HomeMy WebLinkAboutHPC Certified MinutesFiled in Clerk's Office
Before the Common Council of the
City of South B nd AUG 18 2017
ERIC BOYD,KAREEMAH FOWLER
CITY CLERK,SOUTH BEND, IN
Appellant,
V. RE: Application for Certificate of
Appropriateness,No. 2017-0602A
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY,
Appellee.
CERTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS OF RECORD FROM HISTORIC
PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Elicia Feasel, being first duly sworn upon her oath, deposes and states as follows:
1.
I am over the age of twenty-one (21) years.
2. 1 have never been adjudicated and am not insane or incompetent.
3.
I make the statements contained herein based on my personal knowledge and
would so testify in person in a court of law.
4.1 am a resident of the State of Indiana.
5. 1 am the Executive Director of the Historic Preservation Commission("HPC") of
South Bend and St. Joseph County and have served in such capacity at all times relevant to this
appeal filed by Eric Boyd, COA Application#2017-0602A.
6. As Executive Director of the HPC, I have supervisory authority for all of HPC's
official record keeping and documentation, and I am familiar with the record keeping practices
of the HPC.
7.
1 have examined the attached records consisting of sixty-one (61) pages, which
consist of the following:
a) Letter of Denial of Mr. Boyd's Application dated June 23, 2017;
b) Mr. Boyd's Application for Certificate of Appropriateness # 2017-0602A;
c) Staff Report concerning the Certificate of Appropriateness#2017-0602A;
d)
Documentation concerning the previous Certificate of Appropriateness
Application#
2016-0809 for a similar project, including:
i) Application for Certificate of Appropriateness # 2016-0809;
ii) Correspondence from the Building Commissioner;
iii) Letter of Denial of Certificate of Appropriateness#2016-0809
application;
iv) Staff report concerning Certificate of Appropriateness Application
2016-0809;
e)
Violation Notice from the Building Department to Mr. Boyd dated March
2, 2017;
f)
Minutes from a public meeting of the HPC dated June 19, 2017.
8.I certify that the attached records are either exact copies or originals retrieved
from the permanent records of the HPC.
9.
These records are being filed with the South Bend City Clerk's Office on August
18, 2017 in compliance with the deadline established by the South Bend Common Council for
the HPC to submit a certified copy of the minutes and all documents of record regarding action
taken
by HPC and
its staff on Certificate of Appropriateness Application# 2017-0602A.
10.
These records were made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted
by, a person with knowledge of these matters.
11.
These records were kept in the course ofHPC's regularly conducted business
activity, and were made
by regularly conductedactivity as a regular practice.
I affirm, under the penalties for perjury, that the foregoing representations are true.
Date: U g n
Elicia easel, HPC Executive Director
S p U
TF1 South Bend and St. Joseph County
8
coMM,
s sioNEgs
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
227 WESTJEFFERSON BLVD
oC
P FA CF
o/
a SOUTHBEND, IN 46601-1830 0
b
www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.html
x
1865
Phone:574-235-9798 Fax: 574-235-9578 ti,
e-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us
Timothy S.Klusczinski,President A Certified LocalGovernment Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
June 23, 2017
Eric Boyd
1240 West Thomas Street
South Bend, IN 46601
Dear Mr. Boyd,
The Commissioners, at the regularly scheduled monthly Historic Preservation Commission meeting on
June 19, 2017, unanimously denied approval of
theitems originally listed on COA Application# 2017-
0602A: "Mono roof4/12 pitch, rise west to east ending at center of building resting on ledger/East stud wall. Low pro-
file mono roof resting south
brick wall and interior brick w all.
Open courtyard. "
Following is the record from the
meeting concerning your project which states the reasons why your application was denied:
Commissioner Gordon moved todeny application as submitted.
Seconded by Commissioner Anderson.
President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and
reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered.
Commissioner Hertel (AYE): Under Standards and Guidelines Group B Section C this would alter and modi-
fy the structure and change itgreatly by adding this type ofroof plus, we are lacking information on the materi-
als to be usedfor completion ofthe roof.
Commissioner Buccellato(AYE): The design simply does not meet the existing character ofthe structure.
Commissioner Anderson (AYE): It would alter the faVade, architectural integrity, and its style, which are
some of the most important things we have to make a decision on as a Commission.
Commissioner Gordon (AYE): It is not in keeping with the guidelinesfor this building, does not keep the his-
torical character or look ofthe building, and we are missing some information ofhow that roof would be cov-
ered.
Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE): Ordinance 9037-99 designating 1240 West Thomas Street as a Local
Landmark details a number ofstylisticfeatures, specifically two-story Period Revival Fire Station with flat roof
and
limestone parapet coping.
Long term preservation of the structure and safety of its occupants are not
served by the installation which is both inadequate and architecturally inappropriate. I affirm the staff recom-
mendation forflat roofand the noted remedies for violations ofMinimum Maintenance Standards and seek the
support ofthis body, the Building Department, Code Enforcement, and the owner's cooperation to effect chang-
es that willpreserve this unique and special building. I also believe that the current roof beingproposed is not
in keeping with the Standards and Guidelines that the Commission must use in review of all the local historic
landmarks under its jurisdiction. I believe that other more appropriate remedies exist and should be explored
instead ofgranting this particular application.
HISTORIC
COMMISSIONERS STAFF
PRESERVATION
Thomas Gordon(Vice President)Deb Parcell,Deputy Director COMMISSIONMike Voll(Treasurer) Brett Hummer,Legal Counsel
Jennifer Parker(Architectural Historian) SteveSzaday,Preservation Specialist OF SOUTH BEND&ST.JOSEPH COUNTY
Elizabeth Hertel(Secretary) ES T.IP-13
Kevin Buccellato
South Bend and St. Joseph County
S(
U T$
C8
S IpNERs
o` ,,1 'i i,' O HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD
PF.AC/ SOUTH BEND, IN 46601-1830 2
a www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.html o s
G5 Phone: 574-235-9798 Fax:574-235-9578
e-mail:SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us
Timothy S.Klusczinski,PresidentA Certified Local Government Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Commissioner Molnar(AYE): The design is toofar outside ofthe mandated Standards and Guidelines which
the Commission, by law, must follow. The roof would be prominent in display in the front of the structure, as
opposed to the rear. I would be infavor oflooking at something with a lower pitch, not necessarily aflat roof.
Six in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 6—0 COA#2017-0602A Denied.
Although the historic preservation commission did not find your proposed project to be architectur-
ally appropriate and did not believe that the denial would be a detriment to the public or cause
hardship, the commission and staff believe it is important to save this building. Accordingly, staff
believes that it is important to revisit design alternatives that were mentioned during deliberation.
As a compromise to in-kind flat roof replacement, members of the Commission suggested a devia-
tion for a hip roof (originating from the north facade parapet and having a downward slope to the
south).
This would make a drastic improvement over the current plan by not detracting from key
architectural features, still be compatible with water management/drainage proposals and allow
for building material from the current structure to be reused.The latter representing a significant
cost savings for you.
HPC Staff encourages you to thoughtfully consider this alternative design concept and wecomes
the opportunity to consult on a new application. Thank you for your continued stewardship of this
local landmark.
Please contact this office with any questions or concerns or for any assistance.
Sincerely,
Debra Parcell, Deputy Director
cc Building Department
Code Enforcement
Department of Community Investment
COMMISSIONERS STAFF
Thomas Gordon(VicePresident)Deb Parcell,Deputy Director
HISTORICMike Voll(Treasurer) Brett Hummer,Legal Counsel
Jennifer Parker(Architectural Historian) Steve Szaday,Preservation Specialist
PRESERVATION
Elizabeth Hertel(Secretary)
Kevin Buccellato
COMMISSION
Brandon Anderson
OF
SOUTH BEND&ST.JOSEPH COUNTY
Michele Gelfman EST.191-3
Joseph Molnar
s o'UT$ A-ppfica idW GO M155lOgf$
FOR-
1,
CK
Certificate ofAppropriateness
f°
HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONIMMION o
i
sbs of
SOUTH BEND&ST.JOSEPH COUNTY
125 S.Lafayette Blvd,South Bend,IN46601
httpJ/www.st osephcolmtyindian&com/
departments/SJC /mdex.htm
P:574-235-9798 574-235-9578 e:SBSJCflPC@co.st-j0seph_in.us
Ree,.
o
FFICE USE OML ->>>>p0 PLOT COMPLETE A"gIyMMQ rnhrrATAP IN THLS BOX««<OFFIC USE ONLY
7 APPlication Number: I —
C(Q,/A
YES {Date fLffsrBeC,) 16)' )6)1[1 NO
l authorized by.
Title-
rvati on
Commissio n
Review Dater®
Local Landmark LocalHistoric District(tvame)
Ntional Landmark National Register District(N.,)
Appropriateness:
Denied Tabled Sent To Committee Approved and issued:
Please Print)
Address ofProperty for proposed work:
Street Number—Street Nmne--GYty—Zip Code)
Name of
Property Owner(s). i C-
Phone#:
address of
Property Owner(s): /
a
If O 2r., lcS 661
Street Number—Street Name—city—Zip Code)
Name of
Contractor(s): _ r ,
t
t•`'
Phone#:
Contract Company Name:
AIVI/ . -r V&`c es
Address of
Contract Company.- /;L
V4 t-l—, —
rA oak
r J
Street Nionber—Street Namety—Zip Code)
Current Use of
Budding a er
i
t0
Single Family--Multi-Famtly--Commercidl-Go eernme,a--Ind-suial—Vacont—etc.)
Type ofBuilding Construction- _ ,
flood Frame—Beck- &one-Steeb-Concrete—Other)
Proposed Work: In-Kind Landscape New 'Replacement(not in-kimore than on e
box may be checked) Demolition
Description fProp ed
Work-
F
t` a^- G5
L W t
11
at r
L.L I Y\/M 1 I
OwnerlContractor Fax#:
e-mail:
Stqffwill correspondwith only one designee)
X
and/or X
l'CSignature of
Owner Signature of Contractor
A DD r Td t A'r il1 N D T.AT rYDT.M'V jN M A DT. Y ye rV 1
f1A t D X?,TV nL L`CiT1P
r
I
k fo j«^
IV
vv o x
1 1
l
1'r s
j 1` wre"d.
YS,:.{r./e..:. .j
V
ft o:.:S•'f ,:l
rr
i
I
3
x-
Gr
C a M
13
e
t
i
I
lc rsvq
000018
0
h M
w N
M
1 O
h n{
I
L f T
C
o
u
oI o
a
O
it
I-ice^ .ry
t•,
M 1
C t
O 4
w
w i
O
S
OI
0 T.
6D V
I Y,
D
a~
rn0
o
T
Lay M
p
t t
In
C O
a
v
f un
7 2
a o N
4
t
f
I
Y r
5• Y QC l
LU
J
4 1
SIQUEIRA, L.L.C.
November 23,2016
Re:Eric Boyd, 1240 W.Thomas,South Bend,IN
Gentlemen,
I was asked to do a structural inspection on the building at the above referenced address on November
21,2016.The inspection was limited to specific issues as stated below. Eric stated that all joists, rafters
beams used were pine—(
SPF)#2. 1 assumed any studs to be SPF stud grade.
1. Joists spanning 17.5'running east-west at 16"oc,supported at masonry walls. I find these to be
inadequate.A 20 stud wall should be added north-south,to support joists,limitingjoist span to
14'. Assuming a 6'opening,the header should be (2)2x10.
2. Steel beams atcourtyard—south
face at 2"d floor level&(2)at west
face atnorth end—(
1)at
roof
level&(1)at 2"d floor level.These are adequate,except that the roof level beam at west
face is sagging. Eric intends to build a 2x6 wall (16" oc)under it,which should take care ofthe
problem.(3)studs should be placed under where the east west steel beam meets the north
south beam.
3. Courtyard wall bracing. In the absence of a roofand 2"d floor,the exterior walls lack bracing.The
north&east walls need
to
be permanently braced.At the
least,(3)
beams—each (3)2x12 across
the width should be installed at between 15'-18'above 1St floor.These beams should be placed
at% points along the length of the courtyard.Then,beams running north south should be
placed at the end bays,from east west beam to wall at mid courtyard width.The beams should
be extended
into a 4"pocket
into wall.
Alternately,a
2x12 ledger—2'long with(
2)%"x 6" bolts,
16"oc min hor,can be used in lieu of the pockets.At the 2x6 stud wall,the beam should bear on
the face of(3)2x6 studs.Also,it is suggested that the trash pile in the courtyard should be
removed. It is also noted that without a roof,provisions will have to be made to dispose of snow
drain rain water in the courtyard.
4. Framed mono-sloped roof at North West:A ledger(2)2x8s should be added to the east stud
wall, raised up to be snug under the birdsmouth cut rafters. Hurricane clips should be added-
rafter
to ledger. 16d nails at 8"oc—
ledger to wall top plate and(2) 16d nails to each stud below.
Note thatthe1 S t
2x8 should
be nailed as above&
the 2"d
2x8 nailed
to the
1 S t—
2 rows 16d nails
at 12"oc.Add blocking 2'oc at north end bay at rafters to ext.framed wall.Attach wall to
masonry at top of existing parapet.
5. At the South West end at 1St floor ceiling,the 10x10 timber beam running east west bears on a
built up column.
The load is calculated at just over
2700 Ibs&the built up column should be
adequate.
6. Just to the north of the office,20 joists spanning 10'were used.This should be removed and
replaced with 2x8 joists at 16"oc.
TEXAS
1
FLORIDA INDIANA COLORADO1 5035 EMBERS DRIVE, MISHAWAKA, IN. 46545 E-MAI L:BVSIQ QCCMCAST.N ET
TEL:734-34 1-3861
S1 TV
If the above corrections are made as stated,these specific issues will be resolved.
Sincerely,
6
x
unon V. Smue/m' P.E
TEXAS FLORIDA IN DIANA COLORADO
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: June 2,2017
Application Number: 2017-0602A (Application delivered by property owner to Building Departmenton June 1, 2017)
Property Location: 1240 West Thomas Street
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or
Builder: Period Revival/1920/Firehouse#4
Property Owner: Eric A. Boyd
Landmark or
District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #9037-99
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: Firehouse#4 is a 2-story rectangularbrick building. It hada flat roofwith limestone parapet coping, metal parapet scupper/cornice with brick brackets underneath
and ornate limestone detailing at the ends. The windows are 1/1 double-hung with limestone sills. Thereis a brick side chimney,and a roofpenthouse with hip roof.
ALTERATIONS: Most ofthe windows in this former firehouse have been boarded up prior to a 2007fire. RME 2011-1110 approved replacement ofmetal roofto secure the building and protect it from the
elements, although there is no evidence it was ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roof has been
installed without an approved COA onapproximately halfofthe main structure,as well as a second story
addition and gabled roofon the rear ofthe building. Areas where large overhead garage doors were
originally located have been covered with vinyl siding. Most window openings have been covered with
plywood or vinyl siding. COA 2016-0809 to construct shed roof over part ofbuilding, and second floor
addition atop one-story brick portion at rear ofbuilding with vinyl siding and replacement windows wasdenied.
APPLICATION ITEMS: Mono roof4/12 pitch, rise west to east ending at center ofbuilding resting onledger/East stud wall. Low profile mono roofresting south brick wall and interior brick wall. Open
courtyard.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: See COA 2016-0809, pending with the BuildingDepartment as a Violation ofCity Ordinance. Not in compliance with the Violation RemedyRequirements as ordered to be completed by March 13, 2017.
Owner has constructed a4/12 single sloping roofsurface over part of roughly one half, ofthe main
building,from the west exterior wall 30' east to a 10'H wall built on existing brick interior wall, with a 1'
overhang at west wall. Concrete floor ofopen courtyard is 6-8" lower than adjacent floor. Owner plans
to utilize existing floor drain and lower floor height to manage accumulated moisture in the courtyard.This roof has been installed without COA.
See report ofstructural inspection by Siqueira, LLC, submitted with this application. In summary, theinspection reveals inadequatejoists spanning 17.5' running east-westat 16"oc, supported atmasonrywalls; roof
level beam sag, exterior walls that
lack bracing, trash pile in"courtyard", recommended
provisions to
dispose ofsnow and
drain rain in"courtyard", multiple deficiencies in the framed mono-
sloped roof at North West, and 2x4 joists sparming 10' that are insufficient.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B
A. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change
except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper
maintenance of all structure or sites.
B. "Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form.
Such improvements include re-roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can
potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface
whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it
significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a
Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the
proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces.
C. Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure,which does not alter the general massing while an
addition, is a change in mass. A modification,which involves the removal of a part of the
landmark,should be considered under
demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should
not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular
examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does
not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios
of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to
change or alter the following:
1. Structure Necessary structural improvements,where safety demands should be
accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and
construction.
2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark
should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An
alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original.
a. wood—
all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b. siding materials—
the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of
original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible
materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is
considered.
D. Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and
demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other
descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior ofthe landmark. The person or
agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation.
E. Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is
necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. Signs
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super-
graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G. Building Site and Landscaping
1. Required
Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs(house numbers) and
benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land
contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos. patio decks, fixed barbecue pits,
swimming pools,tennis courts, green houses,new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture,
trellises,and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and
neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2. Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge ofthe past appearance of the property
found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to
the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed.
However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by
suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation
would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style,
materials, and scale.
J. Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance ofthe site by removing major landscaping items,
trees, fencing,walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to
the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking
lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation ofunsightly devices such as TV reception dishes
and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public
thoroughfares.
Minimum Maintenance Standards approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, December 16,
1991, state that"all landmarks and all contributing structures located in an historic district shall be
preserved from decay and deterioration, and shall be maintained in good repair and kept structurally
sound. The owner or other person having charge or control of landmarks and property in an historic
district shall not allow or permit deterioration ofsuch property from defects or conditions which in the
judgment ofthe Commission produce a detrimental effect on the character ofthe district as a whole or thelife andcharacter of
the
landmark, structure or property in question." In particular, this property exhibits
the following from the itemized (but not exclusive) list ofdetrimental conditions:
b. Deterioration of roofs or other horizontal members causing conditions such as
sagging, splitting, buckling, crumbling, holes, missing shingles or similar conditions;
e. The ineffective waterproofing ofexterior walls, roof and foundations, includingbroken windows or doors;
h. The deterioration of any feature so as to create or permit the creation ofany
hazardous or unsafe condition or conditions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: After careful review ofthis application, it appears to a large degree to
be similar as applied for in COA application 2016-0809 that was denied by HPC and is a pending
Violation ofCity Ordinance with the Building Department. As in COA 2016-0809, Staffdoes not
recommend approval of the roof deviation from flat to asymmetrical gable and does not recommend a
roofon only halfofthe structure as it does not conform to the standards and guidelines, A, B, and C. Staff
recommends approval of a flat roofcovering the entire main structure. Staff recommends that the owner
be in compliance with the Building Department at the request ofthe Building Commissioner and that all
work is remanded to the discretion ofthe Building Department prior to installation. Staff recommends
that the owner be in compliance with Code Enforcement as there are noted violations of Minimum
Maintenance Standards.
Elicia Feasel
Executive Director
Deb Parcell
Deputy Director
t'agc l Ot 1
Elicia Feasel - Fwd: 1240 Thomas COA Application
From: Debra Parcell
To: Elicia Feasel
Date: 6/6/2017 2:09 PM
Subject: Fwd: 1240 Thomas COA Application
Ayoka Paek <apaek@southbendin.gov> 6/1/2017 3:47 PM >>>
Hello,
We accepted a COA application HPC's behalf. Please pick it up as soon as you are able.We have it in oursafe,so if either myself or Elizabeth is not here mention that it is in Elizabeth's"safe folder".
Warm regards,
Ayoka Paek, MCIP
Zoning and Business Services Administrator
574)235-9554
apaekpsouthbendin gov
St.Joseph County/City of South Bend
Building Department
125 S. Lafayette Blvd, STE 100
South Bend,IN 46601
The informationprovidedinthisemailisinresponseto thespecificinformation requestedanddoes notnecessarilyrepresent all oftherestrictions andallowances applicable to anyproperties identified in this email.
file:///C:/Users/EFeasel/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/593 6B799InternalPLEXISPO 100... 6/6/2017
4 S p t 1 T H a
Application
y`p\MtS510yFAS
FOR s
o
Certificate ofApproriaenesspt
o
t
s
I`.
m HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
M
1865
x
of
SOUTHBEND&ST.JOSEPH COUNTY
125 S. Lafayette Blvd.,South Bend, IN 46601
http'Hwww.stjosephcotintyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm
p: 574-235-9798 f:574-235-9578 e:SBSJCHPC@co.st-josephAn.us
OFFICEUSE ONLF^>>—DO NOT COMPLETEANY FNTRIESCONTAINED IN THIS B0XC«< OFFICE USE ONI•Y
Date Received:Application Number:
PastReviews: YES (Date of L ast Review)` NO
Staff Approval authorized
by: Title: _
Historic Preservation Commission Review Date:
LJ Local Landmark Local Historic District
National Landmark National Register District(ivme)
Certificate of Appropriateness:
Denied Tabled Sent To Committee Approved and issued:
Please Print)
Address of Property for proposed work:
Street Number—Street Nante—City—Zip Code)
Name of
Property Owner(s): S rt`c
may
1-5"ye l
Phone#: 70 c/—
1"t_-
Address of
Property Owner(s):
J L/° w• /!io.wif
S,y e v
Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip Code)
Name ofContractor(s): t\
6111 Phone#:
Contract Company Name:5 ,,,-es -- q `(Jc7 ,_ It^
Address of
Contract Company: 1 2- GW,
77t.,,o i n.,S{ , 7
Street Number—Street Name—Cit)—Zip Code)
Current Use of
Building:C
ryy,.,_orz:1
Single Family—Mttlti-Fancily—Commercial—Government—Indirstrial—Vacant—etc.)
Type of
Building Construction:
9"c k-
Wood Frame—Brick-Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other)
Proposed Work: In-Kind Landscape New
M—Replacentent(not in-
kind) Demolition
more than one box may be checked)
Description of
Proposed Work: 120 tti'ti p,. c4,t fL A.eFOft
ee l,.:
Owner/Contractor Fax#:a-ma il:
Staffwill correspond viitth/only one designee)
X _and/or X
Signature of
Owner Signature of Contractor
APPLICATIONREQUIREMENTS ARE
LISTED ONREVERSE SIDE-
IV
vv
e- ;
7
L i K
Oy
6 V.
lee
j-,
11
1
SAP
M
30
b 1• - wart I
I
go
t
T
e;
i
r
5
I
t,
I
T o
ml
fill,
Sjt
l
T
f j
r e
f• t)f;.. ll1 p!!llllli n fi
tt, ;
r r
tttl•{},Y t,
as
f , i
MN 04M,
ST'Jt'IJIJI
fI
IJI 9
Ilr
j «"
ii;
55ii
r
i I:
d tali! l,tll 1 r 'c I<a#'
laV ff - e Cij
k
fit
xts
r:
j I p l i l B djja
i a:
1^
1a
4 `tlt ,
ld p I I lllf itllli w 1if
B n 4,°
4
1 7,Fllll pll I l l j;lN1,111111
1,1t""1
1 l F'lll!la I I Ilellpc!l.!I 1
@ f r,. .1 t II @ !
b t;
Itf r l'''t'I'Ir!'I'j l'{`' ' •c ' ,
1 1 •11 .d) @@I 'WtBBI f1i I P$+
IIIIIi III' •
iilf2j ` '`: r i a.,;,i.f
i
1 `t' it ijll C`ia°t
t B 1 1 , jj I I,.o F 1
t t(1 1 I B [ 1 1 1 [ ><l , Ifj+1,;, , i` vl; ,
f z.•
1Fjf+
11 rr
P'
dI t
Bilh
h dh`riltBll Pdlrllsfrlll@Will,l ,lf tl
I I;I(1 IjBlr 1 I i BI Ib
hl,It -' I jhll lwlll 7 @'I1 ,II II
1 dllffl;f
117 IIB,I I
tjall I f i ! p f! ,
i @H t _ I,I I! I
I ; III r, •:
I 1lllelFllB I
d @fl@Id@rl q x},+ +1+1+14 Id I; If B @ . 1 19,E
IY°pl+l1@(I I
HIM;p I ra$ Yt :•'5 Il I+ftl tllif+Il
t f I iJf
1 .1 pll+^il+f f is'IB41,rB lllllylp'
B; Il a n I+ .! ! ,#7 s•
IPf4 f f!!t ,+1l It lfl a I, +Ikiplll 1 {
t„ I f r
Idi@ Ilfdl@E1 IiB`` Is;6f19FIIB,B@II@I rIIIIIrl'. If I=
j ii_ , , •`` ` ;.'
j,rlJtt11il Illff III 1 Br 1 i !,! , plp j f I T•-, ^ x
dlrf
lifj`fflll llrll@ IIB @I1+
iN
1 Ijl Il t,lflll tl Ilk qI f t f
D
dt9
Sf{
it=irf°
a @ a;r t.
f`i;P BIUf'!d I`I I +'lllll
e
e,fll I•d-P '+tell;
j tlfR I!t II IBII76cf PSI I I I Itl jltt.IJ ,
I htiilfP
tlylf;
1 I
W ill-
r
4
V.•-
Lf ` ? In f .4 }
i .,T.l
w r y:;
d ; fY •"•. j
du.
of.
z r
x E
Xrt t
t ` ,,
r , :
is } - '++.r+`
tt
1 . y :
Ill—_
3`
r" rt t9
r
btt.t. q
a ``•. R I
k/'
Z,''i'-:
b7T's
rv• J1 •3 c.. .
L i.F S : vat' 't i n, ._,
f
r s.',S w its?'-.; x _
r R $ 3'
fie;.
i
5::• ?
til
f +`•lZy,a :a F ,'
o y
tai+- c ::
r
a'
3_h
t,'.
ti r•, i i. ,
9. ...a'•,,
t. a i.l.
7r +nst`
s•r, o t G"3'
y
t++
i o+
y
s+a!t"-
and.•fi rw" M•na'x • s; {
Ft" i t' 'r
x
i s
t 7n---- i !
a /l°.s•.<'2' n ... -a'u.
y `ten. qgp
Y ' ".'"$'{d'-gnS Y•i f `` j;"
Y ) ".
s;,a a+-`ti p"
cf ST. JOSEPH COUNTY/SOUTII BEND T
Q
1146BUILDING DEPARTMENT v'o` •1:1 :j,;1,
C'1
125 S. IAFAYE't"rc l3m.
Surn: 10 0
V \'•
i r r "
ie
SOUTH BFND, IN 466of
1 574) 35-95542
c`'czr•_s< ='FAX(574)235-554I
JAmEs D. MARKLE, R.A.CHARLES C. BULO•r
AYOKA PAEK,NICP, ivICIPDesign/Ilan Review Specialist BUILDING CM.-IMISSIONER
Zoning&Business
Services Administrator
August 10,2016
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation
Re: 1240 Thomas, South Bend, IN
Dear Elicia:
On October 13, 2015, this office issue a Building Permit for Commercial Roofing at theabove-
referenced address. What was to be a structural repair and reroofing job has now morphed into a
partial roofon the plain building and a new second story addition on the tear ofthe building.None of this has been properly permitted.
