Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutQuotation Award - Norfolk Southern & Canadian National Railroad Crossings & Quiet Zone Materials - Proj No 116-110 - MGI Traffic Control ProductsINTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF ENGINEERING TO: Linda M. Martin, Clerk Board of Public Works FROM: Tara Weigand, Project Engineer Roger T. Nawrot, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: INS & CN Railroad Crossings & Quiet Zone Materials Project No, 116-110 DATE: April 19, 2017 On Aril 11 2017 the Board of Public Works opened and read quotes for the above project. I have reviewed them and found them correct. The bidders ranked as follows: Bidder Quote Amount 1. Impact Recovery Systems, Inc. $ 42,298.63 2. MG] Traffic Control Products, Inc. $ 45,966.40 3. PEXCO, Davidson Traffic Control Products DID NOT SUBMIT The curb system quoted by the lowest bidder does not conform to specifications. Its curb segments do not interlock as required. Therefore, I recommend award of a contract for NS & CN Railroad Crossings & Quiet Zone Materials to the lowest responsive I responsible quote, MGI Traffic Control Products, Inc. in the amount of $45,966.40 . Sufficient funds have been has appropriated from Special LOIT Capital, 257-0608-431.42-96 Please call with your questions. BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 25th Day of April, 2017, by and between, MGI Traffic Control Products, PO Box 421, Fairland, IN 46126, HEREINAFTER called the Contractor, and the Board of Public Works herein called the 'Board". WITNESSETII: That the Contractor covenants and agrees to make the following improvement, as fully set out in the Request for Quotations, Standard Specifications, Special Provisions, Plans, and Bid Proposals, all of which are set forth as a part of this Contract, for: PROJECT NO. 116-110 DESCRIPTION: NORFOLK SOUTHERN & CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILROAD CROSSINGS AND QUIET ZONE MATERIALS COMPLETION DATE: SEE SPECIFICATIONS AMOUNT: UNIT PRICES NOT TO EXCEED $45,966.40 FUNDING; SPECIAL LOIT The unit prices for this improvement were those prices as received and accepted by the Board on the 1 Ith Day of APRIL, 2017. The Contractor further agrees to notify the Engineer when this improvement is completed. This notification shall be in the form of a Completion Affidavit, signed by the Contractor. Upon final acceptance of the improvement by the Engineer, the Contractors final estimate will be presented to the Board for final Payment with one (1) copy of the Completion Affidavit and one (1) copy of a Waiver of Lien. BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS MGI TRAFFIC CONTROL ��44j�k— PRODUCTS, INC. Gary . Gilot, President Elizabeth A. Maradik, Member Printed Name Suzanna et e James A. Mueller, Member Signature Mein er L� Therese J. orau, Member"Alst: Linda M. M in, Clerk CERTIFICATION (To be completed if Contractor is a Corporation) I, , certify that I am Secretary of the Corporation named as Contractor herein; that who signed this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor was then of said Corporation; that said agreement was duly signed for and in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its governing body, and is within the scope of its corporate powers. Corporate ate:Ww_r V Fr i 1 yy 7,04 41 9JM E yG- � a. For purposes ofthis Certification, "Iran" means the government of Iran and any agency or instrumentality of Iran, or as otherwise defined at Ind. Code § 5-22-16.5-5, as amended from time -to -time. b_ As provided by Ind. Code § 5-22-16.5-8, as amended from time -to -time, a Contractor is engaged in investment activities in Iran if either: i. Contractor, its successor or its affiliate, provides goods or services of twenty million dollars ($20,000,000) or more in value in the energy sector of Iran; or ii. Contractor, its successor or its affiliate, is a financial institution that extends twenty million dollars ($20,000,000) or more in credit to another person for forty-five (45) days or more, if that person will (i) use the credit to provides goods and services in the energy sector in Iran; and (ii) at the time the financial institution extends credit, is a person identified on list published by the Indiana Department of Administration. 