The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSB-0221 1988 EIS Environmental Assessment of Transwestern for Econ Dev145601 SOUTH BEND INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE FORMER TRANSWESTERN BUILDING NOVEMBER 25 1988 EIS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS INC 1701 NORTH IRONWOOD DRIVE SOUTH BEND INDIANA 46635 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PROCEDURES 3.0 RESULTS FIGURE 1.1 SITE LOCJTION 141P 2.1 SITE PL.AN 3.1 GROUNDWATER FLOW MAP TABLE 3.1 ANALYSISRESULTSFORVOC APPENDIX LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTS PID ANALYZER CALIBRATION AND FIELD ANALYSIS RECORDS SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOGS SECTION 5.4 OF THE EIS PID ANALYZER STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 1.0 INTRODUCTION EIS Environmental Engineers Inc EIS was retained by the South Bend Department of Economic Development to perform an environmental assessment of the former Transwestern site along Lafayette Blvd in South Bend Indiana See Figure 1.1 The scope of work consisted of collecting and analyzing soil and groundwater samples from three soil borings conducted on or near the former Transwestern site During the borings soil samples were collected and screened in the field for the presence of Volatile Organic Compounds VOC using an analyzer equipped with photoionization detector PID One soil sample which exhibited the highest PID analyzer measurement was selected for laboratory VOC analysis groundwater sample from each boring was collected for laboratory analysis of VOC and heavy metals /\ Os _-Approximate Scale In 2000 ftchFr-o USGS 7.5 MInute Siriss .r ILJ.1i jj11 csi2 jj iiiIL HIi JEELJLICosy.- PfÆI lawn I-____n1Hrct\Ci1 Sr Hal COFA iJLfh 1ftJ IIIi ii8o Lii II nil.A lje1 4I groui oo ii iii 1Navst nd_ 12 rTLj 457L- ro SITE LOCATION a1t JL LI smdbt___ L.L.Jfti _____EJJIJtiJI 1l 2333 lM7 I4L1L4 76 ____ Wke 11 jL_ Figure 11 -1 tJrI51 Site cation Map tij TransweternFcicihty EIS Environm.ntsi Engineer mo 2.0 PROCEDURES Locations of the borings were selected on the basis of expected groundwater flow direction and proximity to the former Transwestern building Groundwater flow directions in the South Bend area are generally toward the St Joseph River Therefore the expected flow direction at the former Transwestern site would likely be toward the northeast Three borings were located so as to provide one boring BHl upgradient and two borings BH2 BH3 downgradient with respect to the expected groundwater flow direction see Figure 2.1 CME75 drill rig equipped with screened hollow stem auger was used to bore hole to the water table at each location As the boring was advanced soil samples were collected at three foot intervals using an 18 inch 1.5 feet splitspoon sampler ASTM Method D1586 Descriptions of the soil samples were made using hand lens grainsize chart and standardized color chart The descriptions were recorded on subsurface exploration log and are provided in Appendix All equipment expected to contact the subsurface soil was washed prior to use at the site Furthermore the splitspoon sampler was washed with trisodium phosphate TSP and rinsed with deionized water prior to use at each boring location I- _________ u%tding ______ BronsOn Street BuilcftflY ___ UI AvG nIt 9ultdtng Bi lull Street Credit Union BuiIdln9 _______ rnpte Street _______\5flflT FIgure 2.1 __ooi Scate Site Man Envlronmenb0 Engifleen Inc %ocaUofl oj Boring portion of each splitspoon soil sample was placed into glass jar sealed with aluminum foil and allowed to sit for approximately five minutes The probe of an HNU PID analyzer was then inserted through the aluminum foil seal to sample the air in the headspace of the jar for the possible presence of VOC Included in Appendix is copy of Section 5.4 of the EIS Standard Operating Procedures for soil vapor analysis The soil sample which exhibited the highest PID measurement was collected in 40cc glass vial placed into an iced cooler and transported back to the EIS laboratory for analysis This sample was collected from boring BH2 at depth of 27.0 to 28.5 feet At each boring an electronic water level indicator Roctest Model CRR6 was used to measure the static water level within the hollow stem auger Groundwater samples for VOC and heavy metals analysis were collected with Teflon bailer from each boring Samples for VOC analysis were placed into pre preserved 40cc glass vials whereas samples for heavy metals