCES
01 UNEXPENDED CDBG FUNDS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 2,915,500.52
02 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 2,349,108.00
'03 SURPLUS URBAN RENEWAL 0.00
04 SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN FUNDS 0.00
05 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 25,167.27
05a CURRENT YEAR SECTION 108 PROGRAM INCOME(FOR SI TYPE) 0.00
06 FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LINE-OF-CREDIT 0.00
06a FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LOCAL CDBG ACCOUNT 0.00
07 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AVAILABLE 38,063.60,
t08 TOTAL AVAILABLE(SUM,LINES 01-07) 5,327,839.39
PART II: SUMMARY OF CDBG EXPENDITURES
09 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER THAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 2,117,743.85
10 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT (39,154.08)
'11 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT(LINE 09+LINE 10) 2,078,589.77
12 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 474,637.90
13 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS 0.00
14 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 13,004.27
'15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES(SUM,LINES 11-14) 2,566,231.94
16 UNEXPENDED BALANCE(LINE 08-LINE 15) 2,761,607.45
PART III:LOWMOD BENEFIT THIS REPORTING PERIOD
'17 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS 0.00
18 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD MULTI-UNIT HOUSING 68,161.52
19 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW/MOD ACTIVITIES 1,793,505.68
20 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT 19,166.67
21 TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT(SUM,LINES 17-20) 1,880,833.87
22 PERCENT LOW/MOD CREDIT(LINE 21/LINE 11) 90.49%
LOW/MOD BENEFIT FOR MULTI-YEAR CERTIFICATIONS
23 PROGRAM YEARS(PY)COVERED IN CERTIFICATION PY:2016 PY: PY:
'24 CUMULATIVE NET EXPENDITURES SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT CALCULATION 0.00
25 CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES BENEFITING LOW/MOD PERSONS 0.00
26 PERCENT BENEFIT TO LOW/MOD PERSONS(LINE 25/LINE 24) 0.00%
PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE(PS)CAP CALCULATIONS
'27 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES 98,002.25
28 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 0.00
29 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 4,561.45
30 ADJUSTMENTTO COMPUTE TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS 0.00
,31 TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS(LINE 27+LINE 28-LINE 29+LINE 30) 93,440.80
32 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 2,349,108.00
33 PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 170,961.60
34 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP 9,615.86
,35 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP(SUM,LINES 32-34) 2,529,685.46
36 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PS ACTIVITIES(LINE 31/LINE 35) 3.69%
PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION(PA)CAP
'37 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 474,637.90
38 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 0.00
39 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 118,804.60
40 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS 13,004.27
1 TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS(LINE 37+LINE 38-LINE 39+LINE 40) 368,837.57
2 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 2,349,108.00
43 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 25,167.27
44 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP 0.00
F5 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP(SUM,LINES 42-44) 2,374,275.27
6 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PA ACTIVITIES(LINE 41/LINE 45) 15.53%
APPENDIX IIl
ST.JOSEPH COUNTY HOUSING CONSORTIUM
AFFIRMATIVE MARKETING PROCEDURES
t
The HOME program, as defined in 24 CFR Part 92,requires participating jurisdictions to design a
' statement of policy and procedures to be followed to meet the requirements for affirmative marketing of
HOME-assisted housing containing 5 or more units as directed in 24 CFR 92.351. The following will serve as
that policy.
The policies and procedures specified below will pertain to the marketing of units in HOME projects, I
for both initial and subsequent tenants,with availability of such units. It is the policy of the St.Joseph County
Housing Consortium to ensure good faith efforts to provide information to and attract eligible persons from all k
t racial, ethnic,and gender groups in the housing market area to the housing available. F
1. To inform the public of the St.Joseph Housing Consortium affirmative marketing policy,the Equal
Housing Opportunity logo or slogan will be used in media announcements regarding the availability of
' Draft or Proposed Housing&Community Development Plans,these notices will appear in the South
Bend Tribune. The affirmative marketing policy and fair housing laws will be addressed whenever a
public meeting is held to describe the general HOME program.
