My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2. Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Agendas & Packets
>
2008
>
09/5/08 Meeting
>
2. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 5:13:00 PM
Creation date
9/2/2008 5:13:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting -August 1 ~, 2008 <br />Ms. Jones asked the impact of the Innovation <br />Park receiving 501 c(3) designation. Mr. <br />Paccenda responded that SOIc(3)s can have <br />taxable activities. It wouldn't affect the real <br />estate taxes for the Innovation Park, nor the <br />tax abatement. <br />Mr. Gibney noted that this project <br />complements the very sizable residential and <br />retail development at Eddy Street Commons. <br />The buildings will be very handsome, very <br />professional The Mayor supports this tax <br />abatement. <br />Mr. Blake voiced Mr. Varner's concern that <br />this development may require additional <br />inii-astructure that the rest of the city ends up <br />paying for. Mr. Gibney responded that the <br />concern is unfounded because the university <br />is paying for this development. The city is <br />not incurring infrastructure costs for this <br />development. <br />Mr. I31akc asked if this project is in more <br />than one TIP area? Mr. Inks responded that <br />it is only in the Northeast Neighborhood <br />Development Area (NNDA)TIP. <br />Mr. I31ake referred to the portion of the tax <br />abatement report that talks about the project <br />needing to qualify for tax abatement as an <br />exception. He asked if that portion of the <br />report is where the report states that the <br />project wouldn't be getting inliastruchire <br />from the city. Mr. Inks responded that this <br />will be one of the more confusing areas of <br />fIF in all of our economic development/ <br />redevelopment areas. "the NNDA includes <br />two TIP allocation areas. One is the <br />residential TIF which is supporting the L',ddy <br />Strcct Commons and Triangle development <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.