Designating Tax Abatement - Harbor Metal Treating of Indiana Inc. 802 S. Fellows (5 Year Personal Property)

Home Browse Search

RESOLUTION NO. q 7l " 9 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND DESIGNATING CERTAIN AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 802 S. Fellows AN ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA FOR PURPOSES OF A FIVE (5) YEAR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR Harbor Metal Treating of Indiana, Inc. WHEREAS, a petition for personal property tax abatement consideration has been filed with the City Clerk for consideration by the Common council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, requesting that the area commonly known as 802 S. Fellows, South Bend, Indiana, and which is more particularly described as follows: Lots 156 THRU 167 EX NE Cor Lot 161 and vacated alleys E H Rushes Second ADD known as parcel #12 Monroe /Sample Redevelopment Area and which has Key Number 18- 3092 -3512, be designated as an Economic Revitalization Area under the provisions of Indiana Code 6 -1.1 -12.1 etet she ., and South Bend Municipal Code Sections 2 -76 et sea., and: WHEREAS, the Department of Community and Economic Development has concluded an investigation and prepared a report with information sufficient for the Common Council to determine that the area qualifies as an Economic Revitalization Area under Indiana Code 6 -1.1- 12.1, et sea., and South Bend Municipal Code Sections 2 -76, gt se ., and has further prepared maps and plats showing the boundaries and such other information regarding the area in question as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, as follows: SECTION I. The Common Council hereby determines and finds pursuant to Indiana Code 6- 1.1- 12.1 -4.5 et sea., that: a. the estimate of the cost of the new manufacturing equipment is reasonable for equipment of that type; b. That the estimate of the number of individuals that will be employed or whose employment will be retained by the Petitioner can reasonably be expected to result from the proposed installation of new manufacturing equipment; C. That the estimate of the annual salaries of those individuals that will be employed or whose equipment will be retained by the Petitioner can be reasonably expected to result from the proposed installation of new manufacturing equipment; d. any other benefits about which information was requested are benefits that can be reasonably expected to result from the proposed new manufacturing equipment; and e. the totality of benefits is sufficient to justify that deduction requested.