Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JULY 28, 2015 252 <br />Expo * <br />p.m. <br />Barbara <br />Procession <br />August 8, <br />On Route as <br />Pawlowski / Relos <br />Hawkins- <br />2015; 8:00 <br />Submitted <br />Subject to <br />Cleveland <br />a.m. to 12:00 <br />Participants staying <br />p.m. <br />on Sidewalks <br />Riley High <br />Procession <br />September 11, <br />On Route as <br />Tabled <br />School <br />2015; 4:00 <br />Submitted; <br />Pawlowski /Maradik <br />p.m. to 6:30 <br />Mr. Pawlowski <br />p.m. <br />stated there is an <br />issue with the route <br />being on Ireland <br />Rd., a main arterial, <br />and a gap in the <br />route that needs to <br />be resolved <br />Center for <br />Procession <br />September 13, <br />On Route as <br />Relos /Maradik <br />Hospice Care <br />2015; 7:00 <br />Submitted <br />a.m. to 6:00 <br />p.m. <br />Frank's Place <br />Sidewalk Cafe <br />327 W. Marion <br />Maradik / Relos <br />'Mr. Pawlowski noted the Police Department and Community Investment recommended a <br />different location due to Orange St. being a major artery and direct route for public safety <br />response. He asked Mr. Murray Miller, Petitioner, if a different location could be utilized, such <br />as one of the less - traveled side streets. Mr. Miller questioned why the Board would have an issue <br />with this location when there are events approved in the center of downtown and Eddy St. is <br />closed all the time. Mr. Pawlowski noted the issue with this one is the location of a Fire Station <br />on the corner, and this route a main arterial for them, as well as Police. He stated he was hoping <br />to minimize disruption of this route. Mr. Miller informed the Board that they use the Martin <br />Luther King Center on one side of the street, and the church on the other side for this event. He <br />explained that children will be crossing back and forth on the street. Mr. Pawlowski asked why <br />they couldn't cross at the crosswalk with assistance from Public Safety personnel and asked Mr. <br />Miller if he could work on moving to a side street next year, and cross at the crosswalks. Mr. <br />Miller stated he would let the committee know, adding he was only one person on the committee. <br />Mr. Gilot stated he has asked all of these questions before when this request was originally <br />brought to the Board. He stated there is a need for a classification of what is a "major arterial ", <br />noting that he didn't feel this section of Orange St. is one. Mr. Eric Horvath, Public Works, <br />stated he could provide that list, but Public Safety would need to send their own list of main <br />arterial routes. <br />TABLE PETITION TO VACATE THE SECOND EAST /WEST ALLEY NORTH OF <br />NORTHSIDE BLVD. FROM PARRY ST. TO FIRST NORTH /SOUTH ALLEY <br />Mr. Gilot indicated that Denise and Bobby Clark, 521 Parry St, South Bend, IN 46617, have <br />submitted a request to vacate the above referenced alley. Mr. Gilot advised the Board is in <br />receipt of favorable recommendations concerning this Vacation Petition from the Area Plan <br />Commission, Police Department, Fire Department, and Community Investment. Area Plan <br />stated the vacation would not hinder the growth or orderly development of the unit or <br />neighborhood in which it is located or to which it is contiguous. The vacation would not make <br />access to the lands of the aggrieved person by means of public way difficult or inconvenient. <br />The vacation would not hinder the public's access to a church, school or other public building or <br />place. The vacation would not hinder the use of a public right -of -way by the neighborhood in <br />which it is located or to which it is contiguous. Mr. Gilot advised the Board is in receipt of <br />unfavorable recommendations concerning this Vacation Petition from the Engineering <br />Department. Per the City Engineer, the City is planning on running a sewer through that alley, <br />therefore, would object to a vacation without proper easements. Attorney Michael Schmidt stated <br />after review, the Ordinance does not provide for future utility easements, only existing ones, so <br />an easement will need to be drawn -up prior to this vacation. Therefore, Mr. Relos made a motion <br />to table this item until the easement is completed. Ms. Maradik seconded the motion which <br />carried. Mr. Relos also requested the description of the location be reviewed on this petition, <br />noting there is uncertainty whether this is actually a street or an alley. <br />