4. Contractor does not knowingly employ or contract with an unauthorized alien, nor retain any employee or contract with a person that the Contractor subsequently learns is an unauthorized alien. .Contractor agrees that he/she/it shall enroll in and verify the work eligibility status of all of Contractor's newly hired employees through the E-Verify Program as defined by I.C. 22-5-1.7-3. Contractor's documentation of enrollment and participation in the E-Verify Program is included and attached as part of this bid/quote; and 5. Contractor shall require his/her/its subcontractors performing work under this public contract to certify that the subcontractors do not knowingly employ or contract with an unauthorized alien, nor retain any employee or contract with a person that the subcontractor subsequently learns is an unauthorized alien, and that the subcontractor has enrolled in and is participating in the E-Verify Program. The Contractor agrees to maintain this certification throughout the term of the contract with the City of South Bend, and understands that the City may terminate the contract for default if the Contractor fails to cure a breach of this provision no later than thirty (30) days after being notified by the City. G. Persons, partnerships, corporations, associations, or joint venturers awarded a contract by the City of South Bend through its agencies, boards, or commissions shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment in the performance of a City contract with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race, sex, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, gender expression, gender identity, sexual orientation or disability that does not affect that person's ability to perform the work. In awarding contracts for the purchase of work, labor, services, supplies, equipment, materials, or any combination of the foregoing including, but not limited to, public works contracts awarded under public bidding laws or other contracts in which public bids are not required by law, the City, its agencies, boards, or commissions may consider the Contractor's good faith efforts to obtain participation by those Contractors certified by the `[ 7 . .. A r%,% Inc 1'1 A State of Indiana as a Minority Business ("MBE") or as a Women's Business Enterprise ("WBE") as a factor in determining the lowest, responsible, responsive bidder. In no event shall persons or entities seeking the award of a City contract be required to award a subcontract to an MBE/WBE; however, it may not unlawfully discriminate against said WBE/MBE. A finding of a discriminatory practice by the City's MBE/WBE Utilization Board shall prohibit that person or entity from being awarded a City contract for a period of one (1) year from the date of such determination, and such determination may also be grounds for terminating the contact for which the discriminatory practice or noncompliance pertains. 7. The undersigned contractor agrees that the following nondiscrimination commitment shall be made a part of any contract which it may henceforth enter into with the City of South Bend, Indiana or any of its agencies, boards or commissions. Contractor agrees not to discriminate against or intimidate any employee or applicant for employment in the performance of this contract with privileges of employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment, because of race, religion, color, sex, gender expression, gender identity, sexual orientation, handicap, national origin or ancestry. Breach of this provision may be regarded as material breach of contract. I, the undersigned bidder or agent as contractor on a public works project, understand my statutory obligations to the use of steel products or foundry products made in the United States (I.C. 5-16-8-1). 1 hereby certify that I and all subcontractors employed by me for this project will use steel products or foundry products made in the United States on this project if awarded. I understand I have an affirmative duty to notify the City in my bid that my proposal does not include the use of steel products or foundry products made in the United States. I understand it is my sole obligation and responsibility to provide a justification to the City, subject to review and approval, why the cost of United States made steel or foundry products is unreasonable. Prior to award and upon submission of bid which does not use steel products or foundry products made in the United States, the City, through its director of public works, shall make a determination if the price of United States made steel or foundry is unreasonable. I understand that violations hereunder may result in forfeiture of contractual payments. I hereby affirm under the penalties of perjury that the facts and information contained in the foregoing bid for public works are true and correct. 