Laserfiche WebLink
RE: Tax Abatement Noble Americas South Bend Ethanol LLC <br />February 20, 2014 <br />Page 2 <br />South Bend Common Council <br />From 2013 through 2015 the company plans to spend $11 Mon new building construction, and $9M on <br />existing building improvements. They have plans for investment going out five years. Because the <br />designation given by the designating resolution only extends out for two years they will need to reapply <br />for abatement at the end of that two year period for the next two year period. The overall cost over 5 years <br />will be $24,000,000. <br />DCI is recommending this petition as an exception. The petitioner has already pulled their building <br />permit. All of their real estate was previously classified by the Assessor' s Office as personal property. <br />There are no building permit restrictions in the local ordinance on personal property. Petitioner was <br />advised they could pull the permit without sacrificing their potential tax abatement. A change in <br />assessment type later occurred and what was once classified as personal property was changed to real <br />property. DCI recommends this exception be considered and approved. <br />The petitioner has not submitted their contractor information. They will have that information on the date <br />of issuing the Confirming Resolution. Based on the petition, the petitioner qualifies for a six to eight year <br />abatement. <br />Total taxes to be abated during the (6) six -year abatement real property period for Phase 1 are estimated <br />at $1,242,213.. Net tax paid is estimated at $3,137,812. For an eight year abatement, the taxes abated <br />would be $1,562,658 and the new project taxes would be $4,443,409. <br />EMPLOYMENT IMPACT <br />Per the petition, it is estimated that the total project will create 50 permanent, full -time and 0 (zero) <br />permanent, part-time jobs within the first year, representing a new annual payroll of $2,808,000. <br />ABATEMENT QUALIFICATION <br />1. A review of the tax abatements previously granted, finds that the petitioner has not been granted or <br />associated with any previous tax abatements: <br />2. The Building Commissioner has reviewed the petition and finds the property to be properly zoned <br />for the proposed project. <br />3. A review of the Tax Abatement Ordinance No. 9394 -03 finds that the petitioner meets the <br />qualifications for a (6) six -year personal property tax abatement under section 2 -76.4, Add -On Real <br />Property Tax Abatement. <br />