Laserfiche WebLink
I e South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br /> Regular Meeting–August 28, 2014 <br /> 6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br /> B. Northeast Neighborhood Development Area <br /> (1) continued... <br /> Dr. Varner stated these effects need to be re-iterated to the public often so that it becomes <br /> clearly understood. He also noted he found the proposed timeline to be aggressive because <br /> this matter will likely generate more questions than anticipated, even with the best attempt at <br /> clarity. We want to ensure the public has a good understanding. <br /> Mr. Ford emphasized staff is committed to answering all questions. The timeline was <br /> established with an eye toward completing the process in conjunction with the passage of the <br /> 2015 City budget. We understand we have an opportunity to set the budget before October <br /> 31'or after January 1St. So, we can amend the budget(s) in early 2015, if necessary. <br /> Ms. Schey echoed Dr. Varner's comments about the timeline. Commissioners were given <br /> the maps on Monday,August 25th, as is normal, for consideration at today's meeting. There <br /> is much research to be done. As Deputy Mayor Mark Neal noted in his opening comments <br /> about the 2015 budget,the circuit breaker has dropped South Bend's funding by 31%. These <br /> losses have been increasing each year and will continue to grow resulting in cuts to City <br /> expenditures to adapt to these changes. She asked what percentage of the City's land would <br /> be captured by the TIF? <br /> Mr. Ford answered we are currently at 34%of land in TIF areas and under the new <br /> boundaries would be at 37%. Most importantly, from the fiscal position, the change would <br /> be flat—as noted previously—from 30.64%to 30.85%. This still includes the West <br /> Washington TIF. Mr. Ford further explained staff had considered carving out certain <br /> sections but found some options to transfer roughly $300,000 from local taxing units to the <br /> State. Weighing fiscal stewardship for our local community,we opted to avoid those trade- <br /> offs. The TIFs are an option to fund infrastructure by taking pressure off the General Fund. <br /> Ms. Schey questioned whether we are expanding the intended scope of TIF as she does not <br /> see Downtown as blighted. She also believes Downtown already has a number of funds <br /> dedicated to its area. She further pointed out an area in the expansion and asked whether it is <br /> in the Near Northwest Neighborhood and doesn't this area have benefit of CDBG dollars? <br /> Ms Schey was concerned that some areas of town do not have specialized funds available to <br /> them. <br /> Mr. Ford noted that area Ms. Schey identified is the right of way of the rail—the former coal <br /> line—which goes up to the Drewrey's parcel. It is in the Near Northwest part of town, but <br /> we are unsure if it is within the NNN's defined boundaries. This was identified in the <br /> Corridor Plan as an opportunity to build a trail <br /> • <br /> 6 <br />