Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING QCTQRRR 8F 19:Z3 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />the full fuel prices. He stated that the South Bend rates are quite low compared to other cities. <br />He used Michigan City as an example. Mr. Butler then explained that, in July, the drivers in Sout <br />Bend asked that a proposed ordinance to raise the rates be stricken. The drivers have since come <br />up with a recommendation on the increase in the rates. He explained that the companies have been <br />unable to recruit and train the drivers because of the small income they receive. He indicated <br />that, if the companies cannot recruit the drivers, the service to the community would be decreased <br />and the users of the cabs would be the people to suffer. He indicated that the drivers also reali <br />that most of the people that use the cabs are on a tight budget. He talked about the rates per <br />hour and the income the drivers derive from the amount of business they do in a day. He explained <br />that there has also been an increase in the operating costs during the last few months. Previousl <br />gasoline could be purchased at 28� a gallon. Now, the gas costs 10� to ll� higher per gallon and <br />the drivers must pay for it. He explained that this amounted to an increase of more than $2.00 a <br />day. He stated that other garage services had also increased greatly. Mr. Butler stated that <br />Courtesy Cab is owned by its drivers; therefore, there is no profit to the company. He then <br />explained that, after the previous ordinance was withdrawn, the rates were discussed between the <br />drivers and passengers. It was determined that an increase of about 15� in the fare would help to <br />cover the bulk of the increased expenses. This would amount to a 15� increase per trip. Mr. <br />Butler indicated that he felt and the drivers also felt that this was an honest figure. He stated <br />that the drivers have also requested a charge for carrying parcels; however, he stated that this <br />would affect very few passengers. He asked that the Council give the proposal careful considera- <br />tion as he felt the ordinance was very important and necessary to the drivers. He concluded by <br />indicating that a few drivers were present to answer any questions the Council might have regardin <br />the proposed ordinance. <br />Miss Fanny Grunwald, 227 South Frances Street, wondered about the exact wording of the ordinance. <br />She asked if the people using the cabs would still be expected to leave a tip for the drivers with <br />the increase in the fare and the charge for handling packages. Mr. Butler answered that the <br />drivers were aware of that and all that was required was the minimum $1.00 or $1.25 if the package <br />were handled by the driver. He indicated that tipping would be strictly up to the individual. <br />Mrs. Janet Allen, 125 West Marion Street, wondered if any consideration had been given to a minimu <br />or maximum charge. Mr. Butler indicated that the practices vary throughout the country. He state <br />that in South Bend it is a per trip charge rather than a per passenger charge. He indicated that <br />most of the fares that the drivers have are single. Mrs. Allen wondered if consideration had been <br />given when there were more than one person involved. Mr. Bert Liss, 1443 East Washington Avenue, <br />President of Indiana Cab, indicated that the drivers had done everything possible in order to <br />keep the fare down to a minimum. He stated that the raised rate only amounted to a 72% increase. <br />Mrs. Allen expressed concern for the drivers and indicated that she felt there would be an increase <br />of income to the drivers if every passenger was charged rather than a per trip charge. Mr. Thomas <br />Allison, 1416 North Olive Street, a driver for Indiana Cab, stated that the drivers usually only <br />average one driver per trip. He felt that, by charging a flat rate per person, there would be ver <br />little increase realized to the drivers. Mr. James McCann, 1209 North Garland Street, also a <br />driver for Indiana Cab, asked about the Michigan City rate. He suggested that perhaps the minimum <br />distance coverage should-be increased. He asked about the price freeze and its effect on the <br />increased rates. Mr. Butler indicated that the rate was not affected by the price freeze. Mr. <br />McCann talked briefly about the situation in New York, and Mr. Liss pointed out that the cabs in <br />New York are subsidized by the government. Mr. McCann wondered how parcels and shopping bags woul <br />be defined. Mr. Butler stated that, in the event the person getting into the cab does not require <br />a waiting time, there would be no additional charge. He stated that, according to the drivers, <br />there would be a minority of persons whose trips would not already meter a dollar. Mr. McCann felt <br />the persons living on a fixed income would be hurt by the increase. He asked about the rates bein <br />charged for luggage at the St. Joseph County Airport. Mr. Butler indicated that the primary use of <br />the cabs was for transporting passengers and not packages. He again stated that, when a passenger <br />carries a package and the driver loses time, there would be a charge involved. Mr. McCann pointed <br />out that, last year, there had been a 15� increase in the rates. Mrs. Shirley Doxie, 503 Blaine <br />Avenue, was of the opinion that, in the past, the drivers had paid an excessive amount for the <br />lease of the cabs. She asked how much it would cost the drivers to obtain the cab and if the <br />driver would have to pay for the gas. She also wondered if the ordinance would increase the <br />financial input to the company rather than to the drivers. Mr. Liss indicated that the most the <br />company expected out of the increase was 10% and the drivers would derive the 90 %. Mrs. Doxie <br />questioned one of the drivers regarding the cost of purchasing and leasing the cabs. She also <br />wondered if a waiting time was specified in minutes in the ordinance. Mr. Butler indicated that <br />this would depend upon the drivers to determine whether or not there was a waiting period and <br />whether or not he was losing time. He explained the rates and the charges for the carrying of <br />parcels and the waiting time. Mrs. Maurice Schwartz, 725 Park Avenue, asked if there was a charge <br />for waiting by the taxicab driver, and Mr. Butler indicated that there was a charge for three <br />minutes of waiting time. Mr. Allison indicated that the drivers move accordingly because of the <br />passengers. He stated that, when people need assistance in loading and carrying parcels, there <br />should be a fee involved. <br />Councilman Szymkowiak felt something was wrong with the taxicab industry today. He stated that <br />either the volume is down or the service is not needed. He felt one of the reasons was the lack o: <br />courtesy extended by the drivers. He believed that every man should have a living wage; however, <br />he suggested that perhaps the ordinance should be referred to a committee for further consideratioi <br />Councilman Parent felt the drivers were asking for a reasonable increase; however, he indicated <br />that he knew nothing about the taxicab industry. He concluded by indicating that, when the Counci: <br />must consider an increase in something, it is difficult to do without any background information. <br />Councilman Miller asked about a curb space charge, and Mr. Butler indicated that there was such a <br />charge. He stated that $125 is required for every 22 feet of curb space. Councilman Miller <br />indicated that he had some reservations about the minimum rate of $1.00. Mr. Liss stated that the <br />business has been continually dropping. He stated that he would like to cut the rate in half but <br />it could not be done because the manpower was not available. Councilman Miller asked if this was < <br />mandatory rate, and Mr. Butler indicated that it was. He also added that he thought this was <br />traditional in most cities. Councilman Miller felt there was a problem involved with the parcel ai <br />package matter. He asked what would be considered a package, and he stated that he felt the $1.00 <br />fee should be eliminated. Councilman Kopczynski felt the taxicab business was a private matter an( <br />should remain that way. He felt that business would take care of itself. He stated that, if the <br />rates were too high, the people would stop using the cabs. He felt the drivers knew what they wer( <br />talking about and asking for, and he also felt that the drivers had made a thorough investigation <br />of the rates. <br />