My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
mending - Zoning ordinance Rezoning Procedures
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Ordinances
>
1972
>
mending - Zoning ordinance Rezoning Procedures
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2013 3:40:35 PM
Creation date
12/18/2013 3:14:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
7/24/1972
Ord-Res Number
5409-72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AREA PLAN COMMISSION <br />OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IND. <br />Peter Nemeth, President <br />Common Council of the <br />City of South Bend <br />County -City Building <br />South Bend, Indiana 46601 <br />HOWARD BELLINGER. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR <br />ROOM 1219 COUNTY -CITY BUILDING <br />22l W. JEFFERSON BLVD., SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 48801 <br />(219) 284 -9571 <br />May 24, 1972 <br />In Re: Amendment to Zoning Ordinance of the City of South <br />Bend, Indiana - Article 7, Rezoning Procedures <br />Dear Mr. Nemeth: <br />Please be advised that the Area Plan Commission, on <br />May 16, 1972, held a public hearing on the ordinance amend- <br />ing the Zoning Ordinance of the City of South Bend, Indiana <br />"Article 7, Rezoning Procedures." <br />I have enclosed a copy of the ordinance which includes <br />amendments worked out in earlier conference with you and At- <br />torney Kevin Butler. Please note the amendments have been <br />underlined for your convenience. <br />Following due consideration, a motion was made by <br />Dwight Miller and seconded by Russell Rothermel and unani- <br />mously carried recommending favorably to the Common Council, <br />the subject ordinance with the following recommended re- <br />visions: <br />1. Sec. 21 -118 -3 This item should read as follows: <br />"(3) A member of the Common 00uncil, to that Council. <br />This is consistent with State Enabling Act, Page 15, #52 <br />Item (1). <br />2. Sec. 21 -119 This paragraph should read as follows: <br />III the case of an amendment proposed and recommended by the <br />Commission, the Council has 60 days in which to adopt or re- <br />ject said recommendation. If the Council has not adopted <br />or rejected said recommendation within 60 days after the Com- <br />mission's recommendation the amendment shall be deemed ap- <br />proved as recommended and the ordinance submitted with the peti- <br />tion shall have the force and effect of law." <br />3. Sec. 21- 120- 4.C.1. This item should read as fol- <br />lows: <br />(4.C.1) ... unless the petitioner makes request to the -Com- <br />mission in writing for additional time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.