analysis were placed into prepreserved one liter plastic bottles These samples were placed into an iced cooler and transported to the EIS laboratory for analysis The bailer bailer rope and water level indicator were cleaned with TSP and rinsed with deionized water prior to use at each boring Upon the completion of each boring the auger stem was removed and tremie pipe was used to pressure grout the bore hole with Bentonite clay mixture to grade 3.0 RESULTS The PID analyzer calibration and field analysis records are included in Appendix The PID headspace analysis performed on the soil samples from the borings generally resulted in measurements no greater than background levels suggesting that VOC contamination of the soil was unlikely to be present The one exception was the soil sample from boriig BH2 at depth of 27.028.5 below grade The peak PID analyzer reading for this sample was ppm which was approximately three times greater than the background level PID analyzer reading of greater than twice background level is generally considered by EIS to be indicative of the possible presence of VOC contamination However the PID analyzer field results are not definitive and laboratory analysis is required to confirm the presence of VOC contamination and to define the specific compounds involved The laboratory VOC and metals analysis reports are provided in Appendix and summarized in Table 3.1 Laboratory analysis did not detect VOC contamination in the soil sample but did detect VOC contamination in the groundwater sample from each boring Trace amounts of lllTrichloroethane Tetrachloroethylene and Toluene were present in the groundwater sample from boring BHl and trace amounts of cl2--Dichloroethylene were present in the groundwater sample from boring BH3 -6- TABLE 3.1 ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR VOC Concentrations USEPA Groundwater Soil Maximum 1ug/l ppm Contaminant Parameter BH1 BH2 BH3 BH2 Levels c12Dichloroethylene N.D N.D 4.4 N.D N.E 111Trichioroethane N.D N.D N.D 200 Tetrachioroethylene 2.7 N.D N.D M.D N.E Toluene 1.9 N.D M.D M.D N.E Fuel Hydrocarbons N.D 760 M.D N.D N.E ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR HEAVY METALS Concentrations National Drinking Groundwater mg/i Water Standards Parameter BH1 BH2 BH3 Primary Standards Arsenic 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 Barium 4.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 Cadmium 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.010 Chromium 0.64 0.33 0.30 0.05 Lead 8.6 2.3 2.4 0.05 Mercury 0.025 0.0035 0.0025 0.002 Selenium 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Silver 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 M.D Not Detected N.E Not Established The only detected VOC contamination in the groundwater sample from boring BH2 was fuel hydrocarbons at level of 760 parts per billion ppb Laboratory analysis detected heavy metal contamination in the groundwater sample from each boring The U.S Environmental Protection Agency EPA has established maximum contaminant level in drinking water of 200 ppb for 111Trichioroethane The lllTrichloroethane detected in the groundwater sample collected from boring BHl was below the Practical Quantitation Limit PQL of ppb There are presently no established EPA maximum contaminant levels for c12Dichloroethylene Tetrachioroethylene Toluene or fuel hydrocarbons The levels of metals contamination detected in the groundwater sample from each boring exceed the Primary National Drinking Water Standards for Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead and Mercury but do not exceed the standards for Arsenic Selenium and Silver The fuel hydrocarbons observed in the groundwater sample collected from boring BH2 appear likely to have source other than the soil in the immediate area of the boring The groundwater flow direction as determined from the static water levels measured in each of the three borings appears to be approximately 60 see Figure 3.1 This southeasterly flow direction differs approximately ninety degrees from the -8- -t I-________________ 1W __BronsOn Street uiding 72.51 __ tIBU%I9 __________Li _______B1 Tutt Street 72.0 Credit Union uiIdiflg mpe 5treet _______ I.Sonn Location ol goring Ond etevOl%0 FigUre 3.1 B1 ES Envir0nmt ngLfles inc Groundwater Flow tvictp 72.0 Scale ol static water level relative to grade at Bi ___ __________ initially expected northeasterly flow direction and may represent the effect of possible