Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING MARCH 12, 1973 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />Councilman Miller asked about the design of the entrance of Bercliff Estates, and Mr. Richardson <br />answered by indicating that McKinley will have new curb and gutter and he assumed that there would <br />be curb and gutter returns to the entrance and a new paved approach. Councilman Miller asked if <br />there would be signals at that location, and Mr. Richardson indicated there would not be. <br />Councilman Kopczynski indicated that, previously, there had been discussion on the Ironwood <br />sewers, at which time the Council had requested that a sketch plan be submitted whenever this <br />type of appropriation is needed. Mr. Richardson indicated that he had sent an explanation to the <br />Council regarding this appropriation. He also indicated that the Federal Highway Commission <br />advertised for a public hearing. He mentioned that he could furnish the Council with the set of <br />plans if needed; however, they contained at least 50 sheets. Councilman Kopczynski asked if Mr. <br />Richardson had just a preliminary plan, and Mr. Richardson indicated that he did not and that <br />everything he had was in final form and quite lengthy. Councilman Kopczynski felt the Council <br />should be furnished with a sketch plan in order to know what is going to be done on this project. <br />Mr. Richardson indicated that it would be possible for him, in the future, to bring the plans with <br />him to the Council meetings when requesting appropriations of this type. Councilman Kopczynski <br />asked when the project would be completed, and Mr. Richardson answered by indicating that construc <br />tion would start sometime in May and most of the work would be completed before winter; however, <br />there would be some work yet to be done in the spring of 1974 when completion of the project was <br />anticipated. Councilman Kopczynski asked if there were enough firms in the South Bend area to <br />take care of the bidding on all of the projects the city was going to let. Mr. Richardson <br />indicated that he could not answer that question and stated that the city does advertise for these <br />projects in many different publications. Councilman Kopczynski asked if it would be possible for <br />the city to undertake too many projects at one time, and Mr. Richardson indicated that completion <br />dates are set and complied with and taken into consideration is the work loan of the industries, <br />acquisition of right -of -way, etc. Councilman Kopczynski asked if there was a penalty for late <br />completion, and Mr. Richardson indicated that there was not; however, a liquidated damages clause <br />is used where the contractor is required to pay a certain amount per day for every day work is <br />done on the particular project after the completion date. Councilman Kopczynski asked if the city <br />was on schedule for the overall picture of the projects, and Mr. Richardson indicated that it was. <br />Councilman Taylor mentioned that the Council had received a letter of explanation from Mr. <br />Richardson on his request for this appropriation, and he also indicated that he would like to come <br />to Mr. Richardson's defense. He felt that Mr. Richardson has done a good job of letting the <br />Council know what he is proposing. <br />Councilman Parent made a motion that the ordinance go to the Council as favorable, seconded by <br />Councilman Szymkowiak. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $750,138.00 FROM <br />THE FEDERAL ASSISTANCE GRANT FUND, COMMONLY <br />REFERRED TO AS GENERAL REVENUE SHARING, FOR <br />VARIOUS PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS, TO BE ADMIN- <br />ISTERED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND THROUGH ITS <br />DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. (AS AMENDED) <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mayor Jerry J. Miller made the presentation for <br />the ordinance. He proposed certain cuts to the ordinance. In Program FA5 "Motor Vehicle Highway <br />Motor Equipment ", he requested that the street paver equipment be cut by $3,118 and the slurry <br />seal distributors by $25,000. He further requested that, in Program FA9 "Merry Avenue Land <br />Acquisition ", the entire amount of $25,000 be deleted. He mentioned that some people might think <br />quite a bit of money is going into Public Works projects; however, he felt that these projects <br />were a very important factor as they involve the safety of motorists and pedestrians on the <br />streets, alleys and the entire community. He mentioned that the money targeted last December was <br />also included in this budget. He indicated that these programs will have to be complied with as <br />far as national safety records are concerned. He also indicated that these would be asked for in <br />the 1974 budget; therefore, if revenue sharing can be used, it would help as far as the taxes are <br />concerned. He briefly spoke about the street equipment, indicating that much of the equipment is <br />very old and some of the machinery is not even in operating condition. He hoped that at least <br />eight or nine street sweepers would be in working condition at one time rather than just four as <br />has happened in the past. He felt that the Solid Waste Department budget was self- explanatory, <br />and he mentioned that copies were furnished the Council. He indicated that Program FA7 "Madison <br />Street Bridge" was for land acquisition on that bridge. He concluded by indicating that $394,502 <br />is left in reserve for future Public Works programs, and he expressed hope that the Council would <br />act favorably on this request. <br />Mr. William J. Richardson, Director of the Department of Public Works, spoke briefly on the pro- <br />posed amendments to the Bureau of Solid Waste budget. He mentioned that there was to be a re- <br />classification of a job title because of the union contract with the Teamsters. He then itemized <br />the amendments as follows: Under item 4, in Services Personal, drivers were being re- classified <br />as solid waste men with a total of 17 of these men at $150 per week. This would eliminate item 5, <br />11 helpers at $140 per week. He also indicated that item 6 would be deleted and a new item 5 <br />would be 17 holidays at $30 times 9 remaining for the year. He indicated that the new sub -total <br />would then read $120,183. Further, that item 8 would be decreased to $1,510; however, the total <br />of Services Personal would remain at $121,693. <br />Miss Virginia Guthrie, Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning Association, indicated that she <br />had a few questions to ask regarding this revenue sharing package, and she further indicated that <br />the Civic Planning Association was hoping that more time would be taken to study the requests for <br />appropriations because it was such an important matter. She referred to Program FA4 "Municipal <br />Services Personnel" and asked if the figure of $5,000 was for a new manager. Mr. Richardson <br />indicated that, at present, there is a building engineer on an hourly basis and that it was hoped <br />that this man could be put on a salaried basis and increase his annual salary by $5,000. He <br />mentioned that this amount would also include fringe benefits. Miss Guthrie asked if the full <br />$5,000 was needed for the year, and Mr. Richardson indicated that it could be prorated at 75% for <br />the remaining nine months. Miss Guthrie felt this should be done. In relation to Program FA5 <br />"Motor Vehicle Highway Motor Equipment ", she commented that the association was pleased that <br />additional money was going into the operation of the vehicles. In relation to Program FA6 "Summer <br />Clean -up Program ", she felt it was not such an emergency at this time. In relation to Program FA8 <br />"Street Lighting ", she asked if the $25,000 in that account was to restore what was previously cut <br />from the budget. She felt this should also be considered as a safety factor because of the high <br />