Designating Tax Abatement - Harbor Metal Treating of Indiana, Inc. 802 S. Fellows (5 Year Personal Property)

Home Browse Search

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND DESIGNATING CERTAIN AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND COMMONLY KNOWN AS 802 S. FELLOWS AN ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA FOR PURPOSES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR HARBOR METAL TREATING OF INDIANA, INC. WHEREAS, a petition for personal property tax abatement considera- tion has been filed with the Common Council of the City of South Bend, requesting that the area commonly known as 802 S. Fellows, South Bend, Indiana, and which is more particularly described as follows: LOTS 156 THRU 167 EX NE COR LOT 161 AND VACATED ALLEYS E H RUSHES SECOND ADD KNOWN AS PARCEL #12 MONROE \SAMPLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA and this property has Key Number 18- 3092 -3512, be designated as an Economic Revitalization Area under the provisions of Indiana Code 6.11- 12.1 -1 et -se g., and South Bend Municipal Code Sections 2 -76 et sea.; and WHEREAS, the Department of Economic Development has concluded an investigation and prepared a report with information sufficient for the Common Council to determine that the area qualifies as an Eco- nomic Revitalization Area under Indiana Code 6 -1.1- 12.1 -1, et se g., and South Bend Municipal Code Sections 2 -76 et sect., and has further prepared maps and plats showing the boundaries and such other infor- mation regarding the area in question as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Human Resources and Economic Development Committee of the Common Council has reviewed said report and recommended to the Common Council that the area qualifies as an Economic Revitalization Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, as follows: SECTION I. The Common Council hereby determines and finds pursuant to Indiana Code 6 -1.1- 12.1 -4.5, that: (a) the estimate of the cost of the new manufacturing equip- ment is reasonable for equipment of that type: (b) the estimate of the number of individuals that will be employed or whose employment will be retained by the Petitioner can be reasonably expected to result from the proposed installation of new manufacturing equipment; (c) the estimate of the annual salaries of those individuals who will be employed or whose employment will be retained can be reasonably expected to result from the proposed installa- tion of new equipment; (d) any other benefits about which information was requested are benefits that can be reasonably expected to result from the proposed installation of new manufacturing equipment; and (e) the totality of benefits is sufficient to justify the deduction requested.