4L.111 Dated this day of 20 J 7, / / f/ .L /,L �I Contr or/Btdder (Finn) Signature of Contractor/Bidder or Its Agent /%'fie f U O Printed Name and Title Subscribed and sworn to before me this e`fl day of / / `^ , 2o-L7 My Commission Expires -91� Notary Public County of Residence'1 01- Barbara S. Stevens ,,•�';�-,, Resident Of Shelby County •"°^"`• My Commission Expires: o n7t"tCM A (To be completed only by Contractors/Bidders claiming to be a `local Indiana business" pursuant to I.C. 36-1-12-22) INDIANA LOCAL BUSINESS PREFERENCE CLAIM A "local Indiana business" refers to any of the following: (1) A business whose principal place of business is located in an affected county. (2) A business that pays a majority of its payroll (in dollar volume) to residents of affected counties. (3) A business that employs residents of affected counties as a majority of its employees. (4) A business that makes significant capital investments in the affected counties as defined in rules adopted by the political subdivision. (5) A business that has a substantial positive economic impact on the affected counties as defined by criteria in rules adopted by the political subdivision. An 'affected county" refers to Si: Joseph County, Indiana, or the following counties located adjacent to St. Joseph County: Elkhart County, Marshall County, Starke County and LaPorte County There are the following price preferences for supplies purchased from a local Indiana business: • 5% fora purchase expected by the purchasing agency to be less than $50,000 3% for a purchase expected by the purchasing agency to beat least $50, 000 but less than $100,000. • 1 % for a purchase expected by the purchasing agency, to beat least $100,000. Date: Pursuant to I.C. 36-1-12-22,claims a local Indiana business preference for Project ASr Y.e-2vlC (Project # /4 located within the City of South Bend, St. Joseph County, Indiana_ je,„ y ❑ The location of the principal place of business is .(A4ress) ❑ St. Joseph County, Indiana � / /7'/ y(V z 0 The following county located adjacent to St. Joseph County, Indiana- 1.1 The majority of the business's payroll for the 12 months prior to the date of this Bid is to residents of St. Joseph County, Indiana or the adjacent county noted above. o The majority of the business's employees for the 12 months prior to the date of this Bid are residents of St, Joseph County, Indiana, or the adjacent county noted above, If the business is deemed to be the apparent lowest, responsible, responsive bidder, then it shall provide supporting documentation for the 12 month period prior to the date of the Bid of (i) the total payroll amount paid to all employees of the business, and (ii) the total payroll amount paid to employees who are residents of St. Joseph County and the adjacent county noted above. WHEN SUPPLYING SUPPORTING PAYROLL RECORDS, BIDDER SHALL REDACT ALL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. Dated this day of 'r , 20)_� Contractor/Bidder (Firm) Signature of Contractor/Bidder or its Agent X;1 � C% Y � l Printed Name and Title - _ 0 A MACTEC engineering and constructing a better tomorrow June 30, 2008 Mr. Robert Schindler President Qwick Kurb, Inc, 1916 US 41 South Ruskin, EL 33570. Subject: Report of Laboratory Tests for Compressive Strength of Pre -molded Curbs Made From Recycled Phone Cable Scrubs MACTEC Project No. 6155-08.0157 Dear Mr. Schindler: MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. (MACTEC) is pleased to provide laboratory testing services for Qwick Kurb, Inc. The following briefly summarizes our understanding of the scope of work, and presents the test results. As requested, we performed compressive strength testing on a Qwick Kurb Product, Premolded Curbs made from recycled cable scrubs using representative section of the product. The samples were shipped to our laboratory in March 2008. Photos I fund 2 show one of the samples as received, We performed a compressive strength test by placing the sample in a compressive strength testing machine used for concrete compressive strength tests (Forney Model LT-8063-D2). We loaded the sample until it reached the maximum load and used this maximum load and the contact area (area between the load plate and the top of the sample) to calculate the nominal compressive strength in pound per square inch. Table 1 summarizes the results. We also monitored the rebound for a day after the sample was loaded. Photos 3 and 4 show the tested sample after complete rebound compared with the untested sample. After 24 hours, the tested sample rebounded to within 90016 of its original height, Table I. Sample