large scale pumping activity in the area Such large scale pumping activity is referenced in the Indiana Department of Natural Resources 1987 Publication Water Resource Availability in the St Joseph River Basin Indiana Water Resource Assessment 87i However it should also be noted that the static water levels in the borings may not have stabilized when the measurements were taken Consequently the apparent groundwater flow direction indicated by the static water levels may not be indicative of the actual flow direction -10- APPENDIX LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTS REPORT SHEET Mr Pocius CLIENT South Bend Dept of Econ Dev SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION 1200 CountyCity Bldg South Bend IN 46601 Groundwater from Boreholes Transwestern Site ANALYSIS NO 5081H 5085H Collected by EIS JCS DATE SAMPLED 092888 92888 DATE RECEIVED 092888 EIS Project %145601 DATE FORWARDED 11-21-88 Concentration mg/i Boring Boring Trip Parameter Blank Arsenic 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Barium 4.6 1.6 1.4 0.5 Cadmium 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 Chromium Total 0.64 0.33 0.30 0.05 Lead 8.6 2.3 2.4 0.1 Mercury 0.025 0.0035 0.0025 0.0002 Selenium 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Silver 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Volatile Organic Compounds See Attached Report %OIDIEcTOR 2001 Rev 110487 EUS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS INC 1701 North Iroriwood Drive South Bend Indiana 46635 219/2775715 KAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD EIS J1RONMENTAL ENGINEERS INC jt No Project Ncme EIS LABfr21 ij-zlI_Tc 61ks ILI_LLLLL _I Ii ________Ij__t_L _I_V4 64zNI __________________III_I__1I__I_1I39A Vij jj__LJ__jVotu1-4441b____ __---------_-1 I__ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I. _________________ ___________________II II ___ ___________________II II ___ ___________________II ___ ___________________II II ___ ___________________II till II ___ _________________it II __ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _1_I__............._...........I__l II ____________ _____I_I__II ___ _____I ____________I_I It _______ incuished by LJ jReiinquishe by Dare lime Receve by ___A4 ________________________ lnauisheQ by Daze Time Receivec by Rincusnec by Date Time Recerieb by of Trcnsortciion EIS Vehicle Pclic Transportation Carrier Way or Air Bill No VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND VOC ANALYSIS REPORT Mr K.C Pocius CLIENT South Bend Department of Date Reported 102688 Economic Development EIS Lab No 5081H 5085H 1200 CountyCity Building Sample Date 92888 South Bend IN 46601 Date Received 92888 P.O It LOA Date Analyzed 100688 Sample ID Transwestern Site Samples Received Refrigerated Yes No Groundwater from Bore Holes 123 In 40 cc Vials Yes No Soil from Bore Hole Air Space Yes No RESULTS Table presents results of analysis SAMPLE RESULTS WILL LIST ONLY THOSE COMPOUNDS WHICH ARE ACTUALLY DETECTED IN THE SAMPLE If no compounds of interest are detected the following type of statement is given No Table Volatile Organic Compounds VOC were detected in this sample Table summarizes test procedures used Table lists the types of compounds which can be detected by the test procedures employed This table also lists Practical Quantitation Limits PQL for each compound in both water and soil samples Additional data which might accompany this report includes chromatograms Quality Assurance data sheets ChainofCustody forms and allowable contaminant limits if available This data is analysis support documentation The following support data is enclosed Chromatograms of the analysis National Drinking Water Standards The soil sample exhibited headspace as is normal for this type of sample collection LABORATORY DIRECTOR RQV 1025SB EIS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS INC 1701 North Ironwood Drive South Bend Indiana 46635 219/277-5715 TABLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS VOC Client Description Groundwater from Bore Holes and Soil Sample Type __________________Analytical Method 601 602 CONCENTRATION GROUNDWATERS iig/l SOIL ppm as received DUPLICATES DUPLICATES PARAMETER BH-1 BH2 BH-3 BH-3 BH-2 BH-2 c-12--Dichloroethylene ND ND 4.4 4.4 ND ND 111-Trichioroethane ND ND ND ND ND Tetrachioroethylene 2.7 ND ND ND ND ND Toluene 1.9 ND ND ND ND ND PQL Xl Xl Xl Xl Xl Xl Fuel Hydrocarbons ND 760 ND ND ND ND Moisture 16.1 NOTES ND Not Detected