My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-19-16 Utilities
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2016
>
Utilities
>
05-19-16 Utilities
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2017 10:58:48 AM
Creation date
6/13/2016 11:06:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
> Example attached seems reasonable, but it is for a 4.6 Acre lot. A more comparable example would be <br />as follows: <br />FeclEx Project <br />31.5 AC <br />$83,885.60 <br />Pepsi Project <br />13.4 AC <br />$52,348.16 <br />Spec Building <br />24.3 AC <br />$71,340.32 <br />General Sheet <br />26.7 AC <br />$83,074.29 (110% multiplier) <br />SJEC Project <br />165.46 AC <br />$349,027.25 (110% multiplier) <br />Section 17 -82 — Effective Date <br />> No issues <br />Section 17 -83 — Owner Responsible for connection costs to main line <br />> Need an understanding of how tap /connection fees play into final cost? <br />> Is 110% multiplier applied with connection costs too <br />Section 17 -84— Party Responsible for payment of charge <br />> What is the need to add "current" to this section? <br />Section 17 -85 — Methods of payment <br />(c) If in the City, city rates apply. <br />If outside the City, non -City rates apply. <br />If outside the City but file an irrevocable annexation petition, City rates will apply. <br />Section 17 -86— Waiver of Annexation and Compact Fees <br />(a) Effective date affirmed to be June 3, 2002 <br />> If not presently enforcing these rules, should not the effective date be moved to date of passage or <br />new effective date? <br />> Is there a plan to go retroactive with Compact Fee and Waiver requirements? Or is there a statement <br />of fact on file that says Compact Fee and Waiver will only be required here to forward? <br />(b) Waiver provision for service (quid pro quo) <br />> What happens in situations where owner does not want to sign nor is there any reasonable semblance <br />of contiguity or adjacent to another municipality? <br />(c) Compact fee for NON -CITY residents only <br />> Annual fee <br />> Discriminatory in that it only applies to Non -City residents on top of 110% requirements for service <br />> The language has been modified to say "...that utility..." — so does this contemplate that there could be <br />a compact fee for both water and sewer at a total 60% rate? Previously capped at 50% <br />Section 17 -87 — Exemptions (NEW SECTION except for subsection e) <br />(a) Owners that have executed a permit to connect or who have connected prior to 7/1/16 are <br />exempt. <br />> Will projects be approved in interim period so that they become exempt or will they be held past this <br />date? <br />(b) BOW will enter into a reimbursement agreement with other entity that built water and sewer to <br />reimburse expenses or waive assessment fees outright. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.