My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6A(1)
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Agendas & Packets
>
2014
>
03-13-14 Redevelopment Commission Meeting
>
6A(1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2014 4:58:55 PM
Creation date
3/10/2014 4:58:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hydrocarbons-Gasoline Range Organics (TPH-GRO), BTEX and MTBE in accordance with RISC <br /> guidelines. Based upon the results, all of which were below the laboratory detection limits, which were <br /> at or below the RISC Residential Default Closure Limits (RDCLs) for the constituents analyzed. Based <br /> upon these factors, IDEM concluded that no further response actions were deemed necessary, based <br /> on information known to IDEM at the time of the determination. <br /> Summary Evaluation — Based upon our review of the limitations identified by the GPR Survey, the <br /> documentation that the former UST systems were located along the western side of the former building <br /> and the location for sampling established primarily along the eastern and southern portions of the <br /> subject site; JPR believes that there is a potential that historical UST systems and/or other service <br /> station related equipment/operations has a potential for impacting soils beneath the former gasoline <br /> service station structure. It also seems that the presence of only 1,000-gallon and 750-gallon UST <br /> systems as part of a historical gasoline service station is somewhat unusual. Such operations typically <br /> involve tanks that are 5,000-gallons to 10,000-gallons in size. Furthermore we note that the area of the <br /> former UST systems was built over with the western addition to the automotive reconditioning center in <br /> 1974, and the absence of any documentation regarding the closure of any of the UST systems <br /> removed from the site, only the accounts of Mr. Bryant for the 1,000-, 750- and 500-gallon systems. <br /> Regarding the previous Phase II, there were very limited number of soil borings placed within the <br /> footprint of the former service station (SB-2 and potentially SB-7), where it is likely that floor drains, <br /> waste oil tanks and hydraulic lifts may very well have been present. Furthermore, with groundwater <br /> flow in the area of the site being predominately westward, there are no soil borings that have been <br /> installed to the west of the building, or for that matter on either of the parcels not directly associated <br /> with the former service station operations (north and west). As such the potential for on-site migration <br /> of contaminants from off-site sources to the east and north have not been evaluated relative to the <br /> subject site. Such facilities include the former Hi-Speed Car Wash (former fueling center with two UST <br /> systems removed, no documentation of closure available), former dry cleaning operations, etc. <br /> JPR also notes that current IDEM policy calls for the analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), <br /> Lead, Lead Scavengers and Naphthalenes. This expanded analysis versus that of TPH-GRO (no <br /> longer used by IDEM) and BTEX, allows for a more comprehensive assessment of potential impacts <br /> stemming from the possible historical use of solvents, lead in gasoline, cleaning and degreasing <br /> agents, etc. <br /> PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES <br /> In response to the aforementioned environmental concerns, and in an effort to determine the extent to <br /> which, if any, potential impacts to the subsurface environmental have occurred; Jones Petrie Rafinski <br /> would propose a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment involving the collection and analysis of soil <br /> and groundwater samples to be used in the evaluation of such potential environmental impacts. It <br /> should be noted that such scope of work has been prepared prior to the completion of the Phase I <br /> Environmental Site Assessment, as commissioned by the City of South Bend Department of <br /> Community Investment, and is based primarily on a review of existing documentation, review of the <br /> environmental database search and Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps for the subject property. It should <br /> also be noted that Jones Petrie Rafinski has been somewhat limited in terms of our ability to conduct a <br /> thorough reconnaissance of the subject property based upon snow accumulations for the South Bend <br /> area during the month of January and February. Some modification to our concerns and/or <br /> recommendations relative to the proposed scope of services for Phase II Environmental Assessment <br /> may be appropriate following the site reconnaissance. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.