Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting — Thursday, August 15, 2013 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />G. Ratification of Services Contracts <br />Ms. Schey asked if the Commission would table ratification of 1509 Kendall until its next <br />meeting, will this have any detrimental effects to the negotiations. Mr. Meteiver responded that <br />the mortgage company has been difficult to work with from the beginning of this acquisition. A <br />delay at this point might cause them to put this on the back burner. If the Commission defers this <br />contract to the next Redevelopment Commission meeting, we will be getting close to the final <br />deadline again which could create additional problems. If anything, these changes will facilitate <br />the acquisition of the property rather than delay it. He recommended not tabling the item. <br />Ms. Schey asked to table the ratification of this address due to the family (owner) filing a <br />complaint with the Council. There are some issues that still need to be addressed. She clarified <br />that we will be up against the deadline, but will not be past it if we table? Mr. Meteiver <br />responded that that would depend on how quickly the bank could turn things around again. If we <br />defer action here, that may be a signal that the bank can defer action from their end and we will <br />be late for the purchase agreement's deadline. <br />As a courtesy to the family who did come before Council on Monday, Ms. Schey asked that the <br />item be tabled until the next meeting. <br />Mr. Meteiver asked what the family's concerns are. Ms. Schey responded that they have a <br />number of concerns. <br />Mr. Relos noted that staff could hear at any moment that with these changes to the agreement, <br />the agreement has been approved. This acquisition should have been closed some time ago. The <br />mortgage processor has been very difficult, and actually, the family has an attorney that Mr. <br />Relos is working through who is working with the mortgage processor. <br />Mr. Downes asked if the Council has any authority over this transaction. Mr. Relos responded <br />that it does not. The authority falls to the Commission and it's been approved by the <br />Redevelopment Commission previously. <br />Ms. Schey noted that as a member of the Council that answers to the people of South Bend, there <br />is a responsibility when citizens come before us. Regardless of one's opinion whether TIF <br />dollars are, in fact, the money of the tax payers the money that is spent is public money. The <br />residents have asked for further clarification on this matter. Therefore, Ms. Schey asked again <br />that ratification of the purchase agreement for 1509 Kendall be tabled until the next Commission <br />meeting. <br />Mr. Varner clarified that the Commission essentially had no contract after the purchase <br />agreement expired. Mr. Meteiver responded that either party to a contract can terminate the <br />contract based on the closing not taking place within 30 days. Neither party took that step, so we <br />still have a valid contract. <br />14 <br />