Detected but below the PQL The Trip Blank exhibited no detectable levels of VOC CC/MS confirmation of groundwaters from BH1 and BH2 was performed The fuel hydrocarbon in groundwater BH2 is quantitated as Fuel Oil but not so specifically identified The GC fingerprint of this species resembles gasoline but no detectable levels of Benzene Toluene and Xylenes were present GC/MS showed that compound classes such as alkanes and alkenes were present Trace levels of naphthalenes were also noted The probable identity of this fuel hydrocarbon is gasoline PQL Discussion PQL Detection Limit varies with individual compounds the type of sample laboratory treatment dilutions and method of analysis 601 602 or 624 POL for clean samples is shown in Table The PQL value shown above expressed as X41 is the value by which the Table PQL is to be multiplied in order to determine the Detection Limit for individual compounds for the sample in question Revised 101188 TABLE REFERENCE METHODS/ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES REFERENCES Test Methods Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater USEPA 600/482057 July 1982 Methods 601 602 624 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods SW846 Third Edition November 1986 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES VOC of interest are liberated from the matrix by use of Purge and Trap procedures Surrogate compounds are employed for each Purge and Trap run The effluent from the gas chromatograph is monitored by Photoionization and Hall 700A Electrolytic Conductivity Detectors operating in series Component separation is achieved by SPB1 capillary column 60m 0.75 mm I.D In certain situations confirmation of the sample response is performed by use of Mass Spectrometry Analysis Method Numbers are different in different reference manuals even though the procedures used are essentially the same With respect to this analysis Method Numbers are referenced to Test Methods Methods For Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater USEPA 600/482057 July 1982 The samples reported herein were analyzed by the following methods GC/Hall/PID Method 601 602 GC/MS Method 624 _____ SUPPORTING DATA If GC tracings or GC/MS data is supplied with this report surrogate/internal standards are identified by the letters and/or IS Rev 020588 TABLE PARTIAL LISTING VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTABLE BY PROCEDURES LISTED IN TABLE AND PRACTICAL QUANTITATION LIMITS PQL Practical Quantitation Limits PQL Water pg/i Soils ppm Compound Name 601 602 624 601 602 624 Acetone 10 0.5 0.5 Acrolein 10 0.5 Acrylonitrile 10 0.5 Benzene 0.05 0.25 Bromodichioromethane 0.05 0.25 Bromoform 0.05 0.25 Bromomethane 10 0.05 0.5 Carbon Disulfide 0.25 Carbon Tetrachioride 0.05 0.25 Chlorobenzene 0.05 0.25 Chloroethane 10 0.05 0.5 2Chioroethylvinyl Ether 10 0.5 0.25 Chloroform 0.05 0.25 Chioromethane 10 0.05 0.5 Dibromochioromethane 0.05 0.25 12Dibrontoethane 0.05 0.25 Dibromomethane 0.25 12Dichlorobenzene 0.05 0.25 13-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 0.25 14Dichlorobenzene 0.05 0.25 Dichiorodifluoromethane 0.05 0.25 11Dichioroethane 0.05 0.25 12Dichioroethane 0.05 0.25 11Dichioroethylene 0.05 0.25 c12Dichloroethylene 0.05 0.25 t12Dichloroethylene 0.05 0.25 12Dichioropropane 0.05 0.25 c12Dichloropropene 0.05 0.25 t12.--Dichloropropene 0.05 0.25 Ethyl Benzene 0.05 0.25 2Hexanone 10 10 0.5 0.5 lodome thane Methylene Chloride 0.05 0.25 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 10 10 0.5 0.5 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 10 10 0.5 0.5 Styrene 0.05 0.25 1122Tetrachioroethane 0.05 0.25 Tetrachioroethylene 0.05 0.25 Tetrahydrofuran 10 10 0.5 0.5 Toluene 0.05 0.25 111Trichioroethane 0.05 0.25 112Trichloroethane 0.05 0.25 Trichloroethylene 0.05 0.25 Trichiorofluoromethane 0.05 0.25 123Trichioropropane 0.05 0.25 Vinyl Acetate 10 10 0.5 0.5 Vinyl Chloride 0.1 0.25 Xylenes 0.05 0.25 In addition fuel type hydrocarbons such as gasoline fuel oil and kerosene and industrial mixtures such as naphtha and thinners are also detected bytheseprocedures Note Soil PQL is on an as received basis Both water and soil PQL values are for CLEAN samples PQL increases with sample matrix problems EIS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS INC QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA SHEET VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS QC Description Surrogate Recovery EIS Lab Numbers 5081H 