Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, met in the Committee of the Whole in the
<br />Council Chambers in the City hall on Monday, December 9, 1963, at 8 :05 P.M., with all members present, The meeting
<br />was called to order by Councilman T. W. Lehman, Chairman, who presided.
<br />ORDINANCE
<br />AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF
<br />RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN, RELIGION, OR.ANCESTRY BY CERTAIN OWNERS,
<br />SELLERS, RENTERS, LESSORS, GRANTORS, LESSEES, GRANTEES, ASSIGNEES,
<br />MANAGING AGENTS, REAL ESTATE BROKERS, REAL ESTATE SALESMEN, LENDERS,
<br />AND OTHERS, PROVIDING FOR THE RENAMING OF THE SOUTH BEND FAIR EMPLOY-
<br />MENT PRACTICE COMMISSION, PRESCRIBING ADDITIONAL DUTIES AND POWERS,
<br />AND PROVIDING PENALTIES
<br />Public hearing on the above ordinance having been continued from the December 2nd meeting of the Council, Chairman
<br />Lehman gave proponents and opponents an opportunity to be heard thereon. Speaking in favor of the proposed Ordinance
<br />was David Simms, 314 S. Illinois Street, Joseph A. Roper, Attorney for the South Bend - Mishawaka Board of Realtors,
<br />spoke in opposition to the Ordinance. Councilman J. Chester Allen and Councilman Harold L. Coleman were,heard.
<br />Richard M. Hodson, President of the South Send - Mishawaka Board of Realtors, was heard speaking against the proposed
<br />Ordinance.
<br />Councilman Krueper made a motion for a five minute recess. Councilman Allen seconded the motion. Motion carried.
<br />The meeting recessed at 9:25 P.M.
<br />The Meeting reconvened at 9:35 P.M.
<br />Councilman Allen made a motion that the Ordinance be reported favorably to the Council. Councilman Coleman seconded
<br />the motion. Motion lost by a roll call vote of 2 ayes (Councilmen Allen and Coleman), 7 nays (Councilmen Kroll,
<br />Ladewski, Tellson, Glass, Krueper, Lehman and Muszynski). The roll call was requested by Councilman Allen.
<br />The Clerk read a report from the Committee of the Whole which reads as follows:
<br />"After due consideration of the Fair Housing Ordinance, the Committee of the Whole has reached the following
<br />conclusions:
<br />" 1. We believe that a sincere effort should be made to solve this long- standing problem, but the
<br />Ordinance as written is not acceptable to the majority of the present Council members.
<br />" 2. If action were to be taken at this time, it would require numerous amendments and we cannot
<br />completely agree on just what amendments should be made.
<br />"3. We also feel that since the execution of an Ordinance of this kind will be carried out by
<br />another administration, the provisions of such an Ordinance should be left to their discretion.
<br />"4. Since the legality of any Council action is debatable,we feel that this question should be
<br />resolved before any action is taken by the Council.
<br />"Therefore, it is the opinion of the majority of the members of the Committee of the Whole that
<br />the proposed Fair Housing Ordinance should be left in Committee for action by the next Council."
<br />/s/ T. W. Lehman,
<br />Chairman
<br />Councilman Tellson made a motion that the report be accepted and placed on file. Councilman Ladewski seconded the
<br />motion. Motion carried.
<br />The Clerk also read the following communication:
<br />The Common Council
<br />City of South Bend
<br />South Bend, Indiana
<br />Gentlemen:
<br />December 7, 1963
<br />Not having had the privilege of addressing; your body in executive session as have my fellow colleagues in real
<br />estate-; I wish to submit my remarks" on the .Fair Housing Ordinan?ce- you -are_ considering'. ;, I take this means of:
<br />calling- certain points ''to your attention which have not'- heretofore been presented.. I write to.you as South
<br />Bend's only Negro real .estate broker and as a member of the Board of Directors, National Association of Real
<br />Estate Brokers, Inc.
<br />Our organization, while not as well known as the National Association of Real Estate Boards, has members in
<br />forty -two states and two foreign countries. It was born out of need for a voice of Negroes in housing. As
<br />you may .now know, Negroes are not free to join the organization of Realtors which are opposing this Ordinance.
<br />They do not speak for all the real estate industry. The primary difference between the two groups is that we
<br />have as our slogan "Democracy In Housing" and weaetively work to achieve this for all Americans. Our policy
<br />is vigorously supported by the national administration and the state administration of Governor Matthew Welch.
<br />Your Adoption of this ordinance in its original form is strongly recommended if the free choice and rights of all
<br />people are to be protected in the field of housing. My operations in South Bend can testify to the factual
<br />need for legislation. We are constantly approached by many white.homeowners who wish to sell their home but
<br />could not find realtors that would accept their house on an unrestricted basis. Many Realtors refer property
<br />owners to us because their office or their board will not permit them to sell to all qualified buyers. These
<br />restrictive practices are not only supported but are encouraged by local board policy of no- policy. This
<br />ordinance is not opposed by all Realtors and should be welcomed by brokers and builders who wish to serve all
<br />our community without different sets of standards. It certainly would remove the competetive disadvnatages they
<br />now face if they do abide by fair housing practices on a voluntary basis.
<br />It should also be noted that racial segregation in housing is more pronounced in South Bend today then it was
<br />forty years ago, yes, even twenty years ago. The problem is nore acute because the housing industry has failed
<br />to initiate any educational program as they now advocate. It is a fact that in the past two years the local
<br />real estate board has consistently refused to set down and talk to the Urban League about an educational solution
<br />The Mayor's Bi- racial Committee had tg agree to a closed =door meeting with a few independent realtors because
<br />their board would notofficially cooperate. With fourteen years as a licensed broker, my own application to join
<br />this trade organization has been rejected twice. As practiced in the trade, good faith must first be demonstrate
<br />
|