My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Rezoning - 8 Acres of Land Located Near the Northwest corner of the Intersection of McKinley Ave and Hickory Rd
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Ordinances
>
1969
>
Rezoning - 8 Acres of Land Located Near the Northwest corner of the Intersection of McKinley Ave and Hickory Rd
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2013 10:56:02 AM
Creation date
11/18/2013 10:55:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
11/10/1969
Ord-Res Number
5119-69
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
m o `f BagsO° nPm o <br />will be a new innovation in marketing with an Ayr -Way <br />store and an L. S. Ayres both being constructed on one parcel <br />of ground. He indicated that his clients have no objections <br />to the limitation of a single sign and entrance as proposed <br />by Mr. Wilson. Fie also indicated that the project will be <br />suitably landscaped and thae they must have the zoning <br />before they can proceed with financing since- -this will be <br />a 6 to 6 1/2 million dollar project. <br />Mrs. Susan Parker, 232 'Sylvan Glen, appeared and stated <br />that while she was not against the proposal she.would <br />like to know what assurance the people have_that' the <br />_ . . . - -___ 4a a..ria- does notes <br />build thelproject'but sells the property. <br />Mr: "Gonter', 534 Preston Drive, now appeared and stated <br />that heifeat the'property owners should be given some <br />assurance about .what will be built and the Plan Commission <br />has a responsibility to assure the people of this fact. <br />1 <br />There now ensued considerable discussion between Mr. Wilson, <br />Mr. Helling, Mr. Weisman, plan Commission attornev, and <br />the Commission relative to whether or not a site plan was <br />being submitted and, if the petitioner could be held to it. <br />ted that the general drawing submitted by <br />Mr. Helling sta <br />I his clientsl would be considered binding as far as they..are <br />ission's <br />concerned.,/ Foilowina further discussion the Comm <br />attorney advised them that the plan submitted-by the <br />petitioner can be considered as being binding and /would thus <br />give the surrounding property owners assurance that if the <br />g <br />project is not built as indicated any other use would have <br />to me Yia�k -to, e' tli .i Commissiop.. T � <br />r; <br />After due consideration of. tie in <br />presented,• i <br />was moved 'by ?sir. J. Miller that the ordinance, subject to <br />the- limitations of the attached drawing, be recommended <br />favorably to the Common Council. Mr. Simeri seconded the <br />Y motion and it was unanimously carried. <br />i <br />I <br />a <br />x <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.