Laserfiche WebLink
Sam Centellas and Tom Capers agreed. They both said an effort to increase awareness, to match <br />opportunity with capacity, break down barriers and to simplify the process was vital. <br />Valerie Schey, the City Council liaison, suggested the City might bid for professional services as well as <br />goods and services. <br />With that President Summers asked the board to focus on section 1 of the current ordinance with <br />specific attention to definitions. <br />Carrie Kosac suggested the material provided by Council Attorney Cekanski - Farrand dated March 18th <br />helped clarify some contradictions in the ordinance. <br />In the roundtable discussion that followed several clarifications of definitions and points of emphasis to <br />better delineate and measure goals were identified. Among those were, as previously mentioned a <br />tighter definition of "good faith," and a clarification of the designation local business enterprises (LBE). <br />Verification of ownership and certification documentation was discussed in terms of who, how and why <br />information would be collected and verified. <br />Sam Centellas brought up the notion of using certification criteria other than, the state certification <br />Carrie Kosac pointed out that an alternate certification had been suggested in the Trinal study. <br />Eric Horvath said perhaps a "grace period" allowing non - certified businesses to qualify for work prior to <br />meeting certification would help nurture smaller providers. <br />Having identified work that needed to be addressed in section 1, Mr. Summers shifted the discussion to <br />section 2 of the ordinance affecting board makeup and protocols. He began by noting his <br />dissatisfaction with the lack of "due process" in the removal of someone from the board. Could a <br />member be removed by their appointing entity, Mayor, Council or Chamber in a seemingly arbitrarily <br />manner? For better or worse the answer was deemed to be yes; though it was agreed there was <br />dissatisfaction without some level of "due process ". <br />A variety of other deficiencies or challenges were noted in the current ordinance. Specifically, Jan Hall, <br />the City's Diversity Compliance Officer, wondered about the reference to achieving "federal goals ". <br />This led to some discussion of legislative intent and the need for measures to determine progress <br />toward achieving goals. George King, responding to Carrie Kosac's question about training, said training <br />referred to training for department heads in the city to attune them to fostering minority business <br />access to contracting for goods and services. <br />Eric Horvath felt the reference in the ordinance to (MOU's) Memorandums of Understanding between <br />contracting parties needed to be better defined. This went hand in hand with Valerie Schey's query <br />about whether a builders affidavit is adequately defined by either the Board of Public Works or the <br />DUB, suggesting both be the same. <br />