Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 6 1. 1. � 0 0 A o f --( 1 _ <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, REQUESTING <br />THE SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION TO STUDY IN GREATER DETAIL THE REQUEST <br />TO FUND THE NEW TECH HIGH SCHOOL AND TO MEET PUBLICLY WITH THE COUNCIL <br />9�, the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, notes that Indiana Code § 36 -7 -14.5 sets <br />forth the enabling state legislation which authorizes a unit of local government to establish by ordinance a 5- <br />member Redevelopment Commission, with three (3) members being appointed by the Mayor, and two (2) <br />members being appointed by the Council; and <br />the Common Council further notes that Ordinance No. 4121 was passed by the South Bend Common <br />Council on September 24, 1956; and was approved by Mayor Edward F. "Babe" Voorde on September 29, 1956 <br />with this ordinance creating a "Department of Redevelopment" as well as a Redevelopment Commission; and <br />currently the Redevelopment Commission meets on the I" & P Fridays of each month at 10 am. in <br />the Board of Public Works Conference Room, 13 Floor County-City Building and its membership includes <br />Marcia I. Jones, President; Dr. David Varner, Vice - President; Nancy King, Secretary; Gregory Downes, Member; <br />and Don Alford, Member with the Common Council having appointed Marcia Jones and Dr. Varner; and <br />the Common Council has learned from news reports that the Redevelopment Commission may be <br />formally asked to consider using $1.3 million of TIF monies in 2009 and an additional $1.6 million of TIF monies <br />in 2011 for the proposed New Tech High School, a concept which the South Bend Community School <br />Corporation supported to pursue at its February 9, 2009 meeting. <br />tea., 6lL Gs .r awa,, by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, as follows: <br />Section I . The South Bend Common Council believes that the new tech teaching and learning concept is <br />very exciting and may be a significant benefit to our youth, as well as to our entire community. However, the <br />Common Council strongly believes that since the Redevelopment Commission has never had the proposed new <br />tech high school on their agenda, that before the Redevelopment Commission can move forward on any funding <br />requests for such a project, that much more information should be shared with the Common Council and the entire <br />community. New projects of this magnitude should be successful and cost - efficient, especially in the post HEA <br />1001 era which has created additional fiscal challenges on all public entities. Before individuals can <br />enthusiastically embrace the overall goal, communication and information sharing is not only mandatory, but it is <br />vital to the very success of the proposed project. At a minim the following critical areas should be addressed <br />and discussed openly before moving forward: <br />• What is the complete plan for the proposed new tech high school project in the short and long term? <br />• Why is private property being considered for its possible location, and were school properties considered? <br />• Why is the timing of the proposed project so rushed, especially in light of the estimated cost for the fast <br />year of operation being $2.75 million? <br />• Have inter -local agreements been drafted spelling out the role and responsibilities of each entity? <br />Section II . The South Bend Common Council notes that under the current Indiana state law that approval <br />of TIF monies is given to the Redevelopment Commission, an appointed board, rather than an elected body. In <br />light of that, the Common Council urges the Redevelopment Commission to meet with the Common Council and <br />the South Bend Community School Corporation Board of Trustees to discuss this proposed project in public. Such <br />a meeting would provide the opportunity for transparency, and perhaps even better ideas to make a new tech high <br />school in South Bend, Indiana, an example of education excellence which other communities would want to <br />emulate. <br />Section M. 's Resol 'on shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption by the Council and <br />appr v the or. <br />A , <br />re S, District O1i N D�a�is, 6 istri ct <br />Henry D r., District Al " uddy" Kirsits t Lar e <br />TRhias LaF tain, 3` ct Karen L. Whit , At Larg <br />ello, 4 <br />22 _ , � <br />trict Timo y A. e, At Large <br /><1, <br />avid Varner, 5 District Kathleen Cekanski- Farrand, Council Attorney <br />C�',/�iCadUua_ o��el�nriarr� 2009 . <br />J City Clerk Stephen J. Luecke, Mayor of South Bend <br />