REGULAR MEETING JUNE 24 1974
<br />IIREGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED (CONTINUED)
<br />11RESOLUTION NO. 430 -74 (CONTINUED)
<br />WHEREAS, the Board of Park Commissioners of the Park District of the City of
<br />South Bend has determined to take the necessary steps for the construction of a White
<br />Water Way Park, Island Park Development, Pier Park Development and Centennial Park
<br />Development and for the acquisition of approximately eight (8) acres of land adjacent
<br />to the White Water Way Park; and for the complete renovation of Potawatomi Park Zoo,
<br />a public park within the City of South Bend, Indiana; and
<br />WHEREAS, a petition has been filed under the provisions of Chapter 119 of the
<br />Indiana Acts of 1937 by more than fifty (50) owners of taxable real estate of the City
<br />of South Bend, Indiana, requesting said Board of Park Commissioners of the Park District
<br />of the City of South Bend to issue park district bonds for the purpose of providing funds
<br />to be applied on the construction of a White Water Way Park, Island Park Development,
<br />Pier Park Development and Centennial Park Development and for the acquisition of approxi-
<br />mately eight (8) acres of land adjacent to the White Water Way Park; and for the complete
<br />renovation of Potawatomi Park Zoo, a public park within the City of South Bend, Indiana,
<br />and on the payment of the incidental expenses in connection therewith and on account of
<br />the issuance of bonds therefor; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Common Council finds that the construction of such park and park
<br />development, the acquisition of approximately eight (8) acres of land and the complete
<br />renovation of Potawatomi Park Zoo by the Board of Park Commissioners of the City of
<br />South Bend, Indiana, is in the best interest of and will be for the general benefit of
<br />the City and its citizens; and
<br />WHEREAS, said Common Council agrees that such project must be funded by the
<br />issuance of park district bonds; and
<br />WHEREAS, it is necessary for there to be an appropriation in an amount not to
<br />exceed One Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,700,000.00), in order that the
<br />above projects proceed.
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend,
<br />Indiana:
<br />That the proposed issuance of park district bonds by the Board of Park Commissioners
<br />of the Park District of the City of South Bend, Indiana, in an amount not to exceed One
<br />Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,700,000.00), the purpose of which is to pro-
<br />vide funds to be applied on the construction of a White Water Way Park, Island Park
<br />Development, Pier Park Development and Centennial Park Development and for the acquisi-
<br />tion of approximately eight (8) acres of land adjacent to the White Water Way Park; and
<br />for the complete renovation of Potawatomi Park Zoo, a public park within the City of
<br />South Bend, Indiana, is hereby approved.
<br />s/ Roger 0. Parent
<br />Member of the Common Council
<br />A public hearing was held on the resolution at this time. Mr. James Seitz, Director of the
<br />Department of Public Parks, explained that the Board of Park Commissioners was requesting the
<br />Council to approve the resolution authorizing the Park Board to proceed with the legal requirement
<br />for the issuance of $1.7 million dollars of Park District Bonds. He stated that the proposed bond
<br />issue would be for $700,000 for the first phase of the master plan for the renovation of the zoo;
<br />$286,000 for the acquisition of three parcels of land adjacent to the Civic Center; $230,000 for
<br />the development of Island Park; $39,000 for the development of Centennial Park; $140,000 for the
<br />development of Pier Park; $250,000 for the development of the White Water Way; $19,000 for
<br />architects' fees; $14,000 for attorney's fees and bond cost and $22,000 for contingencies. Mr.
<br />Seitz indicated that, if revenue sharing funds or other funds would be available, the White Water
<br />Way development would not be included in the proposed bond issue and that money then would be
<br />designated for the zoo renovation. He stated that the Park Board could eliminate any of the pro-
<br />jects within the bond issue but could not change them.
<br />Councilman Kopczynski wondered if the resolution contained any funds for development of the
<br />Belleville Gardens Park, and Mr. Seitz indicated that it did not. Councilman Miller asked who
<br />would issue the bonds, and Mr. Seitz indicated that this hearing was to be the last hearing on the
<br />bond issue and the Park Board would then negotiate and sign the bonds. He stated that the $1.7
<br />million dollar figure could not be increased. Councilman Miller wondered if some of the areas
<br />within the bond could be changed, and Mr. Seitz explained that certain items can be taken out but
<br />there could be no changes. Councilman Miller stated that he was concerned about the issuance of t
<br />bonds for the Civic Center project. Mr. Seitz indicated that the Park Board had approved the
<br />financing and would eventually hold about three public hearings on the necessary resolutions.
<br />In January or February, it was hoped the bonds could be sold. Mr. Seitz indicated that the first
<br />hearing would be in July. Councilman Miller made a motion to table the resolution and place it on
<br />the agenda for the July 8th Council meeting, seconded by Councilman Kopczynski. Council President
<br />Nemeth asked about the timetable on the development of Belleville Gardens. Mr. Seitz indicated
<br />that the ball diamond was being constructed. Councilman Kopczynski asked if the improvements to b
<br />made at Belleville Gardens would only be handled through the Park Department budget, and Mr. Seitz
<br />indicated that they would. Councilman Serge could see no reason to table the issue. Councilman
<br />Miller explained that he was somewhat confused on what the bond issue covered. He wanted some tim
<br />to evaluate the plans for the land acjacent to the Civic Center. Mr. Seitz explained that the
<br />resolution was proposed in the broadest scope possible. He urged the Council to pass the resoluti
<br />He stated that any of the items could be deleted, if desired. The motion to table the resolution
<br />lost.
<br />Councilman Newburn made a motion that,the resolution be adopted, seconded by Councilman Serge. Tr
<br />resolution passed by a roll call vote of eight ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, Taylor,
<br />Kopczynski, Horvath, Newburn and Nemeth) with Councilman Parent absent.
<br />
|