HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-87 Supporting South Shore Line Upgradese,
IY«
Common Council
City of South Bend Indiana
4th Floor County -City Building
227 West Jefferson Boulevard
South Bend, Indiana 46601
(574) 235 -9321 (574) 235 -9173 Facsimile
it ion Cierkk.5 Office
November 9, 2016
Members of the South Bend Common Council NOV 0 9 2016
4th Floor County -City Building
South Bend, Indiana 46601 KAREEK4AM lDnwj ,=ry
Re: Support for the South Shore Line Proposed Upgrades and Improvements
Dear Council Members:
TTY /TDD
On November 2, 2016, U.S. Representative Peter J. Visclosky spoke before the Michigan City Common Council
urging them to approve a proposed resolution approving an Operating Agreement for the Double Track Project
between their city and the Northwest Indiana Commuter Transportation District (NICTD). The proposed upgrades
of the South Shore Line in the Michigan City area is commonly referred to as the "Double Track NWI ". It calls
for a second set of tracks from Gary to Michigan City; as well as new high -level boarding platforms to improve
boarding and disembarking from the South Shore Line trains.
The South Shore is applying for a federal grant which would pay for approximately one -half of the project's
estimated $210 million cost; and the competition for federal funding is very competitive.
The attached proposed Resolution sets forth detailed information on the NICTD's 20 -Year Strategic Business
Plan which sets forth proposals on updates and major improvements on the South Shore Line operations in the
four (4) Indiana counties of St. Joseph, LaPorte, Porter and Lake. The capital plan upgrades include a proposed
$15 million upgrades identified as the "South Bend Realignment ".
As Chairperson of the Council's Public Works and Property Vacation Committee, I believe that the Council's
support of the attached Resolution addressing the proposed plan to upgrade and improve the South Shore Line
may assist in the competitive federal grant application process. The many anticipated benefits of such upgrades
to all communities served by the South Shore Line would contribute to all of their best interests. I have attached
a copy of the Executive Summary of the 20 -Year Strategic Business Plan for your review. I seek your support of
this innovative plan which will boast transit and contribute to lasting and needed improvements. Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Council Member Jo (Maternowski) Broden
4th District Common Council Member
Attachment
04SpuTH8 �
U 1. d
1865 RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
EXPRESSING ITS SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSED MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS AND UPGRADES
OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
WHICH OPERATES THE SOUTH SHORE LINE
G," the South Shore Line is a commuter rail line operated by the Northern Indiana Commuter
Transportation District ( NICTD), with a 10- member NICTD Board including St. Joseph County Commissioner
Andrew Kostielney and St. Joseph County Council Member Mark Catanzarite, as part of the membership. For
many decades, the South Shore Line has provided, and continues to provide vital transportation services from the
South Bend International Airport to the Millennium Station in downtown Chicago. The South Shore services
countless numbers of residents and businesses located in the following Indiana counties: Lake, Porter, LaPorte
and St. Joseph; and
6 *;,%4 NICTD's 20 -Year Strategic Business Plan notes as part of the "Program Overview" that:
"Trip times from South Bend to Chicago would be reduced by 39 minutes, with smaller time savings from
other stations. Two of the factors that have the greatest positive impact on ridership are better travel times
and more frequent service. Therefore, these improvements will increase average daily ridership on the
NICTD system by 38 %, and would also greatly facilitate and enhance transit- oriented development and
strengthen neighborhood redevelopment along the route"
and have identified $15 million for the South Bend Realignment as part of the "Market Expansion Capital Costs"
projections, and has further noted that:
"South Bend Realignment: South Shore trains currently navigate a circuitous reverse `C' in order to access
the South Bend Airport terminal from the east. The route is long and trains are slowed by 23 grade
crossings. This realignment project would provide a more direct route to the west side of the airport
terminal by eliminating three track miles, reducing travel time by up to 10 minutes, and cutting the number
of grade crossings from 23 to 7" with a map of the expansion depicted on page 11 of the Executive
Summary; and
6*Lm� the NICTD has further proposed that the South Shore Line take the necessary steps to meet the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements so that the proposed improvements and upgrades can
meet the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) "Core Capacity" funding guidelines, and collaborate on seeking
the additional state and local funding necessary to positively move the transportation advancements forward; and
6ACm%& the details on the "Double Track N.W. I — Connectivity for Accelerated Growth" for Michigan
City where a double -track is proposed from Sheridan Avenue to Carroll Avenue were discussed at three (3) Public
Workshops held at the Center for the Arts in Gary, Indiana on October 4th; at the Indiana Dunes Visitor Center in
Porter, Indiana on October 5th and at the Michigan City Hall on October 6th, with more information being available
at: http: / /www.doubletrack- nwi.com /images /files /Michi anCityExhibitsforAgreement pdf ;and
Cam, on November 2, 2016, the Michigan City Common Council adopted a Resolution approving an
operating agreement for the Northwest Indiana Double Track Project which also supports the "Core Capacity
South Shore Line Resolution
Page 2
Project" aimed at modernizing and improving the South Shore Line's facilities through the four (4) Indiana
counties of Lake, Porter, LaPorte and St. Joseph.
