My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-16 Zoning and Annexation
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2016
>
Zoning and Annexation
>
05-23-16 Zoning and Annexation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2017 3:46:23 PM
Creation date
6/14/2016 8:36:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
5/23/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
great old buildings in this City. We have to save that entire neighborhood and this is an important <br />piece of that neighborhood. <br />No one from the public spoke in opposition to the bill. <br />Patrick C. Kerr, Engineering Department with offices on the 13th Floor, stated they have no <br />objection to a curb cut on Chapin other than checking the sight distance. Originally there was an <br />alley connected but did not push it through Chapin because of vertical sigh distance along <br />Chapin. From their standpoint as long as their inspection is okay Engineering has no problem. <br />Committee Chair Davis asked what would make their check fail. <br />Mr. Kerr responded if there was something where the drive could not see a car coming or a car <br />on Chapin could not see them pulling out. <br />Committee Chair Davis asked if there is a problem what are the steps that could be taken to <br />alleviate the issue. <br />Mr. Kerr responded a number of things depending on the problem such as removing a tree that is <br />in the way. This is something that could be worked on and we are not opposed to a curb cut, we <br />just need to make sure to protect public safety in the process. <br />Council Attorney Cekanksi - Farrand asked if they could complete that process by the next <br />Council meeting on June 13th. <br />Mr. Kerr responded yes they could probably make that work. They typically have the developer <br />perform these studies but they could help the process move quicker. If the director chooses for us <br />to make those calculations ourselves then we certainly could do that. <br />Mr. Zeiger stated they would be alright with a delay if that is most advantageous. We are just <br />trying to move forward and cant until this step is completed. It would just push all our plans back <br />two (2) weeks but it would not be the end of the world. <br />Committeemember John Voorde made a motion to continue the meeting to June 13th. <br />Committeemember Gavin Ferlic seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of four (4) <br />ayes. <br />Bill No. 22 -16 — Rezoning at 6100 Nimtz Parkway <br />Mathew Chappuies, Area Plan Commission with offices on the 11 th Floor of the County -City <br />Building, served as the presenter for this bill. This is the northwest corner of the Blackthorn Golf <br />Course just south of Nimtz Parkway. The petitioner is requesting a zone change from Light <br />Industrial to Community Business for a hotel. They are also seeking a special exception to keep <br />the remaining portion of the golf course because a golf course is not something that is allowed in <br />Community Business. North of the property are offices. Just east of the property is the golf <br />course clubhouse. To the south is the rest of the golf course. To the west of the bypass are farms. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.