|
~-
<br />. •~
<br />~.]E~~JL,A~ 1~I1EE~'I1tiICp
<br />AI7~I1S~ 11, 20~~
<br />4. dray I~~ntiae ~razad A.n~ 1993 ~302.~~
<br />S. ~lz~e ~ldsz~z~bzle 9~ 1992 ~350.0~
<br />~, fl~l~e Chevrolet Sazbaarban 19b6 914~1.0~
<br />12. fled/ site F~ard F-1ST 1991 ~463.~~
<br /> ~~~~~, ~1,91~.a~
<br />~eseincl. July 14, 200 Award ~f Vehicle t~ Shirley Fantle die t~ failaare t~ ~iel~ aa~ vehiefle. ~'1~~;
<br />next highest bidder was Robert Sett, fir., fir the f~ll~wh~g azn~a~~t.
<br /> did
<br />1'~~znber Vel~efle I~al~e~ 1~~del wear
<br /> Az~rz®aant
<br />6. white F~ntiae Grand Any 1997 ~45~.00
<br /> ~'~~'~~~ X450.00
<br />Rescind .Iaaly fl 4, 200 Award ~~ ~Icl~aiele t~ I~~bert Sec~tt, ~~°., daae to failaare t~ ~ielc a~n
<br />~'lze next highest bidder was Shirley l~lantfle f€~r the fill®wing aznc~~ant.
<br /> did
<br />I~T~n~ber Vehicle alce~ ~de1 wear
<br /> Axa~ ~~nt
<br />10. Tan G1~/IC 515 197 X50®.50
<br /> `i,~TAflJ X500.50
<br />Aber disci sign, l~r. Sett and 1~/Is. l~az~tle are determined t~ be rac~n-res~~nsibfle bidders. ~ ,
<br />a n~z~ti~n rnade by 1Ytr. InflCS, seec~aaded by 1~Ir. f,ittrell grad caz-ried, the above r-"` ;,
<br />abandoned vehicle awards were rescinded as ~~tlia~ed above, azad that vehiefle its; a~~zzr - - ~ ,
<br />5, ~, and 12 be re-awarded to Indiana l~a~t~ darts, the next res~~nsive, res~ra ~ ~ , _ "
<br />bidder, and that items 6 az~d 10 be re-adveztised fir bid.
<br />1'AF~AI~IE`FER 1~1~NI`f~RS (CAfl~I~I'Afl/ I1VII~R~VEIVIfl/I~TS
<br />In a rnena~randuna to the I3~ard, Assistant Chief ®~~' fl~MS Steven Cox, Fire l~efl~artzzaezat, ;
<br />that ®n ~aaly 14, 200, bids were received az~d ~~ezzed ~®r the above referred t~ e~zzi~z~erat.
<br />reviewing those bids, Assistant Chief Fix rec~n~zz~aends that the fl~c~ard award the ec~ntrae
<br />flowest responsive and responsible bidder, ~ollfl I~Tedical Corlaoration, 269 'edi11 '~.
<br />Chelz~sford, l~Iassacla~ efts 01 ~2~, in the nnit ~riee aa~o~nt of ~14,763e33. `Therefore, l~/Ir.
<br />a~aade a z~otion that the recor~rnendation be aeee~ted and the bid be awarded. as o~tflined ab
<br />1VIr. Isittrell seconded the rnotion, which ea~-ied.
<br />In a lldenzorandiizn to the fl3oard, IVIr. IJarry Io/Ieteiver, Legafl fl~e~artrnent, recflaaested thhat ~~
<br />reject all bids received for City-awned ~ro~erties heated at 70g . Indiana, 7fl 0 . I
<br />and '71.2 W, Indiana Avenge. l~r. l~eteiver stated in his ]~ez~o that the ~ropez~ies were F~~~-°
<br />with Federal f~az~ds and ~ t meet Federal re~~ireaxzents if disp®sed of. Aeeordiz~.g to
<br />requirements, any bidder rrz~ t provide the following:
<br />1} have a ~rofessionafl draw aa~ a site flan showing the footprint, ~arlcing n~.,
<br />sereenzng, landseapnzg, etc.
<br />2.) I~resent the site flan to residents az~ad pro~ez-ty owners in the generafl vicinity
<br />lots and receive s~.alaort froze them for the developrrzent.
<br />3.) Ineflaade a tia~aeline that is aeeelatable to CflJ~ for in~plenzcntation of the devel~
<br />because these additional regzaireznents were clot included in the original ~oti.ce to bidders, it is
<br />reeoznended that the hoard reject alfl bids received on duly 1~, 200, and re-advertise.
<br />Therefore, 1~r. Iz~cs made a motion that all bids be rejected and the Fro~erties be re-advertised iz~.
<br />eom~liance with Federal regulations. l~r. hittrefll seconded the motion, which serried.
<br />Afl7l'I~CVfl~ CIdAI~iC~fl/ CR~flJR N(~. 1 ~FIl'~AI,~ AT~I~ FIZ~fl~fl/CT C~I~/1fl7IJfl1TICN !~FF~~~.'Vfl`;
<br />1VIr. C~ilot advised that l~r. Toy Vi11a, ~ngin.eering, leas subz~itted Change Order I°~o. 1 ~~
<br />behalf of ~Taflsh ~z ~_ , ~:~35~ State Road 23, Soutlz fiend, ~~diana 4661, indi
<br />eontraet antoazz~t be decreased by X3,194.00 for a new contrast swim, including this ~'"-
<br />of ~5~,$91.00. Additionally submitted was the Frojeet Coz~~letion Affidavit indieatiz~ _
<br />
|