Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting — Thursday, July 25, 2013 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />B. Airport Economic Development Area <br />(1) continued... <br />received all of the $5.6 million with some of the money coming as early as 2005 or 2007. <br />We have approximately $4.8 million remaining. <br />Ms. Schey asked that a paper trail be made available so the public could see when and where <br />these funds were deposited and how they were used. Ms. Kolata responded that they are <br />public information. Only a very small portion from a few years ago has been appropriated; <br />the bulk of the payments came in earlier this month and is not appropriated yet. <br />Ms. Schey asked if the $6 million that was received through grants was also in a separate <br />budget from the Redevelopment budget. Ms. Kolata responded that a lot of the grant funds <br />came in starting around 2000 and 2002 and were deposited in Fund 209. That also includes <br />some money that was spent directly by EPA which did approximately $800,000 to $900,000 <br />worth of work. So this is counted as a grant but was never received as cash. <br />Ms. Schey wanted to confirm that the project to date has cost the city $26.8 million; with <br />approximately $12 million of this was received from other sources and taxpayers money. <br />Ms. Kolata responded that it is. When this project was started in 1999, the community came <br />together with an Advisory Committee to develop a plan for how to deal with the older <br />buildings. The Advisory Committee recommended the adoption of the plan, which then was <br />approved by the Council and the Commission, and since then staff has been implementing <br />the plan. The plan stated it would take somewhere between 5 -15yrs and would cost between <br />$13 -$30 million dollars. We are right on target in terms of how long it has taken and what <br />the actual cost would be to accomplish this. The variable at the time was the environmental <br />costs; no one had a feel for how much environmental work would need to be done, but also <br />the demolition estimates were low. One of the key components of it was that as a <br />community, when Studebaker was at its thriving best, with 20,000- 25,000 people working <br />there, they were not all South Bend residents. Staff made an appeal to the County, State, and <br />Federal Governments, stating that this was not just a local benefit; it was a community and <br />area wide benefit and they should help with the costs. Both the State and Federal <br />governments came through with grants, and staff has used a small portion of the County <br />Option Income Tax (COIT). Mostly it's been the AEDA TIF which was tapped, a very <br />small amount of general fund, and the big source was the Section 108 loan against HUD <br />dollars, which is being paid back by a State program called Community Revitalization <br />Enhancement District (CREED). Money is collected from this program each year and is <br />used to make the payment to Section 108. There are about 5 -6 years remaining on that loan. <br />Ms. Schey asked if the property now has a clean bill of health. Ms. Kolata responded that it <br />does not. There are ground water issues that are being dealt with. The buildings are down <br />and those issues are taken care of; we believe the soil is remediated; there still is more <br />testing to be done. Until all of the buildings were down, we could not get good testing done <br />Cel <br />