I recently niet with the owner and indicated that all work is to stop until this department receives
a formal submission and plan set for the proposed work. We will not issue any additional
permitS Until St1Cl1 tillle that all proposed and current work nieets basic building standards.
This is a case where our best intentions to lielp preserve (lie historic integrity ofa local buildingdid not pan out as expected.
Sincerely,
Charles C. Bulot, C.B.O.,C.P.M.
Building Commissioner
NRIOTICE OF PERMIT '
CONSTRUCTION
St. Joseph County and City of South Bend
Building Department
574) 235-9554
DATE: 10/13/2015 PERMIT NUMBER: BD 15005044ADDRESS: 1240 THOMAS, SE CRN WITH WALNUT, N OF WESTERN AVE.
CONTRACTOR: BOYD SERVICES
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT: PARTIAL ROOF
Lot No.Add'n.
48 COMMISSIONER'SOF S PT BANKOUTLOT 85 &86
BOYD ERIC
812 704-3005
Owner's Name
1207 WThomas St SouthBend,IN 46601
Phone
Owner's Present Mailing Address/Email
Zoning MU Twp.PORTAGE Multiple Unit Count
Valuation $500.00 Height Acreage 0.19
018-30_ 74_^_2912 ABZA Date:State 1\0.
Front Rear Side
Building Permit Fee
30.00
Contractor BOYD SERVICES (812)704-3005 boydmaster455@yahoo.com
Electric Permit Fee
Contractor
Plumbing Permit Fee
Contractor
Heating Permit Fee
Contractor
Subtotal$ 30.00
Penalty S
Total S 30.00
kwidawsk
Signature
i
Charles C.Bulot-Building ommissioner
Thepersonorcontractorlistedaboveherebycertifiesthatthestatements containedhereinaretrueandcorrectandinconsideration ofthegrantingofthepermitagree tosaveSt.JosephCounty andCityofSouthBendharmless fromanyandalldamagesand agreetoperformtheworkcovered bythispermitinconformitywiththelawsoftheState ofIndianaand theOrdinances ofSt.Joseph Countyand theCity ofSouth Bend,Indiana.
I agreetocallforan inspection approvalbeforeanyconcrete ispouredfor footingsandwalls, orany framing, electrical, plumbing,orheatingmaterialiscovered. Iunderstand thataFinalInspection maybenecessaryandaCertificateofOccupancyshall beissuedpriortooccupancybeing allowed. 1alsounderstandthatthis isonlyaBuildingPermit.Separatepermits aretobeobtainedforanyheating,ventilation,airconditioning,electric orplumbing work.Understandingofthelaws and rules regardingthispermit iscertified byapplicant'ssignatureabove.1'hispermitisvalidfortwo(2)yearsfrom dateofissuance,orasdetermined by the Building Department.
This Placard must
be posted until project
is cotnpleted.
Failure to comply will result
in acitation and
fine,
cil
q j
lk:
I-
f v i
t A
VI
I-
C i—
Ca l
1 5
j E}
JL. E+
r
N
r
I dh
3
1 6"
1
Bell Totver
Iloilo Roof—
Phase.2, oofing Open Court Yard
t b
is t•'
rcr,
tfr
J
pi,,
i
x*a t ws t i•, ." x
XTe }.rt`T y j+Ft,1#'l^ '
V`
t?!„q !
f t - fj'3
9 J.+
S,
r4.•:
r.la' 'iJl f l rr S r
3 My
t# t il v
x
r y,nab„Q 3:
aj'fi"iL.a.T}•
y!
fu'' r
44
r
r :.
J''V:•atI
J' t
tJS`•
t `v 3`4 i ts.2c`
T' i.- ..
r N 'E li:J. ,"Y” x •C t
r>•is(}.n y
L f.
r
i'F. " >
t i,
S. .. . i '^
S
f.
Ne s`7(.Z/ ! •'-t f.. sr} .. {
s > _
t.
A' i sdv
i
4yj''.*•
t sr '•
3' i t
dSs io :P rzL '
m'i 4 •VJJ'n. L3 fe;}.:::s:.i _.:;r3.
tSa.t'
r t:1
inc'4 '-'".5'
5 ^
ry?,
i
Mono Roaf
Bell Toa,ei —
Phase2, Roofing Open Court Yard
hi 3e}
J
fa i55 7
4 •_ .
a 3 j. ?}
f y' .... t x `
3 Et 4.?s+
t
y'
St°$£&&,y;r•+
t., '
k .}as;" f X S•,r .a n } J
a -`'- -}'
s>r
gig.R'
4F-. `k L;;iY`J
j'
Si s` f<r
t i
t
t +
t
7
Ky
T rr
f x
8i i
rg
f?v;
s..b - i u .
rt14Y•:f i J: rS%.
a+
fi
J` $.Yi.r J=T<
tf3 l 1
J ('I. s.T i..•F:zc.v':
TNC.ttie,;;;ai3,s S„
H +fa.-e
f •0 3?'
r
r
t
t i .-
4 j_
E °
d
f
STg a
r' rl ' b
Y . <t> ,:
s
r
ti
s x RIMd r• '!T r t r
2 ..cE Rr—l q ._#r 4k2
w •
ti°k as+;. hdlx'7 r' a }f ity`
U.I, t
I
Y,-, 'yr`` ;• F' y it y.rR
7' i.
x+r<'Sf:C{.. `
i 1
f.• ';='j
e
2,„{ -
@. `'r {
tx4Y``,r}'"'
s3i''Y•:t z -_
E
E}
i
y.
3}
iA i
b' l - ..
I L5 ''
7rr d a.\! t l ` {
A.
J fa a1•,,33
3t.m'
E
dP Y<
ti J c T a. ^t• ' , a+ .H` -S.
b
i , {,y= r3 x^'`'..
T1 y,:;E -J
e
y,
b '
s` '
h .,i 'S.. ',r
g
g`
s Yi.
Y '
r iz •
j
1
Ig
R <-e `
yv
11. -`.
yn'{.
t.'Js`+
n t+
f 2lCd;,'•x y' t t.
J 2 `-
x .
a
9
r
7q°
va ;•ed
3 _
ti y
3YS•`a '.
r
ti:
f; .:
t
it•-
S E
F k
s.,-8 4"'
s-'.-., f`
k}
y
nub :^';}
r•
r iLd}s ae j r
r
y
1 d Y'3
F
K
ni l,' 11,E %. .+'
y
r
t';
jai 3j• a
o .
1iLS 3' f l r.: .y •`:".
X
j. S J u y/
F
ro Y 2r
maci
a ray; ;•
P'`
r
t t IN;,.
Mar-•- 'i h, Ua
tw,...
Y'
a
b ra•-"s' t t«`c:s'
P"M r •
y
6
r e
Y-
i t
J t '
h" TF"• I Y..
6. .
v p,ayd_`.
R,
xpr s.4r".t4cy^' 7 54l• £a,
y{'
L-x
p
t .-'
C,R i '`S' S.y{':f.'w P,.
y1• <
i'; '.' .-•r
r-•
j>
NOW_ *
r ,
j'.. y'u 3r'°'' *'
x. ._ •, , . '$5 { k _ ;
a' a-
N•
o
x' 3 ,y.sir
r' !;>
1 •
v
3
t4.•s y' C- 3f6.,
ig
Y
3s :
in•
r ';
ti?.b t' -
yid •?' .tFt x•,
a ' 'T!'S'-s'.'
y4• W .':.
r4.r
r jr '-t-(
y atf %i i 3 e'-,}'..'
a.Y-
lfr,
j'T-I F'•
a
4Y,
y.t^
4yy F t i y
y
1
y S F:i i!
aJ-w ?
sar'ks ','0 - Y
s ,
t s c t,
i
PKP L.0v1vFrti.4;'{iA 23*.'
k.•
vS
a .
y 1'. 'n
g_y •S
f.-
t '•
q: '
jilyn: 3 8t`-•Tr'.. £f'`;i .
ti
i. h" i w,a'`"w"f`
1LX':g,A'•L7t i f`o iY,-.F '` " a tti'';z rv 5'"
i y
Y fi ••*`F,
l'.,'
y`
h
O r
I•'i4°t[
Y*..lyrvP t•-t:?n-.uV: '1
t
i n
l,'.
f;y t i t ni% "T" g5"` '4jk's 3
rtE':
r r V
s
d
L"fCt
r'
r JtY"y4=1 •a
r'
y,>
EiY `yen 4i', i.3 25
y4}.
JY
2 e '- - •
r
J "
yam
yfP e
str
AY aahart alt i`
t`+::r...t
t.'tt
tj •.
i r.+.cry'tip i
i,
i
r•'
t (
y t''
r"
v v k '^.,
ff.x•
r; a••, k.
g,•
r•
Y
i
t re
rt:£-
r Jk' xf r C^•
t"t vr $js
t}Y > t y. x c^ r_•
la a..r:'
d Y
d
tyYa ,t S• •
f iyp
q
5J 2 t'
rSn
lT
2BM i '
A k r
3.. 9 Y>3: .°
viiL e
5r' rs
d a y
FINc f
i-.`}a Z?y*L -' .
G°`. 41:!
J rQ '
fit.T.
et
fie• -
S
6, r ; d'
z: .
1,«'F5y"Q`
t t r` , '
t b • .+
t r
I
irYt{?
y.t i'
ixr t 4`i °f r} -r
J]c J # ,`'.` r...: r a i- 3Yd, ct l s / y. Y-[ ...'.t;,. 'A•'. L{; r'
fi_..,
py-
I
t
Fi. r. s ar s,'
f s'^•V l f f {
t ,
4. FA
f'aa!
iA•
t
t h ' 1'.1 t 14
J`
T f
f i
pz
aft} .< x •rr„- k`I'
p!}4' ¢.. •' a 1
z ir mf J f
i
6•'t,+. t ' Ni '' s z + ,'
E ,`rs
r7 .' ;°'
V'
S c?
i r f+'
M'
i°,3 i r I
y,r
a°
tij ,;;•- °. }. r Axy S 4 JL '03 i`
2
c 1
k .`. -. `-`
7ral
3Y 4 i } z r:F •S. r"
7 yY 4Y ^. .1 f9
t ix
y r
f
c .'?•?
i J.up_
f 3 a:t:
fr w. - r . Y 5+
1 3;
y, /
t . , _r
r>'t''w
h" 4:? 5 t' ',`. t3! J, t•a v ,w
9 a ir.''.
u
r
f ,
s
sr '•;r
4 f
j
s}
ar^"iy,. k s s
Ss
j`,
4 i ,Y 'r
k i! _ A'wfk
t4c t 7tr y!+
Ti
r y...«....a y -r..r
fu .
i
Z• >
rr
ri i
F
t
t};
ty.
aS a"
j p..rl}l`
t
t
ypr .,-
v+•
p.'
6y`' £ r.
S
t,-
t
i
i {7j4 :.] d' .` •J
Fa
u
f'a' h. 3
G
f1,rQ
Y
3 t•
Y•.i¢3
J.,
may" c T•
3.
r r u .
r)
c
7'r MT' 1i J •'
t.. }`
raN
y . 7. .
i Y• N'
5`
MS-•f` g,
Y
C ! `R^
JAM:'
P#c
O 0 Y'2,>
N" 5 s
siyA eTt 1
i.
F
j,t J
t4tJt1
t
xl`,
A r ">;
act' +
t+,.
x` J
x i
t .
r• :S -
S5k
evts 0. m, a-
1 r .;Ff '`'•,'A 3: 2.,f v a
0
w,..
A
i-
jt 3'k :7S y
RNMMIN1+,;F?,,},Y'. `+'• '1..,}`;
y
yrt., .*{
c,`S C
y L t- '•¢:
a :.iT:rL{,r y t}'X'
kX FJZ fd`i*a"Y s;
i '. - r:i*4,' P'
a'•+l x"
n 1- ,i^
l
y 3''r 7`'2`
Y'..q(1
fi x,#
r
k` r$.•.R#...J a
J`
t'
rl
ak. ^
rJ,yr..
v7"`}
t'''.£;'
trrF
ti,a;,.:<<3
xYi',l:
5i
r7t'::7zg,:.
Y l:
s,"i i'x
s'
S
w:
i.t;l
a`.+
t•
ld"
t3t$`Y1`"`
4,
S R•'
4i
v'
3-'
mi.,
k,
c
r
r ::- r.
1J.:
r*'
lS,
iy,
t.S.:
ii,
J-'y.
s'.#,rt`v`fJ's,"}`'
s`
i
L,
ti
j
y[y•+
r"
t
y•'
l'
St
V-
S y
L!
r'.
r..
w*
h''[[
V4y.
Y.':°.
