HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/02/87 Board of Public Works Special Meeting Minutes1
B O O K T 6
B OARD O F P UB L T C WORK S
M T NU T E S
T 9 8 7
1
2
SPECIAL MEETING
JANUARY 2, 1987
A Special Meeting of the Board of Public Works was convened at
10:03 a.m. on Friday, January 2, 1987, by President John E.
Leszczynski, with Mr. Leszczynski and Mrs. Patricia E. DeClercq
present. Board member Michael L. Vance was not in attendance.
Also present was Chief Deputy City Attorney Thomas Bodnar.
APPROVE LETTER OF AGREEMENT - ANIMAL SERVICES COMPANY (ANIMAL
CONTROL SERVICES)
Mr. Leszczynski stated that the purpose of the Special meeting of
the Board today is to discuss an Agreement for animal control
services to replace those services previously provided by
the Humane Society of St. Joseph County, said Contract having
expired on December 31, 1986. He stated that it is not the intent
of the Board to sign a Contract for said services at this time.
However, a Letter of Agreement has been submitted for discussion
and execution.
Mrs. Patricia E. DeClercq, Director, Department of Code
Enforcement, informed the Board that animal control services have
been handled by the Humane Society of St. Joseph County for some
time. Before contracting with the Humane Society, however, the
City did handle its own animal control services and it was the
City's choice to contract with the Humane Society on a yearly
basis.
She stated that this year, however, the Humane Society advised
that they were not willing to enter into a Contract for 1987
unless the City agreed to pay $145,000.00 per year for services
rendered. That amount is $8,000.00 higher than the amount paid
in 1986. If the City did not agree to the said increased cost,
Saturday service would be eliminated. It was noted that in the
past, services were provided seven (7) days per week and were
eventually reduced to six (6) days per week. Now, it is proposed
that without an increase in the contract amount, service would be
reduced to five (5) days per week. As the last Contract
submitted to the Humane Society for approval was unacceptable to
them, the City looked very closely at a proposal which it
received from another firm willing to provide the scope of animal
control services required by the City. At that time, discussions
began with that company.
Deputy Mayor Craig Hartzer, pointed out that Mr. Curt Eugene
Koesters, Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Joseph Mariano,
Executive Vice -President of Animal Services Company, were present
today. Mr. Hartzer reiterated Mrs. DeClercq's comments that
recent negotiations with the Humane Society have reached an
impasse.
Deputy Mayor Hartzer stated that the City has received political
pressure to contract with the Humane Society at their desired
level and as the South Bend Tribune recently reported, the City
did recommend that an interim Contract be entered into with the
Humane Society for a three (3) month period in order to give the
City some time to evaluate services. That recommendation was
rejected by the Humane Society. Mr. Hartzer stated that it is
the City's responsibility to provide the best possible service at
the lowest cost and it is incumbent upon the City to seek
proposals from other firms. However, the lowest possible cost
obviously cannot be the only criterion. The Animal Services
Company proposes to provide the City with more service at the
same dollar amount for the next three (3) years. That is a
proposal the City must consider.
Deputy Mayor Hartzer additionally reiterated Mr. Leszczynski's
comments that the purpose of the meeting today is to consider
entering into a preliminary Letter of Agreement with the Animal
Services Company to further discuss the details of a contractual
arrangement that would provide the City with more service. It is
1
u
SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 2, 1987
anticipated that seven (7) days of service at a cost of
$137,000.00 each year for three (3) years would be provided.
Deputy Mayor Hartzer reminded Board members that the Humane
Society provides animal control services not only to South Bend
but to Mishawaka as well as St. Joseph County and they do have a
monopoly on this type of service. However, the City did receive
an unsolicited proposal from the Animal Services Company of Sioux
City, Iowa to provide such services.
Mr. Curt E. Koesters, Chief Executive Officer, Animal Services
Company, addressed the Board and provided some background on the
company. He stated that Animal Services Company was formed out
of a financial need of Sioux City, Iowa. He stated that he
operated the animal control program for the Police Department in
Sioux City for seven (7) years. Because of a budget crunch of
Sioux City, he needed to look for alternatives which resulted in
privatization of the operation. Having worked in public service,
Mr. Koesters informed the Board that he understands the
requirements needed by municipalities. Also, he has assumed
responsibility for animal control for other cities and counties
and those programs have worked. He is, therefore, looking toward
expansion of services to other cities.
Mr. Koesters stated that when he started this business, he
adopted a humane philosophy and sought to learn everything there
was to learn about animals and this type of service. Through
that philosophy an efficient animal control service has evolved.
Common Council President Beverlie Beck inquired of the Board the
timetable for the above referred to services as at the present
time the City has no contract for animal control services. Mr.
