Laserfiche WebLink
UTILITIES NOVEMBER 4, 2013 5:00 P.M. <br />Committee Members Present: Valerie Schey, Oliver Davis, Henry Davis, Karen White <br />Other Council Present: Tim Scott, Dr. Fred Ferlic (AB), Dr. David Varner, Gavin Ferlic, <br />Derek Dieter <br />Citizen Members Present: Carol Davis <br />Others Present: John Stomp, Kathy Ciesanski - Farrand, John Murphy, Jack Dillon, <br />Mark Neal, Cecil Eastman, Eric Horvath, Becky Schafer, Erin <br />Blasko <br />Agenda: Discussion of Proposed Utility Rates <br />This meeting of the Utilities Committee chaired by Valerie Schey was called to give the City <br />Administration an opportunity to discuss proposed sewer rate increases. It will undoubtedly be only the <br />first of a series of discussions regarding the most appropriate way to fund the EPA /IDEM mandated <br />storm /sanitary sewer separation project. <br />Valerie distributed several handouts (attached) prior to the presentation which was made by Eric <br />Horvath, Director of Public Works. Referring to the handouts and aided by a slide presentation (to be <br />provided in paper form at a later date) Eric recounted the EPA mandate, the work done by the City so far <br />to meet the requirements and the work yet to be done. He covered overall project costs detailing costs <br />for specific benchmarks in phase I and phase II. The how best to pay for the project was covered in yet <br />another handout (attached) prepared by Crowe Horwath an accounting consultant represented at this <br />meeting by John Stomp. Also present was Becky Schafer representing the engineering consulting firm of <br />Greeley Hansen. In short, the construction would be funded by a balance of cash and bond financing <br />made possible by suggested sewer rate increase of 9% each year for the next three (3) years. <br />Most of the following discussion by Councilmembers present revolved around the City's pace in trying to <br />achieve EPA compliance. Forestalling compliance efforts to meet minimum standards was urged, not to <br />take issue with the mandate itself; but to lessen increases in rates in the near term. <br />The counter argument to the approach was basically the "pay me now or pay me more later" rationale. <br />Greeley and Hansen's long term control plan has a price estimated to be over $600 million. Crowe's <br />analysis and funding plan based upon this plan is the one now being proposed by the Administration for <br />Council consideration. <br />Councilmembers feel alternative funding proposals should be developed and more discussion be <br />necessary before rate increase approvals. <br />