Laserfiche WebLink
UTILITIES COMMITTEE DECEMBER 15.2014 4:00 P.M. <br />Committee Members Present: Dr. David Varner, Valerie Schey, Dr. Fred Ferlic, Karen White <br />Citizen Members Present: Kathleen Petitjean, Chris Huff <br />Other Council Present: Tim Scott (AB), Henry Davis (AB), Oliver Davis (AB), <br />Gavin Ferlic (AB), Derek Dieter <br />Others Present: Tom Unger, Mike DuPont, American Structurepoint Inc., <br />McCormick Engineering LLC, Kara Boyles, Eric Horvath, <br />John Murphy <br />Agenda: Re- examining of South Bend's Long Term Control Plan for our <br />CSO Plan — Eric Horvath <br />There has been much consternation about the $600+ million dollar estimates cost for the City to comply <br />with the EPA mandated storm /sanitary sewer separation project. <br />The City Council has been particularly adamant about re- examining the costs of the compliance plan <br />given its subsequent effect on city ratepayers. <br />To that end, Dr. David Varner, Chair of the Utilities Committee, called a meeting to give Eric Horvath, <br />BPW Director an opportunity to outline the city's proposals to reduce the bottom line cost estimates. <br />Eric Horvath stated prior to an overhead slide presentation that the city was re- examining the <br />compliance plan hoping to cut the estimated costs by at least $100 million. He went on to say the city <br />had hired MWH, an engineering consulting firm, to identify potential savings. MWH was represented at <br />the meeting by Tom Unger and Mike DuPont. They cited their company's successful track record of cost <br />savings in Indianapolis and Lima, Ohio. Their overhead presentation is attached to these minutes. <br />Also introduced were representatives from McCormick Engineering and American Structurepoint who <br />would also be part of the team re- examining compliance issues. <br />Tom Unger from MWH who was identified as the project manager said the process would be one of <br />integrated planning with emphasis on affordability analysis and stakeholder engagement. He said phase <br />1 of the process would have two parts, A & B, the first taking 4 -6 months and the latter, 10 —11 <br />months. The presenters then took questions and comment from the Council. <br />Both Dr. Varner and Dr. Ferlic pressed for rate projections along with more specifics regarding cost <br />savings. <br />Citizen members Chris Huff and Kathleen Petitjean emphasized the desirability of "green solutions" <br />heretofore not incorporated into alternative compliance plans. <br />Tom Unger and Eric Horvath in summary comments said every alternative to save money and keep <br />future rates lower would be given due consideration. <br />