NN,
k
1`
a
4'0a .
a
a•,
u;_
v,
a1s'
j
s
S OUT H
South Bend and
St. Joseph County Missio,Y
o ,t;'tt, d HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION °`W,
FRSO
227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD
w PEACF
SOUTHBEND, IN46601-1830
www.stjoseplicountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.litmi 0
M
mar
1865
R
Phone:574-235-9798 Fax:574-235-9578
e-mail:SBSJCHPC @co.stjoseph.in.us
Timothy S.Klusczinski,President A Certified Local Government Elicia Feasel, Executive Director
September 27, 2016
Eric Boyd
1240 West Thomas Street
South Bend, IN 46601
Dear Mr. Boyd,
The Commissioners, at the regularly scheduled monthly Historic Preservation Commission meeting on
September 19, 2016, unanimously denied approval of the items originally listed on COA Applica-
tion# 2016-0809: "Roof,windowreplacement, apply for addition—siding vinyl and window replacement is long term.
Current plan is to keep windows boarded for security reasons(2 replacement windows have been broken). Color ofvinyl
siding is brown". Following is the record from the meeting concerning your project which states the
reasons why your application was denied:
Commissioner Gordon moved to deny application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. President
Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members
to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered.
Commissioner Hertel(AYE): the best course ofaction in rrtaintainingthe historic integrity ofthe building
Commissioner Parker (AYE): due to the architectural character of building, and the lack ofother op-
tionslquotations
Commissioner Anderson(AYE):lack ofconforming to architectural integrity ofhistoric building
Commissioner Gordon(AYE): not in keeping with the integrity ofthe landmark status
Commissioner Klusczinski(AYE): work is not in keeping with Landmark standards and guidelines, work
was performed without prior approval by the HPC and the Building Department, evidence suggests that the new
changes are not structurally sound and in compliance with current building code, there is only one quotation
obtained by the applicantfor in-kind work, and there is insufficient documentation to consider alternative pro-
posals at this time.
Commissioner Voll(AYE): a tough decision because ofall the work the owner has put into it. The build-
ing, ifit were restored, in that neighborhood, would be a classic piece. That is a difficult option here, but there
is hope that there may be ways to achieve that.
Commissioner Buccellato(AYE): project does not ineet standards and guidelines, in particular that addi-
tions to Landmarks should not detractfrom the originalform. This roof, as proposed, will detractfrom the orig-
inalform. Would like to see the building saved, andrecommended that ifa sloped roofis necessaryfinancially,
the owner would come back with a proposal that does not detractfrom theform ofthe structure.
Commissioner Gelfman (AYE): architectural integrity, lack ofother quotes on aflat roof, changingfrom
flat rooftogabled roof, losing the structural integrityofthe building as-is historically, andmaterials being used.
COMMISSIONERS STA FF
Thomas Gordon(VicePresident) Deb Parcell, Deputy Director
HISTORICMike Voll(Treasurer) Brett Hummer,Legal Coy nsel
Jennifer Parker(ArchitecturalHistorian)Steve Szaday.Preservation Specialist
PRESERVATIONElizabeth Hertel(Secretary)
KevinBuccellato COMMISSIONBrandon Anderson
Michele GelfmanOF
SOUTH BENZ]&ST.JOSEPH COUNTY
EST.1 Q73
Joseph Molnar
SOUTBB
South Bend and St. Joseph County
o
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION t A`°
W,
0NfRSO
227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD
F%/
SOUTH BEND, IN 46601-1830
www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.html to
1865 Phone:574-235-9798 Fax:574-235-9578
e-mail:
SBSJCHPC@co.st
joseph.in.us
ti!
rtia
Timothy S. Klusezinski,President A Certified local Government Elicia Feasel, Executive Director
Commissioner Molnar (AYE): echoes Commissioner Voll's statements that this is a tough choice. Szzggestschecking with Community Investmenttosee ifthey have any programs that couldassist in thisproject.Nine in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 9-0 COA 42016-0809 Denied.
Please contact this office with any questions or concerns or forany assistance.
Sincerely,
Debra Parcell, Deputy Director
COMMISSIONERS STAFF
ThomasGordon(Vice President) DebParcel],Deputy DirectorHISTORICMike Voll(Treasurer) Brett Rummer,Legal CounselJennifer Parker(Architectural Historian)Steve Szaday,Preservation SpecialistPRESERVATIONElizabeth Hertel(Secretaq•)
Kevin
nAndl
COMMISSIONBrandon Anderson
MicheleGel fnan OF SOUTH BEND&ST.JOSEPH COUNTY
Joseph Molnar ES T.1973
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 9 August 2016
Application Number: 2016-0809
Pr operty Location: 1240 West'I'homas Street
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Period Revival/1920/Firehouse#4
Prop erty Owner: Eric Boyd
Landmark or
DistrictDesignation: Local Landmark
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: Firehouse 94 is a 2-story rectangular brick building. It had
a flat roof with limestone parapet coping,metal parapet scupper/cornice with brick brackets underneath
and ornate limestone detailing at the ends. The windows are 1/1 double-hung with limestone sills. There
is a brick side chimney,and a roof penthouse with hip roof.
ALTERATIONS: Most of the windows in this former firehouse have been boarded up prior to a 2007
fire. RME 2011-1110 approved replacement of metal roof to secure the building and protect it froth the
elements,although there is no evidence it was ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roof has been
installed without an approved COA or Building Permit on approximately half of the main structure,as
well as a second story addition and gabled roof on the rear of the building. Areas where large overhead
garage doors were originally located have been covered with vinyl siding. Most window openings have
been covered with plywood or vinyl siding.
APPLICATION ITEMS: Roof, window replacement,apply for addition—siding vinyl and window
replacement is long term. Current plan is to keep windows boarded for security reasons(2 replacement
windows have been broken). Color ofvinyl siding is brown.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: HPC Staff has worked with the current owner in recent
years to support a tax abatement and rezoning petition. Although an RME was issued for a replacement
roof in 2011, the details of what was actually installed were not presented at that time. Additionally, the
Building Department has provided a statement that indicates the current roof configuration was not
approved with a Building Permit and has ordered all work to stop until a formal submission and plan is set
for the proposed work. This property was heard at a July 26,2016 Code Enforcement hearing where a
date of January 26,2017 was given for Code compliance.
Owner proposes a 4/12 shed roof be constructed over part of the main building, from the west exterior
wall 30' east to a 10'H wall built on existing brick interior wall, with a 1' overhang at west wall. Second
floor addition atop one-story brick portion at rear of building is to be vinyl sided to match existing brown
vinyl siding used to fill garage door openings; replacement windows to be used to fill window openings in
this addition. Existing windows in building are to be left boarded up for security reasons. Most of this
work with the exception of the windows and vinyl in the rear addition have been installed without COA
or Building Permit.
PRESERVATIONSPECIALIST REPORT: n/a
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B
A. Maintenance
The maintenance ofany historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change
except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper
maintenance of all structure or sites.
B, Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form.
Such improvements include re-roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can
potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change ofany surface
whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate ofAppropriateness if it
significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a
Buildilg Permit,a Certificate ofAppropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the
proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces.
C. Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification ofa structure,which does not alter the general massing while an addition,
is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal ofa part of the landmark,should be
considered under
demolition(see
demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original
form and unity ofthe landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions
to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of
the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the
additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements,where safety demands should be accomplished
in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be
of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative
material may be allowed if it duplicates the original.
a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trine in shape and size.
b. siding materials—
the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original
materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials
Should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered.
D. Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety,and
demolition is the only alternative,documentation by way ofphotographs, measured drawings,or other
descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or
agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation.
E. Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is
necessary, the owner ofthe landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F.aigns
No neon.or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super-
graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G. Building Site and LandscapMg
1.Required
Major landscaping items,trees, fencing,walkways,private yard lights, signs(house numbers)and
benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land
contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits,
swimming pools,tennis courts,green houses,new walls,fountains, fixed garden furniture,
trellises,and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and
neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2. Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance ofthe property
found in photographs,
drawings,and newspapers. Plant materials and
trees in close proximity to
the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed.
However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by
suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation
would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style,
materials,and scale.
3. Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items,
trees, fencing,walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to
the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking
lots nor paved nor blaektopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes
and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public
thoroughfares.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staffdoes not recommend approval of the roof deviation from flat to
asymmetrical gable and does not recommend a roofon only halfof the structure as it does not conform to
the standards and guidelines, A, B, and C. Staff recommends rear second story addition with gable roof,
however, is not recommending the proposed window and siding treatments as they can be considered an
incompatible material as reference in C, 2. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with the
Building Department at the request of the Building Commissioner,
Elicia Feasel
Executive Director
I
essw.vFRr
ST.JOSEPH COUNTY N
CITY OF SOUTH BEND
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Ev
x
I$G5
March 2,2017
Eric A Boyd
1207 W Thomas St
South Bend,IN 46601
AND
Current Owner/Tenant
1240 THOMAS ST,
SOUTH BEND,IN 46625
Re: Violations ofCityOrdinance at 1240 Thomas St, South Bend, IN 46625/Third Notice
Dear Mr.Boyd,
Werecognizetheefforttoreduceviolations ofthe CityofSouth Bend ZoningOrdinance, atyourproperty located at 1240 THOMAS ST, SOUTH BEND, IN 46625,zoned"MU"MixedUse District.However,the property is still in violation.
The above-referenced property has the following violations:
1. The failure toobtain an improvementlocation permitwhen one isrequired by the termsand provisions ofthis Ordinance,Section 21-100(2), specifically doing construction
remodeling without application for applicable commercial building permits.
2. Failure to comply with any other provisions ofthis Ordinance,orother applicablefederal, stateorlocal laworordinance,Section21-100110), specifically the failure toacquire a Certificate ofAppropriateness for new construction from the HistoricPreservation Commission forabuilding identified as a South Bend Local Landmark,Ordinance No. 7591-86)
3. Failure to complywiththeterms, provisionsorconditions ofanyotherpermitrequired as
a prerequisiteto the issuance ofa improvement location permit,Section21-10(f)(8)(C),specifically the failure tocomply with the Historic Preservation Commissions decisionagainst the work that has been recently done to the building.
VIOLATION REMEDY REQUIREMENTS
Immediately remove the additions to the building installed without issuance ofaCertificate ofAppropriateness from the Historic Preservation Commission and
EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT125 S.Larayette Wd.1 suite 1001 South Bend,lndtana 466011 p 574.235.95541 t 574.235.5541
S'- JOSE"H COUP"'1' I C:1'1"1'Ul'SOUTH BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
apply for an inspection by our department to verify the unapproved work has been
properly demolished.
Ifthese violationsexiston or afterMarch 13 2017citations will beissued. Ifyou have anyquestions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
4ek
Ayoka Paek,MCP, MCIP
Zoning and Business Services Administrator
cc:
Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Commission
Randy Wilkerson, Code Enforcement
EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION EMPOWERMENT
125 S.Lafayette Nd.I Suite 1001 South Bend.Indiana 46601 p 574.235.9554 f574.235.5541 2
1
i I
k
Ali a
E 1
f
AWo
Y
K„'
1"
ry F xr+
F T
F?
M27 <
l.f z7
7
i-
d`• '
j-'
y:
ti
r .,,; '
Ell
M-MIT OiW
DOW-
r
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OFSOUTH BEND&ST.JOSEPH COUNTY
June 19,2017
131 Floor Conference Room
County--City Building
South Bend,IN 46601
I.CALL TO ORDER
President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Tom
Gordon,Asst. Secretary;Brandon Anderson,Kevin Buccellato,Joseph Molnar,Treasurer
Members Not in Attendance: Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian; Michele Gelfinan,
Secretary;Mike Voll
StaffPresent: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Deb Parcell, Deputy Director; Steve Szaday,
Preservation Specialist;Katlyn Foust,Legal Counsel
Members ofthe Public Present: Roman Sysyn,K&J Building Contractors,Mark Wenkus, Mike
Fernander,Deb Fernander,Beadenual Williams,Mike Illes, Kart Nichols,Leticia Morris,Theresa
Johnson, Kevin Jakiel, Eric Boyd, Aaron 66, Michael Boyd, Gloria Jones, Unetta Jones, Kirstin
Champer, Steve Mihaljevic,Gladys Muhammad,Derek Wright,Todd Zeiger
II. PUBLIC HEARING
A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
1. 1327East WayneStreet COA#2017-0508East Wayne Street
Representation by Mike and Debbie Fernander, 1327 East Wayne
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: May 8,2017
Application Number: 2017-0508
Property Location: 1327 East Wayne Street North
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/I941/Mills House
Property Owner: Michael&Deborah Fernander
Landmark or
District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District,ordinance#7796-87
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE
Two story,rectangular floor plan,wood frame construction with limestone first story and asbestos shingles on balance of
exterior. Side gabled roofwith gable returns and simple entablature. The roofis covered with asphalt shingles,8/8 double hung
wood windows with ornamental louvered shutters. On the south ofthe home,there is a one-story porch wing with flat roofand
diamond pattered wood railing. Porch wing fagade has plain entablature and plain pilasters,enclosed with sliding glass doors
and pergola. Attached two car garage is on the south end of the home.
ALTERATIONS:
The survey card,updated in 1998,notes"major"alterations to this home including:aluminum storm door and windows,enclosed
south porch wing,and siding.
COA 2002-0522 was approved for the removal of"existing gray asphalt 3-tab shingles from roof ofhome and garage and
replacement with
light'shake w ood
brown'color asphalt architecturalshingles on roof and garage"
COA 2009-060113 approved
an 8'x 31'kitchen addition and 7'x 20'covered porch. COA 2013-0620 approved removal and replanting ofa maple tree onstreet lawn.
APPLICATION ITEMS:
Fencing along 3 sides of yard.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
Owner proposes installation of 5'wrought iron gate at northeast comer of garage,attached to a 38"high decorative wrought iron
fence continuing 23'east to sidewalk,then running between shrubs and sidewalk(P offsidewalk)north 28'and west 38%
transitioning to a6'high wood privacy fence running 34'west,terminating at existing 6'high wood fence(existing fence to
1
remain).Fenced area will be closed off between south end of existing wood fence and house with 7'wrought iron gate with two
side pieces. Although this plan proposes a fenced area in front ofthe house,this would be on the Jacob Street side,not East
Wayne Street,as the house actually faces Jacob.
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:
EAST WAYNE STREET LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT
I.THE ENVIRONMENT
B.BUILDING SITE,LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES
Required
Major landscaping items,fencing,walkways,private yard Iights,signs(house numbers)and benches which reflect the property's
history and development shall be retained.Dominant land contours shall be retained.Structures such as gazebos,patio decks,
fixed barbecue pits,swimming pools,tennis courts,greenhouses,new walls,fountains,fixed garden furniture,trellises and other
similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character ofthe site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed
from a public walkway.
Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance ofthe property found in
photographs,drawings and newspapers.New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale,type
and appearance.Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's
historic fabric should be removed.However,trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by
suitable flora.All high intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission.
Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance ofthe site by removing major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,
outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development.Front yard areas
shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped.Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall
not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house.The installation ofunsightly devices such as television reception
dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare.
Not Recommended
Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be
seen from the thoroughfare.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Although the proposed fence would extend in front ofthe setback line of the house,the
siting ofthe house on the lot would position this fence near Jacob Street,notEast Wayne Street. A similar fence project was
approved for 304 Twyckenham with COA 2011-0606. Staff recommends approval.
Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Deb Parcell,Deputy Director
Commissioner
Hertel moved to approve applic at ion as submitted.
Seconded by Commissioner
Molnar. Six in favor,none opposed.
Vote: 6—0
COA42017-0508 Approved.
2. 812 Golden COA#2017-0523 Riverside Drive
Representation by Leticia Morris, 812 Golden
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: May 23,2017
Application Number: 2017-0523
Property Location: 812 Golden
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1911
Property Owner: Tim&Leticia Morris
Landmark o r District Designation: Riverside Drive LHD,ordinance#7469-85
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The 2 story frame house has a square plan and is set upon a concrete block
foundation.It has a high hip roofwith a gable projection on the main fagade and it is covered in asphalt shingles.The walls are
aluminum sided. Some of the upper floor windows and the front fagade windows appear to be original 1/1 wood double-hung.
All the windows have aluminum storms.There is an open porch with concrete block pillars and piers with wood Doric columns.
The front door appears to be original. The house is situated on a very small wedge-shaped lot with a narrow front and side yard;
the garage completely dominates the rear yard.
2
ALTERATIONS: The house is aluminum sided and all windows have aluminum storms.The steel security door at the rear of
the house is a replacement. The garage appears to be original. The storm door is not original. The south kitchen window has
been reduced in size and replaced with a modern vinyl replacement window(1985).A south basement window has been replaced
with a vinyl replacement window and the other south side basement window has a deteriorating aluminum storm and wood
window. A window at the rear ofthe house has been removed and/or covered with aluminum siding(1985).The roof was
replaced with COA 2007-0316.COA 2010-0802A for vinyl replacement windows was denied with the exception of the front
third floor window,as it was determined by the Preservation Specialist that existing windows could be repaired and/or
rehabilitated. COA 2016-1019 approved tear down ofexisting garage,and conditional approval of installation of anew wood
deck andFrench doors(replacing windows)atback side ofhouse;removal and replacement ofexisting wood windows was
denied. COA 2016-1205 and 2017-0103 for removal and replacement ofexisting wood windows were denied.
APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace existingstone retaining wall in front yard with landscape blocks;add landscaping plants,and
plant flowering dogwood(Comus florida).
DESCRIPTION OFPROPOSED PROJECT.Owner has removed stone retaining wall infrontofproperty,and installed dry-
laid landscape block retaining walls along sidewalks. New plants,shrubs,and a flowering Dogwood(Corpus florida)have been
planted in theyard. This goal ofthis project was to improve soil retention,as well as the overall appearance ofthe property.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:
Riverside Drive Local Historic District
I.THE ENVIRONMENT
B.BUILDING SITE,LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES
Individual properties inthe district are characterized by a house located in the center ofaflat lawn,often divided by awalk
leading to the front entrance.Several ofthe residences are sited on two or more building lots;however,the preponderance ofthe
homes have been erected on a single lot.Most ofthe properties include a double garage,usually located at the rear ofthe
property.The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare,while a few are
accessed from the alley.There are also a fewhomes with a covered carport located atthe rear ofthe property,as well as a few
with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete,asphalt and brick.All ofthe properties have trees
and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges.Most ofthe houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block.
Required
Plants,trees,fencing,walkways,private yard lights,signs(housenumbers)and benches which reflect the property's history anddevelopment shall be retained.
Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge ofthe past appearance ofthe property found in photographs,
drawings and newspapers.New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale,type and
appearance.Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic
fabric should be removed.However,trees and plant materials that must be removed should be
immediately replaced by suitable flora.All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation
Commission.
Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance ofthe site by removing major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,
outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development.Front yard areas
shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor black-topped.Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not
extend forward beyond the setback line of the house.The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and
solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can he viewed from the public thoroughfare.
Not Recommended
Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the
thoroughfare.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:As the new retaining wall and landscaping will prevent erosion,does not detract from the
appearance of the property,and is similar to other retaining walls in the Riverside Drive historic district,Staffrecommends
appro val.
Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Deb Parcel],Deputy Director
Public Hearing:
Barbara Gatto,808 Golden: Supports the Morrises as they are good neighbors and are good for the
neighborhood. They have improved the neighborhood.
Angela Philpott, 1077 Riverside: Before this retaining wall was put in, there were loose rocks .
there,and kids would pick them up and throw them.This will be safer.
CommissionDiscussion:
Commissioner Hertel pointed out for the record that the installation of the retaining wall was
completed before the application had been filed and that the applicants should have had knowledge
of procedure from recent COA projects.
Commissioner Buccellato moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner
Anderson. Six in favor,none opposed.
Vote: 6—0
COA#2017-0523 Approved.
3.511 West Colfax COA#2017-0526A Local Landmark
Representation by Steve Majalevich, 117 Franklin Place, South Bend
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: May 26,2017
Application Number: 2017-0526A
Property Location:
51 l West Colfax
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1898Birdsell House/Wilson Parker,Archt.
Property Owner: Steve Mihaljevic/Anisah Michael
Landmark or
District Designation: Local Landmark,Ordinance#8609-1995/West Washington St.National Register Historic
District
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE:The wood frame house has field stone veneer facade on the first floor,second floor
is brick veneer,gable ends ofhouse are Tudor-style halftimbers. The foundation is concrete and stone and the half-timbering in
the gables. Wood windows are diamond patterned 4/1. Verandah is supported with stone columns with ornate capitals. The
porte cochere has a hipped roof.
ALTERATIONS:Original roof has been replaced with asphalt shingles. COA 2000-0316 approved a wrought fence around the
property,and a rear yard chain link fence was approved with COA 2001-0129,although neither ofthese fences were installed.
COA 2008-0604A approved reconstruction of chimney. RME 2016-0825A approved repair of five original double hung
windows in second story south and third story south. COA 2016-1018 to replace the existing asphalt shingle house roof and
metal front porch and porte cochere roofs with standing-seam copper was denied. COA 2016-1128A approved copper standing-
seam roofing material to be used on porch and Porte cochere,and alternative(reproduction),synthetic materials for the main
roof,subject to commission approval at a later date.
APPLICATION ITEMS:Replace current shingle roof with combination of faux slate,copper caps,copper gutters,copper
valleys,coper caps,copper drip edges. Main roof will consist of faux slate,porte cochere and front porch will be all copper.
Additional work that will be occurring: -Repainting of all exterior surfaces(wood)stucco,windows.-Repair ofwoodwork(in-
kind).
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:This is a reapplication for items approved with conditions on COA 2016-
1128A. Owner proposes to install EcoStar Majestic Slate synthetic slate tiles with copper drip edge,copper valley,edge trim and
flashings on house roof,and copper standing seam roof material on front porch and porte cochere. Historic photos show the
original house roofto be flat clay tile,and the Portage Township Assessor's card lists a file roofin 1935. The original porch and
porte cochere roofs,as well as gutters and accents which still exist,are painted metal;the original house roof was replaced with
aspha lt shi n gle s.
Additionally,the owner proposes to repair all woodwork,and repaint all exterior surfaces:wood,stucco,and windows. These
items to be approved as Routine Maintenance Exclusions.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:
The current roof material is asphalt shingles on the main house and metal raised-seamed roofing on the front porch and porte-
cochere. Several patches and alternative coverings are in place in multiple locations where the asphalt roofhas begun to roll up
and deteriorate.From the interior ofthe house water damage is evident on the southeast,northeast,and southwest comers. A
large area on the northeast has the most significant damage.The exterior patches and correlating interior damage would suggest
that an inspection should take place to identify any necessary roof deck repairs or replacement that should take place prior to
installation of any new roofing material.
Steve Szaday,Preservation Specialist
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:Group B
A. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general
cleaning and upkeep ofthe landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance ofall structure or sites.
B.Treatment
4
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such
improvements include re-roofing,glazing,or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or
detract from the character ofthe landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its
environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark.
Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit,a Certificate ofAppropriateness may be necessary.
The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces.
C.Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification ofa structure,which does not alter the general massing while an addition,is a change in mass. A
modification,which involves the removal ofa part ofthe landmark,should be considered under demolition(see demolition).
Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular
examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of
overall appearance ofthe site. The proportions,materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the
additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1.Structure—Necessary structural improvements,where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to
cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2.Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same
material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it
duplicates the original.
a.wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b.siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with
additional siding.Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar
to the original when renovation is considered.
D.Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety,and demolition is the only
alternative,documentation by way ofphotographs,measured drawings,or other descriptive methods should be made of both the
exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the Iandmark shall be responsible for
this documentation.
E. Moving
The moving oflandmarks is discouraged,however,moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary,the owner of
the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. Signs
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super-graphics will also be
disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G.Building Site and Landscaping
1.R wired
Major landscaping items,trees,fencing;walkways,private yard lights,signs(house numbers)and benches which
reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures
such as:gazebos,patio decks,fixed barbecue pits,swimming pools,tennis courts,green houses,new walls,fountains,
fixed garden furniture,trellises,and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and
neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2.Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance ofthe property found in photographs,
drawings,and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to
the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However,trees and plant materials that must be removed should be
immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic
documentation would
indicate such
fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style,
materials,and scale.
3.Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance ofthe site by removing major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,
outbuildings,and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front
yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor black-topped. The installation ofunsightly devices
such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public
thoroughfares.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:As the proposed synthetic slate material closely replicates the original flat clay the roof;Staff
recommends approval.
Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Deb Parcell,Deputy Director
Commissioner Buccellato moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner
Hertel. Six in favor,none opposed.
Vote: 6—0
5
COA#2017-0526A Approved.
4. 1067 Riverside COA#2017-0524
Riverside Drive
Representation by Roman Sysyn, 1067 Riverside
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: May 24,2017
Application Number: 2017-0524
Property Location: 1067 Riverside
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1911
Property Owner: Roman Sysyn
Landmark or
District Designation: Riverside Drive Local Historic District ,ordinance#7469-85
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The house is a typical square plan,2 plus stories built in 1907 by real estate
developer Frederick Keller of Whitcomb and Keller. The foundation is rusticated concrete block,the first story is clapboard with
an enclosed porch;the second floor is wood shingles above a string course. The roof is a high hip roof with three gabled roof
dormers,exposed rafter tails,wide overhangs and is covered with asphalt shingles. The windows are 111 double hung;the porch
has horizontal 1/1. There is a bay window on the east side.
ALTERATIONS: The porch windows are not original to the house. The roof is a replacement(1986-0417)and re-roofed over
with Art
Lock shingles(
2007-0705). The porch had a complete tear off and re-roof with asphalt shingles(2007-0705). COA
2009-0826 approved removal of existing chain link fence and installation of new wood fence. COA 2013-0422C approved
restoration of wood spindle rail on 3 sides of front porch. COA 2015-0929A approved removal ofdying Sugar Maple in front
lawn.
APPLICATION ITEMS:Install one replacement window.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
Owner proposes installation of new Champion vinyl replacement window in
front attic window opening.Currently there is only a triple track aluminum storm window in the opening. The new window will
be an interior replacement type,installed behind the existing aluminum storm window,and therefore difficult to see. Existing
wood trim will be retained.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:
This morning at approximately 9:30 AM,I met with the owner of 1067 Riverside Drive at the property.He has applied to change
his attic window(north/front side)from what was there to a vinyl Champion window.The current window is nothing more than
an aluminum triple track storm window which will remain in place. There was a wood and glass sash hinged in place that the
owner installed himself in 1973.That window was not original but fit in the jamb frame on the inside of the storm window.That
sash had finally fallen apart and the owner no longer had possession of it.There was a double hung window there once but that
was prior to this owner purchasing the home in 1973.
The owner would like to have permission to install a new vinyl double hung window installed inside the existing window
framework without any grilles.The house currently has double hung windows without grilles that are covered up by the
aluminum storm windows.The new window will also be covered up by the existing storm.The proposed window is an interior
replacement type and would be difficult to see after installation.