Leszczynski advised Mrs. Beck that it is anticipated that Animal
Services Company could provide animal control services no later
than February 2, 1987. Mr. Leszczynski additionally distributed
to individuals present copies of the Letter of Agreement with
Animal Services Company submitted to the Board today for
consideration.
Councilman Joseph Serge inquired how animal control services
would be provided in the meantime. Mrs. DeClercq responded that
through the Police Department and their liason officer and the
Department of Code Enforcement inspectors, the City will handle
the operation. She stated that the office of Code Enforcement
will handle calls Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. and on Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. She stated
that these hours are the same hours of service provided by the
Humane Society. The City will continue handling animal control
services until a new operation is in place.
Councilman Thomas Zakrzewski inquired how the City intends to
handle reports of stray animals. Mrs. DeClercq advised that it
is the City's intention to work with local boarding kennels or
veterinarians regarding this aspect of the operation.
Ms. Theresa Lacopo, 1603 Crestwood, South Bend, Indiana, inquired
if she was correct in that as of today there is no pick-up
service for stray animals. Mrs. DeClercq responded that the City
will now be handling this matter. Ms. Lacopo questioned various
aspects of animal control services including what veterinarian is
overseeing proper treatment of animals, what veterinarian will
supervise, where bite animals will be housed, who will transmit
tissue samples to the State Board of Health and what provisions
have been made to provide proper transport of various types of
animals together. In response to these concerns, Mrs. DeClercq
advised that the City is working out all the concerns mentioned
and is also working with Dr. Plain of the St. Joseph County
Health Department. She advised Mrs. Lacopo that the City
understands that these concerns have to be met and each matter
will be handled on a case by case basis as they come up. Ms.
Lacopo inquired about disposal and euthanasia and what method of
euthanasia would be utilized by the City prior to February 2,
1987.
�j/i-
1 1+
SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 2, 1987
At this point, Mr. Leszczynski advised Ms. Lacopo that he
understands she would like answers to her questions and suggested
that she put her questions and concerns in writing and submit
them to Mrs. DeClercq who will provide answers as well as names
of kennels and veterinarians that the City intends to utilize.
He stated that the City is currently in the process of
negotiating with kennels and veterinarians but will get that
information to Ms. Lacopo as it becomes available.
Ms. Lacopo inquired what instructions were given to the Street
Department regarding dead animals. She advised that as recently
as today, the Street Department has been to the Shelter with dead
animals. She stated that the City does not have a contract with
the Humane Society to store those animals. Mrs. DeClercq advised
Ms. Lacopo that the City is aware of this aspect and is working
on procedures which will be made available to the Humane Society
when they are in place.
Deputy Mayor Hartzer inquired of Mr. Curt Koesters of Animal
Services Company, that assuming negotiations and details are
worked out effective February 2, 1987, how the company would
assume the role of provider of animal control services for the
City of South Bend. Mr. Koesters stated that he would anticipate
meeting with the Humane Society Board as well as local
veterinarians regarding aspects of the operation.
Common Council President Beverlie Beck reminded Board members
that the County pays $4,500.00 per month for Humane Society
services of which the City pays $2,000.00 as City residents
through county taxes. She stated that the City is, therefore,
entitled to $2,000.00 worth of service and asked if the Board had
given any thought to asking the County to cover the additional
expense for the City. Deputy Mayor Hartzer advised Mrs. Beck
that the City has not made that request.
Deputy Mayor Hartzer stated that the City has been accused of not
paying its fair share to the Humane Society for animal control
services and the City is not interested in being a burden on the
Humane Society. In response to Mr. Hartzer's inquiry whether or
not the City has ever received any financial data from the Humane
Society, Mrs. DeClercq responded that the City has not.
Reiterating, Mr. Leszczynski stated that Animal Services Company
would provide service seven (7) days per week as opposed to the
most recent six (6) day service provided by the Humane Society
and currently proposed five (5) day service. Mr. Koesters of
Animal Services Company confirmed Mr. Leszczynski's statement.
Ms. Cindy Searfoss, 318 East Eckman, South Bend, Indiana,
addressed the Board and stated that she is an employee of the
Humane Society and urged support to keep the animal control
business in the community instead of with an an out-of-state
company. She stated that it is possible that employees of the
Humane Society may lose their jobs because of the animal control
services contract not being awarded to the Humane Society.
Mr. Koesters advised that Animal Services Company intends to
bring in one (1) person, a former director of a Humane Society,
to run the operation in South Bend. Other individuals that will
be employed will be hired from this community. Mr. Leszczynski
stated that Animal Services Company would become a local business
based in our community.
