Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF SOUTH BEND <br />SOUTH BEND, INDIANA <br />CITY PLANNING COMMISSION <br />J. FRANK MILES <br />PRESIDENT <br />DONALD L. ADAIR <br />VICE - PRESIDENT <br />RAYMOND S. ANDRYSIAK <br />DONALD F. ERHARDT <br />F. R. HENREKIN <br />BERT MCCLELLAN <br />CHESTER MUEZYNSKI <br />GALEN B. SARGENT <br />CHARLES A. VAN DEVEIRE <br />FOREST R. WEST <br />ROBERT L. HUFF <br />DIRECTOR OF PLANNING <br />The Honorable Common Council <br />City of South Bend <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Gentlemen: <br />November 10, 1958 <br />The attached petition of Hartman Builders, Inc. to rezone the <br />property located on the south side of Lincoln way West, west of <br />Sheridan Avenue and north of Elwood Avenue, containing approximately <br />3.5 acres, from "B" Residential Use District and "A" Height and <br />Area District to "C -1" Commercial Use District and I'D" Height and <br />Area District was legally advertised on 22 September 1958 and <br />given public hearing on 2 October 1958. The following action was <br />taken: <br />After due consideration the Commission found that with the exception <br />of the construction of the Beacon Bowling Alley at the city limits <br />there had been no subsequent change of conditions since the <br />unfavorable recommendation of the original petition, said petition <br />being essentially similar to subject petition. The Commission <br />noted that were the subject area zoned commercially it would be <br />unreasonable and arbitrary not to change the frontage opposite <br />in whole or in part on the north side of Lincoln Viay ,'lest to <br />commercial zoning were a petition so filed. The Commission noted <br />that the petition constitutes undesirable strip zoning the granting <br />of which would grant a special privilege to the petitioners at <br />the economic and social expense of the general area. The Commission <br />also noted the findings relative to the previous petition of 6 June <br />1957 which are as follows: <br />1. Because property is on a fairly heavily traveled street is <br />not sufficient reason to invalidate residential zoning. <br />