Since the pane that was in place was not available to inspect,I am unable to determine its condition,I am relying upon the
owne r's account.
Steve Szaday,Preservation Specialist
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:
RIVERSIDE DRIVE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT
11.EXISTING STRUCTURES
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood.Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels.In some cases where
aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered.About half of the structures in the district have aluminum
stone windows,the other half wood windows.
Required
Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes,lintels,sills,shutters,decorative glass,pediments,hoods,
and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair,they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
Recommended
Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames.If
new sashes or doors are installed,the existing or original materials,design,and hardware should be used.When metal
storm doors are used,they should be painted,anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of
canvas material.
Prohi it
Original doors,windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place.New window and
door openings which would alter the scale and proportion ofthe building shall not be introduced
6
Inappropriate new window and door features,such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal ofthe
original windows and doors,shall not be installed.
Not Recommended
Awnings,hoods,and fake shutters made of metal,vinyl,or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing
character or appearance ofthe building.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:As the new window will be difficult to see when installed behind the existing storm,Staff
recommends a pproval
Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Deb Parcel1,Deputy Director
Commission Discussion:
Evidence supports
that only a storm window exists to cover the currentopening—the original
window no longer exists.
Commissioner Gordon moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner
Molnar. Six in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 6—0
COA#2017-0524 Approved.
5.
620 West WashingtonCOA#2017-0601 Local Landmark
Representation by Kevin Jakiel,620 West Washington Street
Kevin Proffitt, 52222 Pickwick Lane,Nappanee
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: June 1,2017
Application Number: 2017-0601
Property Location: 620 West Washington
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Richardsonian Romanesque/1889/Tippecanoe Place/Henry Ives Cobb,
Architect
Property Owner: Brian and Kristi Matteoni/Norm Matteoni
Landmark or
District Designation: Local Landmark,ordinance#6569-1979;West Washington Street National Register
District;National Historic Landmark designated by the National Park Service(only NHL in St.Joseph County and of only 42 in
Indiana)
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE:This four-story house with an irregular plan has a 12/12 red tile covered central hip
roof with numerous intersecting hips,towers,and gables,and a simple eave line with copper gutters. The exterior walls and
foundations are rough stone,with limestone window and door trim. The house has large bay windows on the north fagade,a
four-story tower at the northeast corner,projecting turret with conical roofat the southeast corner,a steep gable on the port-
cochere at the west end,and six stone chimneys with simple banding and cut stone caps. Most windows are one-over-one wood
double-hung;there are also windows with double transoms,as well as a few Gothic windows. Generally,windows are deeply
recessed and feature stone lintels and sills. At the west end of the house,colonnettes flank six windows with double transoms on
the fourth floor,while first story windows are set in rounded heavy stone arches with colonettes. The front entry porch is
enclosed by round stone arches supported by clusters of Romanesque columns. The porte-cochere has intersecting gables and
large arched openings.The rear veranda stretches around the south and east,featuring short Romanesque columns with a variety
of capitals.Doors are wood_
ALTERATIONS:COA 1979-1107 to convert house into a restaurant through exterior changes listed in Appendix I(including
10: enclosing rear garden veranda)was denied. COA 1979-1217 addressed concerns discussed on previous COA to convert
house into a restaurant;it was conditionally approved pending treatment ofthe porte-cochere. COA 1980-0219,upon review for
the third time,approved conversion of the house into a restaurant,enclosure ofthe porte-cochere doorway openings with
nonfunctional paneled wood doors,and enclosure ofrear veranda with 6-and 3-light casement and fixed wood windows. COA
1980-0317 approved construction of a stone sign south ofthe Washington Street entrance. COA 1980-0903 approved
construction of a wooden fence to enclose area south of building to install a freezer. COA 1982-0524 approved repair of roof.
COA 1988-0721 approved in-kind replacement of front steps and repair of north garden wall. Six-and three-light casement and
fixed windows enclosing rear veranda have been replaced with new vinyl windows without COA approval,in violation of
Ordinance Section 21-100(10). COA 2017-0214A to replace wood windows in rear veranda with vinyl windows encased with
wood molding to cover all exposed vinyl was denied.
7
APPLICATION ITEMS:Removal of a total of 21 windows. Install single glass pane Low E DS Insulated Glass 1:from The
Glass Doctors as recommended by HPC. To restore to the previous 1979 installation per pictures attached. Exterior trim will be
installed and painted to historically match. Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed and painted using proper
materials and procedures by K&J Building Contractors. Due to our seasonal time as well as the cost incurred we are requesting
to c omplete the Southeast side
this Fall2017 a nd
the back-South Side ne xt fall 2018. K&J Building Contractors on our behalf
will obtain permits with both City of South Bend and the Historical Commission ifneeded.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
Owner proposes removal of 21 vinyl windows installed without HPC approval,and installation of single glass pane Low E DS
Insulated Glass windows from The Glass Doctors,for an in-kind replacement of the windows which were first installed when this
area was enclosed to provide seating space for the restaurant. Exterior trim will be installed and painted to match existing trim
on house. Although the porch was not originally enclosed,the proposed treatment will restore to the previous 1979 installation
p er pictures attached.
Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed and painted using proper materials and
procedures by K&J Building Contractors. Request has been made to install new windows on the southeast side ofthe rear porch
in Fall 2017,with the balance to be replaced Fall 2018,due to the seasonal time as well as the cost incurred.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:Group B
B. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general
cleaning and upkeep ofthe landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites.
B.Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such
improvements include re-roofing,glazing,or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or
detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its
environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark.
Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit,a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary.
The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces.
C.Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure,which does not alter the general massing while an addition,is a change in mass. A
modification,which involves the removal of a part of the landmark,should be considered under demolition(see demolition).
Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity ofthe landmark and should not cover singular
examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of
overall appearance of the site. The proportions,materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the
additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1.Structure—Necessary structural improvements,where safety demands should be accomplished in such a
way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2.Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be ofthe same material
as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the
original,
a.wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b.siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with
additional siding.Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar
to the original when renovation is considered.
D.Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety,and demolition is the only
alternative,documentation by way of photographs,measured drawings,or other descriptive methods should be made of both the
exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition ofthe landmark shall be responsible for
this documentation.
E.Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged,however,moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary,the owner of
the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate ofAppropriateness.
F. Signs
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super-graphics will also be
disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G.Building Site and Landscaping
1.Required
Major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,private yard lights,signs(house numbers)and benches which
reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures
such as:gazebos,patio decks,fixed barbecue pits,swimming pools,tennis courts,green houses,new walls,fountains,
fixed garden fumiture,trellises,and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and
neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2.Recommended
8
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge ofthe past appearance ofthe property found in photographs,
drawings,and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to
the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However,trees and plant materials that must be removed should be
immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic
documentation would
indicate such
fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style,
materials,and scale.
3.Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance ofthe site by removing major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,
outbuildings,and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front
yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation ofunsightly devices
such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public
thoroughfares.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The vinyl windows currently installed replace wood windows that were not original to the
structure. Group B Standards state that change ofmaterials should be consistent with the character and style ofthe structure.
Renovations,Section C 1,state"Necessary structural improvements,where safety demands should be accomplished in such a
way a s to cau se mini mal v isua l c h ange
to the original style and con st ru ction."
As the porch was originally open,but is now used
for dining,enclosure is necessary. The proposed windows will restore to the look of the windows installed in 1979,and will
continue to allow dining in the porch area while providing a consistent visual appearance;therefore,staff recommends approval
of the proposed window installation. Additionally,staffrecommends approval ofthe proposed time schedule,with installation of
windows on southeast(most visible)side in Fall 2017,with balance of windows to be installed Fall 2018.
Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Deb Parcell,Deputy Director
Public Hearing:
Jason Germano, 52222 Pickwick Lane,Nappanee: In an effort to expedite this project,is there
any way to access previous plans/drawings to determine what the actual window size was in
1979?
Todd Zeiger,Indiana Landmarks,801 West Washington: Indiana Landmarks has an easement
on the property. They were understanding the project would be replicating 1979 windows,not
just swapping out wood for vinyl. Indiana Landmarks supports the three divisions between the
stone pillars,replicating what was installed in 1979. Any information in their files from the
previous window installation will be made available to help determine the original window
size. They will continue to work with the owners and HPC to reach an agreeable solution.
Application withdrawn by Kevin Jakiel,on behalf ofthe owners.
COA#2017-0601 Withdrawn.
6. 1240 West Thomas COA#2017-0602Local Landmark
Representation by Eric Boyd, 1240 West Thomas
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: June 2,2017
Application Number: 2017-0602(Application delivered by property owner to Building Department on June 1,2017)
Property Location: 1240 West Thomas Street
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Period Revival/l920fFirehouse#4
Property Owner: Eric A.Boyd
Landmark or DistrictDesignation: Local Landmark,ordinance#9037-99
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE:Firehouse 14 is a 2-story rectangular brick building. It had a flat roof with
limestone parapet coping,metal parapet scupper/cornice with brick brackets underneath and ornate limestone detailing at the
ends. The windows are 1/1 double-hung with limestone silts. There is a brick side chimney,and a roof penthouse with hip roof.
ALTERATIONS:Most of the windows in this former firehouse have been boarded up prior to a 2007 fire. RAE 2011-1110
approved replacement of metal roof to secure the building and protect it from the elements,although there is no evidence it was
ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roofhas been installed without an approved COA on approximately halfofthe main
structure,as well as a second story addition and gabled roofon the rear of the building. Areas where large overhead garage doors
were originally located have been covered with vinyl siding_ Most window openings have been covered with plywood or vinyl
9
siding.COA 2016-0809 to construct shed roof over part of building,and second floor addition atop one-story brick portion at
rear of building with vinyl siding and replacement windows was denied.
APPLICATION ITEMS:Two story addition,brown vinyl siding and three windows.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: See COA 2016-0809,pending with Building Department as a Violation of City
Ordinance.Not in compliance with the Violation Remedy Requirements as ordered to be completed by March 13,2017.
Owner has constructed a second-floor addition with gable roof atop one-story brick portion at rear of building.It has been
partially vinyl sided to match existing brown vinyl siding used to fill garage door openings.Three windows,that appear to be
vinyl have been installed. The proposed work has been installed,without a COA or Building Permit.
This is not a free-standing structure;it is attached to the main building.No report of structural inspection has been submitted with
this application.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:n/a
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:Group B
C. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general
cleaning and upkeep ofthe landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites.
B.Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements
include re-roofing,glazing,or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the
character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a
Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not
require a Building Permit,a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed
treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces.
C.Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure,which does not alter the general massing while an addition,is a change in mass. A
modification,which involves the removal of a part of the landmark,should be considered under demolition(see demolition).
Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular
examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of
overall appearance of the site. The proportions,materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the
additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1.Structure—
Necessary structural improvements,where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to
cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2.Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same
material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it
duplicates the original.
a.wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b.siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with
additional siding.Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding
similar to the original when renovation is considered.
D.Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety,and demolition is the only
alternative,documentation by way of photographs,measured drawings,or other descriptive methods should be made ofboth the
exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for
this documentation.
E.Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged,however,moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary,the owner of
the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F.Signs
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super-graphics will also be
disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G.Building Site and Landscaping
1.Required
Major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,private yard lights,signs(house numbers)and benches which
reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures
such as:gazebos,patio decks,fixed barbecue pits,swimming pools,tennis courts,green houses,new walls,fountains,
fixed garden furniture,trellises,and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and
neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2.Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs,
drawings,and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to
the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However,trees and plant materials that must be removed should be
immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic
documentation wou ld indicate such
fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style,
materials,and scale.
10
3.Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance ofthe site by removing major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,
outbuildings,and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front
yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices
such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public
thoroughfares.
Minimum Maintenance Standards approved by the Historic Preservation Commission,December 16, 1991,state that"all
landmarks and all contributing structures located in an historic district shall be preserved from decay and deterioration,and shall
be maintained in good repair and kept structurally sound. The owner or other person having charge or control of landmarks and
property in an historic district shall not allow or permit deterioration ofsuch property from defects or conditions which in the
judgment of the Commission produce a detrimental effect on the character of the district as a whole or the life and character of
the
landmark,str uc ture orproperty in qu est ion."
In particular,this property exhibits the following from the itemized(but not
exclusive)list of detrimental conditions:
b.Deterioration ofroofs or other horizontal members causing conditions such as sagging,splitting,
buckling,crumbling,holes,missing shingles or similar conditions;
e.
The ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls,roof and foundations,including broken windows or
doors;
h.The deterioration of any feature so as to create or permit the creation of any hazardous or unsafe
c ondition or conditio ns.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:After careful review of this application,it appears to a large degree to be similar as applied for
in COA application 2016-0809 that was denied by HPC and is a pending Violation of City Ordinance with the Building
Department.As in COA 2016-0809,Staff recommends approval of rear second story addition with gable roof.Staff does not
recommend the proposed window and siding treatments as they can be considered an incompatible material as reference in C,2.
Staff recommends approval of a wood siding or fiber cement siding to complete the new second story addition.Staff
recommends double hung windows,wood or aluminum clad,without rounded tops in the same style as the original windows in
the main structure. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with the Building Department at the request of the
Building Commissioner.Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with Code Enforcement as there are noted violations
of Minimum Maintenance Standards.
Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Deb Parcell,Deputy Director
Owner concerns: 1)UPC office was closed twice when Mr.Boyd tried to turn in COA application,
and he eventually turned it into the Building Department. 2)He did not receive a copy ofthe staff
report and agenda in the U.S.mail,but rather had to come to the office to obtain a copy to prepare
for the meeting properly. 3) Structural report included with second COA is also relevant to this
COA.
Owner noted discrepancies: 1)Boarding of windows was done to comply with Code Enforcement
regulations.
2) He stated that his project is in compliance with the Building Department, and
provided copies of correspondence stating application for COA would be a remedy for non-
compliance.
Public Hearing:
Gladys Mohammed, 808 North Ironwood: worked for South Bend Heritage. Goal to reinvest in
the west side of South Bend, and get residents to do likewise. Eric has a dream and is trying to
pursue it. It appears that someone in the city made a mistake and they need to fix it and not make
Eric pay for it. She is encouraging HPC to allow Eric to pursue his dream, and advise him right,
and not have to pay for someone else's mistake.
Would like to see the building be something
valuable for the community.
Mike Boyd, 1207 West Thomas: big brother of Eric. This is the neighborhood where we grew up.
Here to support his brother in his dream, to see what the process entails, hopes this can move
forward. Communication is important.
Carl Nicbols, Gethsemane Church of God, 308 South Walnut: church adjacent to the land Eric
owns. They own property between viaduct and Firehouse and are in the process of developing it.
It is not appropriate to leave the Firehouse vacant and abandoned. The neighborhood is growing.
No one cares what the building looks like;they care that it is not vacant. Please approve the COA.
11
Beadenual Williams, 1209 Thomas Street: She has wondered since she moved in what was going
to happen with the Firehouse. There aren't a lot of houses on that block, but we try to maintain
what we have. Eric is improving the building. It looks nice now; not like the ghetto. Somebody
took pride and did something with the
building. She supports Eric; he made a change to the
neighborhood.
Gloria Jones,2705 Fredrickson: We all grew up on Thomas Street. It is time something happens
with that building. 25 years from now Eric will be putting her away and using that building. She
supports the COA.
PresidentKhusczinski stated for the record this
is a 1920s st ructure.
There are standards and
guidelines we use that are universal for single-site landmarks like this. There is a law that the city
of South Bend passed that declared this building an historic Iandmark to the city of South Bend,
and gave the Historic Preservation Commission jurisdiction for review of exterior changes to the
structure. The HPC has supported preservation and stewardship of this badly damaged landmark.
A Routine Maintenance Exclusion was granted in 2011 to replace the roof on the structure. The
current project happened without a building permit and without a Certificate of Appropriateness.
The ftPC supports Mr.Boyd in his efforts to preserve the building, but we have a set of standards
and guidelines that are very objective for the kinds of allowances that we could permit for the
exterior of the structure, and in that we try to maintain some discipline about things that are in the
best interest of the structure, to keep its 1920s appearance, or to accept installations of additions
that are sympathetic with that original intent,architectural and historic.
Commissioner Gordon moved to approve second floor addition remanding final review authority
to staff to approve double-hung aluminum clad or wood windows as replacement for existing
second floor windows, retaining existing vinyl siding and installing siding to match on balance of
second floor addition exterior.Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. Five in favor,one opposed.
Commissioner Hertel(NAY)-Vinyl does not fit with the historic integrity ofthe building. I love
this building,this building is beautiful, but I think we are doing it a disservice putting vinyl on it,
and it is not the original intent of the building materials.
Vote: 5 — 1
COA42017-0602 Approved with conditions.
7. 1240 West Thomas COA#2017-0602ALocal Landmark
Representation by Eric Boyd, 1240 West Thomas
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: June 2,2017
ApplicationPlumber: 2017-0602A(Application delivered by property owner to Building Department on June 1,2017)
Property Location: 1240 West Thomas Street
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Period RevivaU1920/Firehouse#4
Property Owner: Eric A.Boyd
Landmark or
District Designation: Local Landmark,ordinance#9037-99
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE:Firehouse#4 is a 2-story rectangular brick building. It had a flat roof with
limestone parapet coping,metal parapet scupper/comice with brick brackets underneath and ornate limestone detailing at the
ends. The windows are 1/1 double-hung with limestone sills. There is a brick side chimney,and a roof penthouse with hip roof.
ALTERATIONS:Most of the windows in this former firehouse have been boarded up prior to a 2007 fire. RME 2011-1110
approved replacement of metal roof to secure the building and protect it from the elements,although there is no evidence it was
ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roof has been installed without an approved COA on approximately halfofthe main
structure,as well as a second story addition and gabled roof on the rear of the building. Areas where large overhead garage doors
were originally located have been covered with vinyl siding. Most window openings have been covered with plywood or vinyl
12
siding. COA 2016-0809 to construct shed roof over part of building,and second floor addition atop one-story brick portion at
rear of building with vinyl siding and replacement windows was denied.
APPLICATION ITEMS:Mono roof4/12 pitch,rise west to east ending at center of building resting on ledger/East stud wall.
Low profile mono roofresting south brick wall and interior brick wall. Open courtyard.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:See COA 2016-0809,pending with the Building Department as a Violation of
City Ordinance.Not in compliance with the Violation Remedy Requirements as ordered to be completed by March 13,2017.
Owner has constructed a 4/12 single sloping roof surface over part of,roughly one half,of the main building,from the west
exterior wall 30'east to a 10'H wall built on existing brick interior wall,with a 1'overhang at west wall. Concrete floor of open
courtyard is 6-8"lower than adjacent floor. Owner plans to utilize existing floor drain and lower floor height to manage
accumulated moisture in the courtyard. This roof has been installed without COA.
See report ofstructural inspection by Siqueira,LLC,submitted with this application.In summary,the inspection reveals
inadequate joists spanning 17.5'running east-west at 16"oc,supported at masonry walls;rooflevel beam sag,exterior walls that
lack bracing,trash pile in"courtyard",recommended provisions to dispose of snow and drain rain in"courtyard",multiple
deficiencies in the framed mono-sloped roof at North West,and 20 joists spanning 10'that are insufficient.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:n/a
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:Group B
D. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any directphysical change except for the general
cleaning and upkeep ofthe landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites.
B.Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements
include re-roofing,glazing,or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the
character ofthe landmark. Atreatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a
Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not
require a Building Permit,a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed
treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces.
C.Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification ofa structure,which does not alter the general massing while an addition,is a change in
mass. A modification,which involves the removal of a part of the landmark,should be considered under demolition(see
demolition).Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not
cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not
disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance ofthe site. The proportions,materials and ratios of the existing structures
should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1.Structure—Necessary structural improvements,where safety demands should be accomplished in such a
way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2.Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same
material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it
duplicates the original.
a.wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b.siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with
additional siding.Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding
similar to the original when renovation is considered.
D.Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety,and demolition is the only
alternative,documentation by way of photographs,measured drawings,or other descriptive methods should be made of both the
exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for
this documentation.
E.Movm'
The moving of landmarks is discouraged,however,moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary,the owner of
the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. Signs
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super-graphics will also be
disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G.Building Site and Landscaping
1.Required
Major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,private yard lights,signs(house numbers)and benches which
reflect the property's history and development shall be retained Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures
such as:gazebos,patio decks,fixed barbecue pits,swimming pools,tennis courts,green houses,new walls,fountains,
fixed garden furniture,trellises,and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and
neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2.Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge ofthe past appearance of the property found in photographs,
drawings,and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to
13
the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However,trees and plant materials that must be removed should be
immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic
documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style,
m ateria ls,and scale.
3.Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,
outbuildings,and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front
yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, The installation of unsightly devices
such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public
thoroughfares.
Minimum Maintenance Standards approved by the Historic Preservation Commission,December 16, 1991,state that"all
landmarks and all contributing structures located in an historic district shall be preserved from decay and deterioration,and shall
be maintained in good repair and kept structurally sound. The owner or other person having charge or control of landmarks and
property in an historic district shall not allow or permit deterioration of such property from defects or conditions which in the
judgment of the Commission produce a detrimental effect on the character of the district as a whole or the life and character of
the
landmark,s tru ct ure or property in questi on."
In particular,this property exhibits the following from the itemized(but not
exclusive)list of detrimental conditions:
b.Deterioration of roofs or other horizontal members causing conditions such as sagging,splitting,
buckling,crumbling,holes,missing shingles or similar conditions;
e.
The ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls,roof and foundations,including broken windows or
doors;
h.The deterioration of any feature so as to create or permit the creation of any hazardous or unsafe
co ndi tion or conditions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:After careful review of this application,it appears to a large degree to be similar as applied for
in COA application 2016-0809 that was denied by HPC and is a pending Violation of City Ordinance with the Building
Department.As in COA 2016-0809,Staff does not recommend approval of the roofdeviation from flat to asymmetrical gable
and does not recommend a roof on only half of the structure as it does not conform to the standards and guidelines,A,B,and C.
Staff recommends approval of a flat roof covering the entire main structure.Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance
with the Building Department at the request of the Building Commissioner and that all work is remanded to the discretion ofthe
Building Department prior to installation.Staffrecommends that the owner be in compliance with Code Enforcement as there are
noted violations of Minimum Maintenance Standards.
Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Deb Parcell,Deputy Director
Owner corrected staff report reference to structural inspection by Siqueira, LLC, regarding
inadequate joists spanning 17.5' and 10'as these reference the second story addition in COA 2017-
0602A and do not reference the roof project of this COA.
Commission Questions:
With respect to discussion regarding the withdrawal of the current application to allow for changes
that better reflect design guidelines, President Klusczinski asked the applicant if he wished to
withdraw his application. The applicant declined.
Public Hearing:
Mike Boyd, 1207 West Thomas: Could this application be withdrawn and come back with
application with different options for roof—different dimensions and/or style? Executive Director
Feasel reminded that when denying COA 2016-0809 for this same roof project, four
Commissioners specifically requested additional quotes/design options. Mr. Boyd further hopes
we will work together to move this project forward.
Theresa Johnson, 2630 Prairie Avenue, Apt. 1-108: Asked for clarification on what needs to be
donefor this to pass.
If Eric followed the suggestions proposed, would it be OK? The
Commissioners explained what details they would need to approve a project that would be more in
keeping with the guidelines.
Unetta
Jones, 1204 Thomas: Questioned what kind of roof the Commission wanted to see?
President Klusczinski explained that to be approved,a new roofwould have to be more in keeping
with standards and guidelines.
14
Karl Nichols, Gethsemane Church of God, 308 South Walnut—church adjacent to the land Eric
owns. They own property between viaduct and Firehouse and are in the process of developing it.
It is not appropriate to leave the Firehouse vacant and abandoned. The neighborhood is growing.
No one cares what the building looks like;they care that it is not vacant. Please approve the COA.
Kirstin Champer, 1240 WestThomas: Supports project not just because she is Eric's wife, but
because of what
its improvement has done for the community.
This building is becoming a
community hub. Before the windows were boarded up,kids were breaking them out. A lot ofthe
things Eric is doing takes into consideration the area where this building is located. A new roof is
necessary to preserve the building, but a flat roof may not drain as well, and is economically not
feasible. At the end of the day, it came down to saving the building and securing the community
or making the roof look pretty. It's not a cute roof,but in this case, it comes down to purpose over
aesthetics,for the safety ofthe building and the protection ofthe community.
Gloria Jones,2705 Fredrickson: You need to understand the history of the firehouse. It's not like
Tippecanoe Place or Kizer House. It is a simpler structure that's part of the fabric of the local
neighborhood. The Commissioners assured that this building is just as important as Tippecanoe or
any other landmark.
CommissionerGordon moved to
deny application as submitted.
Seconded by Commissioner
Anderson. No further discussion. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will
support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when
voting. Roll call was ordered.
Commissioner Hertel(AYE)—under Standards and Guidelines Group B Section C this would alter
and modify the structure and change it greatly by adding this type of roof; plus, we are lacking
information on the materials to be used for completion of the roof.
CommissionerBuccellato(AYE)—The design simply does not meet the existing character ofthe
structure.
Commissioner Anderson (AYE)—It would alter the facade, architectural integrity, and its style,
which are some of the most important things we have to make a decision on as a Commission.
Commissioner Gordon(AYE)—It is not in keeping with the guidelines for this building, does not
keep the historical character or look ofthe building,and we are missing some information of how
that roof would be covered.
Commissioner Klusczinski(AYE)—Ordinance 9037-99 designating 1240 West Thomas Street as
a Local Landmark details a number of stylistic features,specifically two-story Period Revival Fire
Station with flat roofand limestone parapet coping. Long term preservation of the structure and
safety ofits occupants are not served by the installation which is both inadequate and architecturally
inappropriate. I affirm the staff recommendation for flat roof and the noted remedies for violations
ofMinimum Maintenance Standards and seek the support of this body,the Building Department,
Code Enforcement, and the owner's cooperation to effect changes that will preserve this unique
and special building. I also believe that the current roof being proposed is not in keeping with the
Standards and Guidelines that the Commission must use in review of all the local historic
landmarks under its jurisdiction. I believe that other more appropriate remedies exist and should
be explored instead of granting this particular application.
CommissionerMolnar (AYE) — The design is too far outside of the mandated Standards and
Guidelines which the Commission, by law,must follow. The roof would be prominent in display
in the front of the structure, as opposed to the rear. I would be in favor of looking at something
with a lower pitch,not necessarily a flat roof.
None opposed. Vote: 6—0
COA#2017-0602A Denied.