Ms. Karen Radican, 1614 West Ewing Street, South Bend, Indiana,
an employee of the Humane Society, addressed the Board and stated
that to date, the City administration has not made a site
inspection of the Humane Society facilities. Ms. Radican
inquired if an inspection would be made of the facilities of the
Humane Society and Animal Services Company.
t�
SPECIAL MEETING
JANUARY 2, 1987
Mr. Leszczynski stated that he has not inspected the operation of
the Humane Society. Deputy Mayor Hartzer informed those present
that Animal Services Company has provided references which have
been contacted and indicated that those names would be made
available to anyone interested as well as any other information
made available by Animal Services Company.
Ms. Radican was informed that no on -site visits of facilities
were planned by the City administration.
Ms. Hazel Rusk, 1212 East Jefferson, South Bend, Indiana,
inquired who was going to pay for the facilities to operate this
business as well as the medical staff required and wondered if
the City was going to have to pay for these start-up costs.
Deputy Mayor Hartzer informed her that Animal Services Company is
the capital investor. Ms. Rusk inquired of Mr. Koesters how the
company was going to make a profit on the $137,000.00 proposed
contract amount. Mr. Koesters stated that a budget analysis was
prepared and all aspects have been included and are within the
budget.
Ms. Sue Norris, 1217 Bruce Street, South Bend, Indiana, a
taxpayer, stated that quantity hours and quantity pick-up are not
the only concerns but so is humane service. She stated that as a
schoolteacher she has had occasion to be acquainted with the
Humane Society's humane education program which is a wonderful
program and wondered if the community would be losing that
program.
Deputy Mayor Hartzer reiterated that several criterion were
considered in making this decision which included the cost of
service as well as the quality of service. Based on information
the City has received from references contacted, a determination
was made that the City negotiate with Mr. Koesters. Deputy Mayor
Hartzer stated that the City has taken all the steps it can take
at this time to address those concerns.
Mrs. Joseph Szekendi, 2025 Prairie Avenue, South Bend, Indiana,
stated that in the past she has adopted pets from the Humane
Society and is pleased with their service. She further advised
that she is a resident of the Rum Village area where her
neighbors dogs occasionally "get away." She stated that she does
not understand why the City is losing the services of the Humane
Society.
Mr. Leszczynski stated that the City is not going to lose good
service. The City is looking for a better way to increase the
level and quantity of service provided to the community.
Common Council President Beverlie Beck inquired if the Humane
Society would continue its humane education program. Ms. Theresa
Lacopo stated that the Board of the Humane Society would have to
decide that matter.
Councilman Thomas Zakrzewski stated that in regards to the
previously mentioned matter of a site inspection of the Humane
Society facilities, perhaps a representative should be sent to
Sioux City, Iowa, to inspect the facilities of Animal Services
Company in that location. Deputy Mayor Hartzer stated that that
was a viable option.
Councilman John Voorde addressed the Board and stated that he is
not happy with the way things are going. He stated that with the
costs of special arrangements and special contracts, the money
that the City will be spending in the next month could be given
to the Humane Society and then no problem would exist. He stated
that the City is in a regrettable situation.
d,.
SPECIAL MEETING
JANUARY 2, 1987
Mrs. DeClercq reminded Mr. Voorde that the Humane Society has
declined the last two (2) offers made by the City.
Mr. Voorde stated that it seems to him that the City is obligated
to support the Humane Society and that the City does not want to
be a burden but wants to help. He stated that because of an
$8,000.00 difference the City is taking a regrettable and
unfortunate course. He further stated that he would have thought
that the administration would have approached the Common Council
and advised them that the City was unable to negotiate a
contract. He stated that he cannot help but think that the City
could have found a reasonable solution to the problem.
Mr. Voorde stated that it was his opinion that this type of
matter is the kind that could have been presented to the
intergovernmental council to resolve or perhaps the Animal
Control Commission. The decision to go with an outside company
then creates duplication of services. He stated that if the City
administration was interested in intergovernmental cooperation
parties could have met with Mishawaka and various other
individuals and perhaps an agreement on a county -wide basis could
have been developed with everyone paying their fair share.
Mr. Voorde reiterated that he believes that the City is going
down the wrong road and cannot help but think that the City could
negotiate with the Humane Society. He stated that going with
another company is a mistake and is an example of reasonable
people not being able to reach a solution.
Mr. Voorde stated that in the past the City talked about
licensing and the Humane Society has offered to provide that
service as they are negotiating to do so with the City of
Mishawaka. He stated that the Humane Society is an organization
that provides a full range of services and those are the kinds of
organizations we fail to foster in the community. Mr. Voorde
stated that it is his opinion that the City administration should
take one more opportunity to work out differences with the Humane
Society.
Ms. Marva J. Leonard -Dent, Assistant City Attorney, addressed the
Board and stated that she has an advantage in that she has been
working with the Humane Society and the former director of Code
Enforcement Ms. Katherine Barnard for the past three (3) years.
