Laserfiche WebLink
Common Council -3- March 28, 1960 <br />9. That the proponents have submitted a tentative <br />development plan of the proposed shopping center, <br />which is acceptable as a development plan, and <br />that said plan meets the requirements of Sub - <br />Sections 5, 77 8, 91 12, and all other sections <br />applicable, of Ordinance No. 3702, Section 4 -B, <br />and should be given tentative approval; <br />10. That the proponents have sufficient financial <br />responsibility to carry the proposals to completion; <br />11. That shopping center on subject property will be <br />conveniently accessible and will further the general <br />welfare; <br />12. That "strip" and "spot zoning," with their social <br />and economic waste and lessening of the amenities <br />of residential neighborhoods, will be discouraged <br />within the primary trade area of the proposed <br />shopping center; <br />13. That, because of required and proposed front, side <br />and rear yard set backs and planting screen barriers <br />on subject property, there will be no unsightly <br />view which would adversely affect the properties in <br />the residential area; <br />14. That City sewers adjacent to the site are adequate <br />in present and future capacity to accommodate the <br />proposed center. Adequate City water is likewise <br />available; <br />15. That the subject petition complies with the intent <br />of and meets the applicable conditions of Section <br />4 -B, Sub - Section 11C -211, of Ordinance No. 3702, as <br />required before a zoning change is granted. <br />It was therefore duly moved, seconded and carried that <br />the "C -2" Commercial part of the petition be favorably <br />recommended to the Common Council. <br />After due consideration the Commission found that the <br />best possible use for the property located at the southeast <br />corner of Ireland and Miami Roads was commercial. <br />It was therefore duly moved, seconded and carried that <br />the "C" Commercial part of the petition be favorably <br />recommended to the Common Council. <br />After due consideration the Commission found that the best <br />possible use for the 63.31 acres proposed by the petitioners <br />