Laserfiche WebLink
Derek Dieter asked if the current budget funded seasonal employment to which Code Enforcement <br />Director Randy Wilkerson said yes in the amount of about $174,000. Derek also asked how much it cost <br />the City to mow a lot. Randy said on average about $40.00. Derek asked why the $200.00 admin fee <br />over and above actual costs. <br />Karen asked Randy to walk through what was involved once a complaint was filed. <br />Randy responded by describing a minimum 3 step process for Code. An inspection, a re- inspection and <br />a re- inspection for abatement of the problem cited. <br />Oliver Davis wondered why adequate money to address mowing was not already in 2015 budget. He <br />said during last year's budget vetting, as in every year, department heads are asked if they have <br />resources needed to do their job. Generally they say yes; so why now are they short? And why should <br />the Council be asked to raise fees to cover those shortages? <br />Dr. Ferlic felt the long standing problems in Code were now being addressed by Randy who was not here <br />for the 2015 budget vetting. Dr. Ferlic also suggested that $40.00 per lot, maybe the City should explore <br />subcontracting the work. <br />Karen White agreed with Oliver. Every year the Council emphasizes quality of life issues, wanting those <br />basic services to be reflected in the budget. She pledged to make basic services in neighborhoods a <br />priority again this year. <br />Tim Scott defined the $250.00 fee as a deterrent. <br />Oliver felt with collections up the current fee schedule might be adequate. <br />Moving to public comments, six people spoke. <br />Jessie Davis said the City should get its own act together before it raised fines. <br />Becky Kaiser spoke in support of the bill saying irresponsible property owners needed to be targeted. <br />Linda Wolfson felt the fees were too high saying the focus should be on finding better more efficient <br />approached to mowing long grass. <br />Tony Trinka just wants the City to do a betterjob maintaining vacant lots. <br />Leroy Cobb spoke against the bill claiming the increase fees would hurt the poor and elderly. <br />Regina Williams- Preston also felt the new fee structure was too high. She also suggested working <br />through the neighborhood organizations could result in effective innovative approaches to problems like <br />these. <br />The Councilmembers attending then spoke, in turn, offering final comments. <br />Dr. Ferlic led off saying a joint effort among neighbors, schools, non - profit, the City and the Council was <br />necessary to address the problem. <br />Tim Scott expressed openness to alternative approaches; but still felt there needs to be the deterrent of <br />higher fines. <br />