i i i i i 11_1_ I-,
Section I. The Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, acknowledges that the 20 -Year
Strategic Business Plan of the Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District (NICTD) was published in
May of 2014. It proposes to include a four -point investment strategy addressing "baseline capital costs" to "keep
the South Shore Line operating safely and efficiently" which would include:
• $30 million for capital improvements on Metra Facilities
• $43 million for positive train control
• $98 million for double tracking
• $250 million for new car orders
It would benefit tremendously the residents, businesses and visitors of St. Joseph, LaPorte, Porter and Lake
counties in Indiana, resulting in increased ridership on the South Shore Line, increasing train frequency,
significantly reducing travel time, improving and modernizing overall operations by reducing track and road
maintenance costs by upgrading and realigning tracks, reducing the number of grade crossings, and improving
South Shore Line facilities. An aggressive implementation schedule, with a majority of such proposed projects
being completed by 2022 has been proposed. An Executive Summary of the Strategic Business Plan is available
at: https: / /www.in.gov /rda/files /Strategic Business Plan 20140528 Final .pd .
Section II. The Common Council believes that the proposed South Bend Realignment projected to cost
approximately $15 million would promote quality transit development and would contribute to increasing
economic development not only in the South Bend and St. Joseph County area, but would be a significant catalyst
for fostering positive growth in all of the four (4) counties between South Bend and downtown Chicago which
are connected by the South Shore Line.
Section III. The Common Council pledges its support to collaborate with all elected and appointed public
officials, the NICTD Board, and interested citizens so that the necessary steps to meet the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) requirements regarding the proposed improvements and upgrades can meet the Federal Transit
Administration's (FTA) "Core Capacity" funding guidelines.
Section IV. The Common Council believes that it is in the best interests of the City of South Bend, Indiana
to positively move the transportation advancements forward.
Section V. Upon the adoption of this Resolution, the Office of the City Clerk is directed to send a certified
copy of this Resolution to:
Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District (NICTD)
33 East U.S. Highway 12
Chesterton, Indiana 46304
South Shore Line
Attn: Double Track NWI
33 East U.S. Highway 12
Chesterton, Indiana 46304
South Shore Line Resolution
Page 3
so that it may be distributed to all NICTD Board Members,. Nicole Barker of the South Shore Line, and to other
interested community stakeholders and public officials served in the 4- county area of Indiana by the South Shore
Line.
Section VI. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption by the Common
Council and approval by the Mayor.
Tim Scott, 1St District
Regina Williams- Preston, 2nd District
Randy Kelly, 31 District
Jo Broden, 4" District
Dr. David Varner, 5' District
C
Kareemah Fowler, City Clerk
!"SENTED.
1 NPP90Y.10
WYx� ,
Oliver J. Davis, 6 "' District
Gavin Ferlic, At Large
Karen L. White, At Large
John Voorde, At Large
Kathleen Cekanski Farrand, SBCC Attorney
Pete Buttigieg, Mayor
Filed In Clark's Office
NOV 0 9 2016
KAREEMAN FOWLER
CITY CLERK, SOUTH SEND, IN
MAY 2014
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Lij
BauerLatoza
R " c n M s R I D G e
gRpNNER
GOODMAN WILLIA
GROUP MS
Policyr n ies, u c
STUDIO
�M In lw �161nn1I1�
REAL ESTATE RESEARCH
m
3oum snore Line in a state of good repair
The breakout of specific nmiertc indirntEac tha hialm-
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page 1
NIGC.3 20 YEAR STRATEGIC B U S I N E S S PLAN
• Cost of each of the capital packages
• Benefits of the overall plan
• A financial strategy to implement the plan
• A schedule for implementation
• A distribution of benefits by county
STUDY AREA
NICTD provides commuter rail transportation services for the
four Northern Indiana counties of Lake, Porter, La Porte, and
St. Joseph. The South Shore Line runs between the South Bend
Airport and Millennium Station in Chicago, serving Hudson
Lake, Michigan City (two stations), Beverly Shores, Dune Park,
Portage / Ogden Dunes, Gary (three stations), East Chicago,
Hammond, Hegewisch, Hyde Park, and downtown Chicago
(three stations). South Shore Line riders come primarily from
these four counties and southeast Chicago /south Cook County,
Illinois, but are also drawn from adjacent Indiana counties and
southwest Michigan.
The RDA serves the communities in Lake and Porter counties in
Northwest Indiana.
POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT
The Chicago, South Shore and South Bend (South Shore Line),
whose passenger service was taken over by NICTD in the
1970s and 80s, was established in the early 20th century when
Northwest Indiana was becoming one of the most important
industrial concentrations in the country. Heavy industry was
concentrated in the Whiting- Hammond -East Chicago -Gary
corridor, which was a major ridership market targeted by the
new railroad. There was also a major focus on longer- distance
markets: the South Shore's first service linked South Bend and
Michigan City, opening in 1908.
Demographic shifts in the region began in the middle 20th
century, reflecting a broader decline in manufacturing
employment and shift toward service industry employment
seen both nationally and locally. Areas of greatest population
density along Lake Michigan have been gradually shifting
to the south for decades, as cities such as Hammond, East
Chicago, and Gary have seen population declines, while the
development focus has shifted to areas in south and central
Lake County and in Porter County.
A sharp decline of intra -state trips began in the 1950s, driven
by highway construction after World War II and the beginning
of the interstate system in 1956, as well as by the decades -long
shift in population away from the lakefront. This helped shape
2 page
the current ridership situation, which is now largely dominated
by the downtown Chicago -based daily commuter market, with
strongest morning boardings at East Chicago, Hammond and
Hegewisch.
While local economic development — attracting and retaining
jobs within Northwest Indiana - remains an important priority,
attracting and retaining population is equally important for
current and future generations. Improving connections
between Northwest Indiana and Chicago is an important
step for rebuilding the middle class in Northwest Indiana by
enabling residents to participate more fully in the third - largest
regional economy in the United States.
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
FIGURE 1
Study Area with South Shore Line Stations and Projected Population Change (2000 -2030)
Ulm
-NouKe. u-N census Bureau, z000,• u5 Bureau otlaborkatist cs, 2000,• Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC)
and Mi(hiana Area (oundl of 6overnment (MA(06), 2030
Population
2030
Employment
Lake 484,564
199,421
565,348
210,471
Porter 146,798
55,048
115,096
62,463
LaPorte 110,106
47,425
181,512
47,226
St.loseph 265,559
129,558
295,060
179,941
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page 3
GTQ 2 0 - Y E A R S T R A T E G I C B U S I N E S S P L A N
OVERVIEW OF INVESTMENT PROGRAMS
This Strategic Business Plan proposes a four -part capital investment strategy: baseline investments to the South Shore Line to
maintain service standards and reliability, a West Lake Extension into rapidly growing areas of Lake County, major improvements to
South Shore Line to provide faster service and expand the passenger market, and planned annual South Shore Line maintenance.
FIGURE 2
Summary of Investment Programs and Projects
Positive Train Control Federally mandated safety infrastructure
C
C
New Car Orders Replace rolling stock in excess of 40 years in service
0
Double Tracking Greater reliability and schedule flexibility
C
0
0
Metra Facility Capacity Improvements Improved train operations by upgraded track and storage facilities
0
0
0
9
0
g -
° I kill _Pr�o�s` service to ;growing areas
West Lake Extension Service from Chicago to Lake County I I t
• , • iogcfstaQm�vex�s ngmarketsbyimppvingtrovel times, convenience andreliability
Portage /Ogden Dunes Hi -level Platform Reduce dwell times and improve travel time
C
C
Michigan City Realignment / Station Realignment of route through Michigan City; consolidate stations
0
South Bend Realignment Realignment of approach into terminal station at the airport
Gary Station Improvements New station facilities serving Gary`-
•' r' • 1� R e4ui n 'dmdintenatice &stateofg6odtepair
Nil
Planned Annual Capital Investments Maintenance & state of good repair
Primarysystem benefits
as Secondary system benefits
4 page
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
FIGURE 3
Investment Programs and Projects
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page S
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
The following four projects constitute the required
capital improvements needed to keep the South Shore
Line operating safely and .efficiently. These projects
will need to be completed whether or not any other
improvements move forward.
POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL
Federally mandated train control systems are intended
to prevent train -to -train collisions, eliminate work
zone incursions, and automatically enforce all speed
restrictions. This is accomplished via the use of high -
tech, integrated electronic signal systems and controls
interfaced with GPS.
Project Capital Cost:
• $43 million
Proposed Cost Distribution:
• 100% will be from state or local sources. Whether
the source is state or local is a decision to be made
by the counties before the investment is made. A
county allocation could be based on derived benefits
as well as service factors.
NEW CAR ORDERS
This program is intended to purchase cars that will
replace those that have been in service for 40+ years.
This includes 41 cars purchased in 1982 and 17 cars
purchased in 1992.
Project Capital Cost:
• $250 million
Proposed Cost Distribution:
• 100% will be from state or local sources. Whether
the source is state or local is a decision to be made
by the counties before the investment is made. A
county allocation could be based on derived benefits
as well as service factors.
6 page
SSL BASELINE CAPITAL COSTS
Positive
Train Control
$43 million
Double Trading
S98 million
NevrCarftlers 'A
$250 million
ements
on Metra Facilities
$30 million
*Year of expenditure dollars in millions, exclusive of debt financing costs
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
DOUBLE TRACKING
The South Shore Line is a double track railroad that shares
the right -of -way with the Metra Electric District in Chicago.
After the Metra and South Shore services diverge, the section
of double track extends east to Tennessee Street in Gary,
a distance of 17.2 miles. Between Gary and Michigan City
(a distance of 25.9 miles) the South Shore is a single track
railroad with 6 miles of double track in eastern Lake County
and western Porter County, and several mile -long passing
sidings. Constructing continuous double track would increase
scheduling flexibility, improve reliability, expand maintenance
windows, and eliminate the single point of failure that exists
with single track operation.
The South Shore will remain single -track (with passing sidings)
between Michigan City and South Bend, as there is sufficient
capacity for existing and anticipated service levels.
