REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 1
<br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED)
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and
<br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Rollin Farrand, Director of the Department o:
<br />Public Works, made the presentation for the ordinance. He indicated that the service was very
<br />important and was something that should be continued to be provided. He also mentioned that the
<br />City of Mishawaka does not provide that type of service, and he felt that it should not be forced
<br />into the land -fill operation. He stated that the city does have the capacity and capability to
<br />handle the dumpings. He indicated that, during 1972, a total of 18,600,000 pounds of suspended
<br />solids (concentrated sewage) was taken care of at the treatment plant. He mentioned that some
<br />costs are handled through the Bureau of Sanitation, and the Bureau of Water handles the billings.
<br />He talked briefly on the schedule of charges, indicating that the cost would amount to 12G per
<br />pound of sewage with a $5.00 lab fee in order to sample the material and a $3.50 office fee to
<br />cover the handling of all the paper work. He stated that the city's operation was odor free and
<br />the plant was very clean, and also mentioned that there would be other charges to the property
<br />owner who desired to have his septic tank cleaned. He concluded by indicating that the facility
<br />for the treatment of the sewage had been constructed from funds derived from the taxpayers, and he
<br />felt the cost of handling and processing the wastes should be realistic.
<br />Councilman Szymkowiak made a motion that the ordinance go to the Council as favorable, seconded by
<br />Councilman Kopczynski. The motion carried.
<br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE
<br />NO. 4990 -68,
<br />THE CITY OF
<br />TO AS ZONING
<br />STREET).
<br />AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING ORDINANCE
<br />CHAPTER 21 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF
<br />SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, FORMERLY REFERRED
<br />ORDINANCE NO. 3702 (408 SOUTH 30TH
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and
<br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. William Farabaugh, Attorney at Law, 316 Firs-
<br />Bank Building, made the presentation for the ordinance. He indicated that he represented the
<br />petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Jerome Sechowski, and the prospective purchaser of the property, Dr. and
<br />Mrs. Walter Landis. He briefly outlined Dr. Landis' background and the request for the rezoning.
<br />He indicated that the house would remain unchanged; however, the doctor would conduct his practice
<br />within the home. He indicated that the total square footage of the house and garage was 2,400
<br />square feet and the size was 60 by 150 square feet. He explained that three cars could be parked
<br />along the north side of the house and there would not be a driveway from Jefferson into the three -
<br />car parking lot. He indicated that the driveway would be on 30th Street. He stated that the
<br />doctor and his nurse would park in the attached garage. He indicated that the parking lot on the
<br />north would be paved and would have proper and adequate screening. Mr. Farabaugh presented slides
<br />to the Council showing the area in question. He pointed out the various other structures in the
<br />vicinity that were presently zoned "B" Residential. He indicated that there were six service or
<br />"B" Residential uses in the area, they being the Blackwood Apartments, Park Jefferson Apartments,
<br />Crow Chizek Accountants, American Red Cross and the Hickey Funeral Home. He felt traffic would
<br />not be increased by the proposed use and indicated that the building would house a single physiciai
<br />He presented a petition to the City Clerk signed by seven property owners in the area indicating
<br />that they had no objection to the rezoning. He introduced Dr. Walter Landis who indicated that
<br />he desired to purchase the property for his office because it was the closest possible location
<br />to the Osteopathic Hospital. He indicated that the purchase of the home would only be made if the
<br />rezoning was approved. He indicated that the people in the area that he had talked to had no
<br />objection to the rezoning, and that their complaints had to do with already existing problems. Ono
<br />problem concerned the amount of traffic generated on Jefferson Boulevard because of the entrance
<br />and exit to the Park Jefferson Apartments. He stated that this problem had nothing to do with his
<br />request for rezoning. Another problem the residents had complained about was that children walkinc
<br />along Jefferson cut through the lots because there are no sidewalks. He stated that this, again,
<br />was an existing problem and had nothing to do with his request for rezoning. He concluded that
<br />some of the neighbors have stated that they are against spot zoning; however, he pointed out that
<br />those same people are surrounded on three sides by "B" Residential zoning.
<br />Mr. John Condon, 3110 Sunnymede Avenue, indicated that the area in question was a family residen-
<br />tial neighborhood. He mentioned that there was spot zoning in the area, but if spot zoning kept
<br />coming, in no time the whole area would be commercial. He felt that, if the rezoning ordinance
<br />was passed by the Council, more property would be rezoned and the area would become deteriorated.
<br />Mr. Elmer Torok, 3118 Sunnymede Avenue, indicated that he was against the rezoning because it was
<br />spot zoning. He indicated that the area has been a residential area for many years, and he felt
<br />the traffic would be increased because of the doctor's office, and he explained that there was a
<br />problem at the present time in getting off 30th Street onto Jefferson Boulevard. He felt that,
<br />with the approval of the doctor's office on 30th Street, the area would be opened up for another
<br />rezoning and used for additional duplexes.
<br />Councilman Serge asked if the request for rezoning had been approved by the Area Plan Commission.
<br />It was indicated that the Area Plan Commission had voted against the rezoning. Councilman
<br />Szymkowiak asked if three parking spaces would be sufficient for the doctor's office, and Dr.
<br />Landis indicated that the minimum spaces was five, and he and his nurse would park in the existing
<br />garage. He felt the three spaces to the north of the building would be sufficient because he
<br />worked on an appointment basis. He also indicated that some of his patients would be walking from
<br />the Osteopathic Hospital. Councilman Szymkowiak asked if Dr. Landis would be residing in the home
<br />and Dr. Landis indicated that he would not be using the house for a residence nor would be renting
<br />rooms. He indicated that he would be using the whole house for his office. Councilman Kopczynski
<br />indicated that he thought some of Dr. Landis' patients would walk to his office and additional
<br />parking would.not be needed in that area. He felt that, if things are made convenient to the
<br />people in the area, traffic could be eliminated. Councilman Parent indicated that he had driven
<br />in the area and had also walked the area on foot and had tried to visualize the home with addition<
<br />parking spaces on the north. He expressed sympathy for the doctor's feeling of wanting to be clos(
<br />to his hospital, and he felt the seller would be able to sell the house for more because it would
<br />be used as a doctor's office. He did not think the parking lot would add anything to the neighbor.
<br />hood. He expressed concern about the preservation of neighborhoods and felt the Council should
<br />vote against the ordinance. He indicated that he would have to vote against the rezoning.
<br />Councilman Miller indicated that the house faced 30th Street which, he felt, made it more residen-
<br />tial than if it faced Jefferson Boulevard. He stated that, even though there were "B" Residential
<br />buildings in the area, they were strictly "B" Residential. He mentioned that rezonings of this
<br />particular kind are difficult for the Council, and he felt the Council should be conservative and
<br />not make a change in the zoning because the immediate area showed nothing of that kind of "B"
<br />Residential zoning. Council President Nemeth asked about the basis of the recommendation made by
<br />
|