Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Common Council <br />RE: Tax Abatement for Great Lakes Capital Development <br />February 12, 2014 <br />Page 2 <br />There are three different schedules of taxes abated attached for your review. The first schedule shows <br />the taxes abated for a 10 year abatement based on our normal everyday calculations. Under this <br />scenario, taxes abated would be $1,086,677 and net tax paid would be $1,943,305. <br />The petitioner has requested that we offer the business a more aggressive schedule of taxes abated. <br />Much of the investment into the building will be "Costs to Cure" as the building has been vacant for <br />approximately twenty years. The renovation costs are extensive and without a more aggressive <br />schedule of taxes abated, the project does not cash flow in the first few years. The developer needs a <br />more aggressive tax abatement than usual in order to complete this project. This scenario is shown on <br />the attachment called "Petitioner's Requested Schedule. "Taxes abated would be $1,993,298 and net <br />tax paid would be $1,036,684. <br />The third schedule called "Best Estimate" shows the Department of Community Investment's best <br />estimate of taxes abated for this project. Because so much of the rehabilitation costs will be "Costs to <br />Cure ", the department estimates that the new assessed value of the building will only be $5,340,000 <br />despite a $9.5 million investment. This schedule is based on the $5.3 million assessed value along <br />with more aggressive rates for taxes abated and shows that taxes abated will be $1,241,636 and net <br />tax paid will be $696,910. <br />EMPLOYMENT IMPACT <br />Per the petition, it is estimated that the project will create nine (9) new, permanent full -time positions and <br />zero (0) part-time positions with an annual payroll of $315,000. The project will not maintain anyjobs. <br />ABATEMENT QUALIFICATION <br />1. A review of the tax abatements previously granted finds that the Petitioner, Great Lakes Capital <br />Development has not been granted any previous abatements. <br />2. The Building Commissioner has reviewed the petition and finds the property to be properly zoned <br />for the proposed project. <br />3. The property is located in the Central Business District. <br />4. A review of the Tax Abatement_ Ordinance No. 9394 -03 finds that the petitioner meets the <br />qualifications for a (10) ten -year real property tax abatement under section 2 -80 Mixed Use <br />Developments in the Central Business District. <br />