PETITION
<br />TO: THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND
<br />The undersigned hereby respectfully petitions your honorable body to annex to the City of South Bend the following
<br />described property in St. Joseph County, State of Indiana, to -wit:
<br />The northwest One- quarter (1/4) of Section Number Thirty (30), Township
<br />Number Thirty -seven (37) North, Range Number Three (3) East;
<br />Also, a tract of land in Sections Numbered Nineteen (19) and Thirty (30),
<br />Township Number Thirty "(30), Township Number Thirty -seven (37) North,
<br />Range Number Three (3) East containing Twenty -nine and Seventy -three
<br />Hundredths (29.73) acres, more or less, bounded by a line running as
<br />follows, viz: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast
<br />quarter (1/4) of said Section Number Nineteen (19); thence North Two
<br />Hundred Ninety -one and Six Tenths (291.61) Feet; thence East Five
<br />Hundred Seventy -two (5721) Feet, thence South Two Thousand Two Hundred
<br />Sixty -two and Nine Tenths (2,262.91) Feet; thence West Five Hundred
<br />Seventy -two (5721) Feet; thence North One Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy -
<br />one (1,9711) Feet to the place of beginning, being Lots Numbered Four
<br />(4), Five (5) Six (6) and Ten and Nine Hundredths (10.09) acres off
<br />of the West side of Lot Numbered Three (3), as shown on the Plat of
<br />the Commissioners filed in the cause of Sarah Denslow vs Robert G.
<br />eenslow, et al, a transcript of which plat and partition is recorded
<br />in Deed Record 60, Pages 338 to 343, inclusive:
<br />Containing in all One Hundred Ninety (190) acres, more or less,
<br />all as shown in the proposed Ordinance which is presented herewith.
<br />IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, William E. Voor, Attorney for First Bank and Trust Company of South Bend,
<br />South Bend, Indiana, Trustee, the record owner or said property, has hereunto set his hand the day of May,
<br />1951.
<br />(Signed) William E. Voor, Attorney for
<br />First Bank and Trust Company
<br />of South Bend, Trustee
<br />Councilman Erler made a motion that the ordinance, with copy of petition attached, be referred to the City Plan
<br />Commission. Councilman Korpal seconded the motion. Motion carried.
<br />REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
<br />To the Common Council of the City of South Bend:
<br />Your Committee of the Whole to whom was referred "An Ordinance of the City of South Bend, Indiana, appropriating
<br />the sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) to be applied on the cost of construction and improvement
<br />of streets, and expenses incurred in connection therewith ".
<br />, -Respectfully report that they have examined the matter and that in their opinion this ordinance go to the Council
<br />as favorable.
<br />(Signed) STANLEY C. KORPAL, Chairman
<br />Councilman Kemper made a motion that the report be accepted. Councilman Bestle seconded the motion. Motion
<br />carried.
<br />REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
<br />To the Common Council of the City of South Bend:
<br />Your Committee of the 'Whole to whom was referred "An Ordinance reducing a certain item in the 1951 South Bend,
<br />Indiana, Civil City Budget; and appropriating from the General Fund of said city the sum of One Thousand ($1,000.00
<br />Dollars to a certain other budgetary item of the 1951 budget of the Civil City of South Bend, Indiana, and dealarin
<br />an extraordinary emergency ".
<br />Respectfully report that they have examined the matter and that in their opinion this ordinance go to the Council
<br />as favorable.
<br />(Signed) STANLEY C. KORPAL, Chairman
<br />Councilman Glass made a motion that the report be accepted. Councilman Tellson seconded the motion. Motion
<br />carried.
<br />MORT OF THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS & SAFETY
<br />To Mbmbers of the Common Council:
<br />A letter has been received from the Pennsylvania Railroad relative to condition of grade crossings at Calvert
<br />Street, Indiana Avenue and Ewing Avenue, wherein they indicate they will have these crossings inspected promptly
<br />and make whatever repairs are necessary as soon as possible. They, also, indicate that they will handle the
<br />matter of blocking street crossings as they do not want to block crossings unnecessarily for excessive periods of
<br />time.
<br />We are, also, in receipt of a letter from the Grand Trunk Railway System in which they state they have inspected
<br />all six tracks at their grade crossing at Olive and Sample Streets and can find no holes in the pavement. They,
<br />also, state they do not feel their railroad is blocking the crossing for long periods as they have arranged their
<br />switching schedule so they do not switch over Olive and Sample Streets during the time the factories start or end
<br />their 3:00 P.M., 11:00 P.M., or 7:00 A.M., shifts. Their representative will be glad to meet with the city
<br />officials, at any time, to inspect these grade crossings.
<br />The New York Central Railroad system has not, as yet, acknowledged our letter of complaint to them.
<br />Very truly yours,
<br />BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS & SAFETY
<br />By Freda G. Noble, Clerk
<br />Councilman Korpal made a motion that the letter from the Board be held up until the next meeting. Councilman
<br />Bestle seconded the motion. Motion carried.
<br />
|