Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA REVIEW SESSION <br />OCTOBER 3 2013 292 <br />The Agenda Review Session of the Board of Public Works was convened at 10:30 a.m. on <br />Thursday, October 3, 2013, by Board President Gary A. Gilot, with Board Members David P. <br />Relos, Michael C. Mecham and Mark W. Neal present. Board member Kathryn Roos was absent. <br />Also present was Board Attorney Cheryl Greene. Board of Public Works Clerk, Linda M. <br />Martin, presented the Board with a proposed agenda of items presented by the public and by City <br />Staff. <br />APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT /CONTRACT /PROPOSAL /ADDENDA <br />The following Agreement was submitted to the Board for approval: <br />Type <br />Business <br />Description <br />Motion/ <br />Second <br />Agreement <br />St, John- <br />Drilling within the Public Right -of -Way for <br />Gilot/Mecham <br />Authorizing <br />Mittelhauser <br />a Probe of Soil and Water Samples and /or <br />Subject to <br />Entry upon <br />and <br />Installation of Monitoring Wells. Minimum <br />Follow -Up <br />Public Property <br />Associates <br />of Twenty -Three (23) Locations in the Area <br />Reporting <br />for Drilling <br />of Monarch Laundry along Muessel Grove <br />Purposes and <br />Park, Bulla Street, Adams Street, Brookfield <br />Revocable <br />Street, Wilber Street, California Avenue, <br />Permit for <br />Sancome Avenue, and Related Alleyways <br />Environmental <br />Remediation <br />Purposes <br />ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 56 -2013 — A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF PUBLIC <br />WORKS OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND INDIANA AUTHORIZING THE RE- ZONING <br />OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CITY AND APPOINTING AN AUTHORIZED <br />REPRESENTATIVE TO EXECUTE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO REZONE PROPERTY. <br />Ms. Lory Timmer, Community Investment, stated the Board of Public Works owns six (6) <br />properties along Portage Avenue that Redevelopment seeks to redevelop. She stated they need to <br />be rezoned and she is requesting the Board President be appointed to execute future documents <br />for the process. Ms. Timmer stated due to funding issues, there are some time constraints in the <br />process. Mr. Mike Danch, Danch Hamer, explained the rezoning request is for both sides of the <br />street, and all the vacant properties need to be PUD zoned. He noted the existing Ford <br />Distribution building will be redeveloped. Mr. Danch stated if they didn't seek the rezoning, they <br />would need approximately forty (40) variances. He noted that two (2) alleys will be improved, <br />subject to the City Engineer's approval of access to the parking lots off of the alley. Mr. Danch <br />stated they will be adjusting some of the parking shown on the map. Mr. Relos asked if they <br />know how these properties were acquired, are there any federal strings attached to the process. <br />Ms. Timmer stated they were acquired on behalf of the Near Northwest steering committee, so <br />there are no federal regulations. Mr. Horvath noted that each unit has less than '/z parking space <br />per unit. Mr. Neal asked what the reaction of the neighborhood is. Ms. Karen Ainsley, Near <br />Northwest Neighborhood, stated they are excited to see redevelopment of these properties that <br />have been vacant so long. Mr. Relos questioned if at this point the neighborhood is aware of the <br />specific plans. Ms. Ainsley stated they will reach out to the neighbors this weekend. Mr. Relos <br />noted this could have a large impact on the neighborhood. Ms. Greene stated one of her concerns <br />is that they don't have enough parking. Mr. Horvath stated this building has been empty for <br />many years and redevelopment is a good thing; but the appropriate redevelopment. He added the <br />neighborhood should be able to weigh in. Mr. Gilot stated he had concerns about the number of <br />homes in this development; it appears they are pushing the density and he wonders how the <br />neighbors will react. Ms. Ainsley stated people want to keep the development the same in the <br />neighborhood, but realize that to keep funding, property development is needed. She added her <br />commitment is to the neighborhood and their feelings will be heard. Ms. Greene asked if the <br />Board would want to delay it until next week to allow for more information. Mr. Gilot stated he <br />has some reservations on the drainage; parking; density; and architectural character. Mr. Danch <br />stated he has talked to Area Plan, and they are working on some of those issues. Ms. Ainsley <br />stated the neighborhood weigh -in will occur in October. Mr. Relos stated this should be reviewed <br />by the neighbors first. Mr. Horvath noted they are asking for authorization for rezoning at this <br />point, not transfer of property. He stated they need get the tax credit and the rezoning, and then <br />they need to come back to the Board for the transfer of the property. Ms. Ainsley agreed and <br />stated that is a good point. She assured the Board if this doesn't meet their standards, they won't <br />proceed. Ms. Greene noted in reading the resolution, it seeks rezoning, and authorization of Mr. <br />