My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Amend Chapter 4, Article 4, Section 18.5 Regarding Adult Business
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Ordinances
>
2000
>
Amend Chapter 4, Article 4, Section 18.5 Regarding Adult Business
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2008 8:41:17 AM
Creation date
11/7/2008 3:02:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
8/28/2000
Ord-Res Number
9132-00
Bill Number
28-00
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ordinance No. `, >2 ~® <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE SOUTH BEND COMMON COUNCIL AMENDING <br />CHAPTER FOUR, ARTICLE FOUR, SECTION 18.5 OF THE SOUTH BEND <br />MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ADULT BUSINESSES <br />Statement of Purpose and Intent <br />The Indiana Home Rule Statute authorizes municipalities to adopt ordinances to protect the <br />health, welfare and safety of its residents and to preserve the peace, order and safety of its community; <br />and <br />Sexually oriented businesses within the corporate limits of the City of South Bend require special <br />supervision from local public safety and health agencies in order to protect and preserve the health, safety <br />and welfare of the patrons of such businesses as well as citizens of South Bend; and <br />The City Council has conducted an extensive review of land use studies concerning the <br />secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses in other cities including, but not limited to, Garden <br />Grove, California (1991); Phoenix, Arizona (1986); Minneapolis, Minnesota (1980); Houston, Texas <br />(1983); Indianapolis, Indiana (1984); Amarillo, Texas (1977); City of Los Angeles, California (1977); <br />Cleveland, Ohio (1977); Austin, Texas (1986); Seattle, Washington (1989); Oklahoma City (1986); <br />Beaumont, Texas (1982); and Whittier, California (1978); and <br />From review of other cities' studies and their own surveys and testimony from its citizens there is <br />convincing documented evidence that sexually oriented businesses, because of their very nature, have a <br />deleterious effect on both existing businesses around them and the surrounding residential areas adjacent <br />to them, causing among other adverse secondary effects, increased crime and downgrading of property <br />values; and <br />It is recognized that sexually oriented businesses, due to their very nature, have <br />serious objectionable operational characteristics, particularly when they are operating in close proximity to <br />each other, thereby contributing to crime, lower property values, urban blight and <br />downgrading of the quality of life in the adjacent area; and <br />The City Council finds that sexually oriented businesses are frequently used for unlawful sexual <br />activities including prostitution and sexual liaisons of a casual nature; and <br />Increased crime and unhealthful conduct tend to accompany, concentrate around and be <br />aggravated by sexually oriented businesses including but not limited to prostitution, pandering, exposing <br />minors to harmful materials, possession and distribution of obscene materials and child pornography, <br />possession and sale of controlled substances and violent crimes against persons and property; and <br />Concern over sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, is a legitimate health concern of the <br />City which demands reasonable regulations of sexually oriented businesses in order to protect the health <br />and well being of the citizens; and <br />The City Council and staff recognize that preventing prostitution and the spread of sexually <br />transmitted diseases are clearly within its police powers. Southeastern Promotions, Inc. v. Conrad, 341 F. <br />Supp. 465, 477 (E.D. Tenn. 1972), rev ii on other grounds, 420 U.S. 546 (1975). The City Council and <br />staff believe that prohibiting physical contact between performers and patrons at a sexually oriented <br />business establishment, prohibiting pertormers from soliciting payment of gratuities from patrons, and the <br />direct payment of gratuities to performers by patrons are a reasonable and effective means of addressing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.