No. Contact Area (inches') Peak Load (lbs) Compressive Strength (psi) 4 14.95 56000 3746 We appreciate the opportunity of serving your laboratory testing needs. If you have questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 40U(9j� Harry Johnson Geotechnicai Laboratory Manager dang Principal/Manager of Labor ry Services MACTEC Enginearing and Consulting, Inc. 386 Plasters Avenue, NE • Atlanta, 4A 30324 6 Phone: 404-873-4761 • Fax: 404.817.0221 www. rnactec.corn "D U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Mr. Matthew G. Schindler Regional Manager Qwick Kurb, Inc. 1916 Tamiami Trail Ruskin, FL 33570 Dear Mr. Schindler: April 18, 2002 400 Seventh St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Refer to: HSA-10/WZ-109 Thank you for your letters of December 31, 2001, and February 8, 2002, requesting Federal Highway Administration (FH[7VA) acceptance of your company's "Qwick Kurb" longitudinal channelizer as a crashwortby traffic control devices for use in work zones and in permanent installations on the National Highway System (NHS). Accompanying your letter was a report of impact testing conducted by the Transportaion Research Center, Inc., and a video of the tests, You requested that we find these devices acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 "Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features." Introduction The FHWA guidance on crash testing of work zone traffic control devices is contained in two memoranda. The first, dated July 25, f 997, titled "INFORMATION: Identifying Acceptable Highway Safety Features," established four categories of work zone devices: Category I devices were those lightweight devices which could be self -certified by the vendor, Category R devices were other lightweight devices which needed individual crash testing, Category HI devices were barriers and other fixed or massive devices also needing crash testing, and Category IV devices were trailer mounted lighted signs, arrow panels, etc. The second guidance memorandum was issued on August 28, 1998, and is titled. "INFORMATION: Crash Tested Work Zone Traffic Control Devices." This later memorandum lists devices that are acceptable under Categories I, II, and III. Longitudinal Chaunelizetrs Your product is a system composed of two common roadway elements M curbs and road tubes. The effects that permanent curbs have on the trajectory of impacting vehicles has been the subject of crash testing and computer simulations for many years. Modular curbs, such as the Qwik Kurb, had not been subject to crash testing, although there were the same questions relative to vehicle trajectory. There are additional concerns regarding modular curbs with respect to their ability to remain attached to each other and to stay in alignment, and to remain on the pavement in the event of an impact. These questions must be answered on a product -by- product basis. 2 Road tubes have long been considered so benign as to not require crash testing when affixed to the pavement. Your combination device creates an entirely new device or system, a longitudinal ehannelizer, that is covered neither by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) nor NCHRP Report 350. Because of our concerns about the performance of a device in this new category of longitudinal channelizers we developed a crash test matrix that you agreed to follow. Testing A brief description of the tested device follows: The Qwick Kurb is a series of individual, one -meter long, raised separator units that are interconnected to form a continuous Iongitudinal appearance. Vertical channelizers mount integrally into the raised separator units, and reflectors in the shape of an arc depict the raised character of the separator at night. A drawing of the system is enclosed for reference. Full-scale automobile testing was conducted on your company's devices. A unique crash test matrix was developed for this device to answer concerns FHWA expressed in our letter of May 21, 2001, Our first concern was that the curb could cause errant vehicles to be redirected or thrown out of control upon impact with the raised separator. Our second concern was that the individual sections of the modular system might be dislodged by an impacting vehicle and become airborne and potentially hazardous to other traffic. Four tests were performed to address these concerns. In all cases a live driver drove al996 Honda Civic over the test installation at a speed of approximately 65 miles per hour (mph). As the Qwick Kurb system has no significant effect on the speed of the test vehicle, no speed