My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-14 Council Agenda & Packet
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Common Council Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
06-23-14 Council Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2014 1:43:33 PM
Creation date
6/19/2014 1:39:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Agendas
City Counci - Date
6/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
north is extended to the center of the railroad right -of -way. The development standards of the <br />"C" Commercial district are therefore also extended and applied to that portion of the railroad <br />right -of -way. However, the location of the proposed sign, as provided by the petitioner's site <br />plan, is at a point where the Railroad intersects with the Capital Avenue right -of -way. Zoning <br />classifications are not extended into public right -of -ways as they are with railroad right -of -ways <br />Subsequently, it is staff's opinion that the proposed location of the sign is not zoned, and <br />therefore the use is not permitted as a standalone commercial use. <br />The City of Mishawaka recommends denial of the requested variance. A full copy of their <br />comments has been attached previously. <br />3. Petition of FTC, LLC. <br />The staff still recommends denial of the requested variance. Even though the petitioner has <br />reduced the size of the addition to 2,000 square feet, the structure remains twice as large as <br />permitted. The proposed addition would create a structure that far exceeds a typical residential <br />accessory structure. The proposed size and nature of this structure is more consistent with a <br />commercial building. If approved, the variance could negatively impact the use and value of <br />the adjacent property. <br />9. Petition of Ronald L & Katherine S. O'Dell. <br />If the variance is granted, staff recommends it be subject to the remainder either being platted <br />as an outlot on a recorded subdivision or combined with an adjacent parcel on a recorded <br />deed. <br />Special Exception / Special Use <br />A special exception use /special use may only be granted upon making a written <br />determination and adopting appropriate Findings of Fact, based upon the evidence presented <br />at a public hearing, that: <br />(1) The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort, <br />community moral standards, convenience or general welfare; <br />(2) The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or <br />property values therein; <br />(3) The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is <br />located and the land uses authorized therein; <br />(4) The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive <br />Pla <br />11. Petition of Sam & Wadad Ammon. <br />Based on information available a Board meeting, the staff recommends the special <br />e Common Council with a favorable recommendation. <br />(1) The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort, community <br />moral standards, convenience or general welfare. <br />The proposed development will revitalize a vacant commercial property and help <br />improve this section of the corridor. <br />SERVING ST, JOSEPH COUNTY, SOUTH BEND. LAKEVILLE, NEW CARLISLE, NORTH LIBERTY, OSCEOLA, & ROSELAND <br />W WW.STSOSEPH000NTYIN DIANA. CC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.