5085H Date Analyzed 10688 RECOVERY DATA Client Sample Method 601 602 Method 624 Description Si S2 S3 54 Si 52 S3 GW Bi 101 98 97 102 GW B2 95 107 113 GW B3 95 105 97 103 Soil B2 98 109 100 105 Trip Blank 94 88 100 93 SURROGATE COMPOUND DESCRIPTIONS AND QUALITY CONTROL LIMITS METHOD 601 602 Compound Compound Name QC Limits Si 1Bromo2chioroethane 70 130 S2 14Dichiorobutane 70 130 S3 Toluene d6 70 130 S4 i9Decadiene 70 130 METHOD 624 Compound Compound Name QC Limits Si 12Dichloroethaned4 70 130 S2 Toluene d6 70 130 S3 Bromofluorobenzene 70 130 Rev 061388 Page of EIS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS INC QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA SHEET VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS QC Description Check Standard Client Sample Group Transwestern Site EIS Lab Numbers 5081H 5085H Analysis Method 601 602 Date Analyzed 106-88 Concentration Units ig/l SURROGATE RESPONSES EPA Methods 60 602 EPA Method 624 QA/QC Compound Name Rec Compound Name Rec Limits 1-Bromo-2-chloroethane 111 12-.Dichloroethaned4 70-130 14-Dichiorobutane 112 Toluened6 70-130 Toluened6 98 Bromofluorobenzene 70-130 19Decadiene 118 70130 SAMPLE RESULTS Concentration Recovery 624 Response Factors RF Parameter True Found ________Initial Found RSD Acetone 56.2 58.0 103 Acrolein Acryloni trile Benzene 10.8 11.3 105 Bromoform 15.6 12.0 77 0.175 Bromod ichioromethane Bromomethane Carbon Disulfide Carbon Tetrachioride 9.8 8.7 89 Chlorobenzene 12.3 11.8 96 1.324 Chiorodibromomethane 12.1 11.0 91 Chloroethane 2Chloroe thylvinyle ther Chloroform 9.5 11.2 118 7.525 1-Chiorohexan Chioromethane 2Chiorotoluene 4Chiorotoluene 2Dibromoethane Di bromome thane 12Dichlorobenzene 13.8 106 14Dichlorobenzene 18.6 88 4bichloro--2butane Dichlorodi fluoromethane 11-Dichioroethane 9.1 9.6 105 6.852 12Dichioroethane 7.5 7.4 99 11Dichioroethene 3.874 c12Dichloroethene 9.8 8.4 86 t1 2Dichioroethene Rev 101388 Page of EIS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS INC QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA SHEET VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Check Standard Continuation Concentration Recovery 624 Response Factors RF Parameter True Found Initial Found RSD 12Dichloropropane 10.3 10.5 102 0.408 3Dichioropropane ci 2Dichioropropene t1 2Dichioropropene Diethyl Ether Ethylbenzene 9.7 91 2.548 Ethyl Methacrylate 2Hexanone 42.0 41.1 98 lodomethane Methylene Chloride 10.4 11.7 113 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 38.6 35.8 93 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 37.8 30.5 81 Methyl Methacrylate Paraldehyde Styrene 11.7 11.7 100 i22_Tetrachloroethane 0.403 Tetrachioroethylene 11.2 10.1 90 Tetrahydrofuran 71.8 56.3 78 Toluene 10.7 9.8 92 2.372 11iTrlchloroethane 12.6 12.6 100 i12Trichloroethane 11.8 11.2 95 Trichioroethylene 10.2 9.3 91 Trichiorofluoromethane 12 3Trichloropropane112Trichlorotrilfluoroethane Vinyl Acetate Vinyl Chloride 0.945 mXylene o-Xylene 11.1 11.0 99 pXylene 10.8 10.5 97 QA/QC Interpretation Calibration Check Compound CCC with maximum RSD 30% System Performance Check Compound SPCC with minimum RF 0.3 0.25 for Bromoform Rev 101388 EIS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS INC QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA SHEET VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS QC Description Duplicate Matrix Spike Client Sample Group Transwestern Site Matrix Groundwater EIS Lab Numbers 5081H5085H Analysis Method 601 602 Date Analyzed 10688 Concentration Units pg/i SURROGATE RESPONSES EPA Methods 601 602 EPA Method 624 QA/QC Compound Name Rec Compound Name Rec Limits 1-Bromo-2--chloroethane 97/97 12-Dlchloroethaned4 70-130 14Dichiorobutane 106/109 Toluened6 70130 Toluened6 100/98 Bromofluorobenzene 70130 19Decadiene 90/90 70130 SAMPLE RESULTS Recovery Spike Back Amount Recovered Data Parameter Level ground %R RPD Acetone Acrolein Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromoform 17.3 12.1 13.4 74 10 Bromodichioromethane Bromoniethane Carbon Disulfide Carbon Tetrachioride Chlorobenzene Chiorodibromomethane Chioroethane 2Chioroethyivinylethe Chloroform 1Chiorohexan Chloromethane 2Chiorotoluene 4Chiorotoluene 2Dichlorobenzene 3Dichlorobenzene 14Dichlorobenzene 4Bichloro2butane Dichiorodi fluoromethane 11Dichloroethane 12Dichioroethane 11Dichioroethene 16.9 19.6 20.6 119 c12Dichloroethene 17.3 18.4 18.9 108 t12Dichloroethene Rev 101388 Page of EIS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS INC QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA SHEET VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Duplicate Matrix Spike Continuation Recovery Spike Back Amount Recovered Data Parameter Level ground %R RPD 13Dichloropropaneci2Dichioropropene tl2Dichloropropene Diethyl Ether Ethylbenzene Ethyl Methacrylate 2Hexanone odome thane Methylene Chloride Methyl Ethyl Ketone Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Paraldehyde Styrene 1122Tetrachioroethane Tetrachioroethylene 16.9 16.6 18.4 104 10 Tetrahydrofuran Toluene 111Trichioroethane 16.8 14.9 15.4 90 112Trichioroethane 17.1 15.5 15.5 91 Trichioroethylene Tr ichiorofluoromethane123Trichioropropane112Trichiorotril fluoroethane Vinyl Acetate Vinyl Chloride mXylene oXylene p-Xylene P.v 101388 NATIONAL DRINKING WATER STANDARDS Concentration mg/i unless otherwise shown Primary Secondary Recommended Standards Standards Limits Health Aesthetic Other Parameter Standards Quality Substances Arsenic 0.05 Barium 1.0 Cadmium 0.010 Chromium 0.05 Lead 0.05 Mercury 0.002 Selenium 0.01 Silver 0.05 Fluoride Nitrate as Nitrogen 10 Endrin 0.0002 Lindane 0.004 Methoxychior 0.1 Toxaphene 0.005 24D 0.1 Silvex 0.01 Tot.Coliform Colonies/lOOmi Trihalomethanes 0.1 Chloride 250 Copper Detergents foaming Agents 0.5 Iron 0.3 Manganese 0.05 pH pH units 6.5 8.5 Sulfate 250 Total Dissolved Solids 500 Zinc Benzene 0.005 Vinyl Chloride 0.002 Carbon Tetrachioride 0.005 12Dichioroethane 0.005 Trichioroethylene 0.005 11Dichioroethylene 0.007 111Trichioroethane 0.20 14Dichlorobenzene 0.075 Chloroform Chiorodibromomethane Bromodichioromethane Bromoform SBDEPTc.f ECONDE.J PROMTIC thriatogri Data File Sanpie Hane Start liMe thin Stop line Mm Scale Range nO Scale Offset nO 0P1053 508th Sal 0.00 10.80 -i JPIDIG 510 092308 12 0.00 1000 -4 UPIOS1 5002H Sal 0.00 40.00 tPIOI 5083H Sni 0.00 10.00 -I UP1048 SOOSH Sn 0.00 10.00 UP 50050 Sal 108 0.00 40.00 -i -- 0- c___-V -c- _____ ________________ S.I3..DEPT.cf ECON.DEV..SOIL AROMfiTIC Chrbnatngrs Data file SMple Haee Stert line nm Slop line nm Scale Reny nO Scale Offset nU._._.__ UP1029 flB 1/0SUR 0.00 40.00 0P1025 Sill 092390 L2 8.00 4000 UPID33 5001H 1/50 0.00 40.00 -i UPID3G Sf18111 1/50 1110 0.00 10.00 -i 0P1031 ruaou 510 0.00 40.00 -i 03 9- t0 tP __Ic I-____ S..B..DEPT..cf ECON.DEV..SOIL Chrcnatogr Data file Siple Katie Start TiMe tin Slop liMe tin Scale Range tiU Scale Offset tU U0E029 flH l/S0SUR 0.00 40.00 65 Ii UHED2S 510 DZ3D9 000 40.00 65 UH033 50010 1/SO 0.00 10.00 65 11 UHED35 50840 1/50 tOO 0.00 10.00 65 ii ___ ________ ________ _________ S..EL..DEPT.cf ECON..DEV.CHLORINPTED VOC Chronatogr Oath file Stple Hatte Start Fine nm Stop line nm Scale Range nO Scale Offset nO 0111053 508111 Sn 0.00 40.00 65 Ii UHLOIS 911109238812 000 40.00 69 11 UHEDS1 5138211 Sn 0.011 40.00 65 11 01104 908314 SnI 0.00 4000 69 11 UHEOIO 908511 Sn 0.00 10.00 65 11 UHEDSO SOOSH Ssil 188 0.00 10.00 65 II 13 Ow __ -L ____________ Chato Oc t2i19 12 34 Coet S3 DEPT ECO DELLOPET G4 B15ISJR/I NI ng Scm hit 14 44624 1Oi MI Ii iL ii C1oatoga \i\593H iei Ot2F-198 i323 Coent SB E1 ECQ 1EELQPENT B23MISUBfi MID Scan ae Scan hit 14 532 TOT It It1 II 41 ft %fl Ut LJt1Ji .iI C1J LiJiar Search JiUA\5082fl cgiirdOtt-2t.t938 t2B34 1144ConentGilDEPTECt1DEJELOPMEUTGilD1i5pl-StJIf IS FIJI1J0SatwleRase Peak 91 lntpnsiti 143i Scan nwher 351 _______________________________ 00w TOLUEtIE III _____--tt-----1 40 50 HO 90Fottu1aC7H8RankIclc 23Holeculappeht92FitjflfitfjCastt0-00tiEISkJPurityassraneJt95weightrnye1023 Lihrar Search \DAIA\508211 fcquiredOct2i--1988 122834 1310CoientSDDEPT ECOH IEUELOIPIENT GW -i5iSIJIV1S NIl lIcIOX Saiple Dase Peak Intensity 739 Scan ntipher 394 100/TETRACHLOROET%1LEHE L.r rrn 40 60 80 10 140 60 180ForuIaca.CL4 Bani 1nIex 27 M1ecuiar weijht 136 PuritjJ Ftjjj fifitJliJ Cstt 000-0EISLDPuritymassrange3618.L weight ane ki II Jyap Search \1TA\il311 cRired -21Vh38 1323 1fi 1-11CointS13DEPTEtOHDEVEiOUEi1iGMi1U1/1t 119 Saip1e Base Peak 81 Intensiij 838 Sn t-J 33 Lz C1CLOPECtif4NE 1-t1EiW L-2-tET LENE- it.1...1...II iI I..r...r_r__T.T_T_I..__1.-f.T_ 48 5i 68 78 8L3 Ji 1.80 Fortie1a C7.H12 Ran1 .1 1ex 11 tc1ccu1ax weibt 96 Ft FitJ JitJ Ca5 4115841-2L1BBiBPuritymassrange3b182weIsjhrauge--1q23 LiJwarj Search \DAT\5833II AcqtiredOct-211988 J.322L8 1322 Ciwnient SB DEPT ECON DEUELOP1EUT CU B2 fSI.UVL MiD 1iI3/Sap1e Dase Peak 95 Intnsiti 1Ji7 Seaii nube 488 J.cjQX 14PEH1iDIEHE 233-ThIMETPiL- I_i _1j_ 40 68 88 128ForMtJaC8.U14 Patik lntex 1969rdwei31it118Furij1jRfitJ1jJCastt7ti45L1BRtBPuitsassvanje3b116weiyhtyatiqe1fh3 Library SeacIi AI\883H flcquire Qct-119U8 132318 1452-otent SD DEPT ECOI1 DEtELPUEMT GM D-2kI--Ufl/1S-MnJ88SaiipleBase Peak 81 1ntcnsit 8U Scan iutiJer X1 1LIi II -1 138x 14-HEXDIENE 3-Elf-IlL- _____ ___iI I___-..L..