' 2. The Consortium contracts will,individual member jurisdictions,not-for-profit groups,or other eligible 1
agencies to carry out the individual programs. Contracts with participating HOME organizations
include a copy of this policy and include language requiring the organizations to follow the
procedures. These participating organizations then have a responsibility to carry out the Consortium's
' policy by ensuring:
A. Tenants in units to be rehabilitated are to be informed of the fair housing laws at tine same
time the participating organization informs them of its tenant assistance policy. e
' B. The application for funding fort, will inform the applicant/owners of the affirmative
marketing policy and fair housing laws when applying for funds through HOME. i
C. Compliance with the conditions of the affirmative marketing procedures will be required by a
written agreement between the Consortium and the participating organization and, if ,
1 necessary,between the participating organization and the owner. Said agreement shall be
applicable for a period of 5,10, 15 or 20 years(in accordance with the requirements set out in
24 CFR 92.252(a)(5) beginning on the date on which all the units in the project are E
completed.
E
D. By virtue of the contractual agreements, the applicants/owners must agree to comply with
Equal Opportunity requirements applicable to the HOME activities. Specifically, the
applicant agrees to comply with:
' (1) Title VI,Civil Rights Act of 1964,which provides that no person in the United States
shall on the grounds of race,color,or national origin be excluded from participation
in,be denied the benefits of,or be subjected to discrimination under any program or l
' activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
(2) Title VIII,Civil Rights Act of 1968,which provides for fair housing throughout the
United States. Kinds of discrimination prohibited:refusal to sell,rent,or negotiate, i
' or otherwise to make unavailable;discrimination in tenns,conditions and privileges;
block-busting; discrimination in financing and discrimination in membership in
multi-listing services and real estate brokers organization. Discrimination is a
prohibited on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex and national origin. The
' Secretary of HUD (and participating jurisdictions) shall administer programs and
a
5
16
1
activities relating to housing and urban development in a manner affirmatively to
further the policies of this Title.
(3) Executive Order 11063, which requires equal opportunity in housing and related
facilities provided by Federal financial assistance,
(4) The prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of age under the Age 'l
Discrimination Act of 1975, 42 U.S.C. 6101-07, and the prohibition against
discrimination against handicapped individuals under Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973,29 U.S.C. 794.
(5) The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988,which prohibits discrimination in the
sale or rental of housing on the basis of a handicap or because there are children in a
family.
E. Applicants/Owners with Five(5) or more HOME assisted units under this contract, are
required to use the Equal Housing Opportunity logo type or slogan in all press releases, €
advertisements, written communications to fair housing and other groups, and any other
marketing material advertising the availability of units assisted under the HOME program,
F. Applicant/Owners are required to advertise in the South Bend Tribune. In addition,as well as
making appropriate steps to notify neighborhood publications,churches,and neighborhood
centers in order to affirmatively market and solicit applications from persons in the market '
area needing special outreach. They still need also notify the applicable Housing Authority of
any units which become available.
G. To determine if good faith efforts have been made by applicant/owners regarding affirmative
marketing, the Consortium will require applicant/owners to maintain records of potential i
tenants with regard to sex,age, race,handicap or familiar status and method by which they
were referred. This information will be reviewed on an annual basis at the time of the annual
inspection. If the Consortium fords that the required actions have been carried out as
specified,it will assume that good faith efforts have been made,
H. To determine the results of affirmative marketing efforts,the Consortium will examine those
efforts in relation to whether or not persons from the variety of racial and ethnic groups have
become tenants in our HOME assisted units. If the Consortium finds that a variety is
represented, it will assume that owners have made good faith efforts to carry out the 1
procedures.
I. Technical assistance will be solicited from the Housing Specialist of the South Bend Human
Rights Commission for improvements to these procedures.
J. Any applicant/owner that does not comply with the policies and procedures set forth will have
the following corrective action(s)taken against them:
(1) Any forgivable portion of the lien will not be forgiven and will be immediately due
and payable.
(2) Landlords charged with complaints will have to appear before the South Bend
Human Rights Commission and follow the normal course of actions.
(3) They will be denied future participation in the HOME program.
