HomeMy WebLinkAboutTask Order No. 1 - Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.Im
w
I 7
o Cost and Residential Indicator vs. Indiana Recreation Season Water Quality
Compliance hours (all sources)
o Cost and Residential Indicator vs. Indiana Recreation Season Water Quality
Compliance hours (South Bend sources)
o Cost and Residential Indicator vs. Michigan Recreation Season Water Quality
Compliance as percentage of hours in the season when the WQ criteria is met (all
sources)
o Cost and Residential Indicator vs. Michigan Recreation Season Water Quality
Compliance as percentage of hours in the season when the WQ criteria is met
(South Bend Sources)
o Cost and Residential Indicator vs. Indiana Recreation Season Water Quality
Compliance as percentage of hours in the season when the WQ criteria is met (all
sources)
o Cost and Residential Indicator vs. Indiana Recreation Season Water Quality
Compliance as percentage of hours in the season when the WQ criteria is met
(South Bend Sources)
o Cost and Residential Indicator vs. 2012 EPA Revised Water Quality Criteria
Compliance
o Cost vs. Residential Indicator
Concept Maps (Updates of previously presented alternative maps)
o Existing Long-term Control Plan
o Preferred Alternative Plan
* Cost Summary Table for Alternatives
Task 1.4: Documentation of 5-year LTCP Review A summary document will be prepared for
transmittal to IDEM to satisfy the requirements for the 5-year review of the CLIENT's LTCP. The
document will include results from the 2016 FCA Update geographical review from Task 1.1, charts,
maps, and the cost summary table from Task 1.2 and a narrative summary of the process used by the
CLIENT to review the LTCP and formulate a proposed alternative. A key focus of the document will be
to explain in clear and compelling fashion why the alternative approach proposed by the CLIENT
represents a significantly better strategy than the current LTCP for successfully improving the CLIENT's
management of its combined sewer system and achieving improved levels of water quality in the St.
Joseph River. A preliminary outline of the proposed document will be prepared upon notice -to -proceed
from the CLIENT. Upon receipt of comments on the outline from the CLIENT and its Legal Team,
CONSULTANT will prepare a draft of the review document and submit it to the CLIENT and its Legal
Team for review. Upon receipt of comments, CONSULTANT will revise and submit a final version of
the package to the CLIENT.
Task 1.5: Meeting with IDEM/USEPA — Following the CLIENT's review of the outline for the 5-year
review document, CONSULTANT will participate in a conference call with City staff and the CLIENT's
Legal Team to formulate a strategy for a meeting with IDEM/USEPA. Based on input from the Legal
Team, CONSULTANT will prepare presentation materials to accompany the 5 year review document and
be used in the meeting with IDEM/USEPA. CONSULTANT will work through two review cycles of the
presentation materials with the CLIENT and the Legal Team prior to finalizing the package for
presentation and submittal to IDEM/USEPA. Members of the CONSULTANT Team will participate in a
meeting with the CLIENT, its Legal Team, IDEM, and USEPA to present the CLIENT's proposal for
modification of its LTCP. Following the meeting, the Stantee Team will provide written documentation
of the meeting to the CLIENT and its Legal Team.
Fl
a Q A?
n'a9�k�daiF_7 e
_ y
A
Ilk
s l
ra_ - R,#�,r aa�im. `Wx ��pi d' ' 93 a=� ;ar 3� s @' r _■
- a$ "� A 3 - ■
�ra
In 1
ire
F,
� � •�■- � R — �',ry� � _''� Jai§ � ,'"� _ a' ,� �,° ` J.
J OR
o- mAw y�
—F' _�, J•
-... • ,.die■ ti.� �-. -� _- f
I
ji
Appendix I (Compensation)
TASK ORDER 01 COMPENSATION
1 COMPENSATION
1.1 CLIENT shall pay to CONSULTANT under this Task Order, a lump sum amount of
$106,500 as Compensation for the performance of the Services.
1.2 The portion of the compensation amount billed monthly for Engineer's services will be
based upon Engineer's estimate of the percentage of the total services actually completed
during the billing period. Table 1 provides a breakdown of the basis for the lump sum
amount by task.
Table 1
Lump Sum Billing Amounts by Sub -Task
South Bend CSO Long Term Control Plan Reevaluation — Task Order 01
Task
Description
Lump Sum
Amount
1.1
Establish Preferred Alternative
$21,500
1.2
Census -based FCA Update
$8,500
1.3
Documentation of Alternative Analysis
$25,000
1.4
Documentation of 5-year Review
$15,000
1.5
Meeting with IDEM/USEPA
$30,000
Project Management
$6,500
Task Order 01 Total
$106,500
1.3 Electronic payment may be made to the following address:
BANK NAME: Wells Fargo Bank
BANK ADDRESS: 1000 Lakes Drive, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91790
ACCOUNT #: 4945081503
ACCOUNT NAME: MWHA (now part of Stantec) AIR Collection
ABA#: 121000248
SWIFT #: WFBIUS6S
NON US# SWIFT CODE: WFBIUS6WFFX
ACH COORDINATOR:
Jeff Cuevas 626-564-6737
cuevas(cr7,we i lsfargo. co m
MSA Lump Sum (Appendix 1) (Rev. 01-01-2017)
Please Send Remittance Details To:
Accounts.receivable.correspondenee a,mwhglobal.com
1.4 Mail / Lock Box
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
PO Box 842728
Los Angeles, CA 90084-2728
Attn: Accounts Payable
Remittance via Overnight Delivery:
Wells Fargo Lockbox E2001-049
MWH Americas (now part of Stantec) — Box 842728
3440 Flair Drive
El Monte, CA 91731
MSA Lump Sum (Appendix 1) (Rev. 01-D 1-2017)