--.1-.-..-I- 48 88 iUI Foppvji C9 H14 ljf n1.x 1983 IIo1eculax weight iic IfL FitiF1 Pi itU1J 888-899L1LDI1BLtiritytassrange.127 weigt rnqe --1323 Serib cct.ri rrd OG t-i198I It Coiienf SD 1Th.PT PFVF 1401 NEif It UiIYSai.1e Base Feiek 41 1ntnsity 112 nLier 141 i3 PENTAUE 223 4-TETRAMETHL 6JFntuIaC.H2U Bartic ndec 4I2 io1ecu1ar 12 Pur1t9VIjJ fit Cast I16534 LIBIIflB Pupity mass range 36 eiyh raage --123 II Jihrar Srch \DTt\t3H quiredOt-2i1988 13a31 9W Cepnient SD DEPT ECON DEUEtOPENT B-25Mi-LJBf1S MU 131Z SaIe Base Peak 41 intensity 627 Scan nwhe 2b9 J--._-------1_I ri---- 5-DODECENE II -I_i i-LI_r--rrr ..1---rT14--111-----r- 43 5L4 flt ForMula C12.U2tL flark intict 1i3t6 Ilolecular eiht .LGtl flfi J.1J Cs 72I6a8--2LjjjUUBPurityasrare33weightrnjti2J Libray Sarch \DAi4\583Ii Aoqu.irtct21---19C8 J323iR 938coFMentSBDEP.F ECOF1 DEVELO1P1Ei1 Gil B--25iHSUHfH Nil1YSapp1eBase Peak 81 Intenstty J.59 Scn riuiLep 2t1t II J- 1cl3x 4FENIADIEHE 3DINETt$VL Ii ______rr r_t.rtLi_i 43 6t1 rrnl C7 iiia ndec .1 lb ecul wjqibt 16 PTtri tJ Ii t1sJ .1 fi $J fl a-I LI Ji LIBII.HI3 Puvi ty ruiye 36 --J.t32 cight rnqt II ii APPENDIX PID ANALYZER CALIBRATION AND FIELD ANALYSIS RECORDS Page of SOIL VAPOR FIELD ANALYSIS RECORD ___________________________PROJECT NAME /1cic TIrPROJECT NUMBER /9 LOCATION AND PURPOSE OF SURVEY eerr 5i j43 /J /oJ Vc __ ANALYZER/LAMP /1/JIt 1i..eU feij DATE Site Sample Sample Scale Readincis HNU PPM No Type Depth ik steaay Range Time Location/Comments O-O i1 /aLjo4\ ___ H5 -1 ir VOC nip c.jf-.4 ________ _____ ___________ __________ _______________ ____ A- ______ ____ __________________ ___________/5 ____ It /5 _______J/OY ____ __________________ ____ ii -77 __________ ZY-2cc OL _______ ________________ ________________ If 7-ZS.5 -O ZO ___AA-/J4 O./qo pa -s MJJ _______ o.Y- /F cH5 ____ _____________/O ____________ Sample Type Hole punch HA Hand Auger Ambient Air55ptsp00USHeadSpaceincludeminutessittingi.e Hs5 Background Oue6 h.v1 4f1 54_ ppm as Isobutylene unless otherwise specified Page of_ SOIL VAPOR FIELD ANALYSIS RECORD ANALYZER/LAMP /1/DATE Site Sample Sample Scale Readings 1-INU PPM No Type Depth PeakT Steady Range Time Location/Comments ________ _____ _____________ Cf __________________________ 7-91 /7 ____________/3 /1 VC ____ II C7L ___________ _____ ii3o ________________ /AE Mr _________ ____________________ il5 ff5 VC ______________ ______/ii AJi 2.5 -3 /fA13 ______c-__________ zIo _________________ o-j5 if OL /O AV 22S J4 ____ ______________________ //-$ ______ /S-i V-2L7L Z-Z7 t9 755 Sample Type HP Hole Punch HA Hand Auger AA Ambient Air SSSplitspoon HS Head Space include minutes sitting i.e 1155 Background ppm as Isobutylene unless otherwise specified Page of SOIL VAPOR FIELD ANALYSIS RECORD ANALYZER/LAMP /f/Jtf ////74j Lap DATE _____________________ Site Sample Sample Scale Readings UNU PPM No Type Depth Pik Eead Range Time Location/Comments HS 5.$ Cetk.IOC ___44i VA __________________ __________________ ________ _________ _____ _____ ______________ _____ _______________ Ii _____ ___________ ___ _________________ _____ _______________________________ _________ ____________________________ ________ __________ ______ ________ ____________________ ________ _____ _____ ______ _________ _____________________ Sample Type HP Hole Punch HA Hand Auger AA Ambient Air SSSplitspoon HS Head Space include minutes sitting i.e HS5 Background ppm as Isobutylene unless otherwise specified PHOTOIONIZATION ANALYZER FIELD CALIBRATION RECORD Project Name ______________________ CALIBRATIOU GAS Project Number /4L5 2t Isobutylene in Nitrogen If No describe Analyst J.cl poj-ec PID ANALYiR HNU with 11.7 eV lamp ________Date q22k Tip II with 10.5 eV lamp ________Tip II with 11.7 eV lamp ________ALL BLANK BOXES BELOW ARE TO BE FILLED IN ZERO INITIAL CALIBRATION 9O /ti Adjustment During The Day Known TIP HNU Standard No ppm Zero Sa Rangii Reading Time ZERO ////_________ SET /////JA--o /o --8-D3 //// ////24 //// MIDDLE OF THE DAY CHECK /O0 All Adjust zero Analyze HIii Std alculale High Standard Reading ZO J%Criteria Recalibrate Difference /2O4 Known TIP IINU Standard No ppm Zero Span Range Span Reading ZERO //// /////A2 -05 //// 03 /4 //// //// //// END OF DAY CALIBRATION AMffi Known Standard No ppm Scale Reading Difference AJk ZERO ////////////// 05 /O II L0 COMMENTS APPENDIX SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOGS Boring No Sheet ot Project No ________ SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG Client 5k l3ecL p1 oP ic site Loca ion Tra ii ecr Logged By J-Date Started 12-Date Completed _______ Boring Location 5i4 Hammer Wt 140 lbs Boring Method HOLLOW STEM AUGER Drop Distance 30 Sampler Type SPLIT SPOON Sampler Size 18 Datum ____________________________Surface Elevation __________________________ GROUNDWATER DEPTH While Drilling 780 Ft At Completion Ft After Completion /4 Hrs Ft ____Hrs ____Ft ____Hrs Ft ____Hrs Ft ____Sample Data ________Interval Soil Description No From To Inches Blows/6H From To 5/eJRecova- c-tr 1-az -f L/3 3-3-9-15 6t-a ac 2.- Øj 2- /-.e ____ ___________4- P.5 JI2-2.Cf.b fJ 57 OoflI 710 77 t/_O_1 2-1lner ____ ____ ______________ YO /3 ___________________ 2O /rt Vet/ct IC1 iof II 3---l Ukc Co4t Jfl tL 51O ief 1e di /5 __________ __________________4r p4vef1JDj 1/- Boring No _____ Sheet of 2_ Project No _________ SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG CONTD ____Sample Data ________Interval Soil Description 1E From Inches lovs/6 From To -A ___ Recov kieQ Le ___________ Cr._____________ 75 ___ ______________ZZ 3j..5 /et j/f t1 ______rto in__ ___________ etjPet .___________ 1cwc f-eIl ___ _____________ t.j 1J iiim-1 Fe io1c1 ____ ____________________.c_4c 3z _______ ________ FIS FPJVPRONMFNTAI FNflINFFRS INC 17fl1 IJnrIh Irnnwnnd Oriwa Santh Rn Inrfiana 4RR16 2lQI77.c7Ic Sheet of ______ Project No q.% SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG Client otdL 9et Pq1 oP tjcut PL Site Location Trait ec if Logged By J-Date Started 1-2-V Date Completed _______ Boring Location __________________Hammer Vt 140 lbs Boring Method HOLLOW STEM AUGER Drop Distance 30 Sampler Type SPLIT SPOON Sampler Size 18 Datum _____________________________Surface Elevation ___________________________ GROUNDWATER DEPTH While Drilling _________Ft At Completion Ft After Completion Hrs.5_Ft ____Hrs ____Ft ____Hrs ____Ft ____Hrs ____Ft ____Sample Data ________Interval Soil Description No From To Inches lovs/6 From To Tp Recov it IL I.5 /7 .-tiCtp 30 2-3 .._3 I.i ___3.2 .3 /Ykc 7c EO Zz7 7o _________ i3 -9---tb-i I.O -/3_//7O ii 3P y__ii /2 _____iv Y//OtJ c77o htt Dakt yiI Y/__ _________ ___ ______________ ________________ _________ rf A- /7 riiiiIri Boring No 33 Sheet of ______ Project No ________ SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG Client ttiti 3ei Vefi dPCcjc4c PtL Site Location Logged By J-5cQ.Lc Date Started 1-2s-Zg Date Completed _______ Boring Location ee /ei Hammer Vt 140 lbs Boring Method HOLLOW STEM AUGER Drop Distance 30 Sampler Type SPLIT SPOON Sampler Size 18 Datum ____________________________Surface Elevation __________________________ GROUNDWATER DEPTH While Drilling ZB Ft At Completion 23-S Ft After Completion e-5 Hrs.Z.SFt ____Hrs ____Ft ____Hrs Ft ____Hrs ____Ft ____Sample Data Interval Soil Description No From To Inches Blows/6K From To Tp fl .f-rl rjRecov oe .5 ic0er ir I..5 Ii 5o_/CE Mt 3.0 ef coy -aq3 Coue MoJecr- 1-____ 12.0 /.5 15-X 0iv5e 54I ii4 ____ q-Cc l1 __________ivO -O 75.7b AJp .p flILt 10 flU 7$1%3-13 oal ID /1/ ____ _____ ____________ _________iiek c.f zawaL4pl-/bi j0It7O J-J eov4 -s4 ____ ____________________ perotW .-vc APPENDIX SECTION 5.4 OF THE EIS PID ANALYZER STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 5.4 Headspace Soil Vapor Monitoring Method Once the splitspoon/hand auger sample is collected from the bore hole part of the sample is used to monitor the soil vapors from the boring Using clean stainless steel spatula portions of the split spoon/hand auger sample are collected into glass jar Aluminum foil is used to seal the jar The samples are then warmed for predetermined amount of time then headspace analysis is performed The aluminum foil is punctured with the tip of the PID instrument and the soil vapors measured When recording the headspace results always indicate the minutes used to equilibrate the soil inside the jar prior to reading per instructions on the soil vapor field analysis record sheet Temperature conditions to which all jars are exposed should be approximately the same during the course of the day These conditions are to be annotated in the Comments section of the field sheet 5004 Revised 110188 1f LIlpJIILI