Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 1 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Rollin Farrand, Director of the Department o: <br />Public Works, made the presentation for the ordinance. He indicated that the service was very <br />important and was something that should be continued to be provided. He also mentioned that the <br />City of Mishawaka does not provide that type of service, and he felt that it should not be forced <br />into the land -fill operation. He stated that the city does have the capacity and capability to <br />handle the dumpings. He indicated that, during 1972, a total of 18,600,000 pounds of suspended <br />solids (concentrated sewage) was taken care of at the treatment plant. He mentioned that some <br />costs are handled through the Bureau of Sanitation, and the Bureau of Water handles the billings. <br />He talked briefly on the schedule of charges, indicating that the cost would amount to 12G per <br />pound of sewage with a $5.00 lab fee in order to sample the material and a $3.50 office fee to <br />cover the handling of all the paper work. He stated that the city's operation was odor free and <br />the plant was very clean, and also mentioned that there would be other charges to the property <br />owner who desired to have his septic tank cleaned. He concluded by indicating that the facility <br />for the treatment of the sewage had been constructed from funds derived from the taxpayers, and he <br />felt the cost of handling and processing the wastes should be realistic. <br />Councilman Szymkowiak made a motion that the ordinance go to the Council as favorable, seconded by <br />Councilman Kopczynski. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE <br />NO. 4990 -68, <br />THE CITY OF <br />TO AS ZONING <br />STREET). <br />AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING ORDINANCE <br />CHAPTER 21 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF <br />SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, FORMERLY REFERRED <br />ORDINANCE NO. 3702 (408 SOUTH 30TH <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. William Farabaugh, Attorney at Law, 316 Firs- <br />Bank Building, made the presentation for the ordinance. He indicated that he represented the <br />petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Jerome Sechowski, and the prospective purchaser of the property, Dr. and <br />Mrs. Walter Landis. He briefly outlined Dr. Landis' background and the request for the rezoning. <br />He indicated that the house would remain unchanged; however, the doctor would conduct his practice <br />within the home. He indicated that the total square footage of the house and garage was 2,400 <br />square feet and the size was 60 by 150 square feet. He explained that three cars could be parked <br />along the north side of the house and there would not be a driveway from Jefferson into the three - <br />car parking lot. He indicated that the driveway would be on 30th Street. He stated that the <br />doctor and his nurse would park in the attached garage. He indicated that the parking lot on the <br />north would be paved and would have proper and adequate screening. Mr. Farabaugh presented slides <br />to the Council showing the area in question. He pointed out the various other structures in the <br />vicinity that were presently zoned "B" Residential. He indicated that there were six service or <br />"B" Residential uses in the area, they being the Blackwood Apartments, Park Jefferson Apartments, <br />Crow Chizek Accountants, American Red Cross and the Hickey Funeral Home. He felt traffic would <br />not be increased by the proposed use and indicated that the building would house a single physiciai <br />He presented a petition to the City Clerk signed by seven property owners in the area indicating <br />that they had no objection to the rezoning. He introduced Dr. Walter Landis who indicated that <br />he desired to purchase the property for his office because it was the closest possible location <br />to the Osteopathic Hospital. He indicated that the purchase of the home would only be made if the <br />rezoning was approved. He indicated that the people in the area that he had talked to had no <br />objection to the rezoning, and that their complaints had to do with already existing problems. Ono <br />problem concerned the amount of traffic generated on Jefferson Boulevard because of the entrance <br />and exit to the Park Jefferson Apartments. He stated that this problem had nothing to do with his <br />request for rezoning. Another problem the residents had complained about was that children walkinc <br />along Jefferson cut through the lots because there are no sidewalks. He stated that this, again, <br />was an existing problem and had nothing to do with his request for rezoning. He concluded that <br />some of the neighbors have stated that they are against spot zoning; however, he pointed out that <br />those same people are surrounded on three sides by "B" Residential zoning. <br />Mr. John Condon, 3110 Sunnymede Avenue, indicated that the area in question was a family residen- <br />tial neighborhood. He mentioned that there was spot zoning in the area, but if spot zoning kept <br />coming, in no time the whole area would be commercial. He felt that, if the rezoning ordinance <br />was passed by the Council, more property would be rezoned and the area would become deteriorated. <br />Mr. Elmer Torok, 3118 Sunnymede Avenue, indicated that he was against the rezoning because it was <br />spot zoning. He indicated that the area has been a residential area for many years, and he felt <br />the traffic would be increased because of the doctor's office, and he explained that there was a <br />problem at the present time in getting off 30th Street onto Jefferson Boulevard. He felt that, <br />with the approval of the doctor's office on 30th Street, the area would be opened up for another <br />rezoning and used for additional duplexes. <br />Councilman Serge asked if the request for rezoning had been approved by the Area Plan Commission. <br />It was indicated that the Area Plan Commission had voted against the rezoning. Councilman <br />Szymkowiak asked if three parking spaces would be sufficient for the doctor's office, and Dr. <br />Landis indicated that the minimum spaces was five, and he and his nurse would park in the existing <br />garage. He felt the three spaces to the north of the building would be sufficient because he <br />worked on an appointment basis. He also indicated that some of his patients would be walking from <br />the Osteopathic Hospital. Councilman Szymkowiak asked if Dr. Landis would be residing in the home <br />and Dr. Landis indicated that he would not be using the house for a residence nor would be renting <br />rooms. He indicated that he would be using the whole house for his office. Councilman Kopczynski <br />indicated that he thought some of Dr. Landis' patients would walk to his office and additional <br />parking would.not be needed in that area. He felt that, if things are made convenient to the <br />people in the area, traffic could be eliminated. Councilman Parent indicated that he had driven <br />in the area and had also walked the area on foot and had tried to visualize the home with addition< <br />parking spaces on the north. He expressed sympathy for the doctor's feeling of wanting to be clos( <br />to his hospital, and he felt the seller would be able to sell the house for more because it would <br />be used as a doctor's office. He did not think the parking lot would add anything to the neighbor. <br />hood. He expressed concern about the preservation of neighborhoods and felt the Council should <br />vote against the ordinance. He indicated that he would have to vote against the rezoning. <br />Councilman Miller indicated that the house faced 30th Street which, he felt, made it more residen- <br />tial than if it faced Jefferson Boulevard. He stated that, even though there were "B" Residential <br />buildings in the area, they were strictly "B" Residential. He mentioned that rezonings of this <br />particular kind are difficult for the Council, and he felt the Council should be conservative and <br />not make a change in the zoning because the immediate area showed nothing of that kind of "B" <br />Residential zoning. Council President Nemeth asked about the basis of the recommendation made by <br />