Project Capital Cost:
• $98 million
Proposed Cost Distribution:
• 50% of capital costs paid with federal funds
• 50% will be from state or local sources. Whether the source
is state or local is a decision to be made by the counties
before the investment is made. A county allocation could be
based on derived benefits as well as service factors.
METRA CAPACITY
The South Shore Line operates on Metra Electric District right -
of -way from 115th St. to Millennium Station in downtown
Chicago. Metra is a four -track railroad from 115th St. to 11th
Place and then narrows down to a three -track railroad on
approach to Millennium Station. At Millennium Station, NICTD
has a single track leading into four platforms, while Metra
enjoys the benefits of double track access to its platforms. This
single track creates a single point of failure; in the event of a
derailment or an unexpected track, switch, or catenary failure,
all South Shore Line trains would be indefinitely ensnared.
Furthermore, a single track prevents NICTD from operating
simultaneous inbound and outbound train movements. This
project would provide another track into Millennium Station,
improving operating flexibility and capacity.
Project Capital Cost:
• $30 million
Proposed Cost Distribution:
• 50% of capital costs paid with federal funds
• 50% will be from state or local sources. Whether the source
is state or local is a decision to be made by the counties
before the investment is made. A county allocation could be
based on derived benefits as well as service factors.
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page 7
NIC 0
V)
LU
O
0
U-1
Q
V
V)
I-
V)
O
V
a.
Q
V
Enginaarinn
and E
13'
Right of Way
and Land Acquisition
7%
* Contingencies are part of the FTA Cost Categories Template
and reflect the level of detail known at the time of the 2009
feasibility study.
Project Capital Cost:
• $571 million (to Dyer)
Proposed Cost Distribution:
• 50% of capital costs paid with federal funds
• 50% of capital cost is allocated to local sources (Lake
County)
8 page
FIGURE 4
Conceptual Alignment for the West lake
Corridor
1 a_ ICI
S
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
WEST LAKE EXTENSION
The West Lake Extension would expand NICTD commuter rail service south into Lake County. The service would reduce the distance
that central and south Lake County commuters would have to travel to access NICTD train service, and is projected to have a daily
ridership of 5,600 people. The West Lake Extension project is currently in the initial planning stages, having completed concept
feasibility investigations. The preferred alignment and stations served will be identified during subsequent alternatives analysis
and environmental assessments, along with confirmation of the capital and operating financial plan.
FIGURE 5
West Lake Extension Potential Implementation Schedule
BENEFITS
Developing a line extension of the South Shore service into
Lake County would bring the following benefits:
• Connecting the region to downtown Chicago jobs and
employment centers
• Enticing economic development
• Providing an alternative mode of transportation to driving
• Lowering commuting costs
• Increasing NICTD system ridership
• Increasing property values near stations
• Attracting and retaining families and younger residents to
the region
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page 9
N1C10
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
The improvements on the existing South Shore Line
are intended to increase efficiency on the existing rail
line. Trip times from South Bend to Chicago would be
reduced by 39 minutes, with smaller time savings from
other stations. Two of the factors that have the greatest
positive impact on ridership are better travel times and
more frequent service. Therefore, these improvements
will increase average daily ridership on the NICTD
system by 38 %, and would also greatly facilitate and
enhance transit- oriented development and strengthen
neighborhood redevelopment along the route.
It should be noted that while the Market Expansion
improvements are east of East Chicago and Hammond,
they will result in more reliable service, thus providing
benefits along the entire line.
PORTAGE/ OGDEN DUNES HIGH -
LEVEL PLATFORMS
The Portage /Ogden Dunes station is currently
equipped with three warming shelters along the low
level boarding platform and two ADA mini -high level
boarding platforms. This project would construct dual,
8 -car long, high level boarding platforms with gauntlet
tracks to safely separate freight trains. Benefits include
a reduction in travel times.
Project Capital Cost:
• $7 million
Proposed Cost Distribution:
• 50% of capital costs paid with federal funds
• 50% will be from state or local sources. Whether the
source is state or local is a decision to be made by the
counties before the investment is made. A county
allocation could be based on derived benefits as well
as service factors.
10 page
MARKET EXPANSION CAPITAL COSTS
Gary Station Improvements
(Alternative 1) (Alternative 2)
South Bend Realignment $38 million I $52 million
$15 million.._
Realignment/Station
$109 million
Portage / Ogden Dunes
li -Level Platform
$7 million
'Year of expenditure dollars in millions, exclusive of debt financing costs
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
MICHIGAN CITY REALIGNMENT AND
STATION CONSOLIDATION
This project will eliminate two miles of embedded street
running track. The project includes the construction of a
new exposed ballasted double track railroad within the
10th /11th St. Corridor coupled with a modern, fully equipped
consolidated station and 8 -car high level boarding platforms.
The City envisions this new station as the focal point for
renewed retail and residential development in Michigan City.
As part of the station consolidation effort, the existing. Carroll
Avenue station would be closed. The realignment would also
close 16 grade crossings including six of NICTD's top 20 Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) rated high hazard crossings.
Benefits include a reduction in travel time, improved reliability
and operating flexibility and a fully ADA accessible station with
expanded parking.
Project Capital Cost:
• $109 million
Proposed Cost Distribution:
• 30% of capital costs ($33 million) allocated to local sources
(Michigan City and /or La Porte County) for transit - oriented
development and station -area amenities
• 35% of capital costs paid with federal funds
• 35% will be from state or local sources. Whether the source
is state or local is a decision to be made by the counties
before the investment is made. A county allocation could be
based on derived benefits as well as service factors.
SOUTH BEND REALIGNMENT
South Shore trains currently navigate a circuitous reverse "C" in
order to access the South Bend Airport terminal from the east.
The route is long and trains are slowed by 23 grade crossings.
This realignment project would provide a more direct route to
the west side of the airport terminal by eliminating three track
miles, reducing travel time by up to 10 minutes, and cutting the
number of grade crossings from 23 to 7.
Project Capital Cost:
• $15 million
Proposed Cost Distribution:
• 50% of capital costs
paid with federal funds
• 50% of capital cost
is allocated to local
sources (South Bend
and /or St. Joseph County)
FIGURE 6
Proposed Realignment through Michigan City
FIGURE 7
Proposed Realignment Near South Bend
= T c
yOV�ytSHOAEREAE1&k1A%*'*
b
..�„�N.UgOfPfP �' iaor
r!P /AplJk�...
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page 11
r+*ji=m 2 0 - Y E A R S T R A T E G I C B U S I N E S S P L A N
GARY STATION IMPROVEMENTS
There are three stations in Gary with low level boarding
platforms and which are past the end of their useful life.
Alternatives will be evaluated and selected through a future
NEPA evaluation.
ALTERNATIVE 1: STATION
CONSOLIDATION
NICTD undertook a study in 2012 that determined there
aresignificant travel time and construction costs savings to be
derived from consolidating Gary Metro Center and Miller at
a new location near 1 -65 and the Indiana Toll Road. The new
station would include 8 -car long, ADA- compliant high level
boarding platforms with a full service station and expanded
parking, providing easy access for passengers living along the
1- 65corridor. Benefits would include travel time improvements,
ridership efficiency, and reduced maintenance costs.
ALTERNATIVE 2: STATION
MODERNIZATION
This alternative would close the Clark Road station, and upgrade
the Miller and Gary Metro stations. The Miller station would
be rebuilt with high level boarding platforms at Clay Street.
The elevated Gary Metro station would be rebuilt with high
level boarding platforms in the same model as the East Chicago
station. Benefits would include travel time improvements,
maintaining mobility for local commuters, and maintaining
stations as an aspect of neighborhood redevelopment plans.
Although the Clark Road station would be closed, connections
to the Gary/Chicago International Airport would be made at
East Chicago or Gary Metro Center.
Project Capital Cost:
• Alternative 1: $38 million
• Alternative 2: $52 million
Proposed Cost Distribution:
• 50% of $38 million in capital costs paid with federal funds
• 50% of $38 million in capital costs will be from state or local
sources. Whether the source is state or local is a decision to
be made by the counties before the investment is made. A
county allocation could be based on derived benefits as well
as service factors.
• $14 million Alternative 2 premium paid by
local sources / grant / subsidy
12 page
EW,
e �
-
PLANNED MAINTENANCE
Regular system maintenance will ensure a state of
good repair, resulting in reliable on -time service. This
includes routine bridge replacement, upgrades to
switches, catenary renewal, upgrades to maintenance
facilities, expanded parking facilities, and upgrades to
existing stations. These projects are included in NICTD's
five -year transportation improvement program and do
not require new funding. Typically they are funded with
". FTA State of Good Repair allocation (80 percent), with
the non - federal share coming from the state of Indiana.
This financial arrangement should continue in the
near term, but as maintenance requirements increase
with aging and expanded assets, it may be necessary
to secure local funding from the four counties in the
t
railroad's service area.
Project Capital Cost:
• $401 million
Proposed Cost Distribution:
- _ • 100% of capital costs are paid by current federal and
state funding sources
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page 13
a transit system ana its stations influence ridership of the
system and the ability of the surrounding communities
to realize the potential economic and fiscal impacts that
improved transportation service can provide.
14 page
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
a range of integrated residential, retail, service and office uses.
TODs are walkable areas of compact development (NIRPC,
2040 Regional Comprehensive Plan).
A variety of factors influence the potential and success for
TOD. These include:
• Economic climate for real estate development
• Capacity of available land in station area
• Transit - supportive plans and policies
• Urban design and connectivity
• Transit service frequency, schedule and travel times
TOD POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
Land use and economic development planning decisions fall
under local jurisdiction: the municipalities, townships and
counties. While transit agencies and state /regional governing
bodies can provide guidance on ideas and coordination with
transportation infrastructure decisions, it is these local bodies
that can influence development patterns and should prepare
conceptual design and implementation plans for transit -
oriented development and transit - supportive infrastructure
projects.
Actions that local jurisdictions can to take to encourage
TOD and contribute to a unified transit - supportive land use
environment include:
• Introduce or reinforce transit as a viable transportation
choice in local plans, such as comprehensive plans, strategic
plans, etc.
