Laserfiche WebLink
3i <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />REPORT OF BUILDING DEPARTMENT <br />DECEMBER 22, 1958 <br />Common Council of the Civil City of South Bend, Indiana December 18, 1958 <br />Gentlemen: <br />At your last regular meeting on December 15, you passed several resolutions requesting that I submit a report of <br />Building Department activity in slum clearance during the past two and one -half years. Following is that report. <br />During the current year to this date, this Department has made detailed inspections of 249 buildings and has accom- <br />plished, has ordered, or will order, action to be taken on all of them. In addition to those 249, we called at <br />more than 30 other buildings reported by citizens to be sub - standard and found them satisfactory. <br />In addition to the initial inspection, innumerable recalls were made to check on progress toward completion of our <br />orders. <br />Following is a breakdown showing the present status of the 249 properties inspected. <br />Condemned and demolition complete 61 <br />Condemned and demolition in progress 6 <br />Condemned and involved in litigation (appeal, law -suit, etc.) 12 <br />Repairs ordered and complete 22 <br />Repairs ordered and started 33 <br />Repairs ordered and pending (extension of time, etc.) 13 <br />Vacated for various reasons (garage dwellings - pending repairs -et.) 35 <br />No action ordered beacuse located in Redevelopment (Sample Street Area) 6 <br />Repairs ordered and ignored by owners, requiring further action by us. 14 <br />Inspected, but no orders issued as yet. 46 <br />Total properties Inspected 249 <br />In 1957, 22 properties were inspected; 2 were repaired; and 4 were carried into the current year for decisive action. <br />The other 16 properties were demolished. <br />Our records are not too good for 1956, but as nearly as we can tell 14 buildings were condemned and demolished. <br />It is important to note here, that the great difference in accomplishment this year as compared to other years was <br />not accidental. Our great success in 1958 can be attributed to the following factors: <br />1. We did- - -not follow procedures as outlined in Ordinance #3989, but proceeded in accord with <br />those enabling State statutes concerned with elimination of sub - standard buildings. <br />2. Two afternoons each week were set aside by all inspection departments (Electrical, Building, <br />Heating, Fire, and Sanitation) for inspection of sub - standard buildings. Cooperation from <br />other departments was ideal since each filed detailed reports with me for final action. No <br />department issued orders for elimination of sub - standard conditions until they had first re- <br />ferred the matter to us. <br />3. One man (Mr. John Grabarz) from this office was directed by me to devote two afternoons each <br />week for the inspection of substandard buildings and to devote the two forenoons of those same <br />days to paper work necessary to the elimination of sub - standard conditions found. He has done <br />an excellent job. <br />We are proud that we have done so much in 1958, but our report for 1959 should be even better. A new inspector will <br />be added to our staff at the first of the year, and Mr. Grabarz will devote his full time to his duties ad Director <br />of the Building Department's "Division of Sub - Standard Buildings ". Even though other inspectors may not be able to <br />perform their assigned duties if they spend more than two afternoons a week on slum clearance. Mr. Grabarz is well <br />qualified to make many inspections and to accomplish the desired action without their continual assistance. <br />In five years, slum clearance in South Bend has developed from virtually nothing to the results shown in this report. <br />I can assure you that the Building Department will continue its attempt to improve its effectiveness in all those <br />duties which we are expected to perform. <br />I have purposely neglected to include in this °report the names of slum owners. Time and facilities made it impossibl <br />for me to provide that information to you here. However, I invite you, at your convenience, to examine my files to <br />obtain that information if you so desire. And I sincerely solicit you confidence and your support in our efforts to <br />render slum ownership unprofitable in South Bend. <br />I trust that the above will satisfactorily answer any questions you may have had, but if you should desire further <br />information, I will be happy to furnish it. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />/s/ Verner L. Lane <br />VERNER L. LANE <br />VLL:bb Building Commissioner <br />Councilman Hahn made a motion that the report be accepted and placed on file. Councilman Kroll seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried. <br />REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY: <br />Mr. Irving J. Smith, City Attorney, reported on the referral in regard to drawing an Ordinance governing motor <br />scotters. He stated that he had examined the Ordinance which had been passed by the Aurura, Illinois Common Council. <br />He further stated that our State Statutes covered this matter and he, therefore, would not feel it necessary to <br />draw another Ordinance. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 4253 - - -58 <br />AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 3702, AS AMENDED, WHICH ORDINANCE IS COMMONLY <br />KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA (Lincolnway West) <br />Mr. Christman requested permission to pass his vote. Mr. R.J.Nymberg stated they are now in accord with the Ordinance <br />The Ordinance was given third reading and passed by a roll call vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays, <br />