She stated that in isolation, the comments made by individuals as
stated earlier make sense. She stated that if you look at the
facts, however, they are quite the contrary. Each year the
Humane Society has the City "over a barrel." Ms. Leonard -Dent
advised that she, Councilman Ann Puzzello, and Ms. Katherine
Barnard, former Director of the Department of Code Enforcement
met with representatives from the Humane Society. At that time,
the Humane Society would not explain why they believe the City of
South Bend was being subsidized and the City was accused of being
a burden. Ms. Leonard -Dent stated that the City did meet with
the Humane Society to reach an agreement but was unable to do
SO. When asked for financial information, the Humane Society
informed the City that it was none of its business.
Mr. Voorde stated that it is unfortunate that the City does not
make any attempt to negotiate further with the Humane Society.
He stated that perhaps a public forum with the Common Council
would be beneficial. He asked if the Humane Society was ever
offered a multi -year contract. Ms. Leonard -Dent advised him that
the Humane Society refused to consider that option.
Mr. Voorde inquired if the $137,000.00 for the contract for one
(1) to three (3) years with Animal Services Company would cover
all costs that are now covered by the Humane Society. Mr.
Leszczynski advised him that it would cover all costs.
1
1
f]
a
SPECIAL MEETING
JANUARY 2, 1987
Councilman Ann Puzzello stated that in her three (3) years on the
Common Council Personnel and Finance Committee this matter has
been discussed and it has been a problem all of those three (3)
years. She stated that the City has asked to work with the
Humane Society. They have, however, refused the City's request
for a budget and the City knows very little of where the money
actually goes. She stated that the City has tried to get weekend
service as there is no service on Sunday and one-half (1/2) day
on Saturday and has tried unsuccessfully to negotiate with the
Humane Society. She stated that a lot more will be done working
with a group that is willing to work with the City
administration.
Ms. Theresa Lacopo stated that a lot of misconceptions have been
presented. She stated that in a meeting held in November the
City was given a budget. She further stated that on Saturdays
the Humane Society is open from 8:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. and as
ever they have emergency service twenty-four (24) hours a day.
Mrs. DeClercq advised that the Humane Society was sent a Contract
in August of 1986 for calendar year 1987 but it was not until
October that the Society responded. The City was told that
unless the Contract amount was increased, Saturday services would
be cut. The City did not want Saturday service cut. It was only
at that point that the City looked at alternatives that would
provide the scope of services at the dollar amount budgeted and
at that time the process of negotiating with Animal Services
Company began.
Councilman Eugenia Braboy stated that whichever company receives
the business she would like to see more visibility. She cited a
recent situation in which a resident of her district reported a
pack of dogs running in the area. The dogs are still running.
She stated that residents tend not to report the actions of their
neighbors pets and more visibility would resolve problems
immediately. She stated that she will be watching the situation
closely.
As a point of clarification, Common Council President Beverlie
Beck asked if she was correct in her understanding that this
matter rests with the Board and not with the Common Council as
the money for this service for 1987 has already been allocated.
Members of the Board advised Mrs. Beck that she was correct.
There being no one else present wishing to speak in regards to
this matter, upon a motion made by Mrs. DeClercq, seconded by Mr.
Leszczynski and carried, a Letter of Agreement with Animal
Services Company, Inc., 600 Fourth Street, Suite 312, Sioux City,
Iowa was approved and executed.
It was noted that the Letter of Agreement states that Animal
Services Company is a corporation duly incorporated under the
laws of Iowa with its principal office located in Sioux City,
Iowa, and will locate an office in the City of South Bend.
Animal Services Company has represented that they will be able to
provide animal control services to the City of South Bend not
later than February 2, 1987. Such animal control services shall
be equivalent to services provided under past contracts entered
into by the Board of Public Works. In addition to all
obligations listed in previous contracts, the Animal Services
Company will also incur additional obligations, including but not
limited to providing liability insurance in an amount to be
decided by the Board of Public Works.
It is intended by the parties that a contract on the specifics of
the animal control services to be provided will be submitted to
the Board of Public Works for approval not later than February 3,
SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 2. 1987
1987. It is understood by both parties that prior to execution
of a contract it will be necessary for Animal Services Company to
obtain facilities within or in the vicinity of the City of South
Bend to enable it to carry out its intent to provide animal
control services. Further, both parties agree to use their best
efforts to reach a formal contract. Both parties agree that in
no event would the contract price exceed $11,416.67 per month nor
would the term be less than one (1) nor more than three (3)
years. By signing the Letter of Agreement, all parties agree
only to the intentions expressed in the letter.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Board, upon a
motion made by Mr. Leszczynski, seconded by Mrs. DeClercq and
carried, the meeting adjourned at 10:50 a.m.
12�0•;�� �.._. ,.. FAMM
jAn E. Leszczyfts&i�
Patricia E. DeClercq
ATTEST:
l'vy� `w .
Sandra M. Parmerlee, Clerk
1