Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting –December 19, 2008 <br /> <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br /> <br />B. South Bend Central Development Area <br /> <br />(3) continued… <br /> <br />Commission’s garages, and one from <br />Denison Systems. After careful review, staff <br />has determined that Denison’s expenses are <br />approximately $60,000 higher than Ampco’s. <br />Staff has been satisfied with Ampco’s <br />management of the garages for the past ten <br />years, so recommends accepting the proposal <br />from Ampco. <br /> <br />Mr. Inks noted that we discussed with <br />Ampco the lower fee, to make sure they were <br />not planning to cut staff or services to make <br />up for the fee. They will not be doing that. <br />It appears that we can attribute the savings to <br />a competitive proposal process. <br /> <br />C <br />Upon a motion by Ms. King, seconded by <br />OMMISSION APPROVED THE PROPOSAL FROM <br />ASMC <br />MPCO YSTEMS FOR ANAGEMENT OF ITY <br />Mr. Downes and unanimously carried, the <br />SBR <br />OF OUTH END AND EDEVELOPMENT <br />Commission approved the proposal from <br />CPG <br />OMMISSION ARKING ARAGES <br />Ampco Systems for Management of City of <br />South Bend and Redevelopment Commission <br />Parking Garages. <br /> <br /> <br />(4) Staff report on Proposals for Management <br />of Redevelopment Retail Properties. <br /> <br />Ms. Jennings noted that CB Richard Ellis <br />submitted the only proposal for management <br />of the retail properties and for master leasing <br />the retail properties. Staff recommends <br />accepting the proposal for management of <br />the retail properties, but rejecting the <br />proposal for the master lease, allowing staff <br />thirty days to try to negotiate better terms. <br /> <br />Mr. Inks noted that with the proposed annual <br /> 11 <br /> <br />