t
17 ,
1
DIRECT LOANS - MONTHLY PAYMENTS
ADDRESS ZIP ORIGINAL BALANCE STATUS
' INVESTMENT
1*** W Thomas 46601 37,000.00 9,654.25 Monthly Pmts
8** S 29th St 46615 6,950.00 69.88 Monthly Pmts
9** Fairway 46619 14,550.00 278.65 Monthly Pmts
2** E Calvert 46613 9,750.00 455.59 Monthly Pmts
' 7** E Haney 46613 4,000.00 3,009.00 Monthly Pmts
1** N Coquillard 46617 17,800.00 1,461.97 Monthly Pmts
1*** N O'Brien 46628 14,150.00 3,842.39 Monthly Pmts
' 9** W LaSalle 46601 44,000.00 10,838.78 Monthly Pmts
1*** W Napier 46601 71,600.00 32,577.74 Monthly Pmts
1*** Virginia St 46613 11,500.00 10,043.85 Monthly Pmts
3*** Eastmont 46628 9,950.00 2,849.14 Monthly Pmts
5** N Sunnyside 46617 8,000.00 4,323.71 Monthly Pmts
1** S Ironwood 46615 8,200.00 4,049.88 Monthly Pmts
1*** Evergreen Ln 46619 3,800.00 76.42 Monthly Pmts
7** S Grant 46619 5,200.00 3,300.06 Monthly Pmts
' 2*** Fredrickson 46628 9,300.00 5,340.56 Monthly Pmts
9** Blaine 46616 6,700.00 917.47 Monthly Pmts
' 1*** N Kaley 46628 2,500.00 2,234.00 Monthly Pmts
1*** S Kendall 46613 5,950.00 1,864.86 Monthly Pmts
1*** Campeau 46617 13,196.00 9,528.15 Monthly Pmts
1*** E Miner 46617 11,000.00 5,153.18 Monthly Pmts
1*** E Miner 46617 9,210.00 3,340.50 Monthly Pmts
' 22 LOANS 324,306.00 1 115,210.03
1
DEFERRED LOANS - DUE ON SALE '
ORIGINAL
ADDRESS ZIP BALANCE STATUS '
INVESTMENT
1*** S Fellows 46613 6,050.00 4,797.00 Due on Sale
9** Bruce 46613 2,200.00 2,200.00 Due on Sale
7** S Grant 46619 4,300.00 3,227.00 Due on Sale '
1*** N Johnson 46628 3,750.00 2,735.00 Due on Sale
2*** S Scott 46613 7,850.00 6,429.00 Due on Sale '
7** S Bendix 46619 3,700.00 2,660.00 Due on Sale
6** Napoleon Blvd 46617 2,650.00 1,729.00 Due on Sale
1*** Mishawaka 46615 4,700.00 3,927.00 Due on Sale '
1*** Barberry 46619 6,200.00 4,917.00 Due on Sale
3** E Ewing 46613 4,500.00 3,822.30 Due on Sale
2** E Indiana 46613 7,300.00 5,095.00 Due on Sale
8** Diamond Ave 46628 2,050.00 1,999.00 Due on Sale
1*** W Fisher 46619 3,650.00 3,139.00 Due on Sale
6** E Dubail 46613 4,250.00 2,730.51 Due on Sale
4** S Phillipa 46619 2,550.00 1,629.00 Due on Sale '
1*** S Catalpa 46613 3,450.00 976.21 Due on Sale
1*** N Brookfield 46628 4,850.00 3,617.60 Due on Sale
2*** Prast Blvd 46628 4,100.00 3,008.92 Due on Sale '
5** LaPorte Ave 46628 9,450.00 7,886.19 Due on Sale
9** Sylvan 46619 4,400.00 4,400.00 Due on Sale
1*** N Fremont 46628 4,850.00 4,029.00 Due on Sale ,
7** E Ewing 46613 4,050.00 2,982.00 Due on Sale
4** Lamonte Terrace 46616 6,500.00 5,049.11 Due on Sale '
1*** W Jefferson 46601 4,100.00 1,806.00 Due on Sale
3** W Madison 46601 3,550.00 2,332.00 Due on Sale
5** S Albert 46619 5,750.00 5,513.06 Due on Sale ,
7** St Vincent 46617 6,250.00 4,999.00 Due on Sale
2** E Victoria 46614 2,500.00 2,392.00 Due on Sale
1*** N Adams 46628 3,400.00 2,393.52 Due on Sale '
9** W LaSalle 46601 2,700.00 1,286.95 Due on Sale
1*** Randolph 46613 6,300.00 5,034.00 Due on Sale ,
31 LOANS 141,900.00 108,741.37
CITY OF SOUTH BEND PROPERTIES FOR SALE OR SOLD IN 2016
The City of South Bend did not have any CDBG-assisted properties listed for sale in 2016.
' The City of South Bend did not sell any CDBG-assisted properties in 2016.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i�,
ICI �
E
(�
1
�,
��
''
',
��
r
��4'� �
I'�
44
�__
s
n'
h
{�
F
q
��
N ��
4 ¢
{^�V� `
` � a
�y„I
H
I
IP b
1