Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />row of evergreen, trees as shown on adjacent.proposed Outlot "A" located <br />West of Petition site. The Petitioner would state that as shown, they <br />will be providing a double row of evergreen trees on the proposed Outlot <br />"A" of the Subdivision Industrial Park. As shown this would create a <br />buffer area of approximately 64 feet between the few existing homes and <br />the location of the proposed storage area. The properties to the west of <br />the Petition site have a Zoning classification of General Industrial, <br />but there are a few homes located in this area.. This portion of the <br />Petition property also contains the main storm sewer line for the <br />Industrial Park, which transports surface runoff created on the <br />Industrial Parks' lots to the retention basin shown to the northwest of <br />the site. This limits the amount of area that can be used for <br />landscaping containing evergreen or deciduous trees. The Petitioner <br />would hope that the Board Members agree that providing the 20 ft. buffer <br />strip along with evergreen trees on the proposed Outlot "A" of the <br />Industrial Park, that would effectively screen the outside storage area <br />from the closest home. With this proposed buffer, the Petitioners <br />believe that approval of this variance would not be detrimental to the <br />adjacent properties. <br />The last Variance request is from the required minimum frontage of <br />I50 ft. for a property Zoned "GI" General Industrial District to a <br />minimum frontage of 94.50 ft. more or less along Oliver Plow Court. The <br />Petitioner would state that the Industrial Park Subdivision was planned <br />and approved several years ago, prior to the City's new frontage <br />requirement being added to the Zoning Ordinance, The lots were shown on <br />a Primary Subdivision Plat approved through the City's Subdivision <br />process. The petitioner would request to be allowed to create a lat that <br />has frontage of approximately 94.50 ft. on a cul-de-sac. The Petitoners <br />do not believe a variance for the frontage of this proposed Industrial <br />site would have a negative impact on any surrounding property. As shown, <br />it allows for the logical development of the Industrial Park which was <br />envisioned several years ago when. the development of this area began. <br />The Petitioner believes that approval of the above Special Exception and <br />Variances for this proposed use will not be detrimental to adjacent <br />properties, nor will it adversely affect the surrounding property <br />values. <br />The Petitioner would ask the Board Members to agree that°approval of <br />the above described Special Exception and Variances will not have a <br />detrimental affect for this area, nor would the property values, <br />public's health,. safety, morals, or general welfare be adversely <br />affected. <br />The Petitioners contend that the strict application of the terms of <br />the Zoning ordinance will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship <br />as applied to the property for which the Variances and Special Exception <br />are sought: that the need for the Variances and Special Exception arises <br />from such condition pecuii.ar to the property in the same Zone_ and that <br />the use or value of the area adjacent to the property described in the <br />