8. 821 AshlandCOA#2017-0605 Chapin Park
15
Representation by Derek Wright,Access Properties, 623 East LaSalle Avenue
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: June 5,2017
Application Number: 2017-0605
Property Location: 821 Ashland
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/]901
Property Owner: Robert&Carlotta Levy
Landmark or
District Designation:
Chapin Park Local/National Historic District,ordinance#9574-05
Rating: Contributing _
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE:This 2-story wood frame house with square plan sits upon a brick foundation. The
hip roof has asphalt shingles,and a brick chimney offset from the peak with three simple corbel courses. The house front
features a full height bay with windows. Windows are wood 1/1 wood double hung with diamond pattern muntins on front
facade. A hipped roof garage is at the rear of property.
ALTERATIONS:House has had aluminum siding,storm windows and doors added. In 1949 the front porch was removed and
a front stoop was added,with a small plastic porch roof over the entrance.
APPLICATION ITEMS:Demo garage structure,haul away debris. Pad will remain,possibly for extra parking since very
limited street parking. South Bend Code Enforcement affirmed demo.(Stan Molenda)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:Owner proposes to tear down garage. Building is composed of several garage
structures/additions,some block,some frame,in varying conditions,all ofwhich are to be demolished. The 1932 Portage
Township Assessor's card lists a 2-car(19x19)block garage noted in 1949 as being used as a shop,as well as a 1 car(24x12)
wood garage. There is also a note from 1955 listing a 23.5x24 concrete slab car port. Demolition order on garage was affirmed
at June 18,2015 Code Enforcement meeting. Debris will be hauled away,but concrete pad will be retained to provide extra
parking.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:
June 9,2017
I had received a call from Derek ofAccess Properties giving me permission to enter the building last evening.I went first thing
this morning and was able to take interior photographs.There are multiple sections to the structure.There is an apartment in there
as well.The roof has collapsed in the"breezeway"between the apartment and garage.The roof of the garage itself has two areas
that have holes and deterioration.The pads of the garages are in fine condition and could be reused even forjust parking.The
additions are really where the deterioration is the worst.The makeshift walls are rotted through and the exterior walls are a
combination of block and doors.The two strongest walls are those that run north and south and are part of the original garage
structure,but the removal of the rear wall and all the additional weight of the newer walls on the original has begun to pull the
structure apart.The argument could be made to save the original small garage structure;however,the roof and framework of that
roof would still have to be removed and rebuilt as well as the rear wall rebuilt.It may be more effective to tear down and rebuild
a solid larger structure that utilizes the entire pad area The main house is currently used as multi-unit apartments(4,I believe by
the number of mail boxes)
Steve Szaday,Preservation Specialist
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:
CHAPIN PARK LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT
V.GENERAL
A.Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to
the public safety,and demolition is the only alternative.Documentation of interior and exterior
features of the original buildings,especially homes rated as historically significant,is
encouraged.Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic
Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:While evidence from the Assessor's card shows several of the garages have been on the
property for some time,the current arrangement of connected garage structures does not contribute to the historic character of the
property. Demolition has been affirmed by South Bend Code Enforcement. Due to significant deterioration ofthe later additions
and compromised integrity of the altered original garage,staff recommends demolition of the entire garage,and retention of the
concrete pad,and would further recommend owner propose a new garage design to be built in the future.
Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Deb Parcell,Deputy Director
Commissioner Gordon moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner
Anderson. Six in favor,none opposed.
Vote: 6—0
COA#2017-0605 Approved.
16
9. 813 Park COA#2017-0605A Chapin Park
No Representation.
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: June 5,2017
Application Number. 2017-0605A
Property Location: 813 Park Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: T-Plan/I880
Property Owner: James Hickner
Landmark o r District Designation:
Chapin Park Local/National Historic District,ordinance#9574-05
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE:This 2-story irregular plan house has a brick foundation. The asphalt-shingled
cross gable roof with pyramidal hip roof in back has molded cornice at rake in gables. There is a small front porch. Windows
are 1/1 double hung. Siding is wood clapboard.
ALTERATIONS:Aluminum storm windows and door have been added,as well as concrete steps to front porch. Existing 1/1
double-hung wood windows have been replaced with new vinyl windows without COA approval. COA 2017-0216 approved
replacement of five wood windows on back and side of house with vinyl windows. RME 2017-0517A approved replacement of
existing front and back doors with 36"fiberglass doors and replacement oftemporary support post on front overhang with square
turned posts.
APPLICATION ITEMS:Project upper deck with stairs coming down to ground level deck surrounding french doors. 1 plan to
sink(6)6x6 posts in areas close to the house to support the structure of a second floor fire escape door and decks also part of the
stair structure. All structure beams will be wood. Decking is preferred to be composite. Spindels and rails will be wood.
Decking also already partially approved is landing for the back french doors that I would like to have connected to stairs and
upper deck. The addition of French doors and decking that connect to upper stairs door.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
In response to an anonymous call to the HPC office,Preservation Specialist Steve Szaday visited the property on February 12,
2017,and as part of observations noted the installation of French doors replacing an existing double-hung window in a first-floor
bay window at the rear of the house. On a return visit March 2,he noted the French doors had been removed and replaced with
an improperly sized window. Owner now proposes to:(1)reinstall French doors in bay window,with wood steps beneath doors
leading to a composite deck built over an existing sidewalk at rear of property;(2)install a door and build a deck on the second
floor at rear of property as a means of second floor egress. Second floor decking will be composite,with wood rails and
balusters. Deck will be supported by six 6x6 posts. Stairs will connect second floor deck with first floor deck adjacent to new
French doors. See attached drawings. Preservation Specialist's June 7 site visit revealed the French doors have been reinstalled.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:
CHAPIN PARK LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT
II.EXISTING STRUCTURES
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home.Many are double hung
windows with wood trim and sills.Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels.In some cases,where aluminum siding has
been applied,the window and door trim has been covered.About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm
windows;the other half have wood storm windows.
Required
Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes,lintels,sills,shutters,decorative glass,pediments,hoods
and hardware.When deteriorated beyond repair,they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
Recommended
Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames.
If new sashes or doors are installed,the existing or original materials,design and hardware should be used.When metal
storm doors are used,they should be painted,anodized or coated to match the existing.When awnings are used,they should be of
canvas m aterial.
Prohibited
Original doors,windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place.New window and
door openings,which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new
window and door features such as metal,vinyl or fiberglass awnings,hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that
require removal oforiginal windows and doors,shall not be installed.
Not Recommended
Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance ofthe building should not be
u sed.
17
11I.NEW CONSTRUCTION
C. SHEDS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
Required
Sheds and accessory structures(gazebos,decks,doghouses,playhouses,fountains and small reflecting pools,outdoor
sculpture,children's play equipment,etc.)shall be located at the rear of the property and as unobtrusively as possible
while preserving historical relationships between the buildings,landscape features and open spaces.Proportions and
materials shall conform to those required for new construction.
Recommended
Accessory building designs should be compatible in character and mood to the residence and the neighborhood.
Prohibited
Prefabricated metal sheds shall not be used.
Not Recommended
Prefabricated wood composition sheds should not be used unless they conform to all other guidelines and standards.
IV.SAFETY AND BUILDING CODES
A.BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS
Required
Building code requirements shall be complied with in such a manner that the existing character of
the building is preserved.
Recommended
Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that
will preserve the architectural integrity of the structure.Variances for historic properties should be
investigated.
Prohibited
Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features and
spaces is prohibited.
Not Recommended
Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric ofthe building.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:(1)French doors,and related steps and deck are located at the rear of the house and,if
properly installed and trimmed,will be compatible with the structure. Staff recommends approval of the installed French doors
trimmed to match existing doors and windows on house,as well as steps and deck constructed to meet Building Code
requirements. (2)This property differs from many in that it is zoned and utilized as multi-family,necessitating proper egress
from all units. Installation of a second-floor door and stairway at the rear of the house will provide proper egress while providing
no change to the historic character of the building as viewedfrom the street, and will not alter important architectural features;
therefore,staff recommends approval ofthe second-floor door,deck,and stairway,constructed to meet Building Code
requirements. Proper permits should be secured before commencing project(1)and(2).
Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Deb Parcell,Deputy Director
Commissioner Anderson moved to
deny app lic ation as submitted.
Seconded by Commissioner
Molnar. No further discussion. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will
support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when
voting.Roll call was ordered.
Commissioner Hertel(AYE)—questions that cannot be answered
CommissionerBuccellato(AYE)- lack of information to make a ruling
Commissioner Anderson(AYE)—lack of representation and questions not being answered
CommissionerGordon(AYE)—no representation
CommissionerKlusczinski(AYE)—
unable to approve the application for lack of information and
representation by the applicant. We are unable, as a body, to continue the application because it
requires a waiver from the applicant,and our only recourse at this point is to deny the application
to prevent things that we don't yet understand from happening.
Commissioner Molnar(AYE)—
lack of representation to answer questions about the project
None Opposed. Vote: 6—0
COA#2017-0605A Denied.
10. 314 West LaSalle COA#2017-
0606B Local Landmark
Representation by Mark Wenkus,314 West LaSalle
18
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date:
June 6,2017
Application Number: 2017-0606B
Property Location: 314 West LaSalle Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Parapet Front/1892/Frederickson Candy Store
Property Owner: Mark Wenkus
Landmark or District Designation:
Local Landmark,ordinance#7050-1982
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE:The Frederickson Candy Store is set upon a brick foundation with a rectangular
plan. Walls are wood clapboard with comerboards and decorative shingles in the front pediment. A full front porch at entry has
a wood floor,turned columns,wood steps and railing. The door has a double panel with etched glass top lite and transom.
Windows are wood double hung, 1/1,with wood surrounds and wood shutters.
ALTERATIONS:Front door has been replaced and most wood shutters have been removed.
APPLICATION ITEMS: Overlay roof.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:Owner proposes to install Certainteed Highland Slate fiberglass shingles over
existing 3-tab shingles. Existing shingles will become the underlayment for the new roof as they are laying flat,and ice and
water shield were properly applied.
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:Group B
E. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general
cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites.
B.Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such
Improvements include re-roofing,glazing,or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or
detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its
environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark.
Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit,a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary.
The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces.
C.Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure,which does not alter the general massing while an addition,is a change in mass. A
modification,which involves the removal of a part of the landmark,should be considered under demolition(see demolition).
Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular
examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of
overall appearance of the site. The proportions,materials and ratios ofthe existing structures should be carried through in the
additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1.
Structure—Necessary structural improvements,where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to
cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2.Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material In the landmark should be of the same material
as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed ifit duplicates the
o rig inal.
a.wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b.siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with
additional siding.Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar
to the original when renovation is considered.
D.Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety,and demolition is the only
alternative,documentation by way ofphotographs,measured drawings,or other descriptive methods should be made of both the
exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition ofthe landmark shall be responsible for
this documentation.
E.Movine
The moving of landmarks is discouraged,however,moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary,the owner of
the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. Sims
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super-graphics will also be
disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G.Building Site and Landscaping
1.Required
Major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,private yard lights,signs(house numbers)and benches which
reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures
such as:gazebos,patio decks,fixed barbecue pits,swimming pools,tennis courts,green houses,new walls,fountains,
19
fixed garden furniture,trellises,and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and
neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2.Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs,
drawings,and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to
the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However,trees and plant materials that must be removed should be
immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic
documentation would indicate such
fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style,
material s,and scale.
3.Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items,trees,fencing,walkways,
outbuildings,and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front
yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation ofunsightly devices
such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public
thoroughfares.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Although no specific evidence of the original roofing material could be located,
recommendation for roof repair at the Frederickson House,which was once adjacent to this building,state"to be historically
correct,the
house sh ould have wood shingles."
As synthetic slate would achieve an appearance more in keeping with possible
original material and profile,Staff recommends approval.
Elicia Feasel,Executive Director
Deb Parcell,Deputy Director
Commissioner Buccellato moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner
Anderson. Six in favor,none opposed.
Vote: 6—0
COA#2017-0606B Approved.
M. HEARING OF VISITORS
IV. REGULAR BUSINESS
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. May 15,2017—Approved by general consent.
B. TREASURER'S REPORT
1.
Location Report—Distributed.
Budget for 2018 seeks a 5%reduction and
comingles the annual grant from the City of South Bend. Treasurer Molnar will
continue in his efforts to rectify. Discussion.
C. STAFF REPORTS
Commissioner Hertel moved to suspend the agenda and defer staff report questions for the
next meeting,with the exception of legal. Seconded by Commissioner Klusczinski. Six in
favor,none opposed. Vote: 6—0
1. Correspondence—Circulated.
2. Executive
Director—In packet.
3. Deputy Director—In packet.
4. Preservation Specialist—Distributed.
5. Legal—
Brett Hummer has left to take a job with Thor
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS
1. President—Distributed.
2.
Standards and Maintenance Committee—Referencing topics ofsustainability and
deterioration by neglect,Chairman Hertel reported that they have determined that
everything should be viewed on its own merit. No official policy at this time.
V. OLD BUSINESS—None
20
V1. NEW BUSINESS
VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS
A. Commissioner Buccellato discussed need for better documentation,particularly inclusion
of a site map,with COA application to expedite decisions and meetings. Staff will
continue to work to improve this,and follow COA application documentation checklist
more carefully.
B. Commissioner Molnar thanked the Commissioners for the tone of their conversation
with COA applicants,and reminded them of the importance of attitude with the public
when representing a government agency.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Hertel moved to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. Six in favor,
none opposed. Vote: 6—0.
Meeting adjourned at 10:37 p.m.
Attest:
Michele-Gelfman,Secretary Date
7/7`7
21