REGULAR MEETING MARCH 26, 1973
<br />IICOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED)
<br />the public safety appropriation was only about 12 of the revenue sharing budget, and he felt the
<br />$405,000.00 was justifiable. He indicated that, as a Councilman, he felt it his duty to evaluate
<br />and set priorities to his best judgment. He asked if, in the total terms of the revenue sharing
<br />package, anyone knew what the on -going costs would be. Mr. Gallagher indicated that next year, it
<br />was his plan to increase the money allotted for the Police Department. Councilman Miller indicated
<br />that, considering the state tax package, there would be at least $1,502,000.00 of on -going costs
<br />out of $1,675,000.00 and this did not take into consideration wages. He indicated that the Council
<br />was given a figure for on -going costs when it met in caucus. He indicated that next year, Mr.
<br />Gallagher would come in at $400,000.00, and he indicated he wanted some figures on that. He felt
<br />he could not justify the addition of 20 men at this time. He felt time was needed to evaluate the
<br />many fine changes that have been made recently in the department to determine how effectively they
<br />have worked and what must be done further to improve the efficiency of the department. He indicate
<br />he would rather stress the preventive nature of the crime situation rather than the reaction to
<br />crime. He sympathized with Mrs. Green. He indicated that he had previously suggested that the
<br />Police Department look for additional black appointments, and at that time, 15 out of 240 were
<br />black. He mentioned that selection is made on the basis of qualification, education and experience
<br />and that this was a policy decision which he felt could be argued. He felt that a black patrolman
<br />in a black neighborhood might be better qualified for that area than a white person who has had
<br />more training and experience. He felt that the percentage of black patrolmen should equal the pop-
<br />ulation. He indicated that he was in favor of the programs dealing with juveniles and drugs. He
<br />suggested that perhaps a drug treatment center for juveniles, as well as adults, should be set up
<br />on a county -wide basis. He indicated that he could not favor a system of hiring more policemen to
<br />simply react to the crime picture; he stressed the preventive nature. He also supported the budget
<br />on the Safety Department, and he indicated that the Council, in passing the cabinet bill, had many
<br />comments on the equipment that would be needed for that position; however, he indicated that he
<br />could not support the appropriation of $10,000.00 for this. He indicated that in Programs FA18 and
<br />FA19, the budgets were for a period of 12 months, and he felt these budgets should be decreased to
<br />a 9 -month period. He questioned the number of patrolmen in Program FA21. Mr. Gallagher indicated
<br />that many of these programs are predicated upon additional men and to decrease men at this time
<br />would only hamper the department. He mentioned that the department is ready to start team
<br />policing; secondly, there is a criminal justice fund available; and thirdly, there are cities that
<br />have experimented with black officers in black neighborhoods and the study shows that they are not
<br />completely satisfied. He suggested one black officer working with one white officer. He mentioned
<br />that Mr. O. C. Foster from the National Crime Prevention Bureau was going to be in South Bend for
<br />a few days this week starting Tuesday to speak at the Police Academy. He indicated that Mr.
<br />Foster's area was crime prevention, and he mentioned that the city will have money for a Crime
<br />Prevention Bureau. He felt that this budget was put to the minimum, and he was asking for money to
<br />start his office. He indicated that equipment must also be supplied to the police recruits.
<br />Councilman Parent, Chairman of the Council Public Safety Committee, briefly outlined further the
<br />recommendations of that committee and the reasons for the committee's actions. He indicated that
<br />the committee recommended the deletion of Program FA14 and Program FA20 because the interest which
<br />the city received from the revenue sharing funds practically offsets the cost of the money borrowe
<br />to purchase the fire trucks, and in FA20, the monies are requested to meet an anticipated deficit
<br />in Account P -12 and not for new educational incentive programs. He spoke briefly on each of the
<br />programs within the budget. He felt the Council could not expect a department to operate
<br />efficiently without money, and he expressed satisfaction with the impact that the Public Safety
<br />Department has already had on the community.
<br />Councilman Taylor indicated that, on the passage of the ordinance, by law the appropriation must
<br />come through the Mayor's Office. He mentioned that the Mayor did agree with some of the committee'
<br />recommendations, and he wondered if the Council could amend the ordinance at this meeting on the
<br />floor and if it would pass. Mr. James Roemer, City Attorney, indicated that.the Council could not
<br />increase the amount of the ordinance but cutting certain items would be proper in his opinion. He
<br />felt that, if the ordinance was increased, the Council would have to come back with a new ordinance
<br />Councilman Taylor indicated that a great deal of discussion centered around the additional police-
<br />men. He indicated that he has always stated that crime is a large problem and is not all a matter
<br />of police, courts, drugs, etc. He felt it was a combination of many things and he felt the picture
<br />of crime in South Bend was very clear. He mentioned that the city has approximately 1.9 policemen
<br />per thousand and that the city averages somewhat on the low side. He stressed the fact that he
<br />was not talking about a policeman on every corner. He mentioned the fact that the city has gone
<br />through five Police Chiefs in the last six years, and he hoped this would not continue. He felt
<br />the city was undermanned as far as the police force was concerned. The population of the people in
<br />the metropolitan area totalled 250,000 and this had an effect on the crime rate even though there
<br />was a sheriff's department and Mishawaka had a police force. He felt higher visibility was needed
<br />in the inter -city area, and he talked about the drug problem and burglaries possibly being related
<br />to this. He indicated that he had done, to the best of his ability, all he could. He stressed his
<br />support of the ordinance as amended because he felt the citizens deserved the best.
<br />Councilman Kopczynski asked Mr. Gallagher who owned the typewriter that was being used in his offic
<br />and Mr. Gallagher indicated it belonged to the Criminal Justice Unit. Councilman Kopczynski
<br />indicated that, when the office of Safety Director was established, there were statments made to
<br />the effect that there would be no money needed to keep the office going. Hr also briefly questione
<br />the travel expenditure, and Mr. Gallagher indicated that he hoped the city would reimburse him for
<br />his travel expenses. Councilman Kopczynski asked if the actual picture was required in relation
<br />to the picture taking of the substandard buildings, and Mr. Gallagher indicated that the picture is
<br />needed with the file. Councilman Kopczynski suggested that Mr. Gallagher look into the possibility
<br />of purchasing a 35 milimeter camera. He also mentioned, as far as the meeting being conducted at
<br />the Police Academy, by Mr. Foster, that the city did not want to copy the national programs
<br />because they might not work in South Bend. He indicated that most of these appropriations are
<br />investigating crime after it happens. He asked about the possibility of establishing a.center to
<br />keep the kids off the street before the crime happens. He felt consideration should be given to th
<br />whole appropriation for these various programs because some day, they would wind up on the city tax
<br />rate and the citizens would be taxed for it.
<br />Councilman Horvath indicated that he had attended four meetings that had been held on the revenue
<br />'sharing distribution and crime was the important factors stressed again and again. He felt the
<br />money should be spent if it would help to reduce the crime. He.felt the Administration and the
<br />Safety Director had -come up with a fine presentation of the ordinance and programs involved. He
<br />!indicated that he only had one question in regards to the extra and overtime in Program FA17, and
<br />
|