Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING MAY 11, 2015 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />to come in under that. Councilmember Davis responded there is obviously a plan in place for <br />rezoning, my question is are we in conversation with those being affected by this as to what will <br />be happening in the next 4-5 years. Is the zoning conducive to the area or will it force others out? <br />Chris responded it will be more conducive as it will expand parking. If anything the church which <br />is limited now to parking will have access to more afterwards, which would help them out. <br />Councilmember Davis responded I’m pushing on this as this is in my District. We spent a lot of <br />time on developing that area to ensure what the area will look like in 5 years. I’m not sure if that <br />will delay the zoning or would be a condition of approval. I am interested in the next steps. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dr. Ferlic stated didn’t you explain this during the committee meeting? (Chris <br />responded that he did) Councilmember Davis asked what that had to do with anything. <br /> <br />Councilmember White stated in terms of Councilmember Davis’ concerns I do recall having that <br />conversation. I think we should have the Church Grandfathered in so they wouldn’t lose their <br />zoning and their location. Can we have that in writing? Chris responded there are no plans on file <br />with the contractors as we are being proactive, so when the developers do come we don’t have to <br />delay development 4-6 months to wait on approvals but we will be more than happy to put that in <br />writing. Councilmember White asked if the church was made aware of the rezoning and if they <br />had gotten any responses? Council Attorney Cekanski-Farrand responded that they were notified <br />as they are within the 300 radius. Angela Smith stated there was no-one present at the meeting <br />nor did they receive any calls or notifications on opposition. Councilmember White requested can <br />we document this conversation so that it does not have a negative impact on the church, Council <br />Attorney is there anything that we can do? Council Attorney Cekanski-Farrand stated that doesn’t <br />fall within their written commitment. If there is going to be a significant change they would need <br />to come back through the Council. This is now all Public Record. You can request additional <br />communication between the department and the Council. <br /> <br />th <br />Petitioner Chris Fielding, Department of Community Investment, Offices on the 14 floor – We <br />are trying to accomplish the rezoning for the requested area. This is one large parcel between the <br />cul-de-sac and the synagogue to have the same zoning on that block. <br /> <br />This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. <br /> <br />Councilmember Davis interjected before the vote, I can’t believe we’ve gone through all those <br />changes if we are not doing anything. I’m not opposed to redevelopment, I am just more <br />comfortable with having a conversation with the land owners before doing anything further. I just <br />don’t want us to run in to a brick wall three years down the road. <br /> <br />There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in opposition to <br />this bill, Councilmember Gavin Ferlic made a motion for favorable recommendation to full <br />Council concerning this bill. Councilmember Schey seconded the motion which carried by a <br />voice vote of six (6) ayes and one (1) nay by Councilmember Henry Davis, Jr. <br /> <br />22-15 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 19, <br />ARTICLE 2 OF THE SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL CODE IN ITS <br />ENTIRETY ADDRESSING ABATEMENT REGULATIONS ADDRESSING <br />TALL, GRASS, WEEDS, NOXIOUS WEEDS AND RANK OR OVERGROWN <br />VEGETATION AND FURTHER AMENDING SECTION 16-61 OF THE <br />SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL CODE ADDRESSING PENALTIES <br /> <br />th <br />Councilmember Gavin Ferlic made a motion to continue bill for May 26 back to the Health and <br />Public Safety. Councilmember Schey seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of <br />seven (7) ayes. <br /> <br /> <br />RISE AND REPORT <br />Councilmember White requested a motion to rise and report to full Council. So moved by <br />Councilmember Schey. Councilmember Gavin Ferlic seconded the motion which carried by a <br />voice vote of seven (7) ayes. <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />