My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-64 Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
1964
>
05-11-64 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2013 3:58:05 PM
Creation date
7/25/2013 2:08:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Council Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
5/11/1964
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING MAY 11, 1964 <br />RESOLUTION (continued) <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA AS FOLLOWS: <br />1. That the proposed Urban Renewal Area described above is appropriate for an urban renewal project <br />and that the undertaking by the City of South Bend, Department of Redevelopment of surveys and plans for an <br />urban renewal project of the character contemplated by Section 110 (c) of Title I in the proposed'Brban <br />Renewal Area is hereby. approved. <br />2. That the financial assistance available under Title I is needed to enable the City of South Bend, <br />Department of Redevelopment to finance the planning and undertaking of the proposed project. <br />3. That it is cognizant of the conditions that are imposed in the undertaking and carrying out of <br />urban renewal projects with Federal financial assistance under Title I. including those relating to (a) the <br />relocation of site occupants; (b) the provision of local grants -in -aid; (c) the prohibition of discrimination <br />because of ra ce, color, creed, or national origin with respect to housing, facilities related to residential <br />use„ and all public facilities within a project area; public facilities proposed as noncash local grants -in- <br />aid; and employment; and (d) the requirement that the locality present to the Housing and Home Finance <br />Administrator, as a prew requisite to approval of the application described below, a workable program for <br />community improvement, as set forth in'Section 101 (c) of Title I, for utilizing appropriate public and <br />private resources to eliminate and prevent the development or spread of slums and urban blight. <br />4. That it is the sense of this body (a) that a feasible method for the relocation of families displaced <br />from the Urban Renewal Area, in conformity with Title I, can be prepared, and (b) that the local grants -in -aid <br />can and will be provided in an amount which will be not less than one -third of the Net Project Cost of the <br />Project and which, together with the Federal capital grant, will be generally equal to the difference between <br />Gross Project Cost and the proceeds or value of Project land sold, leased,,or retained for use in accordance <br />with the urban renewal plan. <br />5. That the filing of an application by the City of South Bend, Department of Redevelopment for an <br />advance of funds from the United States of America to enable it to defray the cost of the surveys and plans <br />for an urban renewal project in the proposed Urban Renewal Area described above is hereby approved. <br />/s/ Albert E. Palmer <br />Member of the Common Council <br />Opposing the clearance of a 7 block area South of the Studebaker Corporation foundry which was purchased by <br />Cummins Engine Company of Columbus, Indiana, for preliminary survey of the area were the following: <br />Richard Benko, 1410 E. Fox St., who operates a gasoline station in the Cummins area, stated he was concerned <br />with the loss of his business; William Brinley, 2119 Portage Ave., inquired why land must be made available <br />to Cummins at taxpayer's expense, and Francis A. Lies, 175 Concord Drive, stated many small businesses have <br />been put out of business in the Sample renewal area and what it has cost the City in lost taxes. <br />Councilman Muszynski made a motion for the adoption of the Resolution. Councilman Szymkowiak seconded the <br />motion. Motion lost by a roll call vote of 4 ayes (Councilmen Allen, Wise, Szymkowiak and Muszynski), <br />4 nays (Councilmen Hunter, Palmer, Geib and Smith). <br />5- MINUTE RECESS - 9:05 P.M. <br />Councilman Geib asked for a 5- minute recess. Councilman Allen made a motion for a 5- minute recess. Councilman <br />Wise seconded the motion. Motion carried and Council recessed at 9:05 P.M. <br />RECONVENED MEETING- 9:30 P.M. <br />Councilman Geib made a motion to reconsider the Resolution at the next meeting on May 25th. Councilman <br />Szymkowiak seconded the motion. Motion carried. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />Councilman Smith made a motion to postpone the June 8th meeting of the Council to June 15th. Councilman Geib <br />seconded the motion. Motion carried. <br />Mr. Gerald Felty, 104 So. 33rd St.,'and Mrs. Paul Ameling, 2910 E..Jefferson Blvd., complained of sand blowing <br />on their property from a golf course being constructed on the Herman Light property on the north side of. <br />Jefferson Blvd. City Attorney Robert J. DuComb stated that a number of conferences have been held with the <br />developers of the course and that the City does not have power to mandate them to halt the nuisance. City <br />Attorney DuComb stated that he will arrange with the Street Department to install more snowfencing to halt <br />the drifing sand. <br />There being no fuether business before the Council, Councilman Smith made a motion to adjourn. Councilman Geib <br />seconded the motion. Motion carried and Council adjourned at 9:54 P.M. <br />ATTEST: <br />CLERK <br />-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.