My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-05-09 Council Retreat - Brainstorming Session #1
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2009
>
02-05-09 Council Retreat - Brainstorming Session #1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2009 8:41:50 AM
Creation date
2/27/2009 9:44:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
2/5/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Retreat Minutes of February 5, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />the Council is looking into how the delayed tax billings can be corrected since $3/4 million has <br />been spent by the city on interest for loans as a result of these delayed billings. (See: Slides # <br />15 - # 18) <br />Council Member White noted that the emphasis should be on priorities framing the budget, with <br />the Council working collectively with the City Administration. She again noted that with public <br />safety being # 1 priority, the process requires information to be gathered, shared and <br />discussed. As the Council reaches consensus, those priorities need to be advanced. Tonight <br />is the beginning of that conversation and it wilt require a different way of working with the <br />Administration. (See: Slides # 19 - # 20) <br />Council Member LaFountain stressed the need for the citizens need to know, so that they do <br />not see the budget process as ~~back room dealings"; but rather that there is common sense <br />communication by the public officials who are the servants of the public. He noted that priority- <br />based budgeting is all inclusive - it requires communication and information sharing with the <br />Council, the Administration and the citizens. Priority-based budgeting results in a ~~hierarchy of <br />goals and then we work with the numbers". (See: Slides # 21 - # 23) <br />Council President Dieter suggested that additional internal work sessions of the Council will be <br />needed for the process to be successful. He then passed out a 1-page ~~Council Assignments" <br />sheet which focused on five (5) topics: TIF Funding, Major Moves, Redevelopment, Stimulus <br />Package, and South Bend Budget vs. General Budget (copy attached). He also suggested that <br />an ad hoc committee may be needed to bounce ideas and concepts with to gain different <br />perspectives. (See: Slides # 24 - # 25) <br />Council Member Rouse stated that the ~~wagon may be in front of the horse". He suggested <br />that the Administration should be at the table and should be part of a collaborative effort. He <br />noted that the process could be a ~~win/win" if both the Council and Administration are at the <br />table, especially in light of serious reductions in funding. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.