My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-09 Community and Economic Development Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2009
>
09-21-09 Community and Economic Development Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2009 3:49:35 PM
Creation date
10/1/2009 3:49:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n ~~ <br />~'`~ <br />~:,~~ ~~~ <br />-~: <br />~'~~~-. COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 9-21-09 <br />Timothy A. Rouse, Chairperson, Community and Economic Development Committee <br />called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. <br />Committee Members Present: Henry L. Davis, Jr., Vice-Chairperson, Ann Puzzello, <br />Karen L. White; Catherine Andres, Citizen Member <br />Other Councilmember's Present: Derek Dieter, Oliver Davis <br />Other's Present: Mayor Luecke, Pam Meyer, Rita Kopala, Linda Beckley, YWCA, Judy <br />Rosheck, Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand, Jeff Parrott <br />Agenda: 2010 CDBG and ESG Funds & Recommendations <br />Chairperson Rouse stated that this meeting was called to review the 2010 CDBG and <br />ESG allocations. He called upon Pam Meyer, the Director of Community Development <br />to present the 2010 information. With the aid of a color handout, Pam noted that <br />$3,078,707 were available in CDBG funds for 2010. The application process and <br />respective budget calendars were described as well as the policy guidelines that <br />underlined the allocation decisions of the administration. Pam reminded the Council that <br />the 25% cut for 2010 in public services was reflective of a policy to phase out "soft" <br />programs over a three year period in favor of "bricks & motor" programs adopted a <br />couple of years back. This focus was intended to address blight in neighborhoods. The <br />administration formulated this policy, in part, as a result of the Council's desire to <br />emphasize "quality of life" issues in the "challenged" neighborhoods. Pam went on to <br />assure the committee that all allocations met HUD eligibility guidelines, all public <br />notices were given, and all subsequent applications for funds were reviewed in the <br />context of the administrations stated policies. Moving to the handout, Pam indicated the <br />planning and administration costs were shown in yellow. Public services in green and <br />funded programs in blue. In particular Pam noted new program funding such as $50,000 <br />awarded to the Center for the Homeless to rehab a building directed to provide services to <br />veterans. Karen White wondered why neighborhood centers were not on the list. Pam <br />said they did not apply or were in some cases not eligible. That led Tim Rouse to ask <br />about the level of public participation in the process. He took exception to Pam's <br />response that notices were published in the paper, meeting federal requirements. Rouse <br />suggested more could be done to "reach out." Participation was limited, in part, because <br />of a lack of awareness among the community. Derek Dieter asked about programs for the <br />NNW. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.