• Develop station -area concept plans around existing or
proposed rail stations, incorporating TOD best practices
of mixed uses, increased densities, and balanced
parking requirements to create economical and vibrant
neighborhoods.
• Consider location of visitor - driven civic facilities, such
as town halls, community centers, libraries, etc. as
development anchors in station areas.
• Ensure regulatory codes and guidelines, needed to
implement TOD are in place such as zoning ordinances,
design guidelines, subdivision rules, parking requirements.
• Develop multi-modal connectivity plans, to ensure
convenient and safe access to the station for all modes of
transportation, including pedestrians and bicyclists
TOD FUNDING SOURCES
A variety of funding and implementation sources exist for
communities to use to advance these planning activities
described in this section. These local projects would run in
parallel with the investments made by NICTD and RDA to
advance the transportation projects through their required
study and design stages. These include:
LOCAL
• General / capital improvement plan (CIP) funds
• Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
• Special Service Area (SSA) / Business Improvement Districts
(BID)
• NIRPC Livable Centers grants
• RDA development project grants
• Joint development partnerships
STATE / FEDERAL
• TIGER/TIFIA type grants/loans
• CMAQ
• HUD /EPA /DOT Sustainable Communities Grants
• INDOT road improvements
• Parks and trails grants
• Green infrastructure grants
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page 15
NIG0
Building and enhancing NICTD's commuter rail service
will link Northwest Indiana residents with high - paying
jobs and boost the regional economy.
POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT
Do.1, -, +ham. --,+ 'r —..—A X. .- ......._....._.-
Fi
of
16 page
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
This additional household spending has significant implications
for the economic development potential of any community
where such workers choose to live. However, Indiana
workers currently have only a single public transportation
connection to Chicago (the South Shore) compared to their
Illinois counterparts who can choose among 11 Metra rail
lines and seven Chicago Transit Authority lines all feeding the
downtown area. Beyond being limited to a single commuter
route, only a fraction of Northwest Indiana communities are
served by a station compared to the overwhelming majority
of communities being served by Metra in Illinois. If Northwest
Indiana could connect more of its communities - which have an
advantage over Illinois of attracting young families and workers
with comparatively lower costs of living - then, this part of
the state could see substantial increases of local economic
development.
FISCAL
The West Lake Extension project and programs of South Shore
Line capital improvements combined are projected to add
1,984 jobs to the Northwest Indiana economy. Efficiencies
are projected to generate $2.S billion in economic output and
$1.3 billion in gross regional product. These numbers do not
reflect potential secondary economic benefits that may result
from spending generated from new local jobs as well as other
positive economic multipliers that have a continuous effect on
the local economy.
PERSONAL COSTS AND BENEFITS
As gas prices increase, transportation costs to commuters
are compounded by the number of miles they drive. Since
an average household's total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is
largely controlled by work trips, the demand for alternative
modes of transportation such as public transit increases with
the cost of fuel. This increase in demand is also partly due
to the fact that transit fares typically stay relatively flat when
adjusted for inflation compared with fuel prices, resulting in
personal cost savings.
Another enticing draw to taking transit is that rail commuters
have the freedom to pursue other tasks that increase personal
productivity and enhance quality of life. Transit riders can
read, work, use electronic devices, and conduct other tasks
that are off - limits for motorists.
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page 17
NI
USES
The 20 -year Strategic Business Plan recommends four
capital investment programs that will improve rail
infrastructure, provide efficient service, and achieve the
greatest possible economic development potential for
the study area.
FIGURE 8
Existing Capital & Operating Funding Sources
Commuter Rail Service
Fund; Public Mass Trans.
Fund (PMTF); Rail Car
Leasing Company Property
Tax Revenues; General
Fund; BIF; Special State
Appropriations
N/A
18 page
OPERATING
FTA Section 5307
Urbanized Area Formula;
Federal Maintenance
Grants; Federal Grant
Credit to Expense
Commuter Rail Service
Fund; Public Mass Trans.
Fund (PMTF)
Passenger Farebox
Revenues; Metra Purchase
of Service Agreement
(PSA); Chicago South
Shore (CSS) R01
SOURCES: CAPITAL
It is assumed that the overall investment plan will be
financed by a combination of federal, state and local
sources. Close to fifty percent of the funding for capital
costs of new projects is expected to come from the
Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Capital Investment
Program. Other federal funding streams maybe available
to partially fund other investments.
For the remaining share of the capital costs, local and
state sources would need to be found. As of April 2014,
some commitments have been made at the local or
regional level, but additional financial support could
come from or through the RDA, and at the local level,
from a range of options including:
• County Economic Development Income Tax
• County Option Income Tax
• Wheel tax
• Local option gas tax
• Local option sales tax
In order to successfully implement the investment
projects in this Plan, new sources of local capital funding
must be found.
In the case of capitalized South Shore Maintenance costs
for commuter service as it is currently structured, existing
sources of federal and state revenue are forecasted to
cover this program.