change instrumentation was used. Travel Test 1A-Vaulting- while crossing At an approach angle of approximately 14°, the car was driven, at 65 mph, over the separator with the right front tire making first contact with the separator. The steering wheel was maintained in the straight -ahead position, using a light touch. There was no input required to maintain directional control of the car. The tire and rim was not damaged. The event was recorded using a high-speed digital camera and a high-speed film camera. Review of the high-speed digital image and the high speed film showed no vaulting occurred, unloading of the tire did occur and the tire did not follow the backside contour of the separator. Travel Test I B — Crossing a Vee in front of an Attenuator Phase 1: The car was driven, at 65 mph, across a 30-degree Vee of separators. The steering wheel was maintained in the straight -ahead position using a light touch. There was no input required to maintain directional control of the car. The tire and rim was not damaged. Review of the high-speed images show no vaulting occurred, unloading of the tire did occur and there were no control problems with this car. 3 Phase 2: The car was then driven through a Styrofoam cutout representing an Attenuator, and the height of the contact was determined to be 20 inches, by reviewing the digital image. Theta the car was driven over the Vee at 65 mph and through another Attenuator placed 30 feet beyond the Vee. The steering wheel was maintained in the straight -ahead position using a Ight touch. There was no input required to maintain directional control of the car. The tire and rim was not damaged. Review of the high-speed images did not show any vaulting occurred., The contact point of the car with the Attenuator was determined to be 21 inches, after crossing the Vee, as demonstrated by viewing the digital image. Although the test requirements specify that the contact heights remain unchanged by passing over the Vee, it is apparent that the one -inch difference creates no adverse reaction by this car. Travel Test 2 -- Vaultina end -treatment Approaching the end of the separator, at a zero degree angle and at 65 mph, the left front tire was allowed to ride up onto and along the separator for a distance of 2 meters. The steering wheel required only light contact and no correction was required. The car traveled the entire 100 feet length of the separator and the driver removed his hands from the steering wheel for the last half of the length. The tire and rim was not damaged. No vaulting occurred. Travel Test 3 — Returning to the proper lane 100 feet of separators were installed in a straight line. The car approached, at 65 mph, along the right side of the separator. The angle of approach was 2° as determined by review of a still photo taken from the video showing the tire marks on the lane separator. Light steering pressure was applied to the left, and the left front tine was allowed to climb over the separator. The tire remained in contact with the separator during the entire event. The driver's subjective comment concerning the effort required to cross the separator while maintaining control of the vehicle was that some effort was required but that it was well within the normal range andtherewas never a concern about maintaining control of this car. Findings The results of the testing showed that there was no tendency for the curb to cause the driver to loose control of the vehicle, nor was there any movement of the curb sections that could lead to separation. Therefore, the devices described above and shown in the enclosed drawings for reference are acceptable for use on the NHS under the range of conditions tested, when proposed by a State. Please note the following standard provisions, which apply to FHWA letters of acceptance: Our acceptance is limited to the crasbworthiness characteristics of the devices and does not cover their structural features, nor conformity with the MUTCD. Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the device will require a new acceptance letter. • Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in- service performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the device being marketed is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, it reserves the right to modify or revoke its acceptance. • You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and installation requirements to ensure proper performance. • You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for acceptance, and that they will meet the crashworthiness requirements of FHWA and NCHRP Report 350. • To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance, designated as number WZ-t09 shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter, and the test documentation upon which this letter is based, is public information. All such letters and documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request. • The Qwick Kurb may include patented components and if so are considered "proprietary." The use of proprietary work zone traffic control devices in Federal - aid projects is generally of a temporary nature. They are selected by the contractor for use as needed and removed upon completion of the project. Under such conditions they can be presumed to meet requirement "a' given below for the use of proprietary products on Federal -aid projects. On the other hand, if proprietary devices are specified for use on Federal -aid projects, except exempt, non -NHS projects, they: (a) must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with existing highway facilities or that no , equally suitable alternative exists or; (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411, a copy of which is enclosed. Sincerely urs, 6Geo a stensen ro anager, Safety Enclosure 4 ,P.., y. !r-}�' n Cp m m ��.. Amy ro �+, �c'� c� ro Q y ,^gyp, p� ~, H'x' .'• C� WP n C � �.., ct � p p, �. W pq 6 t%i ,oa- � � � P P ��, G [�i 4 •ti O 4 0,.., q � O y !mob O 'c! ct ct a G. r1:6 £i , Ftj '4�`�L" nwfy ppGcr [y �p 4��G cr pj t1W y�^wo[p er b O� [] n ro P. w pC) pr w ran rmpo�jCf)i `�°nrop q�'� p� t�3tpptrtrlbr'� '�Qm,n�rthfm H ,,, N er P°cr�a. rnp fiQCJPH �H��H m Wr '� Dmn P .'3. f�, tc brt {a, m �w�[ +p m yoHPq�y oa p *pro`��mppo°� ©�.q'aro P,p`tn1.0`*��at .a '`'� n ro r�+ i+' 1^a a F' {Y [D ro Id o o w4 tapcap `*pw�d,D G�mgG15ID w pw ro a �C tfCcr, o�@cr r w mac, ro 13 cr rt p m o y m o0 µ , ro m'�ncm+R ro H p m ci 0 ro n Fr�i p K �r ct H p, !� a w, P+ q "" m ry ky k� G "' cr wcr g pM-1 +4 gycp' y ro o m cwrp 0 is y m p a rib ro o N l w �0 °y A mcdron-sp, cr eq 'd +° p• n � et °`+�d er m o(' n °" ' F''' H-i' Q p o rn n m`d p 3� m '*0* HP m ro m� C RK"o m P, boa o� m H q � y Sao ����nn cPr A o, m °�m �crO.h}ryrapeN at0 AcAapwo aci�sror�H p @ R1p�� 1 � o P p,m ro tso�nper `y`wp "A � M p��Vs'-g Vk �Hr0.�3brraC+ m �q n 4 R. m A O ro �.., H C7' �+ ° ~" �'•, ropo A a m ro P, F� `"� n •W„ ro_ a° & Cb et es N ° , /n,,,, 8 p A� tt n,'d H cmt p' m p U1 �4 ro 09 ro ° M m m row �ro �* p ps m t3 A G `}° cra a rF.�ro H ctG cgs cro c*c�r� �tm cloy p rya �pT trot p ,h"' uL p ,n. ct to L`' CDN F� �i (D (aC .PJ �i m H w 5t m �. ctm co tm.-�0 ON„�'`dtnj W+O-t cmr�O mP ��f' N01'9 n 'Gm m ps er h 'f rn P p' G'• t b p ro ro 'ci 0 P O .. m F' �- p •', d *y cr qq. m ai m m cr ro er y �` c? w I m ©F'y dm mty n p + aapppp ` g9- �RC—C, wyb� A+°b� dPm�U 1im9 ., 'P'a-a WPro onq PmaFa` P m� mm a.wroPd mymd�Cla@ �q]G�y� ph] �q'�P'� C/1° `"'ctA mV. ,_yb `F� id'cl"�m rmi,.'"+"p' °1f+sn'y p''"Ey'�y, m A n P " H F7 N P H ct t3 tG i�' m n P 'Cf j �"'�if m 00 0 1110 m p° � H o m r'o �. `-t-0 @ � P n � � �H ro � °y kT' � ,... p•ro m p.��•" ci0. npmCpH'�do c��rrop� ar�o'y,,�tYwpper° H rop on k� m ram hf m F,t, m O n 1V P 4 N Fn cr ',,,, o ro Ga O H' ro` �. er a� o rn p c+ ct cat ,... P.'- S» W m W t H H y fan W ct L= cr er ro �n a a w '� �„n m+Yrononnq mromp��po°m�' k,�'�C�mroaoro�roCrkaH �rodc,°nc�mniir k=`�mronce�m� '' �ro°0 m°AC�°1 `rnpm mrmapPytti,i��Pmwo�w' Fcp0rrpeµp��r.'��acimUss ' ''�kCn��Pwcm3�stmayhoqy`m�yt''�miH444eomF>gc�a 'm�p° mFPi or`rnmrpooA�.m�roaCn�tieAmmc#dil��7*yt�F+psu�r°�pn i�imessYa�C�ocyyyf etom°mo,tm°�`no°. `� �`9mP(pa� Qpro b-y�Rm.P°;pk°iii ro4wsm OR P0rotpo PpmP.2, b�oyo rooA uope+� pre w Vm p p,G,aa'4 rop��* � otoUfih�m9'' s�pHomq Rra`*isA oHao m.caroQq�+ flqp�%qqG99 xtm"r4raA�"far '0 totkB3s�uyu5i°" 6 R01 mRYn$$.,a � P R'od%Yrom�ynnmy OCD bmct ro eot m, cac VedDi .. h3 _ C+u 7 _;. a, Or ID'S o m 4 MID M " aq R Q mQP•ro CD ro S� mro� p � LS d tno r6a n x CD a ro Md 00'a R ° mcAa ro �, n mom03 Moro r�0,,p,p A 11 aq Fy nCD 01b �d�9� NPl d 0 aF4 . m�tlgm dot `C rt� Rom a "ob n npmr ��yy ' ,pro �m o� omnmya odP°Q'¢ A+ prop N Rol p0 U4CD ID 5P' 1 rmrm op��nP� 1J °�id Ca 4 P ,o H ro et Y m ct ro "I ct yP• o0boCD �~�Cr���Ira 4#d � H rn ry H ,-y m ° w WmW Q bcro"rp w � cW-w m r p n y a o s+R-0� �m°qi �°°° $ p•o y r adkl ���0+i ro�GY AP�rnQ hp m G+d i�Y o�K(q�UF�Y �em`u GcF° NmmC p2n pqro Np ut �WR0y m p�"`.p� S1, m +•h [n H t"a O p'LI F' P e�o-�nh3 ro 1.,a�99t '0 �MroH o Qypp,� r1 p, ro ,� �+ �, '¢"7��--tt n � � �' p cpc•o1�� ��-°t p" � � �mr A �ri tY S? Fa (� n © .... rM1k rh. .. m •.. d6 in a 5 off 77TY-771, 77. . �4 i