Laserfiche WebLink
MR. URBANSKI: Do we have a second ?... Do we have a second? Dies for lack of a second. Is there any <br />other motions? <br />MR. HAWLEY: I'll make a motion that we send it to the Common Council with a Favorable <br />Recommendation. <br />MR. URBANSKI: Do we have a second? <br />MR. PHIPPS: I'll second. <br />A motion to send the Special Exception to the Common Council with a Favorable Recommendation was <br />made by Mr. Hawley and seconded by Mr. Phipps. <br />MRS. HENRY: Mr. Young? <br />MR. YOUNG: Yes. <br />MRS. HENRY: Mr. Matthys? <br />MR. MATTHYS: No. <br />MRS. HENRY: Mr. Phipps? <br />MR. PHIPPS: Yes. <br />MRS. HENRY: Mr. Hawley? <br />MR. HAWLEY: Yes. <br />MRS. HENRY: Mr. Crumlish? <br />MR. CRUMLISH: Yes. <br />MRS. HENRY: Mr. Urbanski? <br />MR. URBANSKI: Yes. <br />The motion carried 5 -1. <br />After hearing the evidence on the petition, the Area Board of Zoning Appeals find that you did satisfy <br />the Standards as set forth in I.C. 36- 7- 4- 918.5; therefore, the petition was sent to the Common <br />Council with a Favorable Recommendation. <br />Based on the testimony presented, the Area Board of Zoning Appeals, after careful consideration, finds this <br />Special Exception sent to the Common Council with a Favorable Recommendation and will issue written <br />Finding of Facts. <br />PETITION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION SENT TO THE COMMON COUNCIL WITH A <br />FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION <br />