My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-71 Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
1971
>
05-10-71 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2013 9:12:35 AM
Creation date
7/16/2013 4:00:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Council Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
5/10/1971
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, <br />REGULAR MEETING MAY 10, 1971 <br />CITIZENS REQUESTS - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS <br />Mr. Thomas A. Enyart, 4605 Ridgeway, South Bend, Indiana, suggested that the Council take the <br />action to have the Soldiers Monument repaired because it is in very bad condition. Council <br />President Laven directed the City Clerk to send a communication to the St. Joseph County <br />Commissioners requesting the matter be investigated. <br />Council President Laven Directed the Clerk to send a communication to the Area Plan Commission <br />requesting the withdrawal of the Grant Holladay Development Corporation petition which the <br />Council referred to the Commission at the April 27, 1971 meeting. The discrepancy in the legal <br />description on the petition was clarified by the letter from the Area Plan Commission on the <br />agenda this evening. <br />REPORTS FROM THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION <br />JApril 29, 1971 <br />The Honorable Robert Laven, President <br />Common Council of the City of South Bend <br />County -City Building <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Re: Request for clarification of <br />legal descrepancy in ordinance <br />and petition <br />Dear Mr. Laven: <br />The reason for the difference between the legal description on the petition and the ordinance <br />is the ordinance was amended on the floor at the Plan Commission meeting. The reason for the <br />amendment was to exclude the rights -of -way of Portage and Maple Roads and to enlarge the right - <br />of -way on both to 801. <br />The ordinance has on it the correct legal thus would be the one to follow. If it is the re- <br />quest of the Council to change the petition we will see that it is accomplished. However, <br />since the petition is more for information then legality, it may not be necessary to change it. <br />If we may help in any way, please ask. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />/s/ Douglas Carpenter, <br />Senior Planner <br />for Howard Bellinger, <br />Executive Director <br />DC /dh <br />There being no objection, the report was accepted as read and placed on file. <br />May 5, 1971 <br />The Honorable Common Council <br />of the City of South Bend <br />County -City Building <br />South Bend, Indiana <br />Gentlemen: <br />The attached rezoning petition of First Community Development Corporation was legally advertised <br />on April 10 and April 17, 1971 and was given public hearing on April 20, 1971, at which time <br />the following action was taken: <br />It was moved, seconded and carried that the <br />petition to rezone the western half of the <br />"Harbor Homes" area be recommended unfavorably <br />to the Common Council of the City of South Bend, <br />Excerpts from the minutes of the meeting of the Area Plan Commission will be forwarded to you <br />at a later date. <br />very truly yours, <br />/s/ Howard Bellinger, <br />Executive Director <br />/eb <br />attach. <br />There being no objection, the report was accepted as read and placed on file. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.