With respect to capital costs for the South Shore
Baseline, Market Expansion and West Lake Extension
programs, new funds must be found for a longer -term
bonding scenario. Capital funds for the West Lake
Extension are being appropriated at the time this Plan is
being finalized. A funding package between Lake County
and the majority of municipal entities is being assembled
to secure bond payment obligations arising from the
project construction.
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
The South Shore Baseline and Market Expansion programs
are designed to meet future requirements of "State of Good
Repair" and allow for significant growth of new ridership. These
investments will attract new riders by implementing structural
changes in assets that currently restrict improvements in travel
times and frequency of trains. These factors are major market
drivers for attracting new riders.
Some agreement for allocating the South Shore Baseline
and Market Expansion program costs between state and
local sources must be reached in order to have a precise
plan allocating funding responsibilities for these investment
programs.
SOURCES: OPERATING
A common problem for transit systems nationwide is the
decreasing amount of funds available for annual operating
assistance as revenues fail to grow as rapidly as expenses. For
NICTD, this fact is reflected in 20 -year cash flow projections
that show the railroad slipping into an unfunded operating
FIGURE 9
Capital Cost Summary
SOUTH SHORE LINE
BASELINE
Positive
Train Control
$43 million
Nets
Orders
$250 million
Double
Tracking
B million
Capital
Improvements
on Metra Facilities
$30 million
deficit in 2019 even without considering the service and
ridership improvement projects described in this Plan. The
precise timing of this deficit could change in either direction
depending on the interaction of NICTD operating expenses and
tax collections at the state level. Although subject to change,
NICTD expects to continue receiving operating support from
the State of Indiana. In recent years annual support has ranged
from $12 to $14 million. One option could be to consider
supplementing state funds with revenue from the four counties
in NICTD's service area.
SCHEDULE
The schedule for implementing the proposed improvements is
aggressive but spreads the costs over time, as shown in Figure
10. The majority of projects are scheduled for completion by
2022, with a second round of new car orders in 2030 -2031.
MARKET EXPANSION
South Bend
Realignment
$15 million
9
Gary Station Improvements
(Alternative 1)
$38 million
(Alternative 2)
million
Market
Expansion
$169M
ALL CAPITAL COSTS
*Year of expenditure dollars in millions, exclusive of debt financing costs
Michigan City
Realignment/Station
$109 million
Portage/
Ogden Dunes
Ni -Level Platform
$7 million
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page 19
FIGURE 10
Project Cost Allocation
Capital Cost Estimate
Federal Capital Share
State / Local
State /Local Average Annual
Debt Service*
2 0 - Y E A R S T R A T E G I C B U S I N E S S P L A N
$43.0 $250.3 $98.4 $30.0 $421.7 $7.0 $38.0 $109.3 $15.0 $169.3
$0.0 $0.0 $49.2 $1S.0 $64.1 $3.5 $19.0 $38.2 $7.5 $68.2
$43.0 $250.3 $49.2 $15.0 $357.5 $3.5 $19.0 $71.0 $7.5 $101.0
$2.0 $12.0 $2.9 $0.9 $17.8 $0.3 $1.2 $4.4 $0.6 $6.5
Lake • .
e
•
Porter 0 0
0
0
LaPorte 0 0
0
0
St. Joseph 0 0
0
0
State of Indiana 0 0
0
0
Cost shown in year -of- expenditure dollars, in millions
* Financing scenarios are based on 30 -year bonds, some portion of which
may extend past the 2033 time horizon of this plan.
yY-N.
FIGURE 11
Capital Improvement Implementation
Positive Train Control
New Car Orders
Double Tracking
Capacity Improvements on Metra Facilities
West Lake Extension
Portage /Ogden Dunes Hi -Level Platform
Michigan City Realignment /Station
South Bend Realignment
Gary Station Improvements
Planned Annual Capital Investments
20 page
$571.0
$285.5
$285.5
$16.5
e
N-
N fY- N- -& - -N- N CL N -N - -N
= Additional new car orders would also take place in 2030 -2031
-
to
to
- CO
Ql
O
N
N
CD
O-
O
-
C-
yY-N.
-C
40
N
N
fVb
N
'tV
O-
N --
_
N =M
d
to
%D
O
1
00
Im
rl =0
-_0-
-N-
O_ O' iG
O
--
O-
._�= _�N'_� - -N
N
N'..
N M
et=
rA
-o0
-cV-
ei
ei
a-1
-ei-
ei
;6 -w
N_
- N
-N
O _ - -O -
c>
O
-O
O
O
0:-
O
.0
.O
N-
N fY- N- -& - -N- N CL N -N - -N
= Additional new car orders would also take place in 2030 -2031
NIC.1Q
NICTD and RDA wish to thank the following individuals and organizations, without whose support and participation this Plan would
not be possible.
NICTD BOARD
Mr. Mark Yagelski
LaPorte County Council, Chairman
of the Board
Mr. Michael Repay
Lake County Board of County
Commissioners
Ms. Christine Cid
Lake County Council
Mr. John Evans
Porter County Board of County
Commissioners
Ms. Sylvia Graham
Porter County Council
Mr. David L Decker
LaPorte County Board of County
Commissioners
Mr. Andrew Kostielney
St. Joseph County Board of County
Commissioners
Mr. Mark Catanzarite
St. Joseph County Council
Mr. Robert L. Keppen
Governor's Appointment
Mr. David Wickland
Governor's Appointment
NICTD STAFF
Mr. Gerald Hanas
General Manager
Mr. John Parsons
Planning and Marketing Director
Mr. Keith Casey
Chief Financial Officer
RDA BOARD
Mr. Donald P. Fesko
Governor's Appointment, Chairman
of the Board
Mr. Harley Snyder
Governor's Appointment Vice -
Chairman of the Board
Mr. Tom Dabertin
Hammond Appointment
Mr. Ed Glover
East Chicago Appointment
Mr. Bill Joiner
Gary Appointment, Treasurer
Mr. Randy Palmateer
Lake County Appointment
Mr. Jeff Good
Porter County Appointment
RDA STAFF
Mr. Bill Hanna
President and CEO
Ms. Sherri Ziller
Chief Operating Officer
Mr. Dave Wellman
Communications Manager
Ms. Amy Jakubin
Executive Assistant
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
Congressman Peter Visclosky
US House District 1
Mr. Mark Lopez
District Director and Chief of Staff,
Office of Congressman Peter
Visclosky
Ms. Celina Weatherwax
Director of Communications,
Office of Congressman Peter
Visclosky
Ms. Elizabeth Johnson
Director of Projects and Planning,
Office of Congressman Peter
Visclosky
Senator Joe Donnelly
US Senate
Ms. Meredith Perks
District Director, Office of Senator
Joe Donnelly
Mr. Justin Mount
Regional Director, Office of Senator
Joe Donnelly
Representative Ed Soliday
Indiana State State House District 4
Mr. Tom McDermott
Mayor, City of Hammond
Mr. Mark McLaughlin
Chief of Staff, City of Hammond
Mr. Stan Dostatni
City Engineer City of Hammond
Ms. Karen Freeman - Wilson
Mayor, City of Gary
Mr. Richard Levered
Interim Chief of Staff, City of Gary
Mr. Dwayne Williams
Director of Planning, City of Gary
Mr. Richard Morrisroe
City Planner, City of East Chicago
Mr. Jezreel Rodriguezmay
City Engineer, City of East Chicago
Mr. Joseph Simonetto
Commissioner & Town Council
President Town of Munster
Mr. Tom DiGiulio
Town Manager, Town of Munster
Mr. Rick Eberly
Town Mangager, Town of Dyer
Mr. Bob Volkmann
Town Manager, Town of
Schererville
Mr. Bemie Doyle
Town Manager, Chesterton
Mr. Jon Costas
Mayor, City of Valparaiso
Mr. Bill Oeding
City Manager, City of Valparaiso
Mr. Tyler Kent
Planning Director, City of
Valparaiso
Mr. Larry Blanchard
Lake County Board of County
Commissioners
Mr. Ty Warner
Executive Director, NIRPC
Mr. Steve Strains
Deputy Director/ Director of
Planning, NIRPC
Ms. Eman Ibrahim
NIRPC
Ms. Gabrielle Biciunas
NIRPC
Mr. Jack Eskin
NIRPC
Mr. Kevin Garcia
NIRPC
Mr. Scott Weber
NIRPC
Mr. Jim VanderKloot
Sustainable Communities Program
/Gary Project Manager, US EPA
Ms. Stephanie Cwik
Sustainable Communities Program
/Gary Project, US EPA
Ms. Jenny DeLumo
Sustainable Communities Program
/Gary Project, US EPA
COMMUNITY
STAKEHOLDERS
Mr. Don Babcock
Director of Economic Development,
NIPSCO
Mr. Doug Ross
Editorial Page Editor, The Times of
Northwest Indiana
Mr. Keith Benman
Reporter, The Times
Mr. Tim Cole
Porter County resident
Mr. Mike Daigle
Executive Director, South Bend
Regional Airport
Ms. Heather Ennis
Executive Director Duneland
Chamber of Commerce
Mr. Philip Faccenda
Managing Partner, Barnes &
Thornburg
Mr. Thomas Keon
Chancellor, Purdue University
Calumet
Ms. Christine Livingston
Assistant Director, Indiana Dunes
Tourism
Mr. Jerry Lutkus
Barnes & Thornburg
Mr. Dewey Pearman
Construction Advancement
Foundation
Mr. Jeff Rea
Executive Director, St. Joseph
County Chamber of Commerce
Mr. George Rogge
Gary resident
Mr. Timothy D. Sexton
Associate Vice President for Public
Affairs, University of Notre Dame
Mr. Doug Way
Vice President, 1st Source Bank
Mr. Bill Wellman
Senior Vice President, Whiteco
Mr. Greg Willett
Lake County resident
PROJECT CONSULTANTS
URS Corporation
BauerLatoza Studio
The Bronner Group
Cambridge Systematics
Goodman Williams Group
Policy Ana lytics, LLC
RSG, Inc.
University of Illinois at Chicago -
Urban Transportation Center
URS I BAUERLATOZA • BRONNER GROUP • CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS • GWG • POLICY ANALYTICS